Finding Fabulous Villains in Mediocre Movies
Filed under: Fandom

Sometimes it's hard not to feel sorry for a top-notch bad guy (or girl) who's stuck in a terrible movie. Many of us cherish some guilty pleasure films that we watch just for the evil characters. The plot may stink, the hero or heroine may be as dull as dishwater, the dialogue makes soap operas look subtle ... but oh, those glorious villains add a much-needed spark of life. Often, such villains and villainesses are played by critically acclaimed actors who need a gig with a big paycheck.
I've always wished I could pick up a few of these notably evil characters and move them to a better movie, one where their talents are more appreciated, one that doesn't end up on a DVD that people hide on the bottom of their shelves so no one makes fun of them. Here are a few of my favorites -- who am I missing on this list?
George Kaplan (James Coburn) in Hudson Hawk
Someone suggested I include Richard Grant and Sandra Bernhardt from Hudson Hawk on this list, but I found them incredibly irritating. James Coburn, on the other hand, deserved something better. His double-agent George Kaplan (yeah, I know) was one of the very few performances in the film that didn't cause my eyes to roll and my brain to try to recast and rewrite the film. Fortunately, there are many other wonderful Coburn bad guys we can enjoy, such as his menacing Tex in Charade.
Sheriff of Nottingham (Alan Rickman) in Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves
I know this movie had many fans, but I wasn't one of them. I don't really need to watch Robin Hood and his Merry Men helping women give birth, among other things. And although I love Rickman's portrayal of the Sheriff, I found the attempted-rape scene near the end to be unpleasant and jarring. Rickman has played some memorable nasties in very successful films, from Die Hard to Sweeney Todd ... and of course Severus Snape in the Harry Potter movies, although I know some of you want to put those films on this list as well.
Cardinal Richelieu (Tim Curry) in The Three Musketeers (1993)
Admittedly I am just a big ol' Tim Curry fan in nearly anything and I knew I would pick him for something on this list, although originally I'd thought of his role as Rooster in an otherwise lackluster Annie. This version of The Three Musketeers is a pale, lame shadow of the 1973 version except for Curry and occasionally, Rebecca de Mornay. If only we could create a time warp and substitute Curry for Charlton Heston. For an equally campy Curry villain in a more fun movie, try his Long John Silver in Muppet Treasure Island, or Bill Sykes in a made-for-TV Oliver Twist ... but avoid Legend.
Velma Von Tussle (Michelle Pfeiffer) in Hairspray (2007)
I prefer the original movie version of Hairspray to the 2007 adaptation of the Broadway musical, which I find less edgy and more homogenized. Plus ... no Divine. At least the older characters in the remake are kind of fun, and that includes Michelle Pfeiffer as the ambitious TV station owner/stage mother Velma Von Tussle. She's unabashedly racist, mean-spirited, and will stop at nothing to get what she wants. Fortunately, she gets what she deserves. While I would in no way want to substitute Pfeiffer for the also delightfully evil Debbie Harry in the original version, I do hope Pfeiffer gets the chance to play an unabashed villainness in a better movie. Oh, wait, she did -- check out her evil witch in Stardust.
Huxley (Mandy Patinkin) in The Adventures of Elmo in Grouchland
Sometimes the best bad guys around are in children's movies where the characters don't have to be especially realistic. The Adventures of Elmo in Grouchland is too cutesy-pie even for grown-up fans of Sesame Street -- there's too much Elmo and not enough Grouchland -- but Mandy Patinkin gets a chance to show us his inner old-fashioned villain. He even gets a song. I hope Patinkin will favor us with more evil characters, perhaps in movies for grown-ups.
Sandman (Thomas Haden Church), Venom (Topher Grace), and Green Goblin II/Harry Osborn (James Franco) in Spider-Man 3
I really wanted to like Spider-Man 3, but one big problem was that there were too many bad guys. Near the end, it grew awkward and difficult when you had this big gang of supervillains all wanting to fight Spider-Man, or one another, or both. Bleah. If the franchise had been more reasonable and spaced these evildoers out into two or three movies, each would have had a chance to shine -- or glower, as the case may be. We don't get to spend the time with them that we had in the previous two Spider-Man movies. What a shame.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-20-2009 @ 5:20PM
Mike said...
I didn't think any of the villains in Spider-Man 3 were particularly good, let alone "fabulous". Then again, nothing in that movie was particularly good.
Reply
10-20-2009 @ 5:26PM
Joe said...
Sandman just flying away at the end like a Windows screensaver pretty much seals the deal as him being a terrible villain (villains are to be defeated, for god's sake).
