The Geek Beat: Origins and Endings
Filed under: Fandom, The Geek Beat, Summer Movies

You'll probably be getting a one-two punch of Wolverine this week and next, and I apologize -- but big popcorn flicks deserve a lot of digital ink, especially if they're kicking off the summer season. Plus, this is the solo adventure of my favorite superhero. Avoiding the topic is impossible.
Over the past year, I have shared a lot of opinions of what I wanted X-Men Origins: Wolverine to be, or where I hoped they would take the character, or issues I had with their portrayal of the Weapon X program. But you know what I really wish? I wish Wolverine could have remained mysterious.
Hugh Jackman has argued that he wasn't comfortable taking the character anywhere like Japan without first showing who Logan was, and where he had come from. But what kept Wolverine as such an enduring character (besides his gratuitous body count) was his shadowy origin. It was a big deal when he revealed his name was Logan. The way such information was handled was brilliant and brusque. When asked why he hadn't ever told anyone his name, he shrugged. "You never asked." He just appeared on the scene, a snarling badass. He was Marvel's Man with No Name. Fans loved it. We lived for the teases, flashbacks, and guessworks.
Of course, over the years that's changed. Wolverine's origin has been revealed, and his memories restored to him. His past continues to be "uncovered" in the comics, often retconned faster than it was written. As with every long delayed origin, the payoff is never what you expected or wanted. Most fans bitterly wish they had never even wondered who Wolverine really was because they were so crushed by the answers. (If you ask me, Wolverine and Darth Vader both stand as good geek reasons for not knowing all the deep, dark secrets about a character.)
Now, the X-Men universe veered sharply away from official continuity with the very first film. While I'm a stickler for mythology, I've never been overly bothered by the mutant universe Fox set up, and the fresh slate they offered was full of potential, especially for Wolverine. He was mysterious again! You knew just enough of his ugly past to leave you wanting more.
Wouldn't it have been cool to just leave it there? Why not start Wolverine's solo adventures from some unspecified point in his past? Last week, one of the commenters mentioned how awesome it would be to have a Wolverine film that evoked Sergio Leone. I agree wholeheartedly. Think how daring it would have been to keep the audience in the dark a little longer in order to give us Marvel's mutant A Fistful of Dollars. Not only could you have kept churning out sequels that slowly unraveled who Logan was, but you would have redefined how flexible the genre could be. It would have been as refreshing to the movie universe as Wolverine was in the comic pages.
Even today, the Wolverine books that are the most popular aren't the ones that flog his memories, but the solo one-shots. They're free of timeline and crossover, returning Wolverine to his battered, lonely roots. Inevitably, he stops for a beer and finds himself in the middle of a local disturbance that forces him to pop his claws. It's a storyline you've seen in a million Westerns and action movies, but rendered new by the hero possessing an adamantium skeleton. Silly stuff, but it's the pulpy adventure that rainy Saturdays are made for, and in my opinion, it's far more durable than the latest crossover or spin-off.
But audiences demand origin stories. Mysterious heroes who ride in and out of town, a trail of carnage behind them, have long been out of fashion. Our protagonists need detailed background checks, or we won't understand their motivations. When did that happen? Why can't we enjoy the nameless stranger? Did our minds just snap after centuries of "once upon a time" and in media res? Is that why we can't get enough of rebooted and spin-off franchises that begin by spoiling it all?
Don't get me wrong -- certain heroes need origin stories. Batman is nothing without that night at the opera. That's why a character without one is so unusual, and why you should run with him (or her!) as long as you possibly can. It's the guessing game that's fun, not the answer. With Wolverine, you even had the one-two dramatic punch of the character being as ignorant of his past as his audience was. It's a great device. What a shame it had to be spoiled so soon ... and leave the Old Canucklehead with so few places left to go.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-28-2009 @ 12:49PM
BloodwerK said...
I agree 100%. Wolverine's true origin should never have been told...
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 12:53PM
juwan808 said...
