Review: Gamer
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Thrillers, Lionsgate Films, Theatrical Reviews

A colleague of mine once observed that the very manner by which Chev Chelios had to keep himself alive in the Crank films respectively represented the approach that writing/directing team Neveldine/Taylor took for each of them, which is to say that Crank 1 was all about keeping our hearts racing and Crank 2 was all about shocking us as an audience. It's a simple, literal assessment that nonetheless cleared up why yours truly was a fan of the first and yet let down by the second -- I'd rather be excited than appalled any day.
And at the intersection of 'thrill' and 'shock' is precisely where N/T's latest, Gamer, falls, and it succeeds considerably more when it's shooting for the former than when it's reveling in the latter.
"Some years from this exact moment," the future of entertainment consists of tuning in for the latest episode of "Slayers," in which death-row inmates serve as real-life avatars for anonymous users out on a rubble-strewn battlefield. If they last thirty missions, they would theoretically earn a pardon; naturally, no one's been so fortunate so far. But coming in close is Kable (Gerard Butler), under the thumb of cocksure teen superstar Simon (Logan Lerman) and under the threat of show runner Ken Castle (Michael C. Hall), a Southern-fried megalomaniac who had his reasons for putting Kable in the game and has his reasons for taking him out...
Yes, you're right, it does sound quite a bit like The Running Man, not to mention last year's Death Race remake (with its all-felons, no-civilians policy), and no, concerns about the responsibility of violent entertainment and the consequences of living and killing vicariously -- let alone being controlled by others -- are not priority one. Neveldine and Taylor are more interested in having excess meet excess, by having Castle's previous program, "Society," be a place where the desperate, like Kable's wife (Amber Valletta), can whore themselves out to virtual deviants who want a taste of anything while being anyone.
Like 'em or not, N/T have established themselves three films in as action auteurs who know their genre well, although they can admittedly let their proudly disorienting aesthetic and sleazier touches get the better of genuine excitement and thrills. The world of "Slayers" is a convincingly frantic environment, full of bangs and booms, but when Kable and others start to work on breaking the rules of the game, things become a great deal more interesting (his strategy for fueling an uncovered vehicle is unique, to say the least). However, given enough time, there will turn up a gratuitous shot or two of an obese man pawing himself as he seduces other men in the guise of women in "Society." It's a gratuitous implication of this particular future, one worthy of maybe an insert shot in a montage, not an entire subplot as is the case here.
But how else can you expect to excuse the sight of a character named Rick Rape (played by Milo Ventimiglia, one of many Pathology alums to pop up) dry-humping a stone-faced Ms. Valletta? And in what other movie are you going to see an impromptu musical number set to "I've Got You Under My Skin" turn into a burly brawl of sorts? That last part is an indulgence on behalf of Hall's cackling baddie, which doesn't make it any less an indulgence on part of the filmmakers. To be proudly amoral or even a little surreal is one thing; to willfully welcome the logical extremes of the unleashed id seems like more overkill than the actual overkill.
Butler and Valletta nimbly balance the slight differences between acting as they are and acting as they're told, when not playing up the simplistic melodrama that is their plight. Lerman is a suitably brash teen; Alison Lohman and rapper Ludacris are feasible freedom fighters; Kyra Sedgwick plays a TV host overdue for a change of heart regarding the morality of her favorite show (a transformation wholly expected and yet surprisingly swift in its execution); and there are scant appearances by Keith David, John Leguizamo and Terry Crews beyond that.
Gamer is at times striking, and at others silly, and and yet at others sickening, but never too stupid, at least not compared to so much else flash and pop peddled to the masses these days. Whether you want 'em or not, Neveldine and Taylor brings their concepts to brash life; the day, though, when they learn to value the subversive over the sensational will be the day that we all win.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-04-2009 @ 1:27PM
TheDude said...
Can anyone tell me if Cinematical actually has EDITORS on their staff? Editors that have graduated from a four year degree program at an accredited university anyway? Amazing.
Reply
9-04-2009 @ 2:13PM
DontForgetToTakeYourGreensAndBlues said...
It's like listening to someone with schizophrenia during their word salad moments. Can't get much of a straight answer and one thought goes from A to M, then to D and S. Then I'm just wondering if there was a mix up with the medications and the website is just unable to give him the ol' boot because of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
Reply
9-04-2009 @ 4:28PM
Stan Winsome said...
gawd relax guys. It's an essay on the dichotomy of man. Deal with it.
Reply
9-04-2009 @ 4:37PM
TheDude said...
Yeah, let's just give the people at Cinematical a pass on using proper sentence structure, grammar, etc., much less GOOD WRITING. After all they're just another an online publication that wants to be taken seriously. Why should they bother? Who cares, right?
omg I mean like really none of that should matter d00d lol
9-04-2009 @ 4:46PM
jim said...
Now THIS should be on "Movies I Will Never See".
Reply
9-04-2009 @ 5:03PM
borden said...
commenters 1,2, and 4 thank you for letting me know im sane and my elementary school reading comprehension quizzes didnt fail me. ive been reading reviews on this site wondering if im still literate. cinematical we dont intend to be mean, but we take the time to click on your post to find out if we should go see a film from someone who has already seen it. not read something that sounds like a crackhead with a thesaurus who hides behind a headache of words because he doesnt want to be made fun of by commenters for having an opinion of a film we might not agree with.
just say: "i liked it", "i didnt like it" if that helps.
