Girls on Film: Loathsome Female Clichés
Filed under: Girls on Film

cli⋅ché
1. a trite, stereotyped expression; a sentence or phrase, usually expressing a popular or common thought or idea, that has lost originality, ingenuity, and impact by long overuse, as sadder but wiser, or strong as an ox.
2. (in art, literature, drama, etc.) a trite or hackneyed plot, character development, use of color, musical expression, etc.
3. anything that has become trite or commonplace through overuse.
1. a trite, stereotyped expression; a sentence or phrase, usually expressing a popular or common thought or idea, that has lost originality, ingenuity, and impact by long overuse, as sadder but wiser, or strong as an ox.
2. (in art, literature, drama, etc.) a trite or hackneyed plot, character development, use of color, musical expression, etc.
3. anything that has become trite or commonplace through overuse.
There's not much that's more irksome than clichés -- the flesh-eating fungus of Hollywood, the virus that makes Tinseltown's already rampant repetition all the more tiresome. They're completely trite and overused, but the cinematic machine clings to them like they're energy-giving oil.
The men of Hollywood certainly have a lot of clichés to contend with (the man-boy, crotchety letch, misogynist playboy), but some of the movie world's biggest gems get thrown to the women. In fact, female clichés in Hollywood are so rampant that I often wonder what a complete and total outsider would think of women if shown our filmmaking. They'd probably think we all fit into the clichéd norms I've listed after the jump. What follows is four of the biggies -- the ones I always try to escape, the ones that never go away.
1. The Prostitute/Stripper
While I love writing about movies, the daily grind can get eye-bleedingly irksome when you notice just how many prostitute/stripper films they're out there. Sure, you can think of a few right off the bat, but that's the first drop in a torrent of prostitute/stripper characterizations that run wild through all cinematic incarnations -- the arthouse, the indie, the mainstream blockbuster. It makes me wonder if Earth's alternate name is the "Land of Whores," because any alien or other-worldly creature would assume that prostitution is the most prevalent and wide-spread occupation for the female and human race.
And Hollywood loves them. Even our most beloved actresses flock to the roles because these are the gritty, extreme gigs that bring them critical attention and Oscar love. As the Wall Street Journal has noted, the first woman to win an Oscar -- Janet Gaynor in 1928's Street Angel -- played a prostitute, and thus opened the door to a long history of lascivious leading roles: Greta Garbo, Charlize Theron, Donna Reed, Kim Basinger, Elizabeth Taylor, Jodie Foster...
But at some point, this can't be considered as much of a stretch for an actress when there's almost one hundred years of prostitution productions ... or so I would hope.
2. The Bitchy and Imbalanced Successful Shrews
Always fear the woman in power. She's not like the men. She's a different beast altogether -- the bitch -- the cold, calculating, focused, and detached woman of power who seems to have little to no humanity. In movies, that often means caricatured CEOs who have little social skills or rational thought, but somehow manage to run large companies.
I've never quite understood this trend. It suggests that women have some sort of professional autism, skilled enough to get ahead but not able to function in any other part of their lives. We've grown accustomed to this notion that successful women on the big screen probably won't be successful in their personal lives. Sometimes this can be tackled with enough finesse to be palatable (Meryl Streep in The Devil Wears Prada), and sometimes it's so ridiculous that words fail (Katharine Heigl The Ugly Truth).
3. The Hysterical Woman
Yeah, this category is casting a big net. But Hollywood loves its female hysteria. Now, I've known a lot of women over the years -- everyone from the most butch tomboy to the most girly girl fashionista -- and none have ever been hysterical. Angry and ranty? Yes. Fly-off-the-handle, screechingly insane? No. Even my friends' most tumultuous of moments have been handled with some sort of dignity, but on the big screen, all bets are off. Do something out of line, and the gals will wail, rant, and throw messy scenes that shouldn't be fit for consumption.
Hysteria was the weakest point in Up in the Air (as Anna Kendrick freaks out in a moment of weakness), but it's just the cherry of a long-standing tradition. It will definitely happen when marital plans are afoot (Bride Wars), when ex boyfriends enter the picture (Forgetting Sarah Marshall), when pent-up emotions erupt (Before Sunset), and many more. The sad thing is, three of those four are films are solid projects that I really like -- the "hysterical woman" is not some cliché hidden in unsuitable fare. It's everywhere!
Hollywood needs to learn that the charm of a cold shoulder, a well-written rant, and carefully released burst of anger can be just as cinematic.
