Review: Public Enemies
Filed under: Drama, Thrillers, New Releases, Universal, Theatrical Reviews, New in Theaters, Johnny Depp

Essentially there are two kinds of gangster movies: those made during the time when men wore hats in real life and those made during the time when men wore hats that came from wardrobe. The first type are usually in black-and-white, punchy, nervy and full of wisecracks. The second type are usually longer and more violent, but slower-paced and nobler of purpose, as if the hats suddenly carried an extra weight, an extra sadness. What Michael Mann has achieved with the new Public Enemies is an often fascinating, striking combination of the two.
I walked into the new film, convinced that it could never top lean, mean B-movie classics like Max Nosseck's Dillinger (1945) or Don Siegel's Baby Face Nelson (1957) in which these gangsters were initially immortalized. But it equals them, capturing some of their raw energy and allure and clocking in as a longer, but equally fast-moving and adrenaline-pumping example. Somehow Mann only manages to use the extra time for flash and spectacle, and hardly any for depth or detail, but that only helps to speed things along. Happily, he also avoids the typical origin story, and plunges right in.
Johnny Depp stars as John Dillinger, and unlike the thuggish Lawrence Tierney in the 1945 version or the snaky Warren Oates in the 1973 version, this one is very concerned with his public image. He's handsome and brave and looks great during his bank robberies, wearing his crisp hat, long coat and double handguns like fashion statements. He puts on a great show of stealing only the "bank's money" rather than the small deposits of the general public. He's a bit like Brad Pitt's Jesse James of two years ago, but less subtle.
He uses his charms on Billie Frechette (Marion Cotillard), practically demanding that she become his girlfriend, and she complies; what other answer is there? (Poor Cotillard spends much of the movie occupying the typical "girlfriend" role, until the final quarter when she is allowed a few venomous line readings.) Dillinger promises Billie the world, but the world is slipping through Dillinger's fingers. It's the beginning of the end. Crime itself has begun to change. One rival of Dillinger's has set up a successful gambling business with far less risk and greater rewards than bank robbing. And at one point Dillinger finds himself desperate enough to team up with the volatile, sadistic Baby Face Nelson (Stephen Graham), which results in more corpse-strewn bank jobs than Dillinger is used to.
Worse, the newly-formed Federal Bureau of Investigation, and its much-loathed director J. Edgar Hoover (Billy Crudup) have opened a new anti-Dillinger branch, led by Melvin Purvis (Christian Bale). We first meet Purvis as he guns down Pretty Boy Floyd (Channing Tatum) in the back using a long-range rifle; the film never gives him much sympathy and Bale's chilly screen persona is perfect for a self-righteous villain like this. Unfortunately, the two main rivals, Purvis and Dillinger, don't really connect much onscreen, except for one brief, well-placed discussion through prison bars (it's not as effective as the coffee date between the hero and villain of Mann's Heat). But in one great -- fictional? -- scene, Dillinger finds himself nearby the Bureau's Anti-Dillinger office and wanders in, and finding it half-empty, re-examines his legacy in the form of pinned-up photos and documents.
One of the movie's main themes is that Dillinger lives for the moment, unwilling or unable to consider the future, and with little use for the past. That's Mann's credo as well, and it's what keeps the lengthy Public Enemies in shape. Most scenes come with an intense immediacy, with an effective use of shaky cams and stark lighting, giving chaos an open invitation to rear its ugly head at any time. The bullets are loud and plentiful and when they hit, the blood is not shy about making an exit. Additionally, the stylist Mann spends a great deal of extra time mining Dillinger's real-life ending for all its movie-ness. Dillinger was shot just after a showing of Manhattan Melodrama (1934), and so Mann shows us clips from that film (with Clark Gable, William Powell and Myrna Loy), and deliberately ties in some of its ideas to his own film. Thereby, Dillinger's end now comes fraught with meaning and weight, without betraying the incident itself.
But an earlier, less significant sequence is actually a great deal more interesting. Dillinger is in a movie theater -- a different one -- having a hushed conversation with his colleagues. A newsreel comes on, and suddenly a huge mug shot of Dillinger appears on the screen. An earnest narrator warns spectators that he could be sitting right next to them. The patrons look left, and then right, and no one spots anything. The scene is almost played for laughs, but beneath it is a key theme. To most people these gangsters only exist on the screen, or in pulp novels or newspapers. The big gangster face up on the screen is more immediate than the real one in the seat next to you. The real person has become disconnected from his own legend, and he has become virtually obsolete. That Mann recognized this and was able to so sublimely illustrate it shows that, not only has he made the connection between old gangster pictures and new ones, but also he has made the connection between movies and life.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-01-2009 @ 8:43PM
Chase Kahn said...
Good review -- I loved the film -- narrow, straightforward, visually and aesthetically stunning, but I think you've missed the boat completely on Bale's Melvin Purvis.
He IS a sympathetic character -- he talks with a smooth demeanor in front of cameras, microphones and his boss, Hoover but secretly he is a bit lost, outmatched, sympathetic towards Billie (Cotillard) and extremly fragile regarding the loss of life around him. He's a man who is driven by his job, like anybody, afraid of death and the brutality of his practice chasing a man who is seemingly invincible and unafraid of the consequences. Hence, we see Dillinger taunt him in the jailhouse scene and clearly it bugs Purvis.
Reply
7-01-2009 @ 10:13AM
pete thomson said...
