The Geek Beat: The Everymen of Summer 2009
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, The Geek Beat, Summer Movies

So, last week I rated and ranked the geekier girls of the summer blockbuster season, and now it's time for the men to be sorted and judged. Last year, I didn't bother to rank them and just gave the prize to Harvey Dent and predicted that Wolverine would take it this year. Well, we all know that isn't going to happen. Sorry, Logan, it hurts me as much as it hurts you. Maybe you'll earn the prize in 2012 or whenever it is you go to Japan.
Actually, the boys of summer have proved to be a bit of a challenge. It's hard to believe, but I think the girls actually fared better in terms of variety and interest. When trying to sort out who is the better man, I really feel that all our muscle bound and star-powered heroes came out a little wanting. It didn't look that way going into the season -- there was Wolverine, John Connor, Captain Kirk, Duke and Snake Eyes. Surely one of them would take the Coolest Guy of Summer, right? Wrong.
Now, admittedly on that list I have only seen Star Trek (Terminator: Salvation has long since vanished from the multiplex, and funds keep me from G.I. Joe), but while all had their fans and were enjoyable films, not one character jumped out as a star player. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto were certainly good (the latter especially), but I still feel they're a bit of a wait-and-see at this point. Another Trek film could dash their wow factor altogether. Sure, that seems unlikely, but think to the summer of 2008. Did you imagine that you'd walk out of your theater thinking Wolverine and John Connor were downright blah?
Actually, the boys of summer have proved to be a bit of a challenge. It's hard to believe, but I think the girls actually fared better in terms of variety and interest. When trying to sort out who is the better man, I really feel that all our muscle bound and star-powered heroes came out a little wanting. It didn't look that way going into the season -- there was Wolverine, John Connor, Captain Kirk, Duke and Snake Eyes. Surely one of them would take the Coolest Guy of Summer, right? Wrong.
Now, admittedly on that list I have only seen Star Trek (Terminator: Salvation has long since vanished from the multiplex, and funds keep me from G.I. Joe), but while all had their fans and were enjoyable films, not one character jumped out as a star player. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto were certainly good (the latter especially), but I still feel they're a bit of a wait-and-see at this point. Another Trek film could dash their wow factor altogether. Sure, that seems unlikely, but think to the summer of 2008. Did you imagine that you'd walk out of your theater thinking Wolverine and John Connor were downright blah?
No, this summer belonged to something other than admantium-laced mutants, post-apocalyptic Messiahs, or pumped up Joes. To me, the defining characters were the most ordinary and unassuming fellows. They were men caught up in extraordinary circumstances who ended up defined more by their emotions than their martial art skills. Yep, you've probably guessed it -- my prize goes to Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) of Moon and Wikus Van De Merwe (Sharlto Copley) of District 9.

Both characters are defined by sheer drudgery and dullness. They're pencil pushers of the sort rarely seen in cinema, where everyone always seems to have cool jobs in asethetically pleasing offices. Hollywood doesn't like to portray actual working men and women who pound away at grimy keyboards, counting down the hours till they can go home to their families. It's ugly, awkward, and unhappy, and it's no accident that the only films willing to tackle how utterly dehumanizing corporate life is are rooted in sci-fi. Using the extraordinary to illustrate the ordinary has always been the mark of the genre. While I hesitate to say that either film really makes any grand pronouncements on the corporate culture, I think both lay out a very visible threat in Lunar Industries and MNU. The scariest thing about both isn't something as comic booky as "They want to take over the world!", but that they're a hideous mechanism that Sam and Wikus (and by extension, us) are totally complacent in. They just want to go home and cash that paycheck, and they just don't care about what goes on in the basement.
But Sam and Wikus are forced to care. And what's rather amusing and un-John Connorish is that both act out of sheer self-interest -- they just want to go home. They want their ordinary lives back. They don't give a crap whether they save anyone else (especially if those anyones are Prawns), and you can't quite trust either one of them. If you were with them on the moon or in District 9, there's no telling if they'd bring you along, or leave you to die. It's frightening and it's human, and in the end they both exemplify that part of humanity we want to believe in. Wikus and Sam both sacrifice something, and because it doesn't come with a surge of trumpets and adulation like John Connor or Captain Kirk expects, it's that much grander.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-18-2009 @ 6:15PM
Justin said...
excellent picks, certainly my favorite movies of the summer.
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 7:05PM
CParis said...
"there was Wolverine, John Connor, Captain Kirk, Duke and Snake Eyes...Now, admittedly on that list I have only seen Star Trek."
WTF? Talk about doing a thorough job.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 1:34AM
John Muth said...
So, do you think that she would have voted differently if she'd wasted money on each of the other movies? I personally applaud her for having the foresight - or just not being able to get to see them - to not see the other crap released this summer.
8-18-2009 @ 6:38PM
Coleman said...
I would actually have to agree with you on that Elisabeth except Moon (cause I haven't seen it yet cause I live in the middle of nowhere). District 9 was pure awesomeness and I really enjoyed the Wikus character evolution.
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 6:53PM
scott said...
Perfect choices!
