Fan Rant: When Marketing Leads Audiences Astray
Filed under: Fandom, Movie Marketing
Two unrelated events got me grumbling about movie marketing this week -- the DVD release of Adventureland, and a screening of Bobcat Goldthwait's new film, World's Greatest Dad. What these two films have in common, aside from being low-ish budget hybrid comedies, is that they've been sold to the public as something other than what they really are. It's not an uncommon marketing tactic by any means, and at some point we've all bought a movie ticket based on an ad, only to discover that we've been misled. But it seems that studios, when faced with the challenge of how to sell films that aren't easily described in two sentences, are increasingly willing to promote movies as something entirely different, just to get butts in seats on opening weekend.
Over at the blog PopMatters, writer Bill Gibron offered an excellent observation of the practice, noting that the theatrical marketing of Adventureland pimped it as a Superbad-style laugh fest, when in fact the movie's a much smaller, less raucous character study/coming-of-age flick. And the marketing backfired at the box office. "Fans coming in expecting more penis-laden laughs were legitimately let down by Adventureland's wistful, warm embrace," Gibron writes. "Instead of scatology, they got sentiment. [Greg] Motolla's motion picture tribute received good reviews but did mediocre business, moneywise."
In a somewhat similar fashion,Quentin Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds is bound to feel like a letdown to at least some of the moviegoers who've seen the ads and expect Tarantino to deliver his long-promised Sergio Leone-meets-The Dirty Dozen homage. The spaghetti western tone is there, certainly, but the Basterds themselves are just one component in a larger film that spends most of its time focused elsewhere. In fact, after setting up the squad of eight Jewish American soldiers led by Brad Pitt, we only get the sketchiest of character studies of two of them. Seen a second or third time, Tarantino's picture reveals itself to be a masterfully crafted work -- but on first viewing, it's jarring to realize that this isn't the movie being sold to the public, and it colors the viewing experience.
World's Greatest Dad, which opened in select cities and will be hitting the secondary markets this weekend, is another case in point. The trailer's quite funny, positioning the movie as an edgy comedy about a middle-aged man raising a typically annoying teenage boy. But what the film actually delivers is much darker, much more cringe-inducing and self-flagellating, with Robin Williams shrugging on the most extreme version of his patented sad-eyed schlub persona. And the son ... well, the son, played by Spy Kids' Daryl Sabara, is the most deliberately, unrelentingly repellent character to appear on film in recent memory.
To be fair, the premise (which can't be fully revealed here without producing a massive spoiler) is terrific. But the pacing of the film is typically slow, three-act indie movie stuff, with each set piece punctuated with predictably on-the-nose alt-rock songs, and a resolution so pat that you can see it coming down the road from ten miles away. Critics have mostly responded favorably to World's Greatest Dad, but it's hard to believe that audiences will be as pleased with what they get after seeing the advertising.
The blame falls squarely on the number-crunching which makes opening weekend grosses the studios' only concern. Get people into theaters that first weekend, the conventional wisdom goes, and the rest of the money can be made from foreign distribution, broadcast rights and video sales, even if word of mouth keeps audiences from buying tickets the second weekend. The losers in this scenario are film lovers who actually enjoy going to the movies, and who look to studios to honestly market their product.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-26-2009 @ 8:23PM
Michael Byng said...
I saw W.G.D. over the weekend. I had no idea that BLANK would BLANK himself BLANK BLANK. But it was a good turn. It reminded me of Chaos Theory a few years ago. It promised one thing then completely switched gears.
Reply
8-26-2009 @ 8:57PM
Drewbacca said...
....but what was the deal with BLANK skinny dipping??
8-26-2009 @ 9:12PM
Michael Byng said...
yea i actually didnt like the last five minutes....he shouldnt have told everyone BLANK really BLANK. And wouldnt that be a crime? To tamper with the kid's BLANK and lie to the BLANK officers.
8-26-2009 @ 9:00PM
Matt said...
Anyone who praises Adventureland then goes on to dish it out do disfavorably to World's Greatest Dad, deserves to be shot. Only one of these comedies will be remembered in 10 years, and it's not Adventureland.
Reply
8-26-2009 @ 9:47PM
frothygirl said...
Matt,
I don't perceive either of these movies to be comedies, that is precisely the problem. They are both great movies, but not the movies that were marketed to audiences.
Taking Woodstock, coming out this Friday, suffers the same fate.
The people marketing these movies are hindering their box office performance, not enhancing it.
8-26-2009 @ 9:45PM
Kurt said...
Fun marketing screw-up story.
On the DVD commentary for Se7en, Fincher talks about the horrible screenings that happened because they sent out requests that asked people if they wanted to see a new thriller starring Brad Pitt (Legends of the Fall) and Morgan Freeman (Driving Miss Daisy).
So they screened a movie to what was basically a house full of third grade teachers. One woman told Fincher that whoever directed that movie needed to be shot.
For me, the biggest marketing crime was Wicker Park, a very European-ish film about lies and love triangles, mis-branded as a psychological thriller. It's kind of an enjoyable movie, as long as you aren't expecting what you get.
Reply
8-27-2009 @ 1:41AM
cromag said...
funny thing about wicker park, during a test screening I saw, people in the audience were laughing when the couple kept missing each other, they should have sold it as a comedy.
8-26-2009 @ 11:02PM
Riley Freeman said...
the village misled me and hancock.
both movies sucked but the village has to be the worst movie of all time and m night whatever his name is is on the ban list.
Reply
8-27-2009 @ 8:20AM
C.A. said...
You're friends with Hancock?!
8-27-2009 @ 9:25AM
Matthew said...
Speaking of M. Night, Unbreakable had a crazy bad marketing session. I liked the movie, alot actually, but I was so perplexed coming out of it the first time.
8-27-2009 @ 11:22AM
Shark2778 said...
Fox really messed up Fight Club.
Reply
9-02-2009 @ 8:32PM
Julie said...
The flip side of this it that it can trick people into seeing really good movies. If they can sell Inglourious Basterds to the Transformers-loving crowd, that crowd can get exposed to a higher caliber of film and see what they've been missing, potentially staving off the horrendous dumbing-down of America.
Reply