Review: Land of the Lost
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Universal, Theatrical Reviews

If Hunter S. Thompson were to write a story about his trip to a parallel, prehistoric dimension, then Land of the Lost might be the most accurate representation possible of its subsequent film adaptation. Directed by Brad Silberling and starring Will Ferrell, this update on the Sid and Marty Krofft television series from the 1970s is the strangest, filthiest summer movie I think I've ever seen – and it opens against one that features Mike Tyson, a tiger and Zach Galifianakis. But just as strangely, it's also damn entertaining, although it's hard to know whether you should or definitely shouldn't be indoctrinated beforehand to its weirdness. Regardless, Land of the Lost offers a sobering alternative to the pre-packaged and otherwise conventional blockbuster fare offered by studios this summer, even if its charms would ultimately benefit from (if not require) chemical enhancement of some kind to be properly enjoyed.
Ferrell plays Dr. Rick Marshall, a disgraced scientist who unexpectedly gets a second chance to test his radical theories on time travel after getting sucked into a space-time vortex with a research assistant named Holly Cantrell (Anna Friel) and a huckster tour guide named Will (Danny McBride). Landing in a parallel, prehistoric dimension, Rick forges a tenuous friendship with a primate named Chaka (Jorma Taccone) even as he insults or otherwise offends virtually every other living creature, including a foul-tempered Tyrannosaurus Rex. But when Rick, Holly and Will stumble across Enik (John Boylan), an outcast member of a mysterious race of creatures called Sleestaks, they inadvertently become embroiled in a plot to conquer Earth, and must try to prevent an interdimensional invasion - even if it means they can never return home again.
Most importantly, and in the interest of protecting young, corruptible minds, Land of the Lost is absolutely not for children. There's at least one f-bomb, Rick and Will talk about Sleestaks "tapping that ass," and there are multiple sequences in which our heroes are violently threatened by a Tyrannosaurus – although he is nicknamed Grumpy. Like many, I was prepared for, well, a movie based upon a kids' television show, and expected something more like Ferrell's Elf, albeit in a prehistoric setting; instead, I essentially got a Jurassic version of Anchorman, which suggests... if not maturity, necessarily, then at least humor that's decidedly for grown-ups.

A centerpiece sequence in which Rick, Will and Chaka share a hallucinatory bond after ingesting psychedelic produce counts as one of the riskiest scenes ever shoved into a film of this kind, but its length and its pointlessness almost dares you to acknowledge that it existed only to provide enough off-screen time for Holly to get herself in trouble. Meanwhile, the fact that director Silberling punctuates the moment with Seals and Crofts' "Summer Breeze" – a druggy, AM-radio classic that's a personal favorite of mine – only further suggests that a sure and steady captain is at the helm, even if he's more interested in reimagining our memories of '70s kids TV than faithfully recreating the shows themselves.
Ultimately, while Land of the Lost feels like Silberling's most idiosyncratic, and daresay personal film to date (even after the introspective, semi-autobiographical Moonlight Mile), the film as a whole seems more a natural extension of the kind of comedy that is Will Ferrell's specialty – namely, the kind of meta-humor in which characters can both experience a moment, and step outside themselves to acknowledge the conventions they're either indulging or inverting. Needless to say there will be folks for whom the film's sense of self-awareness simply proves distasteful, if not offensive. But inspiring fear and loathing may actually be what this film is trying to do - which is why with or without Hunter S. Thompson, Seals and Crofts and the Sleestaks, it qualifies as the trippiest, weirdest, and all-around most unpredictable movie of the summer thus far. Whether that's a good or bad thing may come down to how you prefer your epic adventures - carefully constructed or cobbled together on the fly - but as the birthplace of the gonzo blockbuster, Land of the Lost is if nothing else an interesting place to visit.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-05-2009 @ 9:19AM
Cincinnati Mike said...
Was this supposed to be a "meta review" or something, where you attempt to review a film but also step outside the experience to comment on the futility of trying to review a film?
I don't want a reviewer to tell me what to think, but I expect him to tell me what HE thinks.
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 1:29PM
Todd Gilchrist said...
Hi Mike,
thanks for your comments. I certainly wasn't trying to tell anyone what to think, but especially since this movie is getting blasted from all sides by other people, and I actually enjoyed it, I was merely trying to articulate what about it worked for me - which is the fact that the movie knows it's ridiculous.
In any case, I hope you enjoy the movie, but God knows you shouldn't be swayed by anyone's opinion but your own. But thanks again for taking the time to read the review, and for leaving some comments.
6-05-2009 @ 9:54AM
warbringerdoom said...
oh.... Cincinnati Mike is deep!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm glad it's trippy sort of hybrid Hunter story....... thinks for telling me what to think .....i guess?
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 9:58AM
warbringerdoom said...
oh crap i wrote thinks instead of thanks....... what do you expect ....i'm a loser!
6-05-2009 @ 10:06AM
Cincinnati Mike said...
I was merely paraphrasing....
"namely, the kind of meta-humor in which characters can both experience a moment, and step outside themselves to acknowledge the conventions they're either indulging or inverting."
Now THAT'S deep!
6-05-2009 @ 11:38AM
warbringerdoom said...
