Discuss: When Actors Fake Musical Prowess
Filed under: Music & Musicals, Casting, Fandom
With a few new musical biopics headed our way, there's a question to consider: Just how musically inclined should an actor be when they take on the role of a musician?We expect a lot from the pros -- good chemistry, believable delivery of lines, sincere emotion -- but what about musical aptitude? We'll discuss whether the actor looks the part, but less often challenge whether they can hit the right notes. Sometimes it surely doesn't matter. If the band's music is simple enough, the skills can be learned before shooting. Thanks to the wonder of dubbing, if it's just singing, only the showmanship and performance matter. (Although there are times that actors can surprise with both, like Val Kilmer's stunning embodiment of Jim Morrison in The Doors.)
But when it comes to more talented musicians, it's not so easy to fake. If one is iconic enough to be immortalized once again on film, shouldn't the performance show that artistry? Some itch for James Franco to become Jeff Buckley in that upcoming biopic, but he's the one hopeful without any musical talent -- and no matter what he could learn on the fly, it wouldn't come close to Buckley's, well, Grace. Why bother with the project if we can't watch the notes flow through the fingers as they grasp the strings or pound the keys?
When Dennis Quaid took on Great Balls of Fire, he did some playing, but those memorable scenes of the fingers flying over the keys -- that was all stunt hands. His performance made up for this, but it's not the same as getting a full shot of the actor playing. When Robert Pattinson played the piano in Twilight, I remember carefully watching the camera pan up from his hands and realizing that he was, indeed, playing each note.
The realization was the most pleasant shock because Pattinson didn't need to fake it with that oft-used flimsy look of intent concentration. You know the look -- when the actor pretends to play, but every gesture and facial expression betray them, shouting: "I don't know what I'm doing!"
But perhaps I'm just musically sensitive. Do you care if actors have some degree of musical ability when they take on these roles? Are you perfectly happy to see stunt hands pound the keys or films cut footage in a way that we can't tell when they're strumming the wrong notes? Or, do you wish for performances where the music is just as important as the character?
And as a follow-up, which actors have done the best and worst job making music come to life on the big screen?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-30-2009 @ 5:59PM
Baxter said...
Sam Riley's Ian Curtis in "Control" was so good that it felt like watching a documentary.
Unfortunately, as much as I love Lou Diamond Phillips and "La Bamba", it's painfully obvious that he's not playing and it really gives the film a campy quality. As does an adult playing a teenager.
Reply
6-30-2009 @ 7:18PM
Joe Hsu said...
For me, singing ability is far more important than playing ability. Even if the actor doesn't sound like the person he's portraying, at least get the mannerisms and physical requirements down.
"Shine" has always been a favorite of mine, since as far as I know, Geoffrey Rush put in a great performance in addition to being the hands in many of the playing shots.
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 9:28AM
ML said...
If the character is a musician, it's definitely a bonus if the actor can play the instrument because that adds a dimension of realism. In the case of Jeff Buckley, I can hardly expect any actor to be able to mimic what he could do - or sound realistically like Jeff Buckley. I see no reason why they can't have the actor sing (creating a realistic appearance) and dub over the recorded voice. (It's not as though this hasn't been standard practice for musicals forever ...) Let's just say, as a Buckley fan, if they don't use Buckley's voice, they'll have to do A LOT to convince me to show up.
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 10:08AM
john said...
Marion Cotillard didn't sing in La Vie en Rose but it was seamless. Though singing on screen would be different than playing an instrument.
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 10:19AM
Andy said...
Sissy Spacek sang and played guitar in Coal Miner's Daughter.
Jamie Fox played piano (and did SOME singing) in Ray.
Joaquin Phoenix sang and played guitar in Walk The Line.
And John C. Reilly pushed the boundaries of good taste in Walk Hard.
http://www.examiner.com/x-4121-Pop-Culture-News-Examiner~y2009m3d17-The-Best-Biopics-Youve-Never-Seen
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 11:36AM
Jim said...
The Best, bar none, musical biopic was The Buddy Holly Story. The movie itself is a standard A-B-C plot format, but what Gary Busey, Don Stroud, and Charlie Martin Smith do in evoking the birth of Rock and Roll is astounding. The best thing about this film is the fact that they are being recorded live off the floor, and the sound and performances AREN'T perfect. the sound is muddy in spots, there are mistakes in the playing - but that's what makes it real, and the energy they put into the songs is amazing. This film is worth having for the musical performances alone, and its the only Rock and Roll biopic I've ever seen that really got the spirit of the music right. Backbeat is a good film about The Beatles' beginnings, but as soon as the music starts, you know its faked.
Get The Buddy Holly Story and revel in the truly live vibe.
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 11:46AM
lw said...
Could not have said it any better. Busey and the gang were amazing.
7-01-2009 @ 12:00PM
Ron Moses said...
The worst fake playing I've ever seen was Sean Penn's work in Sweet And Lowdown. Painfully distracting for any guitarist to watch.
I'd give the "Nice Try" award to Antonio Banderas in Once Upon A Time In Mexico. Not quite perfect, but clearly practiced and close enough.
Reply