Paul Giamatti, Please Be a Little More Selective

Oh, Paul Giamatti. He's the man you can't help but love and respect. He's got acting chops on all sides of the fence, being able to play it straight and serious just as much as over-the-top ridiculous and campy -- in other words, the perfect combination. Giamatti has come a long way since he popped up as Kissing Man in Singles, and these days, he's the kind of actor who might even lead you to movies you would not have otherwise considered. But now the man needs to get a little more selective.
For ages, he's been attached to Bubba Nosferatu, a project that got immensely worrisome when Bruce Campbell exited over the screenplay (only to get Ron Perlman). It might seem like a project going nowhere, but according to the new Elvis, the film will finally play out during Perlman's Sons of Anarchy hiatus. And Giamatti is still on-board. Strike one: Sticking with this project post-Campbell when the original barely made it to the screen and the film's fans don't want Bubba without Bruce.
But really -- it's inevitable that an actor will take part in something you don't like. You can't please anyone all the time, and while it's a worrisome project, it's far from the worst.
And I'd be happy to accept it if not for the second strike: Becoming Larry for the Farrelly revamp of The Three Stooges. This was like a sword through the heart ... and I had thought Sean Penn was taking drugs ... I'm beginning to wonder if this remake is the Holy frakking Grail of Hollywood with the amount of talent it's attracting. I just don't get it, and I don't see why Giamatti would take it on. If it was a biopic, sure. Indulge in nostalgia, the challenge, and introduce a new audience to the charms of the Stooges. But as a Farrelly adaptation? Egads.
To be fair, he is balancing it with some intriguing fare. I can't wait to see him in Barney's Version, and I'm antsy to see how he takes on Philip K. Dick in The Owl in Daylight. But these two above -- Larry especially -- leaves a bad taste in my mouth and just make me ask: Why?
I realize that it's only two films, but I'm taking a cue from Miles and getting a little irrationally aggravated out of appreciation. He is better than a cult sequel and Larry mimicker. Don't you think?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-17-2009 @ 9:47AM
ronmoses said...
I agree whole-heartedly about the Stooges thing. I can't imagine for the life of me why anyone thinks that project is a good idea, and I pray it never sees the light of day. I'd rather see Bryan Singer direct a BSG reboot movie. ((shudder))
But I have to disagree about Bubba, at least in regards to what it says about Giamatti's judgment. Sure, Bruce Campbell dropped out, presumably for perfectly valid creative reasons, and as a result the film is probably doomed. Granted. So Giamatti could take the cynical view and bail, or he could stick to his commitments and ride it out. I think you could make the argument that it was poor judgment to sign on to this project in the first place (and I'd agree), but once you're committed to doing a film, there are a lot of people whose investments of time and/or money depend on your name being attached to that film. Jumping ship the moment the wind changes direction might be a smart career move, but it doesn't make it the right thing to do, and I don't think it's fair to condemn the guy for honoring a commitment.
Oh... and how you managed to write this article without mentioning Lady In The Water, I have no idea.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 9:13PM
fromsomeonewhoknows said...
On 3 stooges- don't believe everything you hear my friend
Reply
8-28-2009 @ 9:12PM
Holly said...
I still think the Three Stooges thing is a big hoax. But if not, maybe he just wants to blow off a little steam? He's been the critical acclaimed award winning indie darling for the past few years which is awesome, but maybe he wants do stupid for a while.
Reply