TIFF Review: Agora
Filed under: Drama, Theatrical Reviews, Festival Reports, Exhibition, Religious

"If you choose to do nothing, though, you will continue to do the same thing over and over again."
Hypatia (Rachel Weisz), Agora
Hypatia (Rachel Weisz), Agora
To some, the name Alejandro Amenábar sparks instant interest. But if it does not, let me refresh your memory. In 1997, he wrote (with Mateo Gil) and directed the Spanish film Open Your Eyes -- which North American audiences know better by its ultra-strange U.S. remake Vanilla Sky. 2001 marked his English film premiere, the eerie Nicole Kidman thriller The Others (the only feature Gil hasn't co-written). And then in 2004, he went back to Spanish filmmaking with the Javier Bardem-starring Oscar winner The Sea Inside. Now he's grabbed the likes of Rachel Weisz, Max Minghella, and Oscar Isaac for a film that doesn't journey through facial reconstruction, ghosts, or euthanasia. It's a gorgeous, thought-provoking Roman epic called Agora.
The film focuses on one of the most impressive female figures in history – Hypatia, a leading thinker in the Rome-governed Alexandria, considered to be the first notable woman of mathematics. She studied philosophy and astronomy, and both pagan and Christian students from far and wide came together to study under her. "For all men on account of her extraordinary dignity and virtue admired her the more."
The film opens in 391 A.D. Alexandria. The streets are boiling with strife and clashes of faith as Christianity gains power, and men like Ammonius (Ashraf Barhom) make grand speeches and perform "miracles" to sway the disenfranchised commoners. Meanwhile, inside the walls of the Library of Alexandria, Hypatia struggles to extinguish the religious turmoil of her students whilst also staying free of romantic interest. Her slave Davus (Max Minghella) loves her, but cannot tell her, while her student Orestes takes every chance to make his love for her known – even after being rebuffed by her menstrual rags.
When a Roman is killed during one of Ammonius' speeches, "proving" his God's power on hot coals, everything changes, setting off a never-ending stream of desperate violence mixed with overwrought feelings of entitlement. Back and forth, the two sides fight -- each is desperate for something, whether that be the Christians' desire to gain power or the pagans' desire to keep theirs -- and both feel too entitled to make any concessions. The death of the Roman leads to bloody retaliation in the streets, and ultimately, the destruction of the Library and the knowledge it contains, as well as the life Hypatia has always known. Even Davus leaves her to join Ammonius.
Fast forward to many years later, and the same battles continue. However, now almost everyone, including prefect Orestes, is Christian. Now the religious turmoil is focused on the Jews, as well as women and children. Hypatia's rights and political influence are no longer secure, and this leads to her horrific and heart-breaking end. On paper, it stretches the bounds of horrific violent acts, but even watered down for the big screen, it packs a gut-wrenching punch you can't avoid.
It would be easy to say that this is an anti-Christian film, but to do so is utterly oversimplified and inaccurate. Beyond Hypatia's desire for all faiths to exist peacefully, no one side is all good or bad. Both the pagans and the Christians have their moments of honor – the quests for knowledge from the former, and the feeding and care of the masses for the latter – while also partaking in heinous violence; it is this balance that drives the film.
The production design, score, look, and momentum of the film are all grand to the extreme, but the path of Hypatia's story and the fall of Roman Alexandria are perfectly balanced. The gorgeousness and epic feel doesn't seep into the story and drive a path of twists for the sake of cinema. This isn't a film like Troy or Alexander where spectacle trumps story. Agora lets the history speak for itself – becoming both a powerful look at the past while also being an important lesson for today in a world fraught with religious intolerance and quests to reign supreme.
Even more remarkable is the characterization of Hypatia. Over and over again in Hollywood, even the most strong and epic of women are usually reduced to romance and stereotypically feminine pursuits, but Amenabar and Gil remain perfectly loyal to the little we know about Hypatia. Sure, they add some romantic wrenches, but every bit of romance and passion rests with the men. We don't see Hypatia swoon with that far-off, happily romantic look in her eyes; those moments are reserved for Orestes and Davus. She is, from the beginning to the end, in love with learning and thought, and nothing else.
The insistence on thought and intellectualism will probably be the barrier that keeps Agora from being a classic, mainstream hit. But I can tell you this: There is no film that has hit me to the core like Agora has, even well after the dimmed lights shone again. If you see this movie with your heart, exploring the dangers of zealotry and fear, and the ridiculousness of female intellectualism being a danger, you can't help but be changed and inspired.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-13-2009 @ 7:11PM
paul said...
dang! it's them bad Christians, acting up again.