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 6:58PM
Moo said...
Like Coleman, I sadly haven't seen Moon yet (though I don't have the same excuse...I just suck), but Wikus is a fantastic choice!
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 9:03PM
Julie said...
Well done. Great picks and I heartily agree. Both are fantastic films. I think I liked District 9 even more than Moon.
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 7:22PM
Tom Gerlick said...
I haven't yet seen Moon or D9 but your article made me think of the Clive Owen character from Children of Men.
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 8:35PM
Chupacabra said...
Agreed. Helps a lot that they were in the two best movies of the year (so far). It's been a good year for some original sci-fi, and with Avatar coming later it will get even better.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 1:56AM
Matt S. said...
If I had to pick what one male film character I would consider "nerdy" and an "everyman", then I would choose Tom Hansen played by Joseph Gordon-Levitt. Falling for a girl with emotional barriers, nearly impeccable taste in music, works at a job that isn't his passion and not what he trained for.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 2:17AM
aeromunch said...
I agree 100%. I was just noting today that these were two of the best sci-fi movies I've ever seen, and both (especially Moon) are carried on the backs of incredibly strong lead actors.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 7:30AM
Mac said...
After the whole 'movies i never want to see' debacle we now have another reviewer saying "there was Wolverine, John Connor, Captain Kirk, Duke and Snake Eyes...Now, admittedly on that list I have only seen Star Trek."
This is seriously lessening my love for you cinematical. I dont work for a film website and am fiscally challenged and I still managed to see all those films (whether they are crap or not) so I can least have a properly informed opinion on them.
That aside, Sam Bell gets my vote too!
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 7:47AM
Elisabeth said...
Actually, I have seen Wolverine, as noted at the beginning of the review. I wrote a pretty popular review on it.
The only two I hadn't seen are Terminator: Salvation and G.I. Joe. Nothing but bad buzz came out of Terminator, and as I valued the opinion of film critics who advised *against* seeing it, why not avoid it?
I also based my opinion of "G.I. Joe" on critics -- a lot of my colleagues loved the film, but agreed there weren't a lot of standout characters and that it was just the general spectacle that was enjoyable. I'm not the only online writer who hasn't seen it, incidentally, particularly since it didn't screen for the press. At least I'm being honest, few are.
I always form my own opinion on movies (I even went to The Spirit against all judgment), but honestly, what's the point of having film critics if you're not going to listen to them? If a film receives poor reviews, why flock to it and spend money I don't have so I can agree that yes, it does suck? Why give that money to Hollywood so they can make more crappy movies, and pride themselves on people NOT listening to critics?
It also seems a little arrogant to offer my own critical thought on any given topic while snubbing that of my colleagues. If I want people to listen to me, I *should* occasionally listen to them and steer clear of the theater, and wait for DVD.
8-19-2009 @ 6:47AM
Ryan said...
Snake Eyes is an icon that would be hard for any screenwriter to ruin due to the absence of dialogue. His character in the movie is basically unchanged from the comics and cartoons. Still, he's only second best this summer.
Number one is undoubtedly Carl Fredricksen.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 7:57AM
KON said...
MAC, this has a lot less to do with Cinematical & a lot more to do with yourself.
Why go & see a film if you know you're not going to like it?
You either want to see it so you can bitch and moan about how much of a waste of time it was, or you seriously enjoy punishing yourself.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 8:34AM
cosmos said...
So Mac, by your logic, unless a reviewer has seen every single film you've seen their opinion is not properly informed?
I'd think that if you actually had seen GI Joe and Terminator Salvation, like you say you have, you'd certainly know that they probably aren't worth your handbags-at-dawn attitude to this article (which is a thoughtful and personal account of these two characters).
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 8:58AM
Mac said...
No Cosmos, what I was saying was, if a reviewer is giving an opinion on a film they HAVENT seen, how is it properly informed?
And Kon, have you never watched a film that you were expecting nothing off and been pleasantly surprised? The amount of times I have heard people say, 'well, its not the sort of film I would usually watch' or 'I thought that was going to be crap but'. It happened last week strangely enough for a couple of friends when we went to watch...yes you guessed it...GI Joe!
All the film critics in the world could say a film is rubbish/excellent but doesnt mean you are going to agree with them. I would rather make up my own mind, critics are a rough guide, nothing else.
I try to only read reviews if I dont know much about the film. If its a film I already know I want to see I usually avoid reading the review until after I have seen it as I enjoy a film more the less I know about it.
And I did see both GI Joe (silly but fun) and Terminator (excellent action scenes and enjoyable but felt a little rushed and in need of a directors cut).
By the way Elisabeth, I have no problem with the rest of the article (Moon was one of my favourite films this year and cant wait to see District 9), just the line quoted.
Reply
8-19-2009 @ 1:35PM
Al Shut said...
I end up seeing most movies I gave a pass in the theather years later when they hit free TV. Pleasant suprises are clearly the exception that confirms the rule.
8-19-2009 @ 2:19PM
Steph said...
Great picks!
Sam Bell/Sam Rockwell has my top vote.
Reply