Review: The Final Destination
Filed under: Horror, New Releases, Theatrical Reviews, Remakes and Sequels

When the decision was made to produce a fourth Final Destination movie, there must have been conversations about whether the same formula would work without any reconfiguring. Audiences were pretty familiar with it by now: someone has a premonition that saves a bunch of people's lives; then Death comes back around to kill everyone anyway, in the order they'd have died in if they hadn't gotten away the first time. Someone must have asked, "Should we tweak the formula a little? Offer some kind of new angle or a surprising twist we haven't used before?"
That person, if he existed, was outvoted. The new film, senselessly called The Final Destination, follows the formula to the letter, without deviation. You might just as well stay home and watch one of the other three, where at least there will be some devilish wit and ironic humor in evidence. You'll get none of that here.
This time we're at a racetrack when Nick (Bobby Campo), a young man with no defining personality traits, has a vivid daydream about a horrific accident that kills him, his friends, and 50 others. Spooked, he gets out of there just before the real thing happens, saving his own life and the lives of his girlfriend, Lori (Shantel VanSanten), her best friend, Janet (Haley Webb), and Janet's preppy d-bag boyfriend Hunt (Nick Zano). A security guard (Mykelti Williamson) is also spared, along with a few tag-alongs.
What was the source of Nick's premonition? Not explained, or even really wondered about. Why does he continue to have premonitions detailing how the survivors will die, one by one? Also not an issue.
What's important is that they do indeed die, and in the bizarre, elaborate ways that have been this franchise's hallmarks. The gimmick this time is that director David R. Ellis (Final Destination 2, Snakes on a Plane) shot it in 3D and takes every opportunity to fling gore and viscera at us. But the writer, Eric Bress (a co-writer on FD2), evidently took this as an excuse to get lazy with the screenplay. After all, why waste effort on imaginative deathtraps when the whole thing can be spiced up with 3D? There are no humorous exchanges or amusing characters. The central figures apparently don't have families, jobs, or other friends, existing only as cardboard cutouts to be run through the paces of the story.
I say all this as someone who really enjoyed the first and third Final Destination films as clever, self-aware horror machines. This fourth one is strictly by-the-numbers, without a moment of genuine tension and no real surprises. (Small wonder it's from the same creative team as the lackluster part 2.) Even Death himself seems a little bored with it.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-28-2009 @ 9:24AM
Jason said...
Part 2 is far and away the best in the series, so your review has had the opposite intended effect. Now I am more excited! Yeehaw!
Reply
8-28-2009 @ 10:29AM
Anne said...
I was going to see this but since Jason thought part 2 was the best, and is looking forward to this one, I am not going to see it.
Reply
8-28-2009 @ 10:31AM
TR said...
i actually prefer the second one to the others, but that may be because my expectation is for a more visceral (but not gore-porn level) viewing experience. i am kinda looking forward to a mindless 3d experience, but i'm not sure if wanna commit. good to know exactly how 'mindless' it is though haha
Reply
8-28-2009 @ 12:52PM
mdk said...
And it's like, even if someone did get caught in their car's sunroof while going through an automatic carwash, wouldn't the rotating brush just sting a little? It's not like they're going to have anything in there that even has a chance of grinding the paint off cars. Even the hot wax is only going to be as hot as a warm shower.
Reply
8-31-2009 @ 6:30AM
Jhaer said...
I suppose that would depends on what you hit... sure, the soft brush might not hurt you, but if your head hit the part in the center that holds the soft brush and pushed your head back, decapitating you on the sunroof... that might do it.
8-31-2009 @ 12:46PM
mdk said...
Yeah, but notice those bars are designed to bounce up and out of harms way whenever they encounter even the slightest resistance. Like I said, there's nothing in a carwash that could even scratch the paint on a car... gas station owners don't want the insurance claims or lawsuits that would inevitably result if anything in there was dangerous.
8-28-2009 @ 10:44AM
Chelsea said...
The only thing that caught my interest was the 3D. It's the 4th in a series, how good did you think it was going to be?
Also, the clip from the trailer of the girl about to get hit with a tire always makes me laugh. It reminds me of Dane Cook's joke:
"How did Mary die?"
"A tire hit her in the face!"
Reply
8-30-2009 @ 12:37AM
Carrie said...
Chelsea, that little exchange, like all those spouted by Dane Cook, was not a joke. He just has statements and shouted responses. For example, a Dane Cook-ian re-working of an old joke:
"Why did the chicken cross the road"
*makes weird face and kicks in the air* "WHAT THE F***?!?!"
Yeah. Not funny or containing anything resembling a punchline.
8-30-2009 @ 12:48AM
Chelsea said...
*shrugs* To each his/her own.
8-28-2009 @ 1:08PM
pete thomson said...
Worryingly I fell asleep and left the cinema before the end to avoid dying of boredom. I am now looking over my shoulder in a paranoid state in case Mr Reeper has a faulty cement mixer or anal hair bleacher lined up to spoil my fun!!
Reply
8-30-2009 @ 9:19AM
jim said...
Yeah, do make sure you check your anal hair bleacher before you use it!
8-28-2009 @ 12:29PM
hayson said...
I enjoyed the first 2 (Hey, I'm a sucker for Ali Larter) and thought the third was just ridiculous. Somewhat fun, but quite stupid. Still going to have some drinks and check this out tonight!
AND - at least one thing can be said for FD2 - the opening sequence with the highway pileup was completely effective... I still get wigged out when I see a semi with logs/rollable death traps strapped on the back.
Reply
8-28-2009 @ 6:19PM
Gregory Rubinstein said...
I loved the first Final Destination movie. The second one was pure crap. Surprisingly, I liked the third one, but for different reasons than the first one. The writers of the third one were aware of the ridiculousness of their movie, so instead of trying to hide it, they embraced it.
Reply
8-28-2009 @ 2:07PM
Rocket Raccoon said...
I loved the first move. The second I enjoyed. I don't think I saw the third one...
Reply
8-28-2009 @ 8:52PM
Tom Whitaker said...
Another in the "FD2 is easily the best" camp. These films don't need tension - they need expertly constructed, funny death-traps. The second had that so hopefully this will too.
Reply
8-30-2009 @ 2:28PM
Jeffrey said...
Guys, I am really confused, I have planned on going to see this movie but after reading the comments, I don't think I do anymore.
Electric Bicycle, Wedding Speech
Reply
8-30-2009 @ 9:20AM
jim said...
I liked the first, hated the second, and so never saw the third. I guess I'm the only one who quits watching a series when it sucks on #2.
Reply
8-31-2009 @ 8:24AM
Riley Freeman said...
you are right, they really didnt change any rules. it was just an excuse to make a movie in 3d. The deaths were interesting to look at Gore is still in. I am a saw movie fan but I also do think it needs to stop instead of keep going. But these 2 franchises are famous for their horrific deaths.
Reply
9-02-2009 @ 10:59AM
moivefan said...
I think this part is also good.In fact,I like all parts of the movie.Anyone who has not enjoyed it can watch it here: http://www.watch-movies.net.in/movies/the-final-destination-2009/
Reply
9-02-2009 @ 7:06PM
RichyB said...
I've seen it, saw inglourious a couple of days before though so, it had something to live up to.
It was ok.
I can't believe it's a 15 though, it should certainly be an 18.
Reply