Megan Fox's Scratched SNL Hitler/Michael Bay Joke
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand
.jpg)
If you have a few minutes today I'd strongly recommend reading this fascinating five-page New York Times Magazine story on Megan Fox called The Self-Manufacture of Megan Fox. I know, you're not really interested in reading another "OMG, she said that!" article on the overly hyped, sexified actress, but this one is a little different. Yes, it touches on just about everything controversial that's crossed her plate -- from her much-publicized spat with Michael Bay to her longterm off-screen relationship with Brian Austin Green -- but it also digs beneath the surface and exposes the way in which she's sort of self-manufactured her own image depending on where she is and who she's speaking to in order to expand her brand, which, she'll admit, isn't the most glamorous or family-friendly, but it's what's keeping her working.
Fox admits that she got herself into the whole Michael Bay mess, and wonders why no one came to her defense when that nasty crew letter surfaced online ("I think it's because I'm a girl. They left me out there to be bludgeoned to death"). Another interesting fact was that they were going to include a Hitler/Michael Bay joke when Fox hosted Saturday Night Live, but dropped it because it wasn't appropriate. Fox explains, "They wanted me to do a Q. and A. with the audience for the opening monologue. And Hitler is in the audience. Hitler stands up and says, 'Why did you compare me to Michael Bay?' " Fox laughed. "Which is funny, but we can't do that."
Watch the actual monologue and read more after the jump.
Reading the article, I get a sense that even Fox doesn't know how or why she is where she is. "I don't know if I'm talented, I don't know what I can do or can't do. I had no skills at all. As a child, I had it in my head that I was supposed to be doing this, and then I did it. But I didn't know what I was doing," she says. Perhaps NYT magazine writer Lynn Hirschberg described Fox best when she said, "She's not warm or particularly friendly and doesn't seem at all interested in small talk. Instead, she's self-contained and a bit wary. She will answer any question, but she resists true dialogue. With Fox, it's not a conversation but a presentation."
That being said, Fox -- who claims Judy Garland and The Wizard of Oz were what inspired her to be an actress -- readily admits that the image she helped manufacture is beginning to head in a direction she's not comfortable with. In her next film, Passion Play, Fox will star opposite Mickey Rourke in Mitch Glazer's directorial debut about a trumpet player wandering the desert who comes across a traveling circus. On her character, Fox says, "I play a winged girl. I have bird wings that sprouted out of my back during puberty. And I'm on display. Guys pay money to look at me, and Mickey and I have a tragic love story." And while she continues to choose roles -- be them big blockubusters or small indies -- that play up her looks and sexuality, Fox claims she doesn't want it to consume her. "I have to pull back a little bit now," Fox said. "I do live in a glass box. And I am on display for men to pay to look at me. And that bothers me. I don't want to live that character."










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
11-12-2009 @ 10:39AM
Scott Weinberg said...
"I think it's because I'm a girl." Yeesh.
Maybe it's because she's an ass.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 11:02AM
Shemah said...
true.. LOL!
11-12-2009 @ 11:48AM
filmsuki said...
Too bad they cut it, I would have actually laughed...which is a first for SNL. Does this show get government subsidies? How does it manage to be so bad and stay on?
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 9:11AM
cashman7323 said...
You are so right. I watch it for those little bright moments, but they are becomming fewer and further between. It is more liberal puke than MSNBC on most occasions.
11-15-2009 @ 10:49AM
Bret said...
You must be a humorless Resluglican. I know a few people like you...unable to laugh at anything. Go ahead and laugh, it's okay. SNL has never stopped being funny. YOU HAVE TO ACTUALLY WATCH THE SHOW IN ORDER TO HAVE THE LAUGHTER BENEFIT; instead of watching one sketch and coming to the conclusion that the whole show is bad.
11-12-2009 @ 11:53AM
jediknightess said...
Looking for Megan Fox the actress? Anyone?
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 2:46PM
greatone said...
Maybe no one came out to her defense because it might was true. If it wasn't some truth to it wouldn't at least 1 person come out and try to defend her.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 3:38PM
Mike said...
The Angelina Jolie comparisons are valid and I would throw in Madonna too. She is what Maxim wants every female to be. But there is one little detail: Fox lacks any talent outside of manufacturing herself. Scratch away the product: Megan Fox Inc. and there is nothing there. Just the need for fame.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 7:23PM
EH? said...
If I recall correctly, and I know I do, Michael Bay HIMSELF came to her defense.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 10:24PM
latinabunny said...
So if she doesn't want to "live" that character in where she's in a "glass box and men pay to look at her" then why oh why is she always doing half naked photo shoots for men magazines? Why is she always walking around like she is ready to do an opening porno sceen?
Megan really, that statement right there just shows how full of shit you really are and MAYBE that's why no one came to your rescue. Just saying.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 10:51PM
Richard said...
She is nothing but eye candy, PERIOD! If she doesn't want to play the part of a sex-object that men pay to see anymore, then QUIT! There are plenty of other women who will take her place in a heartbeat! Come on, does she SERIOUSLY think it's her ACTING that anyone pays to watch? pfft
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 12:34PM
Nick said...
Actually her acting alone is worth money. She is very bright and unique so you obviously dont know what your talkin bout...pfft! Really dont freakin comment on it if u gotta problem wit her!
11-13-2009 @ 12:28AM
Andy said...
I'm a bit embarrassed to say it, but I'm sort of interested in seeing where she goes from here. It's obvious that she isn't a complete and utter idiot.
She's sort of in this interesting place where she seems to hate what she's created to a point. A 'careful what you wish for' cautionary tale. I honestly think there's more to her than screaming 'Sam' at the top of her lungs...and I'm curious to see it.
Plus, any enemy of Michael Bay's is my allie.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 11:04AM
Andy said...
It's "ally."
11-15-2009 @ 2:18PM
Andy said...
Thanks...for some reason I knew that was wrong, but could not muster the proper spelling.
11-15-2009 @ 7:52AM
Bill said...
It's "WANDERING the desert" a-hole. Stop using spell check and check your spelling. This is the state of journalism now. No wonder Obama's President....
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 11:25AM
stcircus said...
Hear, hear. I had the same observation. The need for 24/7 "content" to fill bandwith has resulted in poorly written, poorly researched articles. One gets the feeling that these so-called "journalists" (ahem) of today, simply hit the "Send" button after a first draft. They probably don't know what a first draft is, in fact. Journalism, as both an art and a profession, is on life-support, if not already dead.
11-15-2009 @ 1:13PM
Lee said...
What the hell does Obama have to do with this persons spelling? If he/she can't spell now, they could spell before Obama was President.
No matter what the subject matter is on these stories, the comments ALWAYS revert back to Obama.
Some of you commentators are so one-sided you want to blame everything on someone that has absolutely nothing to do with all the rants and raves you spill.
Why don't you just suck it up and admit you want Obama to be the scape-goat of all the mistakes that were made by previous Presidents. Just grow up or shut up
11-15-2009 @ 8:31AM
bob said...
If you peel away the "hotness" what you basically have is a slacker. Of course if you peeled away the hotness, she'd be "Megan Who?"
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 8:47AM
MzKarin said...
I hope she doesn't completely let go of her "Looks", because without them, well, thats just about it for her!
Reply