Review: Moon
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Theatrical Reviews
.jpg)
(We're reposting our Moon review from the Sundance Film Festival in advance of the film's theatrical release this weekend)
By: James Rocchi
"You haul 16 tons, and what do you get?
Another day older and deeper in debt.
St. Peter, don't you call me 'cause I can't go;
I owe my soul to the company store. ..."
-- "Sixteen Tons," Merle Travis
Know thyself. -- Solon of Athens
Moon, the directorial debut of Duncan Jones, opens with a bright, breezy bit of corporate propaganda explaining how, in the film's near-future, clean energy is provided by fusion fueled by hydrogen wrenched from lunar mineral deposits on the dark side of the Moon. Sam Rockwell is Sam Bell, who runs a fuel-harvesting station, aided only by the base's A.I., GERTY (given voice by Kevin Spacey). Sam is nearing the end of his three-year contract, and it's been a lonely stint; he's got only two weeks left, but he's on the thin edge. The communications satellite is down, so Sam can't talk to Earth -- his bosses, his wife -- directly; for all of the high-tech trappings and whiz-bang science of his work, Sam's a hard rock miner. And that's always been dangerous work.
Moon evokes many things -- the nature of the human experience, the nature of employee-management relations, how the odds are fairly good that the future will be exactly like today, but more so. With all of its far-flung inventions, impeccable visual design and Clint Mansell's eerie score, Moon boils down to a single man having a long conversation in isolation, telling himself a few lies and opening his own eyes to a few truths; Rockwell, playing the only person for tens of thousands of miles, has no one else to act against, and much of his plight has to be conveyed through special effects that gave him little or nothing to work with on-set.
Many reviews of Moon will go to great pains to preserve its twist -- as will I -- but let it also be said that Moon is more than just a film defined by its twist. Moon has a cat in the bag, yes, but it knows when to open the bag and bring out the cat, fairly early on, so we can take a good look at both and think about what they really mean. Jones (who, not coincidentally, is David Bowie's son; Sam Bell and Major Tom could be distant relations) has made a science fiction film that's not about aliens but instead about alienation, not about future technologies but instead about the people who'll have to live and work and cope with them.
There are bits and pieces of other films and directors in Moon; the earnestness of '70s science fiction films like Silent Running, the eerie isolation and visions of Solaris, the frosty futurism of 2001, the blunt brusqueness of David Mamet's working-class blue-collar plays; the tones and techniques of some of David Cronenberg's finest films. But it is also its own film; I appreciated not just the production design, but also the thinking that went into it. When we first see the mobile camera-and-keyboard terminal for GERTY that can follow Sam through the base, for example, there's a post-it note just under the lens; at one point Rockwell dances dementedly to Katrina and the Waves' "Walking on Sunshine." It's a future, but it's not one that far off; Sam Bell may be harvesting the energy of tomorrow, but he's also got a temp job, with that phrase readable in any number of ways.
Clint Mansell's score pulses and thrums with eerie life, filling the stark visions of the movie with a welcome energy and tone that still never seems obtrusive or jarring. Jones pulls a couple of remarkably tricky shots off with style and flair, but they're always in the story, never above it. Spacey's a little too famously familiar to play GERTY -- you know it's him, and that's a touch distracting -- but even then, Jones and screenwriter Nathan Parker take what you might expect from Sam's relationship with GERTY in several interesting directions. And, to say it again; Moon has a twist, but those twists shape and turn a graceful, smart interlacing tapestry made of tone and character and plot and ideas.
Rockwell, mixing invested emotional scenes with tricky effects-driven moments, also shines. Even in the most extreme and improbable circumstances, he has a warm, everyday quality to him; his everyday observations still have a loopy, unique energy. Rockwell is given several tough acting challenges here, and he makes them no big deal, and he's as capable of making you laugh as he is of breaking your heart. Moon is looking for a distributor here at Sundance, but since the phrase "smart science fiction" seems to translate to "box-office poison" in this day and age, it'll have to be hoped someone takes a bet on Rockwell and Spacey's names selling enough tickets or inspiring enough rentals to earn their money back. I can't quite say I think Moon is knock-me-down, you-gotta-see-this brilliant; at the same time, I can say I'm still thinking about it, and in an age when most big-budget science fiction films are made by people with no respect for science or fiction, it's a welcome pleasure.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-13-2009 @ 3:04PM
ian said...
