Top 10 Annoyingly Ambiguous Movie Endings

Yesterday, we posted a very funny video from College Humor that resolved some classic ambiguous endings in film: The Graduate, Lost in Translation, and so forth. But it reminded me that sometimes these vague endings can be truly irritating and frustrating. I hate sitting through what is shaping up into a good movie experience, then the end negates the whole film, makes no sense, or just plain ends without warning or closure.
Sometimes these ambiguous endings are great: I felt the ending of The Wrestler was just right, and I also liked the way the recently released A Serious Man concluded. Sometimes these unresolved endings are meant to pave the way for a sequel, which is great if you happen to have the sequel there with you, but when it's a new movie, you just want to throttle the filmmakers. Here are 10 movies with endings that make me want to throw a popcorn box at the screen, or find the filmmakers and demand an explanation. It goes without saying that I'm about to spoil the endings of 10 films, so you've been warned.
No Country for Old Men
This movie was in the College Humor video, so I feel a bit guilty repeating it, but it annoyed the living crap out of me. First, the Coens structured it so we didn't see the death of a major character, which was unsatisfying. And then the last scene ... is Tommy Lee Jones telling us about a dream he had. That's it? That's the end? Many people thought this adaptation of a Cormac McCarthy novel was the best movie of 2007, but I never "got" it myself, and the ending (shown below) had a lot to do with my dislike.
Kill Bill Vol. 2
You may ask, "Jette, why on earth is this ambiguous? Beatrix heads off into the sunset with her little girl, it's a happy ending." Really? Not to me. The Bride is now going to be The Mom, and a nice traditional mom at that? I found that difficult to believe. In my head, this movie has another ending -- an epilogue, set 15 years in the future. We're back at Hattori Hanzo's sushi bar and he's good-naturedly arguing with his assistant, Beatrix, when Vernita's daughter Nikki walks in, seeking revenge. We pan up to the attic and there's Beatrix's daughter, practicing with a sword. I had to invent my own ending because the one in the film was so damned unsatisfying.
The Evil Dead
Have you gone back and watched the 1981 film lately? I suspect more of us remember Evil Dead 2 or Army of Darkness. The Evil Dead is more of a straightforward horror movie -- and look at how young Bruce Campbell is! That in itself is almost unbelievable. But imagine you didn't know there were any sequels, and you saw this movie in a theater back in the day. The movie ends with Ash walking outside at dawn, feeling as though he's escaped the terrors that claimed his friends ... and then the DeadCam starts gearing up again. Are they going to claim him, or not? Are they even supposed to be out there after dawn? Did this movie break its own rules? If we didn't know about Raimi's other films, this vague ending would be super frustrating. Horror films do this a lot -- finish up the action, wrap everything up, and then stick in one last shock whether it's consistent or not. I blame Brian De Palma and the awful ending of Carrie. Speaking of inconsistency, I love the end credits music for this movie, too.
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
My husband, who encouraged me to watch this film for the first time earlier this year, suggested this film, and he has a point. Again, if you saw this movie in a theater and didn't have Star Trek III right there in your DVD cabinet, the cliffhanger-y ending would be extremely frustrating. Back in the day, remember, it wasn't a done deal that there would be more sequels, either -- the first Star Trek film was not a runaway success, although this one was. Spock dies, but there's some ambiguity around that -- the ending feels patched-together and doesn't fit the rest of the film. This is in fact because some of it was reshot because test audiences found Spock's death too dark and final. Now it's not final ... and the ending feels off-kilter.
2001: A Space Odyssey
It could be argued that the entire movie is incomprehensible. We're on the spaceship, but then we're in an elegant room, where people disappear and appear and transform. Next thing you know, there's a baby in a bubble and we're in space and the music swells. WTF? My husband tells me that if I would only read the book, everything about this Stanley Kubrick adaptation would make sense -- more sense than it does now, at least. In the meantime, I just sigh a lot while watching the final scenes, and feel like a philistine for not appreciating it more.
He Was a Quiet Man
I caught this indie film at SXSW 2007 and for the most part, it followed a fairly straightforward story line. Christian Slater's character Bob saves the office from a crazy office worker gone postal, even as he considered doing the same thing himself, and he continues to ponder whether it's worthwhile to let all these greedy, selfish people live. At the end, the movie flashes back to the scene where Bob stops the shooting rampage ... or does he? Or is he going on a shooting rampage himself? He talks directly to the screen, the movie ends, and what the hell just happened? Was it all a fantasy or dream sequence? I had no idea. The director talked about everyone deciding for themselves but I was completely irritated by the ambiguity. If it's a dream, I want to know that; if it's real, I want to know that too.
Ghost World
Speaking of the frustrating blur between dreams/fantasies and reality, the ending of Ghost World nearly made me hate the whole movie preceding it. Enid waits at a "Not in Service" bus stop, then boards a bus that picks her up ... is it a real bus? Is it a metaphor for the afterlife, and is she committing suicide, or is she just taking the road less traveled? What the hell? By injecting something unreal at the end of a realistic movie, the filmmakers break the rules of the film's universe and annoy the audience. I had the same problem with the end of The Men Who Stare at Goats.
