Cinematical Seven: Directorial Double Whammies
Filed under: Cinematical Seven

Reading about movies, you hear stories of some films shot in five days and other films shot over three years. Some of the poverty-row directors and B-movie makers cranked out as many movies as they could during a calendar year, while filmmakers like Charlie Chaplin and Stanley Kubrick waited years between projects (making each release a new "event"). Most filmmakers, I think, given the chance would probably release one film per year, keeping their toes in without burning out. But sometimes, whether it's a trick of the calendar, or some peculiar rhythms of timing, some of the greatest directors manage to release two films per year. And even less often, both of these films turn out great. The following is my not-exactly-extensive, but enthusiastic celebration of the one-two punch or the director's double-whammy.
1. Jacques Tourneur: I Walked with a Zombie and The Leopard Man (1943)
The world has frankly been a better place to live since Warner Home Video released the five-disc, nine-film DVD "Val Lewton Horror Collection" box set in 2005. I have often promised myself that, if ever en route to a desert island, it would be the first thing I'd grab (provided that said island came with its own entertainment system). Four directors worked on those nine great horror films (counting poor Gunther von Fritsch, a footnote in film history for being too slow, getting fired from The Curse of the Cat People, and thus launching Robert Wise's career). But Jacques Tourneur -- son of silent era filmmaker Maurice Tourneur -- is undoubtedly the most talented of the group. He started the cycle with the extraordinary Cat People in 1942, and followed it with this one-two punch in April and May of the following year. Sure, they're cheap, quickly-made B-movies, but few films have ever been made -- in any genre, for any price -- with so much textured atmosphere and such a resounding sense of dreamy dread.
.jpg)
2. David Cronenberg: Videodrome and The Dead Zone (1983)
Released in February of 1983, Videodrome went unnoticed at that time, except by the usual band of horror buffs. But these days -- and thanks to a spiffy two-disc Criterion Collection DVD release in 2004 -- it has come to be considered a kind of lynchpin in David Cronenberg's career, and perhaps his masterpiece (it's the crossover from his early, low-budget horror films into his more mature, recent entertainments). The Dead Zone, on the other hand, was released in October by a major studio and earned quite a bit more attention and money. While not up to Videodrome standards, it's still a very interesting work, and it received generally good reviews at the time. So with this particular one-two punch, Cronenberg upped the ante both for his die-hard fans and for his newfound mainstream fans.
.jpg)
3. Orson Welles: The Lady from Shanghai and Macbeth (1948)
Some sources list The Lady from Shanghai as a 1947 film, but it was released in the United States in June of 1948, just a few months before the October premiere of Macbeth. This was a remarkable feat, given that Welles directed, completed and released only 13 films over the course of 37 years, and for two of them to fall in the same year must have been a miraculous luxury for the most adventurous moviegoers of the time. Of course, Welles' name was mud back then, and even today there are those who believe that his career after Citizen Kane was a long, slow downfall. But just check out this pair -- an off-kilter film noir with some genuinely bizarre touches and a low-budget, but nightmarish Shakespeare adaptation -- and you'll see that the genius had never lost his touch.
.jpg)
4. John Ford: Stagecoach and Young Mr. Lincoln (1939)
How did he do it? John Ford averaged two or three movies a year all through the 1930s. He made three in 1939, two more in 1940 and two more in 1941 -- and won the Best Director Oscar twice during that time. And these were no mere low-budget quickies. These were the best A-list stuff Hollywood had to offer. He was good... really, really good. But 1939 was his best year. He finished the year with a Revolutionary War film, Drums Along the Mohawk, which is a perfectly good film, but his earlier two releases are essential viewing, even today. Stagecoach was pretty much instantly acclaimed as an American masterpiece, turning a fairly tired genre on its head and re-inventing it for a more intelligent audience (though it has its fair share of great action, too). Young Mr. Lincoln took a bit longer to find its place, and was helped along by French critics after WWII, who embraced it as one of the director's most balanced films.
.jpg)
5. Don Siegel: Dirty Harry and The Beguiled (1971)
Siegel rose through the ranks from a "montage" director at Warner Brothers, to one of Hollywood's most crackerjack B-movie makers in the 1950s and 1960s to one of the very best action directors of the 1970s. 1971 was his banner year, finishing off with a huge hit and a highly influential Clint Eastwod classic, Dirty Harry; it was so brutal and incendiary at the time that both Roger Ebert and Pauline Kael called it "fascist." But earlier in the year, he made what might be his personal masterpiece, The Beguiled, a psychosexual war film about a wounded Union soldier (Eastwood again) who is taken in by the proprietors of a Confederate girls' school. If that's not enough, Eastwood also made his own great directorial debut this year, Play Misty for Me, and gave Siegel a small part in it.