The movie was okay but lacked real suspense- I would have liked to have seen more characterisation. The idea that these gangsters were the celebrities of their day against a often corrupt policeforce could have been explored a lot more. The consequences of their robberies and random violence was overlooked. I found it disappointingly slow. Lacked the bite of Scorsesse so more of a wasted opportunity than a must see movie. I wonder also if Depp an Bale were just not up to the job, both were a little restrained, though the scene of Dillinger wandering through the anti-Dillinger office was good it lacked tension.
Reply
7-07-2009 @ 7:31PM
macgregor said...
i agree that there wasn't much if any suspense in the scene where dillinger walks through the anti-dillinger office. though i also believe that there wasn't supposed to be any suspense. i thought it felt like kind of a dreamy or a what if type sequence. i'm positive dillinger didn't actually walk through the police station and calmly wonder into an office dedicated to him, but if had happened, i think it would have been somewhat like the movie sequence.
7-18-2009 @ 1:39AM
americanogle said...
There's only one legitimate place I've found to watch it, the rest seem like scams :-/ You can see it over here though: http://vostuu.com/watch28015.html
It takes a minute to load but after that it's good to go :)
7-01-2009 @ 12:37PM
Dan said...
I definitely dug the movie quite a bit, but I have a few things that didn't sit with me right. I'm not sure if this was because of some of the more uncomfortable settings that came with my theatre, or the movie itself, but in any case, I think this is a flick I will want to watch again to fully appreciate.
Not as good as some other of Mann's previous projects, but certainly still damn good.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 12:11AM
moviegal said...
I pledge not to watch any of Bale's movies and Im not giving my money to Depp and Cotillard who hate the U.S.
Depp and Cotillard must have forgotten Hollywood is not in France.
Reply
7-03-2009 @ 2:28PM
Jessica said...
I have to say that you are really misinformed if you actually believe Johnny hates the US? Umm he was born here. He was raised not far from where Dillinger was born too. He has a home in Hollywood where he spends alot of time. He also has kids who he keeps grounded by living in France, England and his Island away from the Hollywood life that has ruin so many kids of the stars.
Why would you ever think he hated the US? As for Marion whe is French and lives in both places too. I would too if I had that kind of money.
shame on you for being stupid ill informed and bigoted. How dare anyone live in other countries too. Oh gee it's so bad to want your kids cultured and safe and not buy into the Hollywood crap.
He still has a home right about Sunset Blv and lives there whenever he is in the US so how Hollywood can you get?
The movie was amazing and so were all the stars. If you have a brain you will love this movie. It's not about robots or other mindless crap out there.
sigh..........
7-02-2009 @ 2:54PM
Matt said...
Thanks for the great review, this is exactly why I come to Cinematical: An intelligent breakdown of the movie and its characters without giving too much of the story away. I was already interested in the movie due to the actors cast and I'm glad to read that it's approach to the story is both current and retro.
BTW, moviegal, your comments make no sense. Pledge away, but please keep it to yourself. You add nothing to a possible discussion of the merits of the movie.
Reply
7-03-2009 @ 1:34AM
ajadoniz said...
did anyone else notice the roughness of the editing? was it intentional or product of the way it was shot? either way, i felt as it cheapened it in trying to depict the film with the same antiqueness as the story.
Reply
7-03-2009 @ 6:58AM
ZGal said...
Dissapointing flick. Did little to highlight Depp's tremendous strengths. Was VERY slow moving inbetween shoot-em-up scenes. The best acting occurred toward the end, but unfortunately, it was to little too late. Wait for the video.
Reply
7-03-2009 @ 1:56PM
michuk said...
My review on my Filmaster movie blog here: http://michuk.filmaster.com/review/public-enemies-are-just-regular-fellows/
Overall, it's a decent movie with great plot and a proper ratio of action and dialogue (if you watched latest Transformers you know what I mean) and as far as action dramas are concerned, this one is at least as big as "Heat" (which is in my personal Top 5 in the category) or maybe bigger. A truly epic movie, worth recommending!
Reply
7-04-2009 @ 3:50PM
Gab and Dad said...
This movie didn't suck, nor was it a classic. It had weaknesses of characterization and engagement; but there's a lot of artistry, and pleasure in the surface of the performances. See me review it with my father at www.youtube.com/gabndad
Reply
7-14-2009 @ 5:08AM
Ryan said...
Really looking forward to see this. Have always been a huge fan of Michael Mann! I just wonder if I will have too much expectations, as I kinda set Mann's "Heat" as the benchmark crime movie. Cheers.:D
http://www.discountshopping2k.com
Reply
7-16-2009 @ 10:20AM
Jason said...
One character, very drunk, makes just about the worst James Cagney impression I’ve ever heard. That’s what this movie is. It’s a Universal film pretending to be a revisionist rendition of the Warner Bros. Gangster films. It’s a bad impression of William Wellman’s film The Public Enemy, starring Cagney. If only it had been more homage than revision. This film could have used the other’s gritty realism, instead of the fantasy world in which Public Enemies comfortably resides. I also wouldn’t have minded if someone had shoved a grapefruit in Billie Frechette’s face when she began to cry.
Read my full review at http://cfilmc.wordpress.com/
Reply
7-16-2009 @ 5:49PM
Todd D said...
This will be a great movie.
Todd D.
http://www.jordomedia.com/RSS/l_op=viewrss/lid=75989.html
Reply
8-07-2009 @ 5:48AM
DG said...
The movie was good like any other movie of Depp. I did like the movie, actually the gang bang scene was awsome. I did read all the reviews and people are complaining about the lack of the suspense. Well people there should be no suspense in the movie as you all know about Dillinger. Well for me every penny worth it. Looking for more to come.
Reply