Reply
9-13-2009 @ 8:03PM
george said...
I'm interested in this film. The filmmaker's previous work has been fantastic. The Others, I think, was an exceptional "ghost story" film.
But I do worry that this film is just going to come down hard on Christians. I'm not against showing truth. I just have seen Christians stereotyped and misrepresented too much.
I see the argument, that Knowledge would have been better had not zealots gotten in the way. But I feel that that is a little biased argument- glorifying intellect. The Bolsheviks replaced Christian holidays with ones honoring idealized Lenin. They took out the church and any important symbols, making a point to the people that these were of no spiritual value.
While I believe it important to pursue knowledge and to make a point of refuting extremism. I hate to see the value of the church degraded.
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 2:56AM
Jasonbe said...
I would be fine with that comment if it included the notion of all churches. Would you defend a Buddhist temple and the Buddhist faith as voraciously? I'm interested to know.
I don't understand why anything that shows criticism is anti-ist?
Every faith has a current of political opportunism and destructiveness. Much like the Bolsheviks. If weist go here then everyone gets a chance to list 100 great things done by... See if we play that game almost everyone comes out positive. Even the tyrants.
9-13-2009 @ 10:09PM
george said...
I would have included the notion of not showing any religion simply through its detractors had the film been about a historical woman defending a historical library from the siege of an angry mob composed of all of the world's religions.
I think a practicing Buddhist would be curious if the film had an important scene in which a group of Buddhists killed the main character.
They would ask themselves, I am sure of this, what light is my faith being portrayed in? Will I be judged by people who have seen this movie, but have not met me?
It is natural to be worried of what the "critique" may be. Especially when you don't know who the person critiquing might be.
And, eventually, as have I, there is the personal critique of why was my religion a part of such an act?
I believe that a reasoned person would think of all of these. I'm interested in the movie- I am more interested in the critique it will offer though..
9-13-2009 @ 8:06PM
NP said...
"the destruction of the Library and the knowledge it contains"
Of course war's toll on human lives is disturbing, but I always find the destruction of books (and art) to be even more so..
I'm very much looking forward to this movie.
Reply
9-13-2009 @ 9:31PM
Jmchez said...
You say the movie is 'balanced". Let's hope so. Nevertheless, the West is the only civilization in history that loves self-flagellation. Even Tacitus in his day complained about the depravity and laziness of the Romans and the heroic nobility of the brutish barbarians -- he should have asked Ovid about whether it was pleasant to live among the barbarians.
At least this movie shows that Egypt and all of the Middle East was Christian before the Muslims took it over, so the Crusades were just about regaining what had been taken by force. No?
Probably not. It doesn't matter. One hundred years after Hypatia, the Western Roman provinces were under barbarian control. Two hundred more years after that, the Arabs had taken over the Middle east and the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Fleet left the port of Alexandria never to return.
Ironically the Arabs tell a story about the conqueror of Alexandria asking his Caliph what to do with the books he found, The Caliph is said to have replied that if the books agreed with Mohammad's teaching , then they were superfluous and unnecessary and if they didn't they, were heretical. Either way, the library was not needed. Six hundred years later, the great library of Baghdad was utterly destroyed by the Mongols.
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 12:10PM
JasonBee said...
>They would ask themselves, I am sure of this, what light is my faith being portrayed in?
You have exactly as much to do with that history as does the average modern German citizen with the Holocaust. I wouldn't read yourself into such tales unless there's a guilt to assuage.
It's also recorded history, inasmuch it's been written at least.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia
I don't see too many people getting as upset when they see modern movies about the Mongol invasions. And they did a fair bit of damage to the western world and knocked parts of the Muslim world back into the Bronze age.
If you're feeling that guilty then you'd be Catholic.
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 3:53AM
doa766 said...
nice review, I just wanted to say that Ale Amenabar came to atention of film fans not with Abre Los Ojos (Open your Eyes) but with his first movie Tesis, a horror film set on a film school about snuff films
you should check it otu because it's great with the same actor from Abre Los Ojos, Edurado Noriega
also it's worth noting that Amenabar is not spanish, he's from Chile
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 11:13PM
Alejo said...
Sorry, but Alejandro Amenábar is indeed Spanish, though born of Chilean father
Reply