Review: Funny People
Filed under: Comedy, Theatrical Reviews

In the new film Funny People, Ira Wright, the character played by Seth Rogen, reveals more or less inadvertently that the reason he became a stand-up comedian was because he was ridiculed by his classmates as a boy. This is probably one of the film's most profound moments, although it hardly treats it as such; but there's a long and illustrious history of comedy serving the purpose of concealing people's feelings, both on and off screen. And filtered through the meta-movie stardom of Adam Sandler's ailing A-lister, Funny People is precisely about the walls people put up in one way or another to protect themselves from emotional harm – which, as the film observes, almost always become a prison for the person who builds them.
Sandler plays George Simmons, a mega-comedian and movie star who decides to "return to his roots" in stand-up after a doctor diagnoses him with a rare and inoperable disease that gives him only a limited time to live. After a disastrous appearance at a local club, George meets Rogen's Ira, an aspiring comedian who mines a few laughs out of his performance, and he hires Ira to write jokes for him, and eventually, to work as his personal assistant. But when George reconnects with his ex-girlfriend Laura (Leslie Mann), who is now married to a daffy Australian huckster named Clarke (Eric Bana), he begins to truly reconsider his affluent but empty lifestyle.
It's tough to know how close to the bone Apatow cut in his fictional portrayal of a modern comedy star who revels in success but loathes his work, but casting Sandler was a stroke of genius, especially since the funnyman has always had a cagey relationship with critics and the media. That's not to say that Sandler is Simmons, merely that the film creates an effective self-parody for the actor, whether it's accurate or pure audience association. At the same time, Sandler seems to have found a perfect role that exploits both his comedic chops and his burgeoning dramatic skills, the which have certainly been displayed memorably (see the uneven but underrated Spanglish, or especially Punch-Drunk Love) but not yet in equally effective measures; here, he gets to be the doofus, the snarky king of punchlines and the sincere straight man, wandering through his own life with too much of others' expectations reflected back upon him and not enough of himself.Meanwhile, Funny People has been broadly championed as Apatow's most personal film to date, but I wonder if that is less because of the director's own comments than the perception that a comedian "going serious," even by a matter of degrees, must necessarily constitute a passion project. That said, it's certainly his most human and deeply felt film, but at most this feels like a tribute to his own wife and family, all of whose members make an appearance; otherwise, it continues the writer-director's trend of depicting relationships in realistic and often unflattering dimensions, while finding the humor and heart in all that messy reality.
Unfortunately, the film's lackadaisical structure undermines some of its dramatic momentum, and it feels overlong without having too many specific scenes or moments that should be excised; while I watched Funny People I was reminded occasionally of the 40-Year-Old Virgin Extended Edition cut, where I enjoyed all of the new material and extended scenes by themselves but recognized that the theatrical version was simply better dramatically. Unlike many of its detractors, I wasn't bothered by the end, either in terms of its developments or its duration, but think that some of the earlier sequences could have been tightened without losing the character development or just the humor, which is probably why when the film gets down to business in the final act it feels like it's been such a long time coming.In fact, the end of the film is precisely what makes Funny People a triumph; watching its final scene, I was reminded of movies I consider classic of this same comedic-dramatic genre, like About Schmidt, where the ending seems like it will never come, but when it does, it works so beautifully it doesn't need to be one second longer. Apatow understands that the character's realization is enough, and that we don't need another decade, much less two more hours, to watch him 12-step his way back into the audience's hearts.
Meanwhile, there are countless other charms to mention, including the film's painfully accurate depiction of Hollywood ambition among the almost-theres, its portrayal of the feeling of being on stage as a stand-up, and among an ensemble of great performances, Eric Bana's standout turn as Laura's earnest-doofus husband, who scarcely can keep his foot out of his mouth even as he offers sincere if painfully uninformed philosophical platitudes. But as a whole, Funny People is one of the summer's, if not the year's best films, because it's a comedy that inverts the medium's typical use – effectively revealing feelings rather than concealing them – and invites the audience to share in that discovery.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-31-2009 @ 9:22AM
Drewbacca said...
While the premise vaguely reminds me of "Punchline", (Tom Hanks, Sally Field), I admit that I'm looking forward to seeing this for the cast alone.
I never really cared for the "serious" Sandler films, (although his over-the-top "silly" films were atrocious).
Judging from the trailers and the critical response, it SEEMS that this will be one of the best films Apatow has done.
(I'm sure plenty of people with either agree or disagree with this comment within the next few days)
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 12:45PM
What the Frack?! said...
Apatow to me is brilliant. Especially when he's the director (some of his writing/producing credits I don't seem to enjoy as much though). The friends that he has made since Freaks and Geeks and mentored through Undeclared and brought up to now is just awesome. When you listen to his commentaries you can tell that he is just a really cool guy to work with.
And that is where I am going to say that I totally agree with Drewbacca about seeing it for the cast. Which makes the rest of the movie an extra special bonusy treat because I too think that it will end up being on of his best films.
7-31-2009 @ 4:42PM
Jim said...