I totally agree. Where's the mystery anymore? It's like we're these hungry little gnats that have to know everything about everything. The not knowing is the fun of it all. That's what makes a movie exciting, not knowing what's going to happen next. I try to go to a film now with as little expectation as possible, so when the movie sucks, I'm not let down so much. And if it's great then it's an even better experience. That's why Darth Vader was such a great character in the beginning because he was a complete mystery. But now? And Wolverine is an awesome character too, but I don't expect to be surprised at all with this movie. I already know way too much, and I haven't even been following it that closely. Nowadays we just know way too much too soon and it stinks. It destroys the whole movie experience.
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 1:13PM
roshow said...
I love this piece, Elisabeth. I agree 100%. It's not that origin stories and continuity are bad, it's that sometimes a story is more interesting without those things.
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 1:24PM
tomas said...
"Batman is nothing without that night at the opera."
It was a movie actually. "The Mark of Zorro".
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 1:30PM
PWebber said...
~taken from IMDB.com~
Christopher Nolan and his co-writers, Jonathan Nolan and David S. Goyer, made the decision very early on not to explore The Joker's origins. This was so the character could be presented as an "absolute".
Which was the smartest thing to do. Yes, we all wanted a Wolverine movie, but it's going to be hard to please with the number of retcons and gimmicks used to keep the character going for this long.
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 2:27PM
Wexler said...
Yeah, I'm pretty sick of origin stories. Good article Elisabeth.
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 2:30PM
Butch Decossas said...
I was lucky enough to see a private screening of this movie in San Diego. Great movie! Really well done.
Butch Decossas
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 3:07PM
filmsuki said...
Origin stories appeal to the same crowd that insists on 5 minute movie trailer that explain the entire story and show bits of the climactic ending. Characters and films without mystery are kind of boring.
Trust me, try watching a film without having seen a single trailer. It's a better experience.
Reply
4-28-2009 @ 4:48PM
JoB said...
Well said Rappe. Origins leave nothing left to be desired. A sequel to this film will be pointless because we've already seen his origin and his eventual role in the X-Men main story line. What else do we need to know about the furry guy?
A Leone style Wolverine film?!? Why did you have to mention that! Now all I want is to see that film and I know I'll never receive it. Fox would never put out something that stylized.
I hope this film makes boat loads of money to prove those Pirate Bay guys' innocence. Viva la internet!
Reply
4-29-2009 @ 6:36PM
chris darragh said...
yip we shouldn't the whole story of wolverine.
wolverine should be like Rambo 2/3 with superheroes
Reply
4-29-2009 @ 6:57PM
Josef said...
I agree with your whole article. But I actually really enjoyed the original Origin story, or Wolverine as a young boy and seeing his bone claws, etc. However I never read any more of the Origin stuff after that so I had this idea of where the character first came from but left it a mystery how he really got to be an X-Man. And I liked it that way.
I feel like too many people now confuse plot holes with purposeful mystery. For some characters, Wolverine in particular, there mystery is exactly what makes them so intriguing and putting all this extra crap in there is like somebody painting spaceships and dinosaurs on the Mona Lisa.
Reply
4-30-2009 @ 12:12AM
ppk said...
Mystery and intrigue are crucial to most storytelling especially now-a-days but drawing out the mystery or purposely teasing an ending that never comes becomes incredibly tiresome... that is where "Lost" lost its way (excuse the pun) and many of its viewers in season three, they just got tired of stories on stories on stories introducing more and more mystery that never went anywhere. Now I like the mystery but I can not stand being dragged along without feeling there will be ending. Eventually, the dramatic tension must be released. A good writer knows this and is prepared with a new tension to take its place. Eventually ALF must no longer be coming and must arrive, eventually Ross and Rachel must get together, eventually you must reveal the identity of Keyser soze; to not reveal is a cop out and unfair to the fans following the story who are expecting it,
Now I do agree that infinite retcon is dumb and I blame publishers and editors for this more than writers, it is their responsibility to maintain integrity... if an origin is established it is set and should not be changed.
PPK
Reply
4-30-2009 @ 7:06PM
DancingNancie said...
really good video showing how the media is reviewing wolverine: Definitely worth a look.
http://www.newsy.com/videos/wolverine_declawed/
Reply