Monday Night Poll: 'Funny People' Gender Divide?
Filed under: Comedy, Universal, Fandom, Moviefone Feedback, Polls

Are you a man or a woman? That may be the essential reason why you either loved or hated Judd Apatow's Funny People, starring Adam Sandler as a comedian facing a mid-life crisis. Marketing research firm CinemaScore says that men graded the movie B+ but women only granted it C+. As reported by Los Angeles Times, that translates into: "men generally liked it ... most women did not."
Which is puzzling to me, because, as I was watching it (alone again, naturally), it didn't strike me as the kind of movie that might polarize the sexes. Now, I can understand the overall audience being smaller than something like the latest Harry Potter. Our own Eugene Novikov surmised as much in his box office summary, pointing out that attempting to market the film "as a typical Adam Sandler comedy was quixotic, and as another laugh riot from the Apatow factory only marginally less so." Yet, I would have anticipated that men and women who had seen Apatow's earlier directorial efforts, The 40-Year Old-Virgin and Knocked Up -- or any of the films of Adam Sandler -- would have a good idea what to expect, as far as the level of raunch and a view of women as generally cranky and more than a little scary. Did Funny People go too far?
Enlighten us, please. Take our poll of the sexes and let us know: Why did you like Funny People? Why didn't you like Funny People? And did you fight about it on the way home? Feel free to elaborate in the comments section.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-03-2009 @ 9:13PM
Dinah said...
Lots of potential reasons for this:
1. It's another dude movie, by dudes, starring lots of dudes, written from a dude's perspective. Thanks to Apatow, either as a director or producer or simply an enabler, there have been A LOT of these lately. It's possible women are just tired of feeling left out of the fun.
2. Apatow's kids and Sarah Silverman aside, there are two (count 'em) women in this story. One is an unsympathetic comedienne who sleeps with the protagonist's douchey roommate for no discernible reason. The other is a high-strung ex-actress who cheats on her husband while her kids hang out with man she barely knows less than 200 yards away. It's possible women are tired of being represented as nags and/or sluts.
3. It wasn't just raunchy. It was raunchy because of all the dick jokes. Dick jokes guys might rate as a B+ and women might just rate as C+. Wouldn't be the first time in the history that's happened where dicks are concerned.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 12:58AM
Dash said...
This movie Flat-out Fucking sucked hard, for a movie called "Funny people" it WAS NOT funny 1/10 from me. p.s Fuck Eminem or what ever the fuck his name is.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 2:05AM
Manvir said...
thats a bit much. the movie WAS funny and EMINEM was fucking hilarious. idk if your half retarded or something cause most of the jokes were laugh out loud funny and the story was actually good. this is deff on the top of aptows work right next to 40 year old virgin and knocked up. this was more personal and you could feel it. im just glad im not you and i actually enjoyed this movie alot.
8-04-2009 @ 9:16AM
Pat Keenan said...
every character in that movie besides seth rogen was a jerk. and its kind of hard to try to care about a bunch of jerks.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 9:27AM
NP said...
A good writer can make you care about the jerks he/she is writing about.
8-04-2009 @ 9:20AM
G said...
I'm a woman. I liked the movie a lot.
I hate it when they try to divide movies based on gender. If a movie is well-written and acted why does it have to be a guy-movie or a girl-movie? I thought it was funny and sad and I wasn't counting how many women were in it or whether there should be more of a female perspective - the movie was about a guy. Guys have guy friends - guys hang out with guys in their field whether they are commedians or not. Women do the same thing. I think it's more a question of personality and what kind of comedy/dramas you like and less a question of whether you are a man or a woman. I still crack up at the "Forty-Year-Old Virgin."
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 9:34AM
E-Rock said...
"Funny People" definitely wasn't Apatow's best, but it was still funny. It wasn't the funniest comedy of the year because it was a DRAMEDY!!! And for those who didn't realize that should go and do their best impression of a lemur jumping off a cliff.
I saw this movie with my girl and we both enjoyed Sandler and Rogen's performances as well as the dick jokes. Why are some women so squeamish when it comes to jokes about junk? I guess it's based on the person's maturity. We think it's funny when they pop up in comedies (Sarah Marshall, Bruno, Zack & Miri, etc.), but we're also mature enough to "get it" or not be distracted by it in other movies (Eastern Promises, Watchmen, Boogie Nights).
I'm not even a big fan of Eminem, but I still thought he was alright in the movie. I noticed from some of the haters in the audience that the second Em appeared on screen it was almost like a knee-jerk reaction for them to groan immediately.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 1:04PM
Mimi said...
I didn't like this at all, as it's yet another guy flick that marginalizes women.
I don't think I've ever seen a film with Sandler that I liked, I really really dislike Rogen and I've come to realize Aptow probably doesn't like women.
Why did I go? It was my guy's turn to select a film... and he wanted to see it. I'm seriously reconsidering the relationship.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 6:25PM
madgamer said...
I didn't like the movie much at all. It was like a chick flick, but replace the female leads with dudes and have some dick-jokes thrown in every ten minutes to keep you from forgetting that it is supposed to be a comedy. I liked the few bits of comedy but not the rest. Seth and Joah Hill were about the only redeeming things in this movie.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 7:18PM
Alexander S said...
I think the more pressing issue is why every other post on cinematical is turning into some kind of gender related diatribe
Reply