.jpg)
6. Clint Eastwood: Changeling and Gran Torino (2008)
This one is all the more remarkable when you consider how complex and detailed the two films are, that they were released only two months apart (in October and December), and that Eastwood was 78 at the time. I found Changeling very tough to sit through when I first saw it, but my admiration for it has grown; I found the fact that Eastwood did not soften the subject matter quite commendable. Apparently viewers did too; it currently ranks on the IMDB's Top 250 films. Gran Torino is a masterpiece, a concept that neither critics nor the Academy picked up on at the time. Happily, the fans did, and they made it one of the biggest hits of Eastwood's career.
.jpg)
7. Preston Sturges: The Lady Eve and Sullivan's Travels (1941)
Sturges was a comedy pressure-cooker, popping out at least seven hilarious classics in the four years between 1940 and 1944. He started out small, with Christmas in July and The Great McGinty in 1940, and raised the stakes for this pair. The Lady Eve is one of the sexiest screwball comedies that anyone could have baffled the censors with in 1941 (complete with phallic snakes), and Sullivan's Travels is still one of the ultimate post-modern Hollywood satires (with a message that continues to be ignored to this day).
Runners up:
George A. Romero: Martin and Dawn of the Dead (1978)
Steven Spielberg: Jurassic Park and Schindler's List (1993)
Alfred Hitchcock: To Catch a Thief and The Trouble with Harry (1955)
Yasujiro Ozu: Good Morning and Floating Weeds (1959)
Anthony Mann: The Furies and Winchester '73 (1950)










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
10-13-2009 @ 11:12PM
The FilmFreak said...
Spielberg and his 1993 masterpieces deserve to be on the list (more so than just honorable mentions) than Eastwoods mediocre forgot films
Reply
10-13-2009 @ 11:26PM
almostinfocus said...
Francis Ford Coppola released "The Conversation" and "The Godfather: Part II" in 1974, definitely deserving a place on this list.
Reply
10-13-2009 @ 11:35PM
almostinfocus said...
Two of Ingmar Bergman's greatest films, "The Seventh Seal" and "Wild Strawberries" were released in his native Sweden in 1957, though they were released in the US in 1958 and 1959 respectively.
10-14-2009 @ 12:21AM
Davey said...
Glad to see "Gran Torino" cited as a masterpiece--it is. The Honorable Mentions seem like they deserve better though.
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 12:49AM
jameswongwhat? said...
Howard Hawks: 1941--Sergeant York and Ball of Fire
John Huston: 1948--Key Largo and Treasure of the Sierra Madre, 1951--The African Queen and The Red Badge of Courage
Michael Curtiz: 1941--Yankee Doodle Dandy and Casa-freakin-blanca, 1938--The adventures of Robin Hood and Angels with Dirty Faces
Sidney Lumet: 1964--Fail-Safe and The Pawnbroker
Joe Mankiewicz: 1950--All About Eve and No Way Out
John Frankenheimer: 1966--Seconds and Gran Prix,
1964--The Train and Seven Days in May, 1962--Manchurian Candidate and Birdman of Alcatraz
Robert Wise: 1958--I Want to Live and Run Silent, Run Deep
Mel Brooks: 1974--Young Frahnk-en-shteen and Blazing Saddles
Victor Fleming: 1939-- WIzard of Oz and Gone with the Wind, I realize both of these films had 4 and 3 directors respectively, Fleming did the bulk of the shooting and was the credited director on both.
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 9:51AM
Angel said...
Great job on pointing out John Huston with Key Largo & The Treasure of the Sierra Madre. Two of my favorite films of all time.
10-14-2009 @ 1:19AM
Frug said...
How the hell did you forget Mel Brooks in 1974. Young Frankenstein and Blazing Saddles were released within 6 MONTHS of each other. There simply never been a comedy one-two punch like that before.
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 3:12AM
Taci said...
Steven Soderbergh, 2000: Traffic and Erin Brockovich
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 8:30AM
freisprechanlagen said...
Hi I have Val Lewton Horror Collection. And its awesome. I feel that is the best I had ever seen.freisprechanlagen
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 9:50AM
Angel said...
