How Self-Aware is Adam Sandler?
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom
In the new film Funny People, comedian Adam Sandler plays an actor remarkably similar to, well, Adam Sandler. His character, George Simmons, is a former stand-up comic who's become obscenely wealthy and famous through a series of patently terrible films with titles like Merman and Dog's Best Friend (Erik Davis wrote about these movies-within-the-movie and shared clips -- check it out here). Now a little older and trying to beat a possibly fatal medical condition, Simmons takes a new look at his life -- including the crappy but wildly popular movies that made him a star.The fake movies are truly awful. But not any worse than some of abysmal actual movies made by Sandler himself, like Little Nicky, Eight Crazy Nights, Mr. Deeds, You Don't Mess with the Zohan, etc. Since the character is so baldly modeled on Sandler, one can't help but wonder what he thinks about the parodies that he helped to create, to make fun of his own career.
Funny People director Judd Apatow and Sandler are longtime friends. They were roommates before Sandler became famous, and the film even starts with an old video that Apatow shot in 1991 of Sandler making a crank call to a deli. Obviously, the line between Simmons and Sandler is deliberately blurred, and the audience is supposed to recognize that the bad movies George Simmons makes are a reference to many of the bad movies that Sandler makes. But how in on the joke is Sandler?
Given the context and his participation, it's impossible that Sandler was oblivious. So that leaves two options: Either he thinks his movies -- movies that, for the most part, he developed, co-wrote, and produced -- are underrated, and that the parodies are spoofing the critical perception of his work, not the actual quality, or he knows that the movies are crap, and has no trouble making fun of them.
If it's the first, then the man lives in a sadly sheltered world of yes-men and toadies, and lacks the critical faculties to judge quality cinema. But it's more likely the second -- that he knows that he makes bad movies and doesn't care. And that, in its own way, is even worse.
Because even knowing that they're bad, Adam Sandler keeps making really crappy movies. Zohan aside, he usually doesn't star in them anymore, distancing himself as a star from the stinkiness of the product. His production company is responsible for the Deuce Bigalow movies, Paul Blart: Mall Cop, Grandma's Boy, and The Benchwarmers, among others, and even though he's not the star, he's the one getting them made, and hiring his pals to write and direct them. If Sandler knows that they're crap -- and these parodies would indicate that he does -- then he's something worse than a sheltered star with no taste. He's a producer who cold-bloodedly churns out dreck aimed at the lowest common denominator simply to make bucketloads of cash, and then mocks his own movies to make himself look above it all.
Then again, maybe he really doesn't know. It's notable that as bad as George Simmons' movies are, the character doesn't ever disavow them entirely, and even considers making Merman 2. And in real life, Sandler's movie factory has a number of dumb comedies in various stages of production, including Grownups, written by Little Nicky/Mr. Deeds scribe Tim Herlihy, and helmed by Zohan/Benchwarmers director Dennis Dugan.
But it's difficult, if not impossible, to believe that Sandler could have reached the level of success that he has and be that clueless, which makes his performance in Funny People both disingenuous and calculated. Sandler gets to play a semi-dramatic version of himself who regrets the mistakes he's made, giving us the impression that he's matured and grown as both a performer and as a person. Meanwhile, in real life he keeps making the same lousy crap as always, and raking in the money.
It's all sort of brilliant, really. And sort of horrible.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
7-30-2009 @ 10:39AM
Brandon said...
Well I think your an idiot... Yes Adam Sandler acted, produced and directed in some of those movies. To all people there not crap. You compared Mr Deeds to Zohan and Nicky which shows that your tatse is way off base. I think Apatow + Sandler is going to be a knock out, Adam has always had so much fun making his movies and had his freinds involved with him in the process. I think your just jealous you are not in Zohan yourself having fun with the sand-man and his freinds. Keep making your movies Adam. We love them.
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 11:43AM
Rico said...
Man, I love the internet.
Aaaaanyway, I'd agree with one of your claims, that he knows he makes god-awful movies and just doesn't care. I have to say, however, that I don't think that makes him worse than a pampered, delusional movie star.
He makes "bad" products, yes; but the audiences keep coming back. Whose fault is that? For god's sake, G-Force was the top-grossing movie this past weekend - is that a comment on the filmmakers, or the slack-jawed audiences that pay for such drivel?
7-29-2009 @ 3:08PM
C.A. said...
Classic! "your an idiot" and "To all people there not crap." It's almost like poetry and I love it. "Your" awesome Brandon!
