Review: My Sister's Keeper
Filed under: Drama, New Releases, New Line, Warner Brothers, Theatrical Reviews, Summer Movies

I'm not ashamed to say that I cry at the movies. Not frequently, but occasionally a story and its characters will grab hold of me to the extent that I'm completely caught up in the emotions and feelings being expressed. Films as disparate as John Ford's The Searchers and Wong Kar-Wai's Chungking Express have caused me to weep with joy, relief, and sorrow.
Despite a relentless barrage of scenes evidently designed with the sole goal of jerking tears, Nick Cassavetes' My Sister's Keeper did not make me cry. It is, however, one of the most glorious-looking terminal cancer pictures I've ever seen. Cinematographer Caleb Deschanel (The Black Stallion, The Natural) paints the oft-mundane proceedings in an otherworldly glow, as though the transition to the next life had already begun. That's the guiding principle of the movie as a whole; even though an inflammatory and emotionally wrenching issue serves as the linchpin for the plot, great pains are taken to soften the blows so as not to inflict lasting damage upon the viewer.
Frankly, that latter point, much more than whether I personally shed tears, is what prevents My Sister's Keeper from escaping middlebrow territory. Cameron Diaz and Jason Patric are splendidly noble as Brian and Sara Fitzgerald, whose daughter Kate (Sofia Vassilieva) is diagnosed at a young age with leukemia. Brian and Sara conceive another child with genetic modifications so she can serve as a donor to her sister. Anna (Abigail Breslin) (*) seems fine with all the body part donations until Kate's condition worsens to the point that she needs a kidney transplant. Then 11-year-old Anna marches into the office of well-known lawyer Campbell Alexander (Alec Baldwin) and demands medical emancipation from her parents.
Quicker than you can say Irreconcilable Differences, the family is thrown into further turmoil. Already stretched to the breaking point by caring for Kate over a period of years, Brian and Sara are beside themselves, not understanding why Anna has experienced a sudden change of heart, especially when she refuses to explain herself beyond a very basic case. She sounds reasonable: donating her kidney will limit what she'll be able to do in the future, and she's tired of not having control over her own body. The arguments are not without merit, but they seem to come out of nowhere, catching the rest of the family by surprise.
Sara takes it harder than Brian. She gave up a promising career as a lawyer to stay at home with Kate. As flashbacks reveal, she's steely, strong-willed, and, literally, never say die in her unflagging efforts to keep Kate alive. Yet her singular focus may have alienated her from her other children. Eldest child Jesse (Evan Ellingson) looks lost and lonely; as a boy, he was sent away for a year to try and cure his dyslexia, and scant attention appears to have been paid to him subsequently. Anna is cheerful and spunky, but complains that her feelings have never been taken into account.
Brian works as a Los Angeles firefighter, evidently giving him very good income and terrific medical benefits, since financial issues related to the extensive medical care and hospitalization are never raised. Brian seems to be more relaxed and less strident than Sara, wisecracking and playing with the kids. We never get much more than occasional peaks at their private lives as a married couple; one would imagine that having a deathly-ill child would place a huge strain on their relationship, but the cracks only show in public, which seems counterintuitive.
Brian also never questions Sara's decision to represent them in the lawsuit that attorney Alexander brings in behalf of Anna; Sara has not practiced in years and doesn't seem to have the experience or expertise needed to argue such an important case. Since finances don't seem to be an issue, why not hire a specialist?
In a similar way, director Nick Cassavetes' insistence on treacly musical montages quickly becomes wearisome. (The choice of songs, one of them being a cover of Talking Heads' "Heaven," is far too obvious.) The outcome of an all-too-perfect romance between Kate and Taylor (Thomas Dekker, from TV's The Sarah Connor Chronicles), a kind, gentle, and good-looking fellow cancer patient, seems preordained from the outset, calculated to wring pathos out of an already tragic situation; the whole relationships descends to the level of bathos because it's so unnecessary, adding little to our knowledge or understanding of Kate's character.
All the family members harbor secret fears and guilts, expressed in alternating, quietly spoken voice-overs that come and go in oddly paced, quick spurts. Presumably they're intended to offer insights from different perspectives, yet the snippets are so brief that they feel arbitrary, added to cover over narrative dead spots.
