Overhype vs. Backlash: Which is Lamer?
Filed under: Fan Rant
Anyone who covers a film festival has dealt with it at one point or another. (More likely they deal with it several times a year.) You go to Sundance, to SXSW, to Toronto, etc., and see a film you really like. At this point the movie is just one of 250 at the festival, although maybe it has some "big names" or something to it. A few other writers end up agreeing with you that the film is quite good, and then the audiences have their say ... and mostly everyone is in agreement: good movie! And then ... it happens: Not just a handful of contrary-yet-insightful opinions, but a full-blown backlash."Dude, I just read your rave on Juno. You overhyped it! It freaking sucks!" --or-- "Martyrs isn't so great. The horror guys always over-praise the stuff they see early." --or-- "Did all the Sundance critics get together and just blindly pick a movie to rave over?" --- and stuff much nastier than that. I was one of the first film critics to see Juno, which at Toronto was just another comedy with a cool cast, until everyone saw it, that is. Then it was the darling of the festival, and I was thrilled to play along. Because I sincerely adore that flick. So did I contribute to the "overhype" on Juno? What about Waitress? I fell in love with that flick at Sundance as well, it came and went without finding a massive audience, and nobody accused me of overhyping the movie.
My good pal James Berardinelli inspired this mini-rant by penning this rather excellent piece about "backlash," and it raises a very interesting question: If you hated Slumdog Millionaire or Juno or Forrest Gump -- are you actually judging the film (which is absolutely your right, no matter how beloved a movie may be) or are you filtering your opinion through some unfairly lofty expectations? I wish everyone on the planet could have been "surprised" by the awesomeness of Juno -- but that's sort of why we (the bloggers, the critics, the entertainment journalists) high-tail it to every festival under the sun: Not so we can yell "first!," but so we can fall in love with a few films before all the interviews and marketing plans get underway.
So yes, I suppose guys like me are part of creating the "overhype," but at least you know with me you're getting sincere and honest analysis and opinion. Nowhere in my early reviews of Juno, Waitress, The Cove, or Dr. Parnassus do I guarantee that you'll love the movie. Keep that in mind next time you read your favorite critic(s) and I suspect you'll approach even the overhyped films with a small dose of caution.
Now, backlash is another story entirely. If you go see Juno and you honestly find yourself thinking "That's it? THAT'S what everyone was raving about?" then my assertion is that you're carrying too much baggage into the opening credits. A film critic may pique your interest on an upcoming film, but where is it written that his/her words are cast-iron FACT? Nowhere. And that's how "Juno was just OK" turns into "Dang, Juno sucked" and then "OMG Juno was the most overrated piece of crap ever." And half of what you're criticizing is not the movie, but the movie in relation to your own inflated expectations. That's not really fair to the film.
So if we eliminate all early reviews (including those from film festivals), we'd successfully eradicate almost all the overhype and probably a good portion of the backlash as well. We'd also find that a lot of great films (large and small, indie and expensive, features and documentaries) get brushed under the carpet, never to find an audience because we're all so afraid of overhype and backlash. A critic's goal is not to "over-sell" a film, but you know what? Every film critic I know is a hardcore movie LOVER, and there's very little in our profession that's better than being able to help people "discover" a worthwhile film. Have I "overhyped" The Cove or Best Worst Movie or The Horseman -- or am I just trying to help a worthwhile film find its audience?
All we can do is put one opinion out there, hope it's a clear and insightful one, and then move on to the next film. And while I'm certainly not impervious to overhype, I have no problem standing up to the eventual backlash. Yup, I still love The Blair Witch Project and I don't care who knows it.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-17-2009 @ 9:00PM
Frantic Monkey said...
I loved Juno, Slumdog Millionaire and Forrest Gump. I don't think your early reviews or impressions on films screening at festivals in any way amounts to overhype. It's hard to say when overhype kicks in, but without those early reviews/impressions I'd miss out on a lot of films.
Reply
11-17-2009 @ 9:39PM
Andy said...
Backlash is waaaaaay lamer if you ask me.
Overhype can be annoying and frankly ruin a movie when you're expecting too much. Frankly I heard people going a little too nuts about this year's 'Star Trek' for it to live up to the hype and it kind of ruined it for me. It was good, but I was a bit disappointed that I didn't find it amazing. Once that wears off, I'm sure I'll enjoy it a lot.
But I have a friend who won't see something if it gets a little too popular for his tastes. He sort of creates his own backlash. I find this completely ridiculous. There are a stack of movies and TV shows he simply refuses to watch because they're popular. While it's true, sometimes very populist things do suck, but you have to take everything on a case by case basis. Who knows what you're missing otherwise.
And I'm with ya, 'The Blair Witch Project' scared the bejesus out of me, and I enjoyed the hell out of 'Titanic'. Backlash be damned.
Reply
11-17-2009 @ 10:05PM
Antney said...
I usually check all positive reviews and hype at the door when I'm late to see a movie that has been widely praised. Weeks before THE DARK KNIGHT came out, there had been review after review calling it an instant classic and that it was nothing short of a masterpiece. Going in, I was pretty confident there was NO WAY it could live up to all the hype... but, whadyaknow? It did! Absolutely loved it.
