400 Screens, 400 Blows - Neurosis and 'Control'
Filed under: Columns, 400 Screens, 400 Blows

400 Screens, 400 Blows is a weekly column that takes an in-depth look at the films playing below the radar, beneath the top ten, and on 400 screens or less.
I'm rather dismayed by the huge success of the awful He's Just Not That Into You (21 screens). I mean, I like Bradley Cooper in general, and Justin Long's character is interesting for a while, at least until his stupid Hollywood redemption during the third act. And it does pose an interesting question: if you were married to Jennifer Connelly and had the chance to sleep with Scarlett Johansson, would you do it? I prefer to think of this question as a koan, or an unanswerable riddle meant to be pondered during meditation. Now, I know what you're thinking: this guy just doesn't like chick flicks. Not true. I love chick flicks, provided they're good, which they rarely are. Chick flicks are almost like horror films; the filmmakers have their audience hooked already and so most of them do the minimum amount of work required to crank out another just like the last one.
The main problem with He's Just Not That Into You is that it's based on a self-help book, and so the characters are seen as types of problems, like a checklist. This one is a little too wound up, and that one is a little too shy and the other one lacks self confidence. That's as far as the writers went. They never once bothered to think of these creatures as living, breathing people with other, more complex thoughts and feelings. Why does Gigi (Ginnifer Goodwin) act like such an idiot all the time? Where does she get these traits? Is she aware of her own behavior? Does she ever get a moment in which she just relaxes, or does she have to be neurotic every second of the day?
On the other end of the spectrum, we have Jim Jarmusch's totally misunderstood The Limits of Control (18 screens). This is also a film in which the characters are reduced to a bare essence, but this time it works. Rather than flinging their neuroses all over the screen, these characters are ciphers, hiding virtually everything behind prepared speeches about the things they like (art, music, movies, etc.). Then there's the hero, who hides behind a mask of nothingness; it's like the 2001: A Space Odyssey of hitman movies. The trick to the movie is that it appears to be a particular genre movie, and we expect to eventually get some information about why the hit is taking place, or just who the hitman is (does he regularly visit a shrink?), but Jarmusch continually withholds this information, pulling us along on a thin rope of hope, and a great, huge serving of mystery and curiosity.
Essentially the difference between the two films it that He's Just Not That Into You throws everything out on the screen and leaves nothing for audiences to discover; there's no room to move in it. The Limits of Control has nothing but room to move; it's an almost total mystery with few answers. It's the difference between being plugged into an automatic entertainment machine or engaging with a unique artist on a personal level. One is certainly easier, but the wonder of movies is that the latter option is even possible.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-21-2009 @ 9:15AM
BloodwerK said...
I'd rather be married to the girl in the photo. She's adorable...
Reply
6-21-2009 @ 11:53AM
Mr.R said...
Totally agree, something about Ginnifer Goodwin is so attractive and sweet, makes you want to hug her all the time.
6-21-2009 @ 10:24AM
viewdrix said...
My main problem is that it ditches its self-help roots and "this is how it really is" mantra to have, for the most part, a Hollywood ending. The characters literally rant about how women hear about a platonic-male-friend turned lover or a married man leaving his wife only to live happily ever after, and that those are exceptions to the rule and they invest too much faith that things will happen for them just as they worked in the movies or for friends of friends, but the movie more or less works out that way.
Let me look up the Wikipedia because my memory's bad for a few of the characters:
Jennifer Aniston.
Conflict: Longtime boyfriend Ben Affleck doesn't believe in marriage, and she thinks it reflects on her that she can't convince him otherwise.
Resolution: He decides to marry her.
Ginnifer Goodwin.
Conflict: Becomes convinced that platonic male friend Justin Long, who dispenses the film's eponymous advice and convinces her about life being full of rules and not exceptions when it comes to men, is interested in her, and is dismayed when she misread his actions.
Resolution: He realizes he's in love with her after all, comes to her apartment, and kiss her.
Scarlett Johansson.
Conflict: Really likes Bradley Cooper, a married man. Drew Barrymore convinces her that she should try to convince him to leave his wife.
Resolution: She convinces him to have an affair with her. His wife Jennifer Connolly eventually divorces him, which I suppose is a happy ending for Johansson, except that she had become upset when Cooper had sex with Connolly while Johansson hid in a closet. If that hadn't been a deal-breaker for her, it would've worked out, but that's one point for you, He's Just That Into You.
Drew Barrymore.
Conflict: Generic problems about it never working out with guys.
Resolution: It works out with Kevin Connolly.
Reply
6-21-2009 @ 8:45PM
GL said...
Thank you for this. You've exorcised the last shreds of insanity that nagged me to see this even though I knew I wouldn't like it.
6-22-2009 @ 12:15AM
YouFaceTheTick said...
My wife wanted to see Not that Into as she read the book and found it funny. The movie - wow not a single likable female character. all of them were weak.
And the writer of this article is correct- Long's character was interesting until he had the hollywood redemption. the same thing happened with Gervais' Ghost Town. Until he changed to fit the Hollywood formula he was an interesting character.
Reply