4. The Pretty Ugly Girl
This is the one we all joke about -- the "ugly" girl who rips off her glasses, pulls her hair out of its ponytail, and suddenly becomes the most irresistible goddess. This trend was rampant in the '80s and '90s teen movies, the basis for many a makeover montage (Clueless), and even pops up today (Needy in Jennifer's Body could be called the modern incarnation). Although, thankfully, there seems to be less pr-ug regularity today as films try to grasp at unique personalities getting loner status, rather than superficial and oft-irrelevant fashion cues likes glasses.
While the ridiculousness can be amusing, this one grates -- as if a girl is toeing the line of uglydom by needing glasses to see. As if any refusal of fashion thrusts her into the realms of the ugly -- not the awkward, not the disheveled -- but the all-out unpleasant to look at. It just breeds a society of snarky, overly critical people eager to pick out the slightest "flaw."
5...
As we all know, there are so much more -- the shopping obsessed, the money idiots, the femme fatale... -- Hollywood never fails to make sure all clichéd bases are covered.
Which do you loathe?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
9-21-2009 @ 9:16PM
The_Avon said...
Lending from The Shrew stereotype: The Shrewish Mom Who Supposedly Has Her Husband's Balls in a Trophy Case and Who Hates Sex or shorter, The Mom Shrew (Mumshrew). The first one that comes to mind is Leslie Mann's character in Knocked Up (or many a mom in conventional sitcoms). Even though Apatow let her character air her grievances to Paul Rudd, she still came off as a hysterical, hormone/emotion driven, untrusting husband-stalker because apparently every husband strays, leading their wives to suspect the worst. The end of that scene really didn't do much to inspire empathy for either or both party's argument, which it could have, thus bringing Mann's character up to the human sphere from the cliche.
I get tired of the cliche of Woman as The Victim, and even more frustrating: in response to woman as the victim, it's The Powerful Woman Who's Made Palatable (Conventionally Sexy) Enough for The Male Gaze.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 9:52PM
Devon said...
"I get tired of the cliche of Woman as The Victim, and even more frustrating: in response to woman as the victim, it's The Powerful Woman Who's Made Palatable (Conventionally Sexy) Enough for The Male Gaze."
Hear hear! It's funny how the second one feels even more aggravating than the first, somehow. Maybe it's because it feels like they're made more for men's sensibilities than women's... or because they're so perfect and removed from normal women that they remain a "them" rather than an "us" and their displays of strength seem not to apply to "us"... or because the filmmakers tried so hard to create female characters who "have it all" that they make cardboard characters - and when so many strong female characters seem unrealistic and as flimsy as cardboard, it makes the whole concept of the strong woman seem the same way. When it's that difficult for writers - even good ones - to *imagine* good, strong female characters, we know we're not out of the woods yet.
9-22-2009 @ 1:02PM
Monika said...
The Shrew Mom is a good one.. It's probably good that one didn't come to mind while writing this -- it would've been hard not to rant for a few thousand words. :)
9-21-2009 @ 10:15PM
aaron said...
get over it, movies are full of cliches of all people. especially all minorities. maybe an asian should get a chance to rant. or someone of hispanic distant. As a black person don't even get me started.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 10:33PM
The_Avon said...
Saying, "get over it" won't do anything. But you bring up a point, women of color get the even shorter end of the stick when it comes to cliches. The outspoken, tell-it-like-it-is, bootylicious black woman, the submissive, geisha-like Asian woman (which I particularly loathe, being a non-submissive, ungeisha-like Asian woman), the fast talking Latina, etc., etc. Both men and women characters of color in film are tacked on for humor (as the joke maker and joke taker) or just as racial accessories for the white main character to unload their problems on. You could say the same for gay and lesbian characters. Cliches abound everywhere for everyone, but "getting over it" won't do shit about eradicating that.
9-22-2009 @ 1:25AM
Aaron said...
I'm not saying we should do anything about it lol. Its just how it is so whatever. If I was advocating some kind of action I wouldn't be commenting on some blog. We're not gonna eradicate anything. Funny thing is for examole there are more stereotypes in a black produced and directed mivie then there as in one with a white protagonist. I've seen the same with other races. So....yea get over it, deal with it, suck it up, so what who cares. Sound shitty well its been like this for a very long time, things change slowly. Write your own story if you have issue with the stories that are out there.
9-23-2009 @ 11:49PM
Devon said...
"maybe an asian should get a chance to rant. or someone of hispanic distant."