Judd Apatow is going to do what noone else has been able to do; That is, force me to see a film with Adam Sandler in it. Through all of Apatow's films, and those that have been influenced by him, inside the laughs and the grossout humour are probably the most honest portrayals of relationships (Male, Female, or otherwise) that you'll see on screen. Apatow really understands that its not the grand gestures, but its those devilish details and idiosyncratic things that people do that add up to who you really are. His characters are never types, they all have angles, edges, and things to discover about them. Its been his stock in trade since Freaks and Geeks, so why stop now? Now, if he finds a way to make Sandler a whole lot less annoying and whiny, I'll call him a genius ;)
Reply
8-02-2009 @ 3:43AM
JeffreyVC said...
I really enjoyed this film and agree entirely with the review. Many label the film as self-indulgent and too long, but I think to be honest in its account, Funny People needs more than the usual funny movie's one and a half hours to actually probe into George Simmons life. I found myself growing more attached to the characters as it progressed, both hating and feeling bad for George as he fell in and out of his own vices. Great film, great review.
- JeffreyVC
cinemasoldier.com
Reply
8-24-2009 @ 9:30AM
BIGGAFF said...
If you hate someone, send them to see the misnamed, “Funny People.” If you hate yourself, go with them.
I saw my first movie in 1950, few have been worse than this trash basket of a film.
The red flags went up when I saw the 150 minute running time; in a film that long, you should see chariots racing around the coliseum in Rome, Atlanta burning or Normandy being invaded. If you have a great imagination, you might be able to piece together two good minutes out of this whole mess.
Basically, the silent surveillance tapes at a Dollar Store, would be more amusing.
I turn to my colleagues for guidance in dealing with this nightmare waste of time. Stacy Coleman once wrote about another film, “this movie stole over two hours from my life, which I will never get back.” Months ago, Mckelvie Wilder was the first critic to give a film zero stars, “Funny People” deserves to be the second.
Like Macbeth, I prayed for sleep and sleep would not come.
THIS IS ONE OF THOSE HORRID MOVIES WHICH PEOPLE ASSUME CAN'T BE THAT BAD
AND SO, THEY TRY TO ATTACH SOME DEEP AND PHILOSOPHICAL MEANING TO THE
CRAP THAT IS BEFORE THEM -- THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES, BUT IF WE RECOGNIZE THAT VERY OBVIOUS FACT, WE HAVE TO ADMIT WE WERE DUPED OUT OF THE PRICE OF THE TICKET.
I WAS VERY PROUD TO SEE THAT MY FELLOW CRITICS WERE ABLE TO SEE THE EMPEROR LEFT THE CASTLE UNPREPARED FOR THE WEATHER CONDITIONS OF THE DAY - HE WAS BUTT NAKED.
ALL THREE POINTED OUT MAJOR FLAWS AND FRANKLY SPEAKING, THE FILM IS A GIANT SIZED FLAW - YOU CAN ALMOST HEAR THE WRITERS SITTING AROUND SAYING LETS DO THIS AND LETS DO THAT AS IF THEY WERE MAKING UP INDIVIDUAL SKITS FOR A JUNIOR HIGH ASSEMBLY PERFORMANCE >> EMINEM AND RAY ROMANO.
I wish to apologize to junior high school students for demeaning their efforts with my comparison to this train wreck of a "film."
A RANDOM LAUGH, NOW AND THEN AND A WONDERFUL SEGMENT WITH GREAT BANTER BETWEEN A TALL DOCTOR AND HIS HOSTILE PATIENT, DOES NOT MAKE THIS A WORTHY FILM. IT MAKES THIS MORE A MATTER OF THROWING MUD AGAINST A WALL AND SEEING WHAT STICKS. I FELT EMBASSASSED FOR THE ACTORS -- IT WAS PAINFUL TO WATCH THEM TRY TO KEEP THIS PUPPY FROM DROWNING IN THE BOTTOMLESS PIT.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ONE LAST POINT - THE NEED SOME FEEL TO "PROTECT" THIS DIRECTOR BY SUPPORTING HIS MISCARRIAGE WITH
"FUNNY PEOPLE," IS MISPLACED LOYALTY. STANLEY KUBRICK WAS ONE OF THE GREATEST DIRECTORS OF ALL TIME AND YET, HE DROPPED THE BALL WITH "EYES WIDE SHUT" AND TRYING TO COVER THAT UP WITH PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY IS INSULTING TO THE
AUDIENCE -- RECOGNIZE THAT YOUR GUY MESSED UP AND FREE HIM TO MOVE ONWARD AND UPWARD WITH A
BETTER FILM NEXT TIME - AND I KNOW IT WILL BE A BETTER FILM NEXT TIME -- THIS WAS ROCK BOTTOM.
OKAY, I AM ENJOYING KICKING THIS THIS TRASH CAN A LITTLE TOO MUCH, I WILL SIGN OFF AND LET TIME HEAL THE WOUNDS FROM THIS EXPERIENCE.
Reply