Cinematical Seven: Most Contrived Rom-Com Scenarios
Filed under: Comedy, Romance, Cinematical Seven, Lists

Let me make this clear: when I say that I'm compiling a list of the most contrived rom-com scenarios, I'm not saying that they're automatically the worst -- although a glance at the titles doesn't exactly stray far from that correlation. Tomorrow's The Proposal finds Sandra Bullock forcing Ryan Reynolds into marriage for the sake of holding off immigration authorities and keeping her/their jobs (I guess it's not too soon to remake Green Card and Picture Perfect after all), so we're talking about seven plot points along those lines of high-concept, close-quarters thinking, with some (dis)honorable mentions along the way...

1. How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days (2003) -- Advertising executive Matthew McConaughey bets his friends that he can woo any gal within ten days; magazine writer Kate Hudson promises her editor that she can frighten off any beau in the exact same amount of time. Lo and behold, not only do they happen to meet one another, and not only does wackiness ensue, but they *SPOILER ALERT* fall in love despite betraying one another's interests.
(I could do an entire list of romantic comedies where one of the main characters either writes for an upscale magazine or works at a hip advertising firm. But I'm tired now. Maybe some other time.)
2. Failure to Launch (2006) -- Handsome thirty-something Matthew McConaughey happens to live with his parents. Esteem-booster-for-hire Sarah Jessica Parker happens to win him over, while cashing the checks from his parents (!). Sure enough, despite the requisite second-act betrayal and the pictured-above climax that has McConaughey tied to a chair and forced to fall in True Love before an audience of strangers (webcam shenanigans this time, not stadium or airport, which would be totally clichéd), they do indeed *SPOILER ALERT* fall in love.
(Sequel pitch: Sarah Jessica Parker + Glenn Kenny = The Girlfriend Experience 2. Think about it, Soderbergh.)

3. The Perfect Man (2005) -- Not only are we meant to believe that Heather Locklear can't attract a decent guy, but we have to buy that she up-and-moves every time a relationship doesn't work out. Better Worse yet, daughter Hilary Duff opts to gather perfect advice from the perfectly single Chris Noth in order to make up a perfect secret admirer for Mom who doesn't even exist... OR DOES HE?!
(Spoiler alert: He does. They fall in love. Gag.)
4. Forces of Nature (1999) -- Ben Affleck's high-strung. Sandra Bullock's free-spirited. His wedding looms, and so does a hurricane. An errant bird grounds their flight. Hail, fire, mistaken identity, jail time and impromptu stripping soon follow. The movie, from title to synopsis, thrives on contrivance and yet has the huevos to *OH, RIGHT, DECADE-OLD SPOILER ALERT* cop out on its feature-length opposites-attract angle.
(Was Hugh Grant busy when they shot this or what? Seriously, this was the exact same writer behind Bullock's Miss Congenialitys, Grant's Music & Lyrics and their Two Weeks Notice. Way to corner a market, dude...)

5. Serendipity (2001) -- Okay, here's one good enough to temporarily ditch the caps lock. The already-engaged likes of John Cusack and Kate Beckinsale spent one fateful night together in Manhattan and, instead of exchanging numbers like proper people do, she puts her info in a book and he puts his on a $5 bill. If one of them comes to possess either one, only then is it Meant to Be, though the wait of several years has both of them antsy enough to go on the hunt and consequently continually miss out on one another and inevitably FINDONEANOTHERAFTERALLTHESEYEARSANDFALLTOTALLYINLURVEOMG!
(Sorry about that.)
(You know what? Can I just lump that year's Kate & Leopold with the other Miramax-released rom-com, in which Hugh Jackman stumbles back in time and falls for possible blood relation Meg Ryan? Even the incest cut has its charms, namely the leads.)
6. 50 First Dates (2004) -- Well-off bachelor Adam Sandler had to go and fall for the one girl who won't remember him the next morning: Drew Barrymore, sans her short-term memory. Them following romantic-comedy protocol in The Wedding Singer was one thing, and a winning one at that, but the gimmick of him growing exceedingly creative in his daily attempts to make her re-swoon transforms into something too mawkish for its own good... and I say that knowing that this puppy raked in $120 million domestically.
(Besides, who leaves Hawaii for the Arctic? They don't have Rob Schneiders in the Arctic!)

7. Some Like It Hot (1959) -- There we go, an honest-to-goodness classic in our ranks. Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis are on the run from gangsters, so they do what anyone would do: dress up as women. And what does one do when they fall for Marilyn Monroe? They do double dress-up duty as a fictional millionaire while their pal falls prey to a very real mogul and his very real affections, duh. It's all funny enough and nimble enough that its central contrivance rarely comes into question -- which is exactly how you do a rom-com right.
(Marilyn Monroe's perfect. I don't care what Joe E. Brown told you.)
I haven't seen... Sleepless in Seattle (I know, I know) or You've Got Mail or While You Were Sleeping, though they all sound like viable candidates.
No one has seen... Leap Year, because they haven't made it yet, but just look at this: Amy Adams travels across Ireland with a presumably helpful stranger (Matthew Goode) in order to propose to her boyfriend (Adam Scott) on the one day where he apparently can't refuse.
In the immortal words of one less than famous magician -- COME ON!