7-29-2009 @ 7:33PM
Brandon said...
Let me ask this, Reign Over Me. It was a great job and Adam Sander did an amazing job in the movie. He got no credit for the movie at all. Punch Drunk Love, another great movie. Adam recieved alot of negitive feedback when those movies came out. People want just a movie that is funny and you dont need to think, you just go in and laugh. I for one thougt Paul Blart was a very good movie and much better than Observe and Report which was basically the same movie. Adam is taking on less cheesy roles as a actor himself, Funny People and there will be more to come. He is one of the best comedy filmstars still around. Hence the reason Judd Aptow and Adam are teaming up. Judd Aptow has written and directed and launched success of many up and coming actors. THis movie is going to be smart and funny and make you want to cry. I just hope you have something decent to say after you watch it.
7-29-2009 @ 11:59AM
roshow said...
I think there's a third way to look at it. You can make self deprecating humor about yourself, and your work in this case, and not think you're crap.
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:00PM
roshow said...
Also, remember, the character maybe patterned on Sandler but the story is fiction and it's a drama. So you can't say because the character regrets his decisions that it means Sandler does too.
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:03PM
Scott K. said...
There's a third option. He's not making them for critics, but for people who occasionally enjoy "lowest common denominator" movies. None are good, in the strictest sense, but they serve a purpose and some find them entertaining. Okay, I doubt anybody found Little Nicky entertaining, but I know a lot of people who found Zohan hilarious (I haven't seen it) and I thought Mr Deeds was cute, harmless fun and found it entertaining.
And each of these fake movies have been made (under different names). Often more than once. And by other people than Adam Sandler.
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:42PM
Kevin said...
Precisely. Dawn seems to be saying that a movie can be one of two things- good or crap. If its not a good movie than it must be a terrible movie. Well, you can make movies that are not good that still serve a secondary purpose. Sandler has this down to a science. He makes films that are truly horrible, but that a large number of people really enjoy. Should he stop making movies that millions of people like just because you think they're shit? Hell, I despise virtually every one of Sandlers movies (including most of the "classics") but I'm not so arrogant as to claim that he shouldn't be making them at all. Who am I (or you Dawn) to tell millions of people that they're stupid and shouldn't laugh at his jokes? Its a preposterous notion to claim that because he makes movies that he knows will A) make people laugh, and B) be considered terrible movies (which they frequently are) that he is some sort of calculating evil genius out to dumb down the country. It always perplexes me when a know-it-all critic/blogger comes out and blames the movie makers for putting out films that are terrible and make money. Its called capitalism. The public likes a product so a company provides it. Its basically the closest thing to a pure democracy the world has ever know, so lay off the guy.
7-29-2009 @ 5:50PM
madgamer said...
I loved little nicky and hated Zohan, so that just goes to show that people do indeed view these movies differently. I think he knows that his movies aren't high art, but that some people enjoy them (and they make him $$$), so he keeps churning them out. All I can say is good for him and keep them coming, as I enjoy the occasional hit even if there is a miss or two in between.
7-30-2009 @ 9:59AM
Delgado said...
Kevin, I get your point, but I think that you can be both entertained mindlessly while still experiencing good movie making and writing. Look at The Hangover as a perfect recent example.
7-29-2009 @ 12:05PM
tcosullivan said...
I think that Sandler movies have gotten progressively worse, as he has become MORE self-aware. He seems to try to inject a different element into his movies, be it likeability (Mr. Deeds) or physicality (Zohan). Billy Madison and Happy Gilmore were fun, stupid flicks; Zohan was just plain stupid. Why not more movies in the vein of 50 First Dates or Wedding Singer.
His Happy Madison productions are aimed at the lowest common denominator- but my pre-teen to tween kids sure love them!
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:08PM
Astin said...
I'd say he's well aware of how bad some of the movies he produces are. He also realizes that those are what make him money. Look at the success of Blart.
He found a character a long time ago - the loveable loser - and stuck with it. People still flock to see him do it, and when he goes beyond that role, people start to lose interest. He's not exactly the only star/producer in Hollywood who churns out crap for the money, he's just one of the more successful ones in comedy.
The problem is, that his characters, and those in his produced movies, are generally idiots. Stupid, slapsticky humour that is beneath the intelligentsia that are critics. So people become ashamed of the films, but Sandler knows they make people laugh, they make him laugh, and that's all that matters. If they never made money, they stop being made.
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:21PM
E-Rock said...
I see someone has a raging hard-on for Adam Sandler.
