Shelf Life: Dawn Of The Dead
Filed under: Shelf Life

While we'll pretty much make up any reason to watch a zombie any time day or night, much less one written and directed by the de facto creator of the genre, George Romero, the release of Zombieland gave our appetite for undead entertainment some legitimacy this week. And while Zack Snyder's 2004 reimagining of Dawn of the Dead might be the more obvious candidate for a "Shelf Life" column given Snyder's status as an emerging auteur himself, not to mention the fact it's the best American zombie movie in the last decade, we elected to go back to Romero's 1979 original and see if its classic status is still deserved.
The Facts: Also known as Zombi, George Romero's follow-up to the 1968 classic Night of the Living Dead was released May 24, 1979 after premiering in Italy almost a year before. With an estimated budget of $650,000, Romero's film grossed $55 million to date worldwide (equal to $181 million in 2009 dollars), and is widely acknowledged as the best zombie movie of all time – even if its predecessor likely remains the most influential.
Its Tomatometer rating is currently at 95 percent. While the movie failed to win any major awards (it netted a Saturn Award for Tom Savini's superlative make-up), the film was praised both for its terrific storytelling and of course gore as well as its social commentary, which was in many ways one of the first times mainstream audiences were introduced to horror movies as a specific metaphor for modern events and ideas.
What Still Works: Romero's straightforward and largely elegant execution of a zombie story, which set the stage for countless other films. While the idea of slow-moving zombies sounds unexciting given the aggressive pace of the zombies in Snyder's remake, much less of contemporary horror monsters in general, the film creates this horrible sense of inevitability – an encroaching doom – that lingers with the audience and keeps them off balance much more powerfully than if the creatures were constantly jumping out or peeling down the street after the protagonists. Meanwhile, the four characters at the center of the story are all fully-realized, realistic and deeply fascinating, going through a wide and interesting array of reactions to the zombie invasion that definitely seem dramatic, but always believable.
Best of all, Romero wisely avoids explaining what caused the zombie uprising, instead simply dealing with the creatures' slow, inescapable conquest of the world of the living. Using the mall location as both a physical fortress and a metaphorical prison, the living character struggle to learn what to do after they've satisfied their immediate needs and more frivolous desires. While the film more or less concretely states Romero's theory that malls are a wasteland of empty consumerism, the characters' evolution past survival towards complacency offers a powerful reminder that getting everything we think we want often comes at a price too high for us to pay.
What Doesn't Work: The only minor quibble I have about anything in the film is the make-up work, which even Savini admits was unevenly done or at least unevenly effective. One can't help but wonder how strongly the contrast between the zombies' grey skin and the tempera-paint blood would have registered on the film's original negatives or in an era where presentation both in theaters or home video was less sophisticated, but the combination creates a certain kind of cartoonish vibrancy that emphasizes the film's structure as a metaphor or social commentary moreso than an actual physical reality. That said, even the obviousness of the make-up fails to lessen the film's overall impact – and for gore-fearing girlfriends, it makes this movie one of the few they can see without getting totally grossed out.What's The Verdict: Hell yes, Dawn of the Dead holds up. Romero's film is one of my all-time favorite horror movies, but ultimately I'm not blinded by nostalgia; technically, artistically, intellectually, and viscerally, Dawn of the Dead is a brilliant, brilliant film, which is precisely why its appeal transcends the boundaries of "typical" horror audiences, and remains a seminal classic – in any genre - that stands the test of time.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-30-2009 @ 9:43PM
thirdmanphilip said...
Can we not call Zack Snyder an auteur?
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 11:06PM
MCW said...
After watching a number of newer zombie films, and playing a few horrible zombie video games, I started to get fatigued on the genre (Diary of the Dead didn't help).
Then I started to question whether or not Dawn of the Dead was still as good as I remembered. So I re-watched (on the newest Blu-ray version - spectacular looking by the way), and I saw things I hadn't noticed before. The attention to detail amazes me.
Particularly wonderful is a certain scene in which a character stumbles out of an elevator and reveals themselves to be a zombie. It's such a funny and startling moment all at once.
I can't find much fault in the movie either, apart from perhaps the one scene early, in which a door is kicked in, and a random guy's head gets blown off by a shotgun. I found it both silly and poorly done (much more visible in 1080p).
Other than that, though I've still not seen all of the zombie films I want and need to catch up on, Dawn of the Dead is still the best.
