Why TV is (Sometimes) Better Than The Movies
Filed under: Comedy, Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Awards, Fandom, Home Entertainment

OK, take a deep breath -- I know what I'm about to say is heresy on a movie site, but have you noticed that TV has gotten pretty damn good lately? So good that sometimes it's better than going to the movies ...almost. The Emmys may be long over, and those golden totems to ad revenue are already being displayed in the trophy cases of the winners. But if you were watching the show, you might have noticed a running theme throughout the telecast: the death of broadcast television. Well I'm going to have to respectfully disagree, because while I totally get that the TV landscape is changing, and the networks may not know how to milk this whole newfangled Internet thing for every dollar its worth, audiences are still tuning in (whether its on cable or broadcast TV) for some of the most innovative entertainment in history.
Not since the days of Seinfeld has talk about TV dominated water cooler chat and flooded the Internet forums and chat rooms. When you arrive to work in the morning, are you talking about last weekend's blockbuster, or are you and your co-workers talking about last night's LOST, Mad Men, or True Blood? Now don't get me wrong: I always have, and always will love going to the movies. There will always be something about sitting in the dark alongside strangers with state of the art sound and images that makes it my favorite pastime. But, I still have to hand it to the small screen for managing to finally make TV cool again. So in honor of our friends at TV Squad, I'm going to throw a little love at the small screen - here are just a couple of reasons why I think TV is (sometimes) better than the movies.
After the jump: in defense of the boob tube...
1. People expect better from TV...and they usually get it.

There's a big debate surrounding the whole 'check your brain at the door' when it comes to going to the movies. While some of us are defenders of popcorn entertainment, there are others who miss being challenged by what they watch, and lately if you want something that isn't just a remake of a board game or 80's TV show, you're probably watching more television than ever before. If you don't believe me, take a look at some of the shows that were earning nominations at the Emmys: a complex examination of capitalism and the American dream, the story of a dying chemistry teacher running a meth lab, the trials and tribulations of polygamists, and a bona-fide cultural phenomenon with one of the most labyrinthine conspiracies in television history.
Now compare that with the reboot/remake fever running rampant in the movie business, and you can't help but notice that TV seems to be more willing to take a chance on something other than a remake or re-imagining. It is awfully nice to see original ideas, and unlike most of the big-budget blockbusters we were subjected to over just this past summer, these stories actually require you to think.
2. Better Parts for (and written by) Women

In the list of Forbes top earning actresses for 2009, the top three spots went to Angelina Jolie, Jennifer Aniston, and Meryl Streep. Now with the exception of Streep, can you name a remarkable movie that either of those ladies made last year? Sure, they managed to make some money (and even the odd award nomination), but let's be honest: those films weren't really burning up the cultural radar. As for the rest of the working actresses in Hollywood, it was back to the grind of girlfriend roles and eye candy, but not in the world of TV.
If you take a look around, ladies are tearing it up on the small screen, and female writers and actresses are getting access to the kinds of jobs that are unthinkable on the big screen. If you don't believe me, take a look at the credits for some of the shows winning those coveted Emmys. The top comedy? Well, that's written by a women. Oh, and that critically acclaimed drama? You guessed it, another writing staff that is heavy on the estrogen.
Now, of course, nothing is ever black or white and it's not like you can say with 100% certainty that one medium is better than the other, and even though TV has yet to match the movies when it comes to giving audiences access to foreign, art-house, or so-called indie content, I still can't help but think we are in the midst of our very own Golden Age of Television.
So what do you think? Has TV finally surpassed the big screen, or would you rather get your thrills at the multiplex? Sound off in the comments...










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-29-2009 @ 8:22PM
vegimorph said...
Angelina Jolie was in Kung Fu Panda and that was pretty big
Reply
10-03-2009 @ 2:22PM
sourabh said...
Well said.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 3:13AM
Ashweeeee said...
Kung Fu Panda was alright, nothing special. I have to agree with this article, I work at a movie store, and when I come home I don't pop in a good ole DVD, I watch shows that I have built up and ongoing and I keep finding more shows to watch. Movies aren't bad, but they are just becoming so filled with redundancy and mediocrity it's hard to pick the good from the bad.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 8:15AM
techstar25 said...
IMO, The Sopranos and True Blood are better than 99% of the movies released in the last 10 years.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 9:12AM
Wexler said...
Movies will always outrank TV for me, I just don't see that ever changing, but TV has definitely gotten a lot better. You have a lot more shows out there now days that have a high production value, very talented casts, and an actual plot running through multiple episodes/seasons. Which is pretty great because now I can sit down and watch something for 20-40 minutes instead of 90-120 minutes and still feel satisfied afterward. Of course it sucks a lot worse when a show decides to jump the shark. It's a lot harder to stop watching something after watching multiple seasons of a show versus the first 45 minutes of a movie.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 9:31AM
ML said...
TV has the opportunity to create an ongoing story, and the lucky ones get to create a novelistic story arc (maybe Lost? We'll see). The less lucky ones ... can sometimes disappoint in the long run (you know who you are!). A movie has to say what it has to say in a relatively short period of time, whereas TV shows can take the time to build to epic dramatic moments. It's surprising they don't take the opportunity more often. (Yes, this takes "episodic" elements, but it's been shown that these can be woven into "stand-alone" episodes.)
That said, I feel I must point out that the highest-rated comedy is still primarily written by men (looks like there's one woman on the team) and I'm guessing it's mostly about men judging by cast & title (I don't watch, personally). I'm sure CBS considers this the "top comedy." ;)
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 5:52PM
Scott Nye said...
If you miss being challenged by what you watch at the movies, just look a little bit deeper than whatever is playing at the largest theater in your town. Look at smaller, art house theaters if you have them. If not, pay attention to what's playing at the Film Forum, Lincoln Center, the IFC Center, or the BAM in New York, Landmark Theaters across the country, read reviews at Reverse Shot, look at what's on IFC OnDemand...do some research. Then add it to your Netflix queue, and they'll have it all set up when it's on DVD.
This year alone, I've seen challenging, mind-expanding, truly great films such as Summer Hours, Silent Light (now on DVD), Treeless Mountain (on DVD), Still Walking, Lorna's Silence, Three Monkeys, and The Headless Woman. Never mind films that got a little more attention like The Hurt Locker, Moon, The Informant!, The Girlfriend Experience, or, if nothing else, Inglourious Basterds, all of which I'd at least say are very fine pieces of work, a couple truly great.
The idea that cinema is in any way dead is so far beyond the way I'm experiencing it right now.
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 11:51AM
Felicia said...
I agree with you and I would also add Julie and Julia, Away We Go, Up and (500) Days of Summer.
10-03-2009 @ 6:15PM
Stephie said...
Although movies are just fine, I've noticed recently that when I talk to my friends, they don't really talk about the movie they might have seen last night. Instead, they're telling me about last week's episode of whatever TV show has captured their fancy.
While TV hasn't surpassed the silver screen yet -- both mediums still peddle a lot of crappy stuff -- considering the TV shows which have graced the airwaves in the last decade or so (including The Wire, True Blood, FlashForward, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, Dexter, The Sopranos and The Tudors), I can say that TV is, slowly but surely, getting close to movies in production values, casting and overall storytelling.
Reply