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-19-2009 @ 1:44AM
Joe said...
Actually, in 'How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days', Kate Hudson's character is already writing the article when someone that knows about the article makes the bet with McConaughey's character. So it's slightly less contrived.
I'd always wondered how they'd worked the two of their bets into the storyline without it being insanely contrived, so I watched the film recently.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 9:17AM
Kevin said...
True, but the premise is still ridiculously contrived. Kate Hudson is pretty enough, but you would have to be drop dead gorgeous/amazingly sexy to not be able to scare off any guy in about 15 minutes, let alone 10 days. C'mon now. Its the dumbest goal in history.
6-19-2009 @ 2:08AM
pinsleric said...
"The Lake House" with the time traveling mailbox and Sandra Bullock as a nurse who realizes the love of her life is someone she saw die? But, she ends up saving his life, they meet, and fall in LOVE.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 2:09AM
William Goss said...
I was considering that, but it's not a romantic COMEDY, so no dice.
6-19-2009 @ 2:14AM
pinsleric said...
Sorry. I must have remembered how hilariously bad it was and was mistaken for actual comedy.
6-19-2009 @ 2:15AM
William Goss said...
:)
6-19-2009 @ 12:36PM
Dan said...
I can't say I disagree with anything on this list by any means, and it's actually really funny, but in spite of that, I actually really enjoy How To Lose A Guy, Failure To Launch, and Serendipity. I always end up liking McConaughey in spite of the fact that he has really done nothing ever to prove himself, and how can I resist John Cusack AND Kate Becksinale? Two awesome people, though for different reasons.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 4:24PM
wilderworks said...
The whole premise of the list is kind of ridiculous. Romantic Comedies are all about the contrivances. Contrivances are also known as “romance.” What is a path of rose pedals and a candle-lit dinner if not a grand contrivance? This is sort of like a list of horror movies that come up with elaborate ways to kill people.
Numbers 1 through 5 do suck pretty bad though.
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 1:43PM
taalibba said...
Oh well, If you wan to talk rom com contrivances, you must see You've Got Mail, it uses one of the most used plots of all time. Coworkers or business rivals who hate each other because of their jobs are also, unbeknownst to them, pen pals who love each other. See also: Shop Around the Corner, In the Good Old Summertime and She Loves Me (musical)
Oh and, In Kate and Leopold, she's not his descendant, she had been dating his descendant (Liev Schriber) for years and they had broken up before the movie started.
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 1:41PM
William Goss said...
"Oh and, In Kate and Leopold, she's not his descendant, she had been dating his descendant (Liev Schriber) for years and they had broken up before the movie started."
http://www.fidrabooks.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/headdesk_macro_400px.jpg
6-24-2009 @ 5:24PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
Actually in the initial cut it was revealed that Liev was THEIR (Meg and Hugh's) descendant, thus her dating him was sort of incest. (I mean, this is how many generations removed?)
They cut this out of the final version, but something hinting at it was in one of the trailers, and the story is all over the Internet.
6-24-2009 @ 1:11PM
duhknees said...
I agree with wilderworks. Another definition of contrivance is PLOT. Romantic comedies are no different from horror or action adventure -- they rely on complicated plot lines (how many ways can we come up with for some villain to be inspired to take over the world??). The keys to success are good writing and good acting, which 1-5 don't have. Plus chemistry, something lacking when your casting director hires based on number of Google hits.
Reply
6-24-2009 @ 4:13PM
Beeks said...
How about things like My Big Fat Greek Wedding? (Which I do really like.) Hot guy falls for average/dumpy looking girl just because she is "quirky".
Reply
6-24-2009 @ 5:55PM
Brian said...
The Perfect Man, among other things, is not original. Check out this plotline.
Neurotic mother of two girls with different personalities (the older one is rebellious, the younger fancies herself a swimmer) moves around every time a relationship fails. She meets this salesman who tries to win her over. Skittish, she decides to move again, but is confronted by her older daughter and ultimately lets love win out.
Consider that it's Bob Hoskins winning over Cher and that the daughters are Winona Ryder and Christina Ricci, Mermaids was a quirky romantic comedy with an odd premise. It also was released in 1990.
Reply
6-24-2009 @ 6:32PM
Buttercheeks said...
How can you include "Some Like it Hot" on this list? This movie was an original trailblazer in it's day and should be heralded as such, and not criticized because it's predecessors had copied it to death. The writing, the acting, the directing...everything about this movie is original...and perfect! Joe E Brown's character's line "Nobody's perfect" was not about MM, it was his response when Jack Lemon confessed he was a MAN.
Reply
6-24-2009 @ 6:35PM
William Goss said...
It's an intentional play on the line, Buttercheeks. I know who it was about and why he said it.
I'm arguing that Marilyn Monroe, the real-life actress, is an exception to the line that his on-screen character ended the film with.
And if you had read the piece, I wasn't criticizing the film or its plot at all. If anything, I praised it for working well within its contrivance and not being slavish to it as more modern films are.
6-24-2009 @ 9:29PM
Jeri said...
If you were to watch "While You Were Sleeping" you'll see that the romance isn't contrived because the picture of Bullock and a sleeping Peter Gallagher is a macguffin(?). Or, she waited while he "slept", but he's not who she winds up with. Plus, the movie is about much more than two disparate people who meet cute and fall in love.
Reply