And while most people moronically spout old films and claim they were "the best ever", this is one of the only ones you can legitimately say that about (I'm looking at you, every person who says the 1st Star Wars film released was "the best ever". At least re-watch it once, and THEN try to tell me what in the crap you're talking about).
Dawn of the Dead should be required viewing for everyone.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 11:12PM
The KoT said...
Whoever says Star Wars (A New Hope) is "the best movie ever" has OBVIOUSLY re-watched it multiple times. I agree Dawn of the Dead is an all-time great film, even though I personally feel Night of the Living Dead is better. The black & white makes the zombies far more frightening (although the comic-book feel of DotD is great) and the overall atmosphere just feels so much more dreadful and horrifying. Plus, DotD's ending (at least the "heroic American" one isn't as believable or powerful as NotLD.
9-30-2009 @ 11:20PM
max said...
Zack Snyder an auteur? How? Do you even know what an auteur is?
Zack Snyder is barely a filmmaker! All that useless jerk-off has managed to do is a really poor remake of a terrific film, and two monumentally bland, nearly shot-for-shot interpretations of graphic novels (yes - 300 was awful to. He has no imagination or style - he just takes what is already there and fucks it up.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 11:22PM
max said...
Zack Snyder an auteur? How? Do you even know what an auteur is?
Zack Snyder is barely a filmmaker! All that useless jerk-off has managed to do is a really poor remake of a terrific film, and two monumentally bland, nearly shot-for-shot interpretations of graphic novels (yes - 300 was awful to say the least!). He has no imagination or style - he just takes what is already there and fucks it up.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 11:22PM
Todd Gilchrist said...
thanks for your comments!
10-01-2009 @ 12:35AM
reidll said...
DotD is certainly on my all-time top 10 list. I really do agree that it surpasses being merely a genre effort, but actually raises the level of what are acceptable horror movies ("Bride of Frankenstein" is another good example). Clearly that hasn't stopped people from making crappy horror movies, but after seeing DotD you can really see how dumb many of the others are.
I will actually stand in favor of Diary of the Dead too. Night, Dawn, and Day are better but Diary is still a solid effort and, again, better than any number of other horror movies (including Land of the Dead).
Romero deserves more praise than he gets. He's a true slice of American cinema history.
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 12:39AM
Wexler said...
Definitely a classic. My favorite zombie film of all time. It's sad to think you might actually be right in regards to the remake being the best America has had to offer this decade. I mean it was such a disappointment in so many regards. Personally I'd probably go with Land of the Dead as it is the only other decent American zombie film I can think of from this decade at the moment. That was an American production wasn't it? Hopefully Zombieland is as great as the early reviews are saying and we can forget about that failure of a remake.
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 2:35AM
Moviola said...
I'm not sure if this counts, but I think Shaun of the Dead is the best Zombie movie of the decade. Does the fact that its a comedy deter that at all? I'd say its not really a spoof of zombies, and maybe kind of in the spirit of horror comedy like the Reanimator or Evil Dead 2.
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 2:20AM
Todd Gilchrist said...
Moviola, I love Shaun of the Dead also, which is why I was careful to make the distinction of calling the Dawn remake the best American zombie movie of the last decade. Truth be told I love both of them for dramatically different reasons, but they're by far the best zombie movies I've seen in the last decade or two. And absolutely the comedy does NOT preclude these movies from being legitimate classics.
Thanks for commenting!
10-01-2009 @ 2:24AM
M said...
I'm always surprised how well this film holds up when I watch it again. I think I always go into it feeling a bit prejudiced because the make-up really is a bit sloppy, but once I get over that, it's a great zombie movie. It feels a bit dated, but in the best way possible as that's exactly how I think 1978 would look.
Also, I have to harp in that Zack Snyder is no auteur. Not even style over substance could save him on his last two efforts, but I'll admit I was pleasantly surprised by his Dawn remake.
Good choice!
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 7:54PM
MYMHM said...
I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I have the hardest time with people trying to get them to watch Dawn and Day.
Don't get me wrong, I LOVES me some DothD, but I think the combination of on the nose social commentary, and cartoony effects makes this film more inaccessible.
When I've sat people down to with NothLD, they walk away acting like they've seen something almost Hitchcockian, but with DotD, all i get is grumbling...
Reply