Reply
11-21-2009 @ 12:28AM
McCormick said...
Have to agree with that. As a website designer just this post made me sick.However "Gamer" is a great movie if you have an imagination, Morgan C Hall is hilarious and Butler is his usual epic self, f-ck it I give 3.5/5 stars
9-04-2009 @ 5:45PM
Scott Weinberg said...
Aside from the last sentence in the sixth paragraph (my fault), I have no idea what you're all complaining about.
Reply
9-04-2009 @ 5:53PM
shadowracer said...
They don't like that there isn't a set rating system(stars or a 1-10 scale), and the review doesn't outright state "Good" or "Bad". So it takes too much energy to interpret.
I've always thought this would be a cool ratings system "See it in theaters" "wait for the DVD" "wait for HBO" "avoid".
9-04-2009 @ 9:48PM
Ben said...
I have to say that Gamer is more or less what Death Race could've/should've been if the script wasn't so very weak. I mean the general idea and plot are more then very similar but the execution is far better.
Reply
9-05-2009 @ 12:20AM
Brian Kelley said...
Can anyone tell me really what the fuck was going on in the "action" sequences? 15 seconds in I had a headache. That never happens to me. As far as never getting too stupid... There's a FUCKING DANCE NUMBER. Michael C. Hall is BRILLIANT on TV. He's NOT a movie star. He feels totally out of place. The movie is vile for no reason at all. And I'm not talking gore or even titties. I'm talking the fat creep stuff... It's sad when the feel of the action doesn't change one fucking bit when following a drunk character. I'm rambling. This movie is pathetic. It makes The Final Destination looking like a masterpiece. I'm only comparing them because they came out a week apart and would seem to duel for mediocrity. I'm so mad at myself for seeing this movie.
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 10:39PM
Teri said...
I agree...this movie is definitely the stupidest and worst movie I've ever seen. My date left 10 minutes into it but I kept hoping it would get better. Didn't happen...we only paid $5 to see it and we wanted to ask for it back. I stayed til the end but was sorry I did.
9-05-2009 @ 12:20AM
sa said...
sorry to be contrary to all the other flaming comments here...but... i completely "get" this review. cinematical often gets a lot of flack for reviewing movies as "popular entertainment" instead of serious works of meaningful art. it is very difficult to walk this line. there are as many kinds of movie fans as there are movies. do you remember that oscar broadcast a few years ago where the host went out to theaters to interview movie goers? it was very funny because not a singe one had seen an oscar nominated film and they all loved a particular gruesome horror movie (can't remember the title).
from this review, i can tell this movie isn't for me. however, i have no ill-will for those movie fans who enjoy a sensational action movie with a healthy dose of shock value. it is obvious to me that it is also important to this reviewer to not insult those fans.
while i don't really know the plot - one spoiler that will keep me from seeing this movie is that a bad-ass like gerard butler might really just be a puppet for some video game boy...
Reply
9-05-2009 @ 5:58AM
marcia shern said...
Amazing I watch a lot of action movie and always find myself missing my favorite action movie and TV shows because of school/work. I use www.moviesdatacenter.com to see missing tv shows and action movies
Reply
9-05-2009 @ 10:36AM
Herc said...
From 1 to 10, I give it a 6 for the story, but it gets an 8 for action. The concept was great and there were some really cool effects. This movie will be a DVD classic. It's very unique and bizarre. The "Humanz" were cool.
Overall I would say go see the movie. It's definitely not prefect, but what other choices are really out there at the moment. What was the name of the song Hackman was singing? Now that was very strange.
Reply
9-05-2009 @ 2:47PM
William Goss said...
Hackman was singing "I've Got No Strings" from Pinocchio.
9-07-2009 @ 11:51AM
Radu Segal said...
This was a cross between 95% Running Man and 5% Matrix with none of the cinnematographic bedazzlement of the latter and missing any of the gratification of the former. A waste of time. On a scale of 1 to 10 it was pretty poor and on a five star scale it really wouldn't make it because it has no real beginning and no plot. The ending is cliche and predictable and at the end of the day the popcorn heartburn and the $15 ticket are not worth it.
Reply
9-13-2009 @ 12:04AM
MIkemoa said...
Hey im 17, i might go see this tonight, can anyone tell me if its any good or if im wasting my money
Reply
9-19-2009 @ 10:54PM
Quentin said...
In my opinion i thought that the whole plot of the movie was already messed up. I was heading to the movies to see another movie but wasnt showing so i saw Gamer neway, the movie started out alright honestly and EVEN THOUGH I NEVER SAW DEATH RACE it immediatly came to my mind when i was watchin the movie cause it looked exactly like the same background from the commercials of deathrace. (which i give a thumbs down for creativity) but back to my opinion the movie started off alright but the whole plot of the movie where people are controlled by others (especially gamers) just made it hard to watch because u wouldnt think someone so demoralized. I like to think of myself as a gamer and i know its not a perfect world. But cmon? i would rate the movie a 3 out of 10 maybe a 4 or 5 on a good day.
Also please write a reveiw with regular words? I mean it does no use trying to emphasize something and no one or a few understands what your saying. Get me?
Reply
9-19-2009 @ 10:58PM
Quentin said...
can someone tell me what was the deal with the random people in the movie?
Reply