When the Levees Broke
Possibly this four-hour documentary about the devastation in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 causes me more frustration than any other movie on the list. We never do find out what happens to the city of New Orleans. Will the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ever build strong levees built to last during hurricanes? Will poor New Orleanians ever get out of temporary housing and back to their homes? Will city, state and federal politicians ever do anything major and lasting to rebuild the city? What's going to happen to the Lower Ninth Ward? It's been four years and those questions are unanswered. Admittedly, however, I can't blame director Spike Lee for that -- it's not exactly a problem with the film.
Blade Runner
You can pick your ending for Blade Runner these days -- the original theatrical version, the 1992 director's cut, or the 2007 "final cut" that Ridley Scott supervised. Any way you slice it, it's in need of interpretation: is Decker a replicant, how much longer do he and Rachael have, and so forth. The theatrical ending is a little like the "happy ending" cut of Brazil, but the other cuts are also maddeningly ambiguous.
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
I first saw this movie in high school and I had trouble believing it was really over. Did the TV station broadcasting the movie cut out some key funny bit, or end it early? Would there be another ending after the credits? What was wrong? Suddenly the storming of the castle shifted into policemen arresting people and breaking up mobs, and bam! Credits. The ending does actually fit the universe of the film, not to mention the Python brand of humor, but it's so very abrupt that I didn't understand it had ended at all. I think it's funny now, but at the time I was extremely frustrated.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
11-11-2009 @ 11:15PM
Rowdy said...
Oh no... it's another list proving that a Cinematical writer is an idiot.
I thought we were done with these after the 'Movies I Will Never See' fiasco.
Reply
11-11-2009 @ 11:55PM
Nikki said...
Agreed. You should not be proud that great movies went completely over your head.
11-11-2009 @ 11:15PM
Videoport Jones said...
This is a terrible list. Sorry, guys- I know it's all personal preference, and we're all artists, etc. But ambiguous endings, while the lamest of them can just be evidence of bad, indifferent writing, are not, in and of themselves, a bad thing. Quite the opposite...I work renting and recommending movies to people, and, when someone complains about the open-endedness of most of the movies on your list, I sigh, internally roll my eyes, and then direct them to the dum-dum section. No country's ending is the summation of the theme of the film...it's about the coming of the darkeness of the new world, and the reaction of the old. It's poetic. It's beautiful.
I could go into each in turn, but your central premise is what's flawed. (I'd add John Sayles' underrated Limbo to the 'intentionally-ambiguous endings that dum-dums complain about' list).
Disappointing.
Check out the movie lists from the best, goddamned movie store in the country (Videoport in Portland, Maine): (for example):
http://videoportjones.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/robert-altmans-phantom-oscars/
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 6:16AM
010111 said...
i thought for certain that "Limbo" would be a completely obvious shoe-in for this list. but... no?
apparently not new enough or classic enough to even be recognized.
there was another movie recently that had a Limbo-esque ending. totally spacing on it right now. but also not on this list.
personally i can think of a lot of movies that would have *benefited greatly* by having an ambiguous ending. there are a lot of good movies that get ruined with a horrible slapped on ending. in some cases ... a non-ending would 've been highly preferable to any and all of original and theatrical and alternate endings.
11-11-2009 @ 11:48PM
moviesrocks1 said...
Ok, I'm going to put my two scents in & say how much I love your lists. Makes me think about the movies you talk about & the ones I've seen & make me rethink the movie.
As far as these endings go, I've seen some pretty creepy & scary movies in my lifetime, but the ending of 2001 has to be THE scariest thing ever! The whole breathing thing didn't help matters at all. I have never seen the whole movie as I got bored of it part way through. Now I want to go & see it. Maybe the ending will make more sense to me. Or not.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:00AM
TheDude said...
Your two "scents"? Really?
11-12-2009 @ 7:44AM
moviesrocks1 said...
Ok, I meant cents. Sue me.
11-11-2009 @ 11:53PM
TheDude said...
I'm firmly convinced that the people who "write" for Cinematical are actually high school journalism students working on their senior projects. The editors are a different story. They're actually college freshman.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:05AM
Mike said...
And yet you still visit the site why?
11-12-2009 @ 1:14PM
J. Bryant said...
Maybe you should should find another site to read if you find this one so juvenile.
11-11-2009 @ 11:59PM
Jette said...
"You should not be proud that great movies went completely over your head."
Sorry, guys, but I don't consider "No Country for Old Men" to be a great movie. Not that fond of "2001" either. And that doesn't make me a high-school student or an idiot, it makes me someone with different taste than you.
If you had actually read the entire article, instead of jumping into "you're a dumbass" mode, you would notice that I mentioned there are many films with ambiguous endings that work well, that I like and think are great. Ambiguity can provide an excellent ending to a film. These films ... not so much.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:41AM
cubitfox said...