But not only immediate family members have secrets and guilty feelings. Judge De Salvo (Joan Cusack) is back on the bench after a long break to recover from the accidental death of her 12-year-old daughter; of course she identifies closely with the 11-year-old Anna. Hard-driving attorney Alexander keeps a dog, which he describes as a service animal, though he has no obvious physical disability; is he some kind of insincere charlatan, or is he hiding something? Only self-sacrificing Aunt Kelly (Heather Wahlquist) provides support without revealing any secrets.
All of these elements may have worked in the best-selling 432-page novel by Jodi Picoult that serves as the basis for the screenplay credited to Cassavetes and Jeremy Leven. In a novel, character details have room to breathe over a span of many pages. In the movie version, however, they feel shoehorned in, perhaps in an effort to be faithful to the source material. The problem is that they distract attention from the most compelling aspects of the story.
Indeed, the idea that parents might conceive children to serve as medical donors for their other children is complex, intriguing, and troubling, and deserves a more in-depth consideration than is offered here. After the issue is introduced, it's abandoned for much of the film, and then things are wrapped up in a pat, somewhat infuriating manner that I found entirely unsatisfying. It's kind of a bait-and-switch: come for a charged social issue movie, stay for an ill-fated romance / all-too-typical, well-intentioned family drama.
My Sister's Keeper feels like an uneven, somewhat soggy mix of two of the director's previous films, John Q and The Notebook. It's a disappointing step back for Cassavetes after the vim and vitality that infused his most recent effort, Alpha Dog. He displayed a somewhat lighter touch with that based-on-fact crime flick, which could have worked well with My Sister's Keeper. As it is, the film looks lovely but offers little in the way of deeper emotional truths.
(* UPDATED: Abigail Breslin's credit corrected.)










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-26-2009 @ 9:51AM
Brian said...
Who is Abigail Berlin??
Reply
7-06-2009 @ 10:19PM
Brian said...
Yeah, the browser I use has spell check, and it caught me there.
8-13-2009 @ 12:13PM
Bev said...
This was a disappointing movie. I was really looking forward to Alec Baldwin as he so fit the role, but they cut it down to window dressing. My biggest problem was that they changed the ending. They also negated the father and the brothers rolls. All I can say is, if you like Jodi Picoult, read the book.
Reply
6-27-2009 @ 4:11AM
maggie said...
I was SO disappointed in this movie...they have completely butchered this wonderful Jodi Picoult story of a family in crisis and have disregarded the true meaning of the book which is that life is not always going to turn out the way you expect it to. The movie, although entertaining, is so far removed from the original novel - there is very little depth to the movie compared to the book. My advice is, skip the movie, read the book. The rewards will be enormous.
Reply
6-27-2009 @ 3:13PM
bookfan said...
I was very confuzzled and didn't understand the movie as well as I did the book. In the movie they leave out some of the main characters. They also switch the ending soooo much! So much that the wrong person dies!!! Read the book... A LOT better!! : )
Reply
7-03-2009 @ 2:16PM
Linda said...
I disagree about the ending. After reading this almost fabulous book, I thought the ending was a cop out and completely dissatisfying for the reader. In fact, I wrote on Picoult's blog exactly this. I do agree that the characters are not well developed in the movie and some left out that added to the book. They did not do a good job with the older brother only eluding to his problems. However, I believe it was a much better, more realistic ending. Sometimes things DO happen as they are intended; in fact, when it comes to serious illness, they almost always do.
6-27-2009 @ 7:09PM
Alexis said...
I truely did enjoy this movie, although they should not have changed the ending and they should have kept the character of Julia Romano. If Titanic and Gone With The Wind could be over 3 hours whats wrong with My Sisters Keeper being just as long?
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 10:52AM
lisa said...
The book had the magnificent twist of an ending that left all breathless and gave us another example of men plan and god laughs....
I rushed to see the movie in part due to the philosophical discussions that it would produce with the people I went with. Nothing ...no depth and the completely predictable ending versus the dramatic twist ....cassavettes WHAT were you thinking.
Lisa in NJ
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 5:50PM
Amy said...
I thought I was going to see a light hearted movie, kinda sad. Boy was I wrong! I really enjoyed this movie, but I have never cried so much in my life. I cried from beggening to end. At times I almost could have wailled, but I realized I was not alone watching it, so I muffeled my cry. I have not read the book, I enjoyed all of the caracters, kate's story was sweet. I liked her romance. I would recomemend this. I cried, but sometimes it feels good to let yourself go.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 6:54AM
Christie said...