I agree. I really love that Cinematical talks about women's stuff, but sometimes I feel they do it to the exclusion of other, similar issues (i.e. race and homosexual issues). I say this as a white, basically straight woman - I think perhaps they should balance things a bit more. I do not, however, think they should just "get over it." Discussion breeds awareness, and that's the first step towards eliminating stereotypes.
9-21-2009 @ 10:39PM
hotmommy1976 said...
I agree with The_Avon on this as far as the women of color cliches. I am done with them completely!
However, I am exhausted by the whiny white girl with everything who needs to find her "true potential" by the end of the movie cliche. Well, yeah, that's pretty much what's offered.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 11:04PM
TheDude said...
Who cares? It's a MOVIE.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 11:12AM
bbmcrae said...
That's the stock response every time someone is asked to think even a little bit about what they are seeing on screen. Sexist cliches? Racist robots? It's just a movie, shut up and stop having an opinion!
People who are passionate about movies care what goes into them. If you don't, fine. But think about the truly great movies you've loved - I'll bet that at least a bit of thought and care went into making them, and there was something more unique than a bunch of worn-out stereotypes.
9-22-2009 @ 1:20PM
GL said...
Bride Wars was not a movie. It was a pile of hot, flaming garbage.
9-21-2009 @ 11:17PM
John said...
You left out the "Alias" syndrome. A petite woman who beats up not just one, but quite a few 180 or 200 pound guys. She will not only use martial arts to get them unbalanced but actually go mano a mano. She will block a punch and push back with a sword against their full body weight.
The number of movies in which this happens are too many to mention. It's kind of like the male spy who can't miss a shot while his enemies can't hit the side of a barn.
SNL once had a skit in which Elen DeGeneros played a secret agent spy. When she confronted the bad guys, they laughed and gave her a beating.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 1:06PM
Monika said...
Kinda covered that here: http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/18/girls-on-film-desiring-real-femme-fighters/
:)
9-22-2009 @ 12:47PM
Gordon said...
"We've grown accustomed to this notion that successful women on the big screen probably won't be successful in their personal lives."
The trouble is, women who have It All — who are successfully and good and well-rewarded at everything in life — would make for unbelievably boring subjects of movies.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 1:00PM
Monika said...
"The trouble is, women who have It All — who are successfully and good and well-rewarded at everything in life — would make for unbelievably boring subjects of movies."
Wow..
Well, first, having a successful personal life doesn't mean being "well-rewarded at everything in life." It means a person who isn't one-dimensional, whose talents aren't miraculously pigeon-holed into one segment of life.
Second, it's probably pointless to argue this if you think a woman's only worth on the big screen is with cliched inadequacies. As if there's no worth in a successful female character who deals with the comedy of everyday life, the challenges of death, the struggle to help someone less fortunate, the intricacies of dealing with the world at large, romance, mysteries, drama, so on and so forth.
9-22-2009 @ 1:32PM
Gordon said...
Monika, my statement was only about women because this article was about women.
There is no worth in ANY character, male or female, who does not have shortcomings. There is nothing interesting about perfect people. There is no STRUGGLE for people who are perfect.
9-22-2009 @ 1:58PM
Monika said...
How are success and shortcomings mutually exclusive?
Success doesn't equal perfection, and even if it did, we live in an imperfect world, so there's always room for struggle.
9-22-2009 @ 3:07PM
Gordon said...
I didn't say success and shortcomings WERE mutually exclusive: by calling successful women with shortcomings a "loathsome cliché," it seemed (to me, and to another commenter below, as well) that YOU were doing that.
Sure, you loaded your argument with ridiculous (and regrettably familiar) examples of the trope, but those seem to be better examples of bad writing than of any actual cliché (loathsome or otherwise) in action.
You even mention a palatable example (Street in DWP, which I have not seen), the existence of which seems to undermine its purported loathsomeness.
9-22-2009 @ 2:58PM
Gordon said...
I didn't say they WERE mutually exclusive.
9-22-2009 @ 3:20PM
Monika said...
That's what you suggest by taking "We've grown accustomed to this notion that successful women on the big screen probably won't be successful in their personal lives." and applying it to "women who have It All."
I didn't call women with shortcomings a loathsome cliche. I called women who are written as being very professionally successful, bitchy, and inept at every other area in their life a cliche.
"those seem to be better examples of bad writing than of any actual cliché"
Isn't cliche, by its very definition, bad writing?
"You even mention a palatable example (Street in DWP, which I have not seen), the existence of which seems to undermine its purported loathsomeness."
I don't believe it does, because not a whole lot is black and white. Streep is a great actress, which makes the character more interesting than most, but her acting talents don't make her character any less cliched.