Five Ways to Save Joss Whedon
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Fan Rant

As much as we all fervently and loyally love Joss Whedon, it's time to face facts: His mojo is off. It's not gone -- I'd never suggest such a thing. One look at Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog and the better episodes of Dollhouse prove that the magic is still there. However, it has lost its focus, writhing in the ether, struggling to gain the fame of his earlier television work -- fame that while never massive, was solid, loyal, and passionate.
With Dollhouse canceled, the question on everyone's mind is how can he get back to the success of Buffy? How can he shrug off the pain of two battles for ratings and second seasons, and present a show that ushers in a fandom rivaling what came before with Buffy, Giles, Willow, and Xander?
1. Start with a Simple, Well-Thought-Out Concept
Dollhouse is confusing. It's not easy to relay to outsiders, and even as a fan, I would have a hard time truly boiling it down to its essence. But even more troubling -- it seems to constantly change as if the PTB aren't truly sure what the series should be, what path it should take. That is something that's clearly not Whedonesque. We're talking about the guy who slid references to Dawn and Buffy's death two years before they were slated to happen with the line "Little Miss Muffet counting down from 7-3-0." The thing that made Buffy different than the shows that came after: Joss had time to mull it over and come up with a concrete plan. There were 5 years between the massacred film and Whedon's show. Five years to solidify his own ideas for the premise after it got turned into a fluff flick; five years to decide exactly what he wanted to say, and how.
Furthermore, while supernatural, the concept was simple: Discuss the growing pains of high school and other social issues with the help of demons. Real life in a surreal world. There wasn't a big cast and a convoluted plot to keep straight. We had Buffy, Giles, Willow, and Xander (and, increasingly and briefly, Cordelia), and as supporting cast members made their mark on the show and fan base, their contributions increased. That way, extra players were never confusing and never detracted from the plot because they'd already claimed their stake, and the audience wanted more. While the show did, indeed, grow, Buffy never needed time to get good. Episodes like "Angel" and "Prophecy Girl" hinted at the greatness to come, and the second season was an all-out powerhouse.
Very few people want to wait around while a show finds out what works.
More at Sci-Fi Squad!










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-15-2009 @ 4:21PM
Stan Winsome said...
How about stop casting Eliza Dushku? She's cute and all but do I need to see her in ever show the guy ever does?
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 6:53PM
Craig said...
I watched two episodes of Doll House when it started and I loved Buffy & Angel...
I guess the thing I didn't like about Doll House was that the character had to change constantly and there-in it was inconsistent from what I saw she never had an identity (or much of one) to grow on, thus it felt hallow to me...
The Vampire Diaries is about the closest thing to Buffy & Angel there is, thus I watch it... Not because they feature vampires (and the supernatural) but because the story is consistent and engagingly so... You have to have characters people can consistently sympathize and identify with, then you have to know how to implement the twist, turns and challenges in accordance with the history you've created... The backstory and consistency defines the depth of any show...
You can't just do things to do general things in a show, like the now cancelled Eastwick did... They were going in circles and never went anywhere. there was not enough character development and the depth of the backstory was barely there... Eastwick was not engaging in the least and the ultimate problem any show must solve, was barely there.
Case in point.... You have to have characters you can identify with and the emotional depth there-in. You have to have twists and turns that impact the characters emotionally and you have to have a consistent point in every episode that builds on a consistent backstory, at least until you get 4 seasons in... Then the writers can experiment... You can explore every character in a show as long as it leads to an ultimate point at the end of each and every episodes that full-fills the greater purpose of the story one is trying to tell...
But most importantly the actors must have chemistry!!!
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 6:40PM
vegimorph said...
I know its a little far fetched but how about a tv series of Titan A.E. That was totally awesome! Great characters, an imaginative story, strong imagination. Only reason it didn't do well was that it was mis-marketed.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 7:11PM
Reuben said...
Speaking of Titan, I was flipping through the HBO channels the other day and there it was, just starting. I never knew that Whedon had anything to do with it, but when I saw his name in the opening credits I exclaimed to no one "Holy shit!"
11-15-2009 @ 7:01PM
carg0 said...
Whedon's biggest problem has always been his show's being stuffed with Soap-opera rejects.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 8:59PM
Jen said...
Hey I like the bulk of his soap opera rejects. And the fact that he's not scared of people with funny names.
11-15-2009 @ 7:07PM
martisco said...