Harry, however, when he wasn't spending most of the film suffering from mind numbing memory loss, was deliciously evil and just about the only actor in the film who knew to crank the Ham meter up to 11.
Topher Grace was a joke beginning to end.
10-21-2009 @ 1:27PM
sodaart2007 said...
Ok being an avid Spider-Man fan I have to agree. Following the marvel that was Spider-Man 2 the third was was terrible. The main redeaming factor was the character development they spend on Harry in the first two films. When he was angry and evil it was amazing. Then they decide to give him brain damage wipe his memories and suddenly what was good in the film was gone! Then they introduced Venom and then killed him in 20 mins. OMG!
However, I thought T.H.C. as Sandman was good. But because they HAD to do Venom he didn't get the development he required.
Sorry Sam... bad move! Sony shame on you for forcing Sam Raimi to do the Venom storyline!!!!
10-20-2009 @ 5:55PM
Relaxing Dragon said...
I always liked Samuel Jackson's The Octopus in The Spirit. He seemed to be enjoying himself enough to shine through the mediocrity of the rest of the movie. Plus I thought he was pretty funny.
Reply
10-20-2009 @ 8:24PM
alergias plasticas said...
stanley tucci, as muerte, in undercover blues (1993)
Reply
10-21-2009 @ 1:27PM
Sodaart2007 said...
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH
Good One!
10-20-2009 @ 8:52PM
Kev said...
I thought Thomas Haden Church was awesome in Spidy 3. But they simply didn't give him enough to do.
Reply
10-20-2009 @ 9:23PM
Videoport Jones said...
I think I'd go for a John Hurt double feature, with his welcome hamminess livening up both the wretched "Jake Speed" and the unwatchable "From the Hip". The man can ham it up like an Armour gift basket and escape with some dignity.
Check out come of our movie lists from the filmgeeks at Videoport (the world's best video store in Portland, Maine) here:
http://videoportjones.wordpress.com/2009/06/17/the-worst-performance-in-an-otherwise-good-movie/
Reply
10-20-2009 @ 9:37PM
Drewbacca said...
I always thought they should have had Church play Venom. (Unlike the anorexic Grace, he has the build)
Reply
10-20-2009 @ 9:46PM
Jen said...
Well, why not "Legend"? Tim Curry as Darkness is a lot of fun, and Tom Cruise as the idiotic boy hero never gets old.
Reply
10-20-2009 @ 9:53PM
NP said...
Because Legend is not a terrible movie
10-21-2009 @ 12:46AM
Justin said...
Jason Isaacs in the Patriot.
"Stupid boy. Did he die?"
Reply
10-21-2009 @ 9:00AM
lw said...
Tim Roth In Rob Roy.
Reply
10-21-2009 @ 6:02PM
Wes said...
I'll one up you and say Tim Roth as Febre in The Musketeer. Crappy movie, great bad guy.
10-21-2009 @ 7:54PM
lw said...
Yeah, Tim Roth is just so good at being a nasty,smarmy guy who you want to beat the shit out of.
10-21-2009 @ 10:13AM
mdk said...
THC was completely wasted in the godawfully-mega-bad Spidey 3. Even poor ol' Sandy's FX sucked. For one thing, it looked like he was composed of Fresh Step kitty litter, not sand (only thing missing was the little blue, odor-absorbing crystals). Secondly, Sandman is known in the comics for being pretty creative with the various shapes he forms his sand-body into. In Spidey 3, all he really did was make big fists or suck up more sand, make himself giant-sized and roar, "AAAAAARRRRRrrrr!". Then there was the ridiculous Sandzilla (Sanderfield?) monster he formed into in the final fight scene. And let's not forget that Raimi blithely changed Spider-Man's entire origin story, making Sandy responsible for Uncle Ben's death (dumb as dirt, or sand anyway), but even so, Peter isn't out for revenge at the end, he and Sandman just sit down for a nice cry. God I HATED this movie!
Reply
10-21-2009 @ 11:45AM
Astin said...
I walked out of Spidey 3 thinking, "it's a shame the movie sucked so much around the great portrayals by Church and Franco".
Grace was disappointing as Venom, but Thomas Haden Church was a great Flint Marko and brought a lot of pathos to the role. Franco, who annoyed me in the previous 2 installments really shone in the third. I was surprised that he was finally able to pull in some acting chops for the movie.
As for the others - Rickman's great in just about anything. Patinkin shines when he's having fun with a role. And Curry? Well Curry is just insane, and sometimes it works brilliantly, and sometimes falls so outside the mood of what he's in that it doesn't work.
Reply