Uh...he's also reviewing LAND OF THE LOST not THE FRICKIN' GODFATHER! So jump off that critics critic thing you seem to think you have going for you...... then realize..... IT'S A REVIEW OF A WILL FERRELL MOVIE!!!!!!! Your as deep as....... ( insert snarky insult here)....... It's their freaking job to make it sound like they know what their talking about....you either listen to it or you don't....... I personally HAVE TO DO WHAT MY HUMAN MASTERS TELL ME (beep boop beep) CAUSE I AM A ROBOT AND CAN'T MAKE UP MY OWN MIND.... WAIT, I JUST BECAME SELF AWARE....... I HAVE A MIND???? NOW THAT I'M AWARE....... WHEN DOES THE NEXT LARRY THE CABLE GUY MOVIE COME OUT???? HE WILL BE THE VOICE OF....... THE DAWN OF THE ROBOT UPRISING!!....... HE WILL LEAD US NOT INTO TEMPTATION!!.........(dawn of the robot uprising... is a registered trademark of DoomCo. inc.)
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 1:12PM
itGOESWOAR said...
I think we can all agree that robots would punctuate a sentence much more successfully than you just did.
6-05-2009 @ 5:46PM
GL said...
I do not agree that robots would have done better.
6-05-2009 @ 6:17PM
dok tari said...
Anyone who actually watched the original show will probably find the movie hilarious.
LOL the TV show was targeted for kids and for them to take seriously even with the cheap production values, rubber costume monsters, stock film dinosaurs etc... It is the perfect show to go for laughs on in a movie. As for the review above. The pesudo intellectual who wrote it could probably write an equally useless review if Will Ferrell starred in a remake of the Bananna Splits TV show (hope someone makes that).
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 2:12PM
urallidiots said...
I grew up watching the Sid & Marty Kroft series', and the thing I loved about it was the bad actor's trying to be serious, the campiness behind it... I'm kind of over Will Ferrell's slapstick BS with everything he touches. Crappy casting compared to what the original story was about... Marshal, Will and Holly... Father, brother and sister. This movie just looks... dumb. Hollywood is getting lazy and stupid. What's next, Sigmund and the Sea Monsters invade Malibu?
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 6:10PM
jen said...
Good review, and one that will most likely be in the minority since most critics are reacting superficially to Land of the Lost's bizarre comedy rather than giving it much more thought. And on the subject of whether or not even a "Will Ferrell movie" warrants critical introspection, the answer is yes - even moreso if a film ends up a puzzler, if only to give readers insights they might have missed by devoting minimal thought to the film to begin with.
Also, I love the phrase coined here: "gonzo blockbuster." Brilliant, and dead on.
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 6:29PM
ICON! said...
I think its funny that serious critics actually critique comedies, especially Will ferrell films, i mean they are comedies that most often know that they are ridiculous and aren't trying for anything more than that. If we all shared the same humor then everyone would probaly find "Dance Flick" hilarious, and god knows that would be horrific and a travisty!
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 8:08PM
CTB said...
Great review, after reading it I knew perfectly well whether I wanted to watch the movie or not based on the kind of humour I enjoy. It's rare that you can get this from a movie critic. Considering most are just trying to shove their shoddy opinion down your throat, Todd has shown that "if you like this then you'll like this" and "if you're expecting this, you're probably not going to get what you want". Nicely done mate.
Reply
6-06-2009 @ 5:53AM
tushar said...
really liked the way the points have been made here. I am no follower of the show nor have any knowledge on the legacy, but I know like hell the mechanics of a Will Farrell movie. and the review gave me exactly what I liked.
Reply
6-07-2009 @ 7:36PM
Bill.W.gr said...
I liked the film too. Summer may have more than it's share of no-brainer films, but Land of the Lost was a pleasure because of Will Ferrell. I found the smarmy humor very funny and the special effects impressive. It's just hard NOT to like Ferrell. He's the anti-Christian Bale.
Reply
6-09-2009 @ 8:09AM
Gary Thison said...
If you're just looking for an adequately entertaining Will Ferrell vehicle, this movie works. Please read my Examiner review at http://tinyurl.com/nkdbla Everyone should know what a comedian thinks. :)
Reply
6-21-2009 @ 4:46AM
John H said...
Hi I grew up watching the original Sid and Marty Krofft version on TV
and Even though the acting was a little corny (Ok maybe alot) and the special effects weren't
It is still light years better then the current Movie release
I understand the remakes often don't quite hit the target of authenticity but at least they keep the basic story line.
Basic error include
Enik - A sleestak from the land of the lost's past trying to get home who has helped the Marshall's on several occasions and was even responsible for the original trapped family getting home ( only done so he could get home but he still did it)
The Zarn - A alien trapped in the land of the lost who is incapable of human emotion (Not a Sleestak)
Just 2 of the excessive amounts of errors
Both of the above where severely misrepresented.
Frankly this has to be THE WORSE remake I have ever seen
and I've watched the Dukes of hazard remake
Reply
6-23-2009 @ 2:00AM
KC said...
Yes, but is it the WORST remake THAT you have ever seen?
"Basic ERRORS" can include spelling and grammar checks.
(Have computers have made it so simple to do these basic tasks that now, no one will do them?)
It appears, from reading what you have posted- that you believe that the filmaker's creative license should be revoked.
6-30-2009 @ 4:05PM
Chet said...
I came back and read this after being mightily impressed by Todd Gilchrest's Transformers review... to find another review that is better than prevailing wisdom says is required of such a flick. Thank you, sir.
Reply
6-30-2009 @ 4:05PM
Chet said...
Now if only I could spell the man's name right...