You don't understand what "great" means. Great doesn't mean good or "i like it", it means important, significant and influential. 'Great' is not subjective, its not up to taste. 'good','fantastic', 'awful' are up to personal preference. No Country is debatable whether it will have any influence in the future. Not enough time has passed.
2001 however is one of the most important films ever made, at least top ten. Ask any filmmaker from Spielberg to PT Anderson and they'll tell you how important of a film it is.
And as it seems you don't even understand the ending. You say "people" appear and disappear, Its only one guy, David Bowman. And who says you have to understand it logically? Its not a logical movie in any way, its abstract. Its a two and a half hour long film where most shots are swirling space ships set to music. The ending fits perfectly, and its not a cliffhanger like The Wrestler. It climaxes in the very last shot. There is ambiguity only if you haven't seen the whole film.
11-12-2009 @ 9:48AM
John said...
@ Cutitbox,
Your definition of "Great" is completely inaccurate. "Great" is a completely subjective notion when it comes to film, and if you don't understand that... then I don't know how to help you.
Influential means influential. Significant means significant.
"Great" is an allusion to artistic quality in the context of film discussion, and since quality in art is not quantifiably measureable, it is, by perfect definition, SUBJECTIVE.
Any argument to the contrary is complete nonsense.
11-12-2009 @ 2:04PM
Matt said...
Oh please. You said you consider The Wrestler's ending ambiguous. Which, I'm sorry, it isn't. It just...isn't. There is no question about what happens. It's obvious. You don't actually see what happens but that doesn't make it any less obvious. Thus, the "ambiguity" you like isn't even ambiguity. It's spoon-feeding with a slightly smaller spoon. Congratulations, you're an online film critic.
11-12-2009 @ 12:09AM
Davey said...
"No Country For Old Men" is maybe my pick for the best movie of the decade; it's also one of my favorite endings of all time.
"2001: a space odyssey" is one of the greatest movies ever. Another one of my all-time favorite endings to a movie. Both left me deeply moved in very different ways.
And does "Kill Bill, Volume 2" seem an odd choice to me.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:06AM
Jay said...
Wow, harsh. I love ambigious endings, but come on, she doesn't really say that they are bad, frustrating maybe, but Jesus, this is an opinion piece, not news.
In Jette's defense, she does write for fucking Cinematical, a great site. The first commenter's screen name is Rowdy, that should be enough to disqualify anything they say. The second thinks they are an expert because they work in a video rental place. I am by no means an expert, just merely a fan, which is the essence of Cinematical and movie blogging in general, and clearly is what Jette is. Try writing for a blog day in and day out, it's somewhat difficult, I keep a tiny unread blog so I sympathize, and if nothing else, it gave us a reason to watch clips from Evil Dead, Monty Python and Blade Runner, so win on all accounts.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:09AM
PaulAtNorthGare said...
With respect to No Country, the point isn't that its ambiguity - such as it is - is fine; it's that there really isn't much ambiguity there at all.
Despite being a minor character, Jones is the narrator of the story - it's his story, so we need to come back to him. Switching to his POV as we survey the aftermath of the final violence at the motel - and not seeing it ourselves while it happens - is significant for the narrative. To us, just as to him, it seems baffling and chaotic. It's beyond him; the world has moved on. If we'd seen it all ourselves, he'd look a bit slow. The distance puts us in his shoes.
Having read others talk about how strange and ambiguous the final scene was, before I saw the film myself, I was surprised by how clear and straightforward it actually is. Jones's dream is almost too obvious a metaphor for how he no longer fits in the world he lives in, and that his life such as it is seems to be coming to an end.
Ultimately, the film isn't about a guy stealing some money and the assassin who comes after him. That's just the incidental playing out of events which exemplify Jones's situation - always one step behind; his old ways not really working in this new country.
Also, a word in support of true ambiguity - and not just subtlety or narrative complexity. Good as it is - and much as its ending was cobbled together at the last minute - The Italian Job wouldn't be remembered half as well, or discussed half as passionately, without the final ambiguous cliff-hanger. How boring to just have the crooks get away with it, or to have them rounded up, or - even worse - the moralistic option of having the gold slip out of their grasp. The ambiguity allows for all of those, and hundreds of others besides.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:09AM
TheDude said...
Oh I read your entire article. When you single out indisputably classic and impeccable films like 2001, No Country For Old Men, and Blade Runner as having ambiguous endings that "demand an explanation" from the filmmakers it's more than a difference of opinion. It's cluelessness.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:18AM
Gregory Rubinstein said...
I am a little ashamed to admit this, but when I saw the first Lord of the Rings movie, I didn't realize it was a trilogy (I was like 11). Anyway, I turned to my sister and was like "Wait... that's it?!" All she says is "There are two more."
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:13AM
TheDude said...
I suppose I'm just a simple-minded macochist Mike.
Reply