Review: The Box
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Thrillers, Mystery & Suspense, Warner Brothers, Theatrical Reviews

Richard Matheson's original short story, "Button, Button," was a nifty little morality tale about a couple faced with a peculiar opportunity -- if they push a button in a box, they'll get a sum of money but kill a stranger in doing so. That version of the story ended with the wife pushing the button and killing her husband, a man she didn't really know. As an episode of "The Twilight Zone" in 1986, the story ended with the couple paid off and assured that the device would then go to another couple to whom they qualify as strangers. Now, Richard Kelly's The Box takes that same basic premise and spins it into a mind-bender of the most baffling degree, starting out as another "Twilight Zone"-worthy variant but eventually reaching the outer limits of both patience and reason.
It's 1976, and times are getting tough on Arthur and Norma (James Marsden and Cameron Diaz). Despite being a key contributor to NASA's Viking mission, his application to become an astronaut is turned down; meanwhile, the tuition discount for their son that comes with Norma's teaching job is revoked. It's an ideal time for a box with a button to show up on their doorstep, and with it comes Arlington Steward (Frank Langella), a horribly scarred but seemingly sincere man who lets the following proposition unfold: you have 24 hours to push that button, receive a million dollars in cash and cause the death of a stranger.
Suffice it to say, the button gets pushed, they get the money and a stranger dies. (We simply wouldn't have much of a feature if it were merely two hours of moaning about morality.) Arthur and Norma, though, start getting a bit more curious as to what they've gotten themselves into, and both their exact circumstances and the direct consequences only grow increasingly more convoluted from there on out.
At the start, Kelly (Donnie Darko, Southland Tales) nails not just the time and place with some impeccable production design (the cars! the hair! that wallpaper!), but also the mood. The original score by some members of the band Arcade Fire is an instantly ominous work that stands among the year's best, and as Steward, Langella is not only quite convincingly disfigured, but also appropriately grave in his manner.
But then an increasing amount of characters are subjected to nosebleeds and moments of cryptic behavior. Jean-Paul Sartre and Arthur C. Clarke get name-checked in equal measure. And our leads find themselves re-located with an increasing lack of continuity. Some of this is eventually explained away, if barely so, but what is supposed to suggest a state of discomfort and unease feels more disjointed and frustrating than anything, and what's meant to be menacing soon turns laughable.
It's creepy when a man silently arrives near a window and just out of frame, but less so when the same man appears to be gawking full-on like a peeping tom with lockjaw, only to pass around the outside of the house with a downright Pavlovian violin shriek matching his every step. A speech meant to elicit sympathy for two characters with similar deformities is rendered risible by a certain someone's persistently twangy accent. Another speech suggesting the logical sense of a box as a device is likewise sabotaged by leaden delivery. And the overall menace of a far-spread conspiracy is diluted by the fact that it comes off like the type of variation on Invasion of the Body Snatchers that one might cull from any college dorm room that has a rolled-up towel at the door and a blathering sociology major on the couch.
The experiment, in all its loopy glory, begins to matter more to Kelly than its subjects, and in this way, he sufficiently negates any stakes that we're supposed to have in these characters and any impact that their decisions might carry. What's worse is that Marsden and Diaz do share little moments of genuine chemistry throughout, usually wordless and often touching, that dare to defy all the mumbo-jumbo that surrounds them.
As is revealed quite early on, there's quite literally nothing inside the box itself. What truly bothers me is that there are glimpses of something inside The Box, bits of heart wrapped inside a headache, soaked under so many riddles and so much water, and surrounded by plenty of bloody tissues.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-06-2009 @ 5:45PM
eli said...
I saw this last night @ a free preview, and very glad it was free because I would have been pissed if I had paid to see this boring, ridiculous movie. The audience laughed at things that I assume were not supposed to be thought of as funny, there's little to no story, and as my friend pointed out, "their accents disappeared halfway through the film." This movies is at best a Red Box rental, don't waste more than a dollar or two to see this when it's released on DVD.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:59PM
Peter Martin said...
Such literal thinkers! The more I think about the movie, the more I like it, simply because it's such a bizarre vision put on screen, with delightful flights of fancy, of the purely cinematic magical variety.
Of course, it probably has more moments that are utterly ridiculous. Good review, though, Will, and eminently fair. Loved your line about the "towel rolled up by the door" and what it symbolizes about those that live within!
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 9:24PM
NP said...
This movie was horrible. The acting (accents included) sucked. The CGI nosebleeds and signature Kelly wacky water were distractions, and the barely veiled misogyny gives Antichrist a run for its money.
Reply
11-08-2009 @ 3:54PM
Lacy said...
This movie was absolutely terrible! It was confusing, boring and way too long. The acting was also horrible. Many people left during the middle of the movie. I would not recommend ever seeing it, even when it is out on DVD to rent.
Reply
11-11-2009 @ 3:45PM
Daniel said...
Not even worth illegally downloading. It is the most bizarre movie I have ever seen and the previews misconstrue what this movie is really about.
Reply
12-06-2009 @ 5:35PM
Kieran Evans said...
I think the above comments are a little harsh. I enjoyed this film, OK it wasn't as good as I expected it to be and I think it got a bit silly in the middle, but there were some good moments and I am glad I watched it. I would say if the concept of the film interests you (as it did me) , then give it a go.
I also don't understand why the above writers all gave it 2 out of 3 when they hated it so much - their comments suggest 0 would have been more appropriate.
Reply
12-19-2009 @ 7:49AM
Matt said...
I don't know what to say actually. Really cool idea, first thirty minutes went well...then got pretty ridiculous really fast. Don't know if it's a thriller, sci-fi, religious or drama...can't make up it's mind. It's like the dude just threw stuff in there whenever it came up in his head. The only good acting was the burned face guy. It was disturbing to watch...because you really don't know what the heck was really going on. It never really addresses the main antagonist...just some ambiguous force/entity/alien race or something.
Reply
12-21-2009 @ 8:21PM
marc said...
it's the most bizzare film i have seen.however i enjoyed it, like the moral questions it poses were pretty much not the point.the fact that some of you were looking for an answer,an ending is what kept me thinking.i would of loved to have seen what happened with burnt/lightning face man or Marsdens son.but the whoel point, to me.was that we're all too inteerested in money,objects to actually realise our potential.
Thats what the tests were for,if your questioning an ending then this film is about you.
reagrds marc
Reply
1-07-2010 @ 2:51AM
MJ said...
This is the worst movie i have ever seen in my life. And let me tell you, i have seen some pretty terrible movies.
Despite the storyline being awful and completely unrealistic, it's the directing that got to me the most. It was very amateur, and it reminded me of high school Media movies. Cameron Diaz was a total bore and her accent bothered me throughout the whole movie.
The worst thing about it though, just to choose one, was when it took a Sci-Fi turn and i began to question whether i had accidently put in The Matrix instead.
If you don't want to spend 2 hours of your life saying "what the hell is this?", i recommend you to NOT watch this.
Reply