Why do we think Joss Whedon can be "saved"? Why for that matter does Joss Whedon need "saving"?
Funny attitudes we have toward creativity. We tend to believe that creativity something that is "owned" by a particular person (whom we call "talented"). In my years of watching movies and TV I've found that the most brilliant work usually isn't repeated, at least not to the same degree, later in someone's career. There are brilliant works of cinema or TV, but to think that someone is just going to go on churning out genius indefinitely strains the imagination. So much luck, circumstance and confluence of other talents goes into creative success. You really can't catch lightning in a jar - you can just enjoy it while it's out there.
I do think Whedon is flogging away in TV (maybe even movies) too much and perhaps should think about focusing on theater or some other medium, where he may encounter other circumstances and co-talents to make lightning strike one more time. Another TV series? Please no.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 9:10PM
Matthew said...
"Saved"? Didn't the guy just win an emmy for 'Dr. Horrible'? So one show tanks. It's the show that tanked, not 100% him. Does Diablo Cody need to be saved because 'Jennifer's Body' didn't do as well as 'Juno' or 'United States of Tara'? (Actually, that's a bad example. Some might say she needing saving from herself long before Juno, but you can probably catch where I'm aimlessly drifting with this.)
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 11:42AM
Holly said...
As well as the demon metaphor worked in Buffy and Angel I would really love it if Joss would stop hiding behind sci-fi!
I understand that's his background and where he probably feels most comfortable, but he writes the best characters and most complex relationships I've ever seen so what would be so wrong with just writing a straight dramedy or even a dark comedy? I want to see that. What's always been so great about his work is how real the emotions feel in their unreal settings. Can't those emotions be the obvious focus for once without requiring an apocalypse or conspiracy?
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 7:06AM
JC said...
What really needs to happen is for Joss to move away from those imbeciles at FOX and find a different way to get his series shown. FOX seems to destroy everything that Mr. Whedon stands for.
As a side note, I believe Nathan Fillion ran aground some FOX exec's wife's nether regions much to their chagrin. Seems that everything Nathan was on in the precious FOX universe got demolished... Firefly, Drive, etc., etc.
(You just knew Firefly was gonna get mentioned, didn't you?! :-)
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 7:32AM
BloodwerK said...
#7 - 100% agree. I think he shot his wad with Firefly...
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 8:32AM
Garrett said...
There is a special place in hell for people like you, Monika.
I'm on season 3 of Buffy thanks to Hulu and Netflix, and now someone decides to spoil the future of Buffy with NO WARNING!!
NOT KOSHER! There are so many bad things I want to say to you, but I'll be taking it out on my dog instead. SHAME
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 10:48AM
Eric H said...
The show has been off the air for 6 years, sorry you are past the statute of limitations for spoilers, FYI Bruce Willis is dead in the Sixth Sense.
11-16-2009 @ 10:59AM
Kenji Meadu said...
Yeah, ditto. Thanks for that one, cow! Some of us had to clean the fryalator at McDonald's during college and missed Buffy while it was on the air.
11-16-2009 @ 11:08AM
Eric H said...
I am soooo sorry, you cant expect someone to never discuss anything ever just because someone may not have seen it. We all don live in a glass bubble because you are 6 years behind on your TV.
11-16-2009 @ 12:57PM
Gordon said...
Eric H is right. It's fucking ridiculous to expect that a 6 year dead TV show's plot points is off-limits to discuss.
Anyway, there's a fucking Buffy comic book right now. You think she stayed dead? Good stories are not about about what happened, but HOW they happened. Joss Whedon understands that (to a fault, sometimes). Keep watching your Buffy and maybe you'll realize it, too.
P.S. Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker's father.
11-17-2009 @ 12:23PM
Clint said...
Rosebud was a sled.
11-16-2009 @ 3:42PM
Paul Arnette said...
I have two ideas:
1) Stop working with Fox
2) Find a network to be patient enough to let a show develop and willing enough to position it for success (i.e. not relegate it to Friday nights)
Dollhouse, while uneven, was still more engaging than the vast majority of show on TV. Whedon's talents would be put to far better use on cable, where creativity isn't frowned upon.
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 4:06PM
DataDroid said...
It's probably too late, since it looks like it'll be canceled soon as well, but Joss should take over Heroes. The concept seems tailor-made for him (he's written X-Men comics, after all) and while this latest season has actually been decent, the characters still need a lot more consistency, something Whedon excels at. Of course, the chances of this actually happening are almost nil, but I still think the idea is sound.
Reply