I hope knowing the spoiler ahead of time doesn't detract from the film. It was rudely revealed in an interview with Duncan Jones on PRI's Studio 360 and I wish I could un-know it.
Reply
6-13-2009 @ 3:07PM
William Goss said...
Jones admitted to yours truly that he feels that development is the general thrust of the plot and not some great twist, so he's cool with it being discussed openly.
Having seen the film, I can see the benefits of not knowing going in, but the overall experience should not be ruined for you.
6-13-2009 @ 3:38PM
Chet said...
The (first?) "twist" is right there in the trailer. I think the definition of "plot twist" has become twisted in recent years to mean "big surprise ending." (Thank you, M Night.) Moon's twist (or at least the one this review dances around) is not the big surprise ending. I know it, and it makes me much more interested in seeing the movie. I think most filmgoers would be in the same boat. Movies don't succeed by being too mysterious. In fact, I'd rather read reviews that aren't afraid to get past the first act.
6-13-2009 @ 4:49PM
ian said...
Thank you Mr. Goss, good to know.
@Chet, I have only seen the teaser from a few months ago which didn't include any of the reveal. My remark was made assuming that was as much as we were expected to know going in. A 1st act reveal is a different case, but I would politely disagree with your statement that movies don't succeed by being too mysterious. They may be more difficult to market, but my favorite film going experiences are when I am still able to be surprised and feel trailers in general give away too much, but it is my own fault for watching them and visiting countless film sites.
6-16-2009 @ 6:01PM
Alan said...
I saw the film last night. I only went to go it on word of mouth from a number of movie blogs and podcasts. I thought it was a great piece of independent cinema. Sam Rockwell gives one of the best performances in years.
But I have read a good amount of reviews this morning and I think this one may be the best.
So thank you for writing such a well worded and, from what I gathered, passionate review.
Reply
6-15-2009 @ 11:22AM
Ralph said...
Has anyone found either the soundtrack or novelization available at Amazon or elsewhere? Are either even being released?
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 4:53PM
Alan 2 said...
Clint Mansell's soundtrack will be released by Black Records on July 13th.
6-19-2009 @ 3:22PM
john castillo said...
This looks to be a very good film.. I'm more excited about this movie than any big block buster released this summer so far.. Thank you for the great read.. Please keep me posted with more work... thank you.
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 5:31PM
mike said...
all I can say is thank god eliza finally came and rescued me from this bore of a movie.I was waiting for something to catch my interest and it never did.You know that intangible hook that all great movies have.Instead I was wishing I was on mushrooms so that it would have made more sense.Nice try but in my opinion over-hyped and straight to video for this stinker.If I had to watch them drive one more second on the moons serface I was going to go batty.Another attempt at something hip ,cool, and oh so intellectually stimulating.In my opinion this falls way short of the mark. YAWN.
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 2:50PM
Alexander said...
i'm sure Mr. Jones and his film apologize for wasting your valuable thinking time...would Transformers 2 be more stimulating for you intellectually?
7-14-2009 @ 1:21PM
David said...
I love this movie with its Silent Running and 2001influences. Gona resist the urge to write a perfectly written review and just say that I find myself thinking about it fondly days after having seen it. No frills, what a relief. dreamy, sad, funny, hip and delightfully cheesy. Let’s not forget ref. to the bad guy countdown of Sean Connery in Outland.
Reply
7-27-2009 @ 9:00AM
Stunbunny said...
What a great, quiet, smart sci-fi film! I loved this movie and am already thinking about seeing it again. The gray desolation of the moon plays really well with Clint Mansell's score in the background and Sam Rockwell does a great job of making this more about human drama than campy fiction and special effects.
Even the odd mix of Kevin Spacey's too-famous voice paired with the slightly-more-modern-than-current-day robot works well after you get over the initial familiarity.
It's so nice to have an intelligent science fiction movie that doesn't over explain everything or treat you like an idiot. We need more of this!
Reply