If I was going to put Clint Eastwood on the list it wouldn't be for Changeling & Gran Torino which are both "good" movies but I don't think either one can be considered a masterpiece but I would put him on the list for the year 2006 when he released "Flags of Our Fathers" and "Letters from Iwo Jima"
All be it "Flags of our Fathers" wasn't great I think for the most part people will agree that it was good. It has a solid 73% on Rotten Tomatoes but "Letters from Iwo Jima" more then makes up for any short comings that "Flags" has. "Letters from Iwo Jima" is a masterpiece. It has a 91% on Rotten Tomatoes & it got him another Oscar nomination which he would have won had Martin Scorsese not done such a great job with "The Departed".
For a director to do two war films from the two opposite perspectives in the same year speaks volumes of the kind of director that Clint Eastwood is.
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 8:38AM
Paolo said...
Abel Ferrara: The Funeral and The Addiction (1995)
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 2:37PM
Jake said...
Soderbergh also double-dipped in '02 with Solaris and Full Frontal, then this year with 'The Girlfriend Experience' and 'The Informant!'
Woody releasing 'Husbands and Wives' and 'Shadows and Fog' (the lesser of the two) in '92 is worth noting, too.
All of them being light years ahead of the turgid and melodramatic 'Gran Torino,' oh my God.
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 2:40PM
Adam Charles said...
Spielberg's '93 films should be more than an honorable-mention, w/ '05's War of the Worlds and Munich being listed as an honorable mention.
Reply
10-14-2009 @ 7:37PM
Angel said...
The Girlfriend Experience?! I love Steven Soderbergh as much as anybody but I don't think anybody would consider "The Girlfriend Experience" a masterpiece.
Reply
10-15-2009 @ 11:41AM
Jake said...
It's no masterpiece, but I'd consider 'The Girlfriend Experience' to be the most accomplished of Soderbergh's experimental films. One of my favorites from this year, too.
Reply
10-15-2009 @ 1:05PM
James said...
You just soiled all credibility you could ever have as a film buff by listing 2008's double whammy of shitty Clint Eastwood. Those rank among Clint's WORST films, and stupid fanboys who are blinded by the moniker of Clint Eastwood are too delusional to realize what lousy, shoddy garbage the movies really are.
IMDb's Top 250 is well known as a joke, considering some of the movies that do make it on there, versus ones that don't. It becomes lamer when you realize that modern movies instantly jump on that list for no reason.
Jolie's performance, while good, suffered, as did the rest of the movie, from an underwhelming screenplay. The worst part was how Jolie's character was forced to repeat several lines up to 8 times a piece, which seemed ludicrous and ranks "Changeling" as a better-than-average Lifetime movie.
Meanwhile, "Gran Torino" is perhaps one of 2008's most Razzie-worthy flicks. It's absolutely abhorrent screenplay, which was full of contrivances and amateurish attempts at being edgy, definitely held it back. But, so did Eastwood's directing style; his one-take cuts were a lousy, disastrous idea, working with those Asian newcomers, and their performances came off as incredibly fractured and unconvincing. Ironically, this was the first time Eastwood's acting impressed me since "Unforgiven". But that doesn't excuse the numerous faults. The Academy was not only justified, but commendable, for snubbing Clint Eastwood TIMES FOUR, and not letting him slide in on a name-only basis. And for you to shamefully list this double shitburger of cinematic timewasters, then you need to be schooled in some more impressive cinematic achievements.
Reply
10-19-2009 @ 8:29AM
Marcus said...
God, James, I totally agree with you. At least in 2006, Eastwood had Letters from Iwo Jima and Flags of Our Fathers, the first of which demonstrated his ability to work with a multicultural cast. In Gran Torino, the screenplay was lousy, the supporting cast made me cringe in pain, and although Eastwood's performance was alright, his character's arc was so predictable I wouldn't have minded someone telling me he got shot at the end of the movie.
As far as Changeling is concerned, Angelina Jolie's performance was great, but the predictability of the storyline had me groaning. At the end of the movie, when she said "Hope," I mouthed the word seconds before she said it. Eastwood is not a stupid director; I really did expect better from him.
10-19-2009 @ 6:03AM
Risto Luukkonen said...
Hitchcock should have made the list. Not for 1955, but for either 1954 (Rear Window, Dial M For Murder) or for 1956 (Wrong Man, The Man Who Knew Too Much).
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 12:36AM
Alex said...
Of course Tim Burton gets overlooked, and by writing this message a bunch of flamers will reply with "Burton is a hack!" or some insightful argument like that. His 2005 films will at least be masterful 'double whammies' to me!
Reply
10-19-2009 @ 8:28AM
Marcus said...
Hey, what about Traffic and Erin Brockovich, two of Soderbergh's great films that won Oscars for its stars (Roberts and Del Toro) and one for Soderbergh (for Traffic)? Weren't they released in the same year?
Reply