Don't get me wrong, I think most young men did at one point, but u have to admit he fell off in the late 90's and hit rock bottom with the eye poison that was "Zohan".
And just when I thought he couldn't be any dumber, he goes and does something like "Funny People"...and toootallllly redeeeems himself! Hopefully anyway.
BTW, Eight Crazy Nights is damn funny, so that's a technical foul.
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:33PM
Mangorilla said...
Maybe he's only self-aware after the fact. I can't believe that any director or writer, especially in comedy, sets out to deliberately make a piece of garbage film. In their own minds, I'm sure they're all brilliant ideas on paper. Even the writer/director of Manos: The Hands of Fate believed he was making a great film at the time. The question is, are you delusional like Michael Bay, who believes he has created true masterpieces that should be required viewing for all humans, or are you humble enough to say, "Yeah, ok... it wasn't great." And Adam Sandler comes from the school of Saturday Night Live, where seemingly good ideas instantly turn into disasterous trainwrecks, often as they're being played out. But I don't believe he's delusional about how good or bad they turn out. And I'm sure there's some frustrations being aired in these movies-within-movies that he's come up with. Funny People is a serious role for Sandler. He has done the serious roles before, but people still know him mostly for Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, SNL, etc. People flocked to Zohan, but not many people have seen punch Drunk Love or Spanglish. So maybe while he wants to do more serious work, he recognizes that audiences still prefer silly Adam. I hope Funny People does well though, because it looks good and we need to encourage films that have some meaning these days. As for the movies he's produced lately, I think maybe these young comedians are approaching him with their ideas, and he's making them happen. He seems like the kind of guy that likes to give back. And many of the movies that Adam has produced have built the careers of younger, or at least lesser known comedians.
Reply
7-30-2009 @ 8:31AM
Kevin said...
Well said reply to my comment Mangorilla. My view is that Sandler makes movies that he probably doesn't think are crap but that he knows the critics will think are crap. I believe (and agree) that his view is merely that a movie that is intended to make people laugh is a Good film if it accomplishes its goal, regardless of whether it has any artistic or intellectual value. So it can be a piece of garbage if it meets one of your three criteria, and he strives to provide the most entertainment, and damn the other two check points. Do I wish he that he would spend more time trying to make meaningful, more challenging films? I guess so, but at the same time I don't get mad at him the way some people do for making movies that I personally dont' enjoy. Millions of others do, and I'm glad that they have a better time sitting through his movies then me. I think we're on the same page, but I just wanted to rant again because the arrogance of bloggers and critics always astounds me. When a terrible Eddie Murphy movie, or G-Force, or Transformers makes a ton of money they always get on their pedestal and start yelling about how stupid Americans are, and how awful Michael Bay is, etc., just because everyone else has a different matrix that they judge movies on. It would seem obvious that the vast majority of americans look at movies not as art, but as entertainment. By that standard, if a movie entertains than its a good movie. Don't blame others just because they want something different then what you want.
7-30-2009 @ 8:34AM
Kevin said...
*canNOT be a piece of garbage...
7-29-2009 @ 12:43PM
Jay Seaver said...
This wouldn't be the first time Sandler has taken some shots at the movies that he made his name on; "Punch Drunk Love" was in some ways a vicious take-down of the meek-until-enraged character he'd built his career on, pointing out that this guy could be flat-out scary once you put him in an even vaguely realistic setting.
As to how cynical the whole cycle is, I don't know. I think it's more timid than cynical, actually - he's willing to work with good directors on more ambitious projects, but when things like "Punch Drunk Love" and "Spanglish" are relative commercial failures, he retreats back to what has worked for him in the past.
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:45PM
Kevin said...
Please provide the accepted definition of "piece of garbage film"...
Reply
7-29-2009 @ 12:46PM
Kevin said...
That was supposed to be a reply to "mangorilla"
7-29-2009 @ 5:02PM
Mangorilla said...
Piece of garbage film: A film lacking any artistic, intellectual, or entertainment value; an overall waste of film.
I take your point, and that was my point as well, but I didn't articulate it very well. "Good movies" or "bad movies" are all relative to one's personal tastes. All I meant was that nobody sets out to make a film that everyone hates. But sometimes in retrospect, a writer or director will admit that the end porduct wasn't as they imagined it, and not as good as they had hoped. In those cases, they either admit that it wasn't great, or they're delusional and will fight tooth and nail to defend their work. Adam at least seems to have a sense of humor about the ones that didn't quite work out as he had hoped.