The Other Oscar Changes Could Mean No Best Song Category
Filed under: Oscar Watch
In all the hullabaloo over the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences' decision to increase the Best Picture Oscar nominees from five to 10 next year, something else has gotten lost in the shuffle: They tinkered with the Best Song category, too. And the new rules mean that there could be a year with no Best Song category at all!Here's how it works (with thanks to The Hollywood Reporter for some of the details). During the nomination process, the 233 members of the Academy's music branch rate each eligible song on a scale of 1 to 10. The five songs with the top average scores get the actual nomination, with 8.25 as the cutoff. If only three or four songs rate 8.25 or higher, that's all the nominations there are. But the question has always been: What if fewer than three songs get an average score of 8.25? So far, it hasn't come up, although you can see that it almost did last year, when there were only three nominees in the category. That means those were the only three songs that rated 8.25 or higher -- sorry, fans of Bruce Springsteen's "The Wrestler."
The Academy has now answered this loophole very simply. If two or more songs score higher than 8.25, then everything's cool. If only one song scores high enough, then that song and whatever the next highest scorer was will be the two lone nominees (and no one will know which had the lower score, because of course that would influence the voting). And if no songs score above 8.25? Then the category is scrapped that year.
Basically, the Academy is enforcing a baseline of quality -- to be nominated, a song must be at least this good. Of course, I wish they'd require the Best Song nominees to actually have been included IN the film, where they can affect tone and story, rather than merely over the closing credits, where they don't do anything. But that's just a crazy dream of mine.
(By the way, they've announced another slight change to the Oscar telecast, too. The non-competition awards -- lifetime achievement, Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award, and Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award -- will be given out not during the show but at a special dinner and ceremony held specifically for those awards three months earlier. That will allow the recipients to be lauded by their colleagues and get the full attention they deserve without taking up 20 minutes of the Oscar ceremony.)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-29-2009 @ 10:26AM
Stunbunny said...
I hear next year they're doing away with the televised Oscars and are just going to Twitter the whole thing. Whoopi Goldberg will host.
Reply
6-29-2009 @ 11:41AM
RTMS said...
I have to agree with you about the song being relevant to the story again. I think this may be their reasoning as well. Jai Ho I think really only became famous because of iTunes, not because it was featured in the film itself. If it hadn't been availble I don't think people would have remembered the song as much.
I think Enchanted was the really the last film to use a song to push the story along, instead of being dumped to the end. And I think this is the reason it changed so dramatically in the last few years. People got fed up with Disney always being nominated and winning in most cases because of course just about every cartoon movie they made back then had a dozen songs. Now that Pixar is in charge they've dropped the ball on that and other movies have picked up the slack,only they are not very good songs or relevant. They are just yet another promotion for the artist to add Oscar winner to their name.
Reply
6-29-2009 @ 12:02PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
Even though Jai Ho was in the closing credits, I think it should get an exception because of that awesome dance number. I certainly remembered it.
Also, you mentioned Enchanted, but Once won the song award that year, and rightfully so, for a song that DEFINITELY affected the story.
6-29-2009 @ 3:37PM
RTMS said...
Thanks for that, I was aware but didn't mention the whole Enchanted thing. But I still agree with the author that the songs are moving away from pushing the plot along and this may be a way to get it back on track. That or the Academy does not deem the song category important enough anymore to pay it much attention, hence make it even harder to get nominated.
6-29-2009 @ 12:14PM
gottacook said...
The Best Song nominating process has always been screwed up. Case in point: The best original song to appear in a movie in 1977 (at least in retrospect) was Kander & Ebb's "New York, New York" - moreover, it was quite integral to the story, as its divergent performances by De Niro's saxophonist and Minnelli's torch singer characters reflected their personal differences almost more than the script itself did - and yet "New York, New York" wasn't even NOMINATED for Best Song that year... enough said.
I don't think you could exclude songs from eligibility that were used only over the end credits, given that some very effective nominees and winners were used only over the OPENING credits (i.e., Bruce Springsteen's "Streets of Philadelphia"); how do you justify allowing one and not the other? I'd rather see the end of the category entirely.
Reply