I unabashedly cry at movies which move me, but found myself crying for a completely different reason this time over "My Sister's Keeper." I was just sick that the ending Jodi Picoult penned (quite shockingly and masterfully) was changed in this movie. There was no reason to change what could have been the most dramatic movie ending this year! Shame on Nick Cassavetes for ruining the integrity of the book! To say I was disappointed in the movie would be an understatement. In fact, I'm re-reading the book to get the bitter memories of what I just saw out of my head. If you haven't seen the movie...skip it and run to the bookstore or library and read the book instead.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 1:36PM
Ami said...
My Sister's Keeper is my favourite book, so I dragged my other half to the cinema to watch it. The film was always going to be relatively soppy and it was likely that it would be rubbish compared to the book.
Why leave out Campbell's love interest to add another story in to give you something else to think about.
And why, why on earth was the ending changed. In the book there is an amazing twist at the end which you just don't see coming. Why kill the wrong person in the film? Only to make it more "nicey nicey". Amazing book. Not so good film.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 5:44PM
Anna said...
i did not like this movie. After reading the book, i was so looking forward to seeing the movie. My mom took me to see it and i was soo dissappointed. they completely changed the ending and got rid of campbell and his lover. my mom loved the movie and thats only because she didnt read the book. i walked out of the theater pissed.
Reply
7-05-2009 @ 2:58PM
Brandy said...
I was so upset over the ending of this movie. I loved the book and understand when you make the movie some things have to change. The ending in the book moved me and when I watched the movie it was like I had watched a girl die the entire movie. It had the ending everyone would expect, but the book had the one thing you did not see coming. The people who decided to change this ending has no imagination. I feel like I could have written that ending or even a 13 year old could have done that ending. It sucked and I will and have told everyone not to waste your money on this movie.
Reply
8-29-2009 @ 8:22AM
Cassey said...
This movie was VERY disappointing. If you read the book it is SOOO much better. Don't like how they switch the endings up. GREAT job on the book. HORRIABLE on the movie!
Reply
7-09-2009 @ 5:21PM
Julie said...
I have just been to see this film and am absolutely gutted. Why did they change the ending? I couldn't believe it. I realise that films often change bits and pieces but this wasn't just a minor change. Why bother making books into films if you are going to change a fundamental part of the book? My advice - read the book!
Did Jodi Piccoult not have any say in what happened in the film - I'm sure if it was my book I wouldn't want them to change it the way they did.
Reply
7-25-2009 @ 6:06PM
miss m said...
i went and saw this film with my friends
oh my gosh i never thought it would be that sad,
i had tears in my eyes nearly the whole film towards the ending, after watching this film it made me think more about people less fortunate then me.
i hope the best for people who have cancer and any other harmfullife threating problems and i wish them the very best in life and i hope they pull through it and stay strong. im gonna start donating more money to cancer.
this film really does open your mind to whats happening in the world but most of all opens your heart but also breaks it.
Reply
8-08-2009 @ 11:15PM
Joan said...
How disappointing. The book is about Anna who is vibrant and alive and wants the right to live life to the fullest. The book judges the mother with "the best intentions" very harshly. The movie is a tear jerker about Kate who is dying of cancer and has a lovely mother who takes a great close-up. All those troubled guys were written out Dad, Jesse & the lawyer.
This was "the movie with the same name" - Did the screen writer & director read the same book I did.
Reply
8-13-2009 @ 11:10AM
Bryony said...
Disappointing. In the film its the ending you would expect. but the books twist is really good. and i didn't see it coming. they also missed out the character Julia. The story of Campell and Julia is not there at all. Fair enough having to cut scenes out but not changing the whole story. That wasn't my sister's keeper.
I defiantly recommend the book!
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 10:26AM
Esther said...
i think i probably would have liked the movie a lot more if i hadn't of read the book before seeing it. the movie dismisses key points from the book and doesn't even include some of the characters (e.g. Julia) that had an important role in the story. i was also very disappointed with the ending as it was completely different to the book's ending (which i thought was a key incident and a more appropriate ending to the story). characters such as Jessie and Campbell had been very much neglected in the movie as there was a lot more they had to contribute to the story and the relationships between themselves and some of the other characters. all in all, i would recommend that you read the book if you want the whole story.
Reply