Skip to Content

WoW Insider is getting ready for BlizzCon!

Girls on Film: Desiring Real Femme Fighters

Filed under: Action, Fandom, Girls on Film



Last week, I was scanning through my RSS feed and came across the following title at Bust: "Watch This: Empowering Girls Through Parkour!" Being a huge parkour fan and loving the idea of it empowering young women, I hurried over and check out a video of young girls getting taught the basics of David Belle's sport. (Check it out at the end of the post.) The clip got me thinking of girls and action, and well, off the parkour track.

There was a time when it was believed that macho test fests full of steroid-enhanced muscles and dumb man mayem were making way for "action babes" -- the Lara Crofts and Charlie's Angels. But as we've seen over the last few years, the boys are back in town -- especially Sly Stallone. The Italian Stallion went back to his old Rocky/Rambo formula, and it worked like a charm. Now muscles are, once again, in ... on the men.


There are still tough women around, but there's a big piece missing: Female action heroes who can actually perform the action they're in, or look like they can. Save from the delightful inclusion of Zoe Bell and her impressive ride (above) in Death Proof, our female heroes most often looks like twigs that would break under even half the action they're facing. Take a beautiful, slight woman, make her look busty, put her in leather ... sure, she could win, but not because of her strength, no matter what the filmmaker would like you to believe. Battling demons? Muscled baddies? Sadistic killers trailing you in their death cars? You need a little more than a good, body-revealing garment.

We, and the bad guys just itching for a fight, need strong women who aren't merely icons of strength -- but women who are strength. Ladies who can lay the smackdown, and do so in sensible clothing, without the ridiculously gratuitous and over-sexualized treatment. While it seems like a pipe dream, when even big female icons like Buffy are all about wearing fight-unfriendly outfits and waifishness, it has worked -- well.

Ask anyone about the best heroes of the big screen and, without a doubt, you'll hear about Sigourney Weaver's Ripley and Linda Hamilton in T2 (who I've mentioned before). They might be the Queens of action, but they're also the first to be forgotten in discussions of female-led action films, which usually degrade into chatter about butt-wiggling fighters who like to giggle and follow Charlie, or seriously awful Catwomen. Still, it's widely accepted that both Sigourney and Linda rock, are tough, and starred in great films. They aren't just beloved by the female moviegoers.

So, what's the problem? Why do people still cling to this idea of "women playing men"? It's not a problem of sex and gender identities. That notion is old and out of date. There are women who are tough, strong, and itching for a fight. Just look at every stunt woman out there who tries her darndest to look like the star they're subbing in for.

No one is going to race out of the theater if the star has a solidly muscled body and looks like she can fight.

If all the male action stars had scrawny bodies, there wouldn't be a male-centric action world, so maybe, just maybe we can say the same for the females and bulk some gals up?

Related Headlines

 

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

.