However, the same cannot and will not be said for SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE. Once again, any preconceived notions were checked at the door...and I walked out absolutely HATING IT, refusing to drink the Kool-Aid and wondering how so many people could be so wrong.
And this will be put to the test again in a few weeks with UP IN THE AIR. Granted, I'm a pretty huge Clooney fan (not so much J. Reitman), and the film has been getting glowing reviews, but I'm hoping to love it on my own terms without any built-in expectations. And I must say, judging from the trailers, so far...I'm sold.
Reply
11-18-2009 @ 11:04AM
Tony le Stephanois said...
Completely agree with you on Slumdog Millionaire. It just didn't work for me.
11-17-2009 @ 10:41PM
Matt said...
Backlash is infinitely lamer and anyone with a brain will recognize that. The "I don't like this because other people like this" frame of mind is one wrapped in the stupidity of having to hate everything to be "cool".
Reply
11-17-2009 @ 10:49PM
Mike said...
I don't know if one is more lame than the other, but in the case of overhype I think a lot of times people (be they critics or self-proclaimed film aficionados) so desperately want to be the first to "discover" a film that they maybe prematurely oversell it. You admit yourself that part of the fun is being "first", but when you view a film in the context of a film festival, where there are so many other bad or melancholy or self indulgent movies, you're just so glad to finally see something that is watchable, maybe even good, that your level of enthusiasm for it could end up being higher than it normally would.
Films aren't viewed in a vacuum. We bring our own baggage into them, sometimes good sometimes bad. Anytime there is hype, there is bound to be backlash. I don't think you can have one without the other. Even with movies that do seemingly "come out of nowhere", there are always going to be those who think it doesn't live up to the inevitable hype, whether that's before or after its release.
Reply
11-18-2009 @ 1:26AM
tumplet said...
A smart movie goer can view any movie critically and objectively ignoring any pre-read hype or backlash. With that said, it is insanely annoying to dislike a movie hyped up the moon, especially when the praise seems never ending as it was did when Juno received several Oscar nominations. At the end of the day, if you can let your opinion of a movie exist without considering its reception, good or bad, it probably wasn't a movie worth your time to begin with.
Reply
11-17-2009 @ 11:30PM
Sam said...
What about backlash that starts before anyone's even seen the movie? Like with "Avatar." The director and people involved with the movie mention that it's going to be "revolutionary" a few people take that and run with it and even with the small amount of footage that we've seen, everyone is fighting to come up with the most clever way to put the movie down. Thundercats, smurfs, furries, cat people, World of Warcraft, videogame cutscene. Anything. Point to it's budget, point to Cameron and put down all of his previous movies, try and find anything that you can to show how much of a rip-off it is of a previous work.
With that movie in particular, unless you simply do NOT like Sci-fi, or action movies, there's no way that the movie can't at least pique your interest a little bit.
I agree with previous posters though, the whole "let me hate this movie because it's garnered near-universal praise" is beyond idiotic.
Reply
11-18-2009 @ 2:28AM
noseless_wonder said...
Overhype made me not want to see Twilight - and I still never have. However, this is because I have two coworkers who went absolutely insane when the movie came out. It's not that I'm "too cool for it", I'm just sick of hearing anything about the characters and the stars and every little thing they are doing that is different from the book. If I'm ALREADY experiencing overload with the story, why would I want to spend two hours emersing myself in it?
One could make the argument that the same thing should have happened to me for Lord of the Rings. However, the Lord of the Rings fans around me kept their opinion to pseudo-generic comments like "It was pretty different than the book, but it was good in its own way". This is different from being briefed on every detail in the book vs. movie or the actor's personal lives. This phenomena has ONLY occurred with me for Twilight.
Reply
11-18-2009 @ 7:43AM
BloodwerK said...
It's this very thing that made me watch Twilight, Juno, and Slumdog Millionaire. All the hype and hate these films got couldn't possibly be warranted. I had to see for myself. Well, Twilight was neither as good nor as bad as people on both sides claimed. Just like I figured. I actually liked the film and thought it had some good points, but there were parts of it I thought were kinda silly (the baseball thing). Juno was another matter. I watched it and didn't care for it at all. I think whoever wrote the script was trying way too hard to be clever, which I don't much like in a movie. Slumdog Millionaire, while a very well-done film, was boring as hell. It was all I could do to sit through the whole thing, which I did because I wanted to see if it deserves the praise it gets. In my opinion it doesn't.
Anyway, what I'm getting at is that I might not have watched any of those movies if it weren't for the back and forth on the net. I had to see what it was all about and make up my own mind. There is, however, a certain group of people who get irritated when films they aren't interested in get talked about. Dark Knight fans, I'm talking about you. Not every fan of TDK is like that though, because I like the movie too, but it's that fanbase that does the majority of the hating on everything else. Comic book internet nerds, basically. It's perfectly alright for article after article about The Dark Knight or Watchmen to be posted but God forbid there be an update for Twilight or the like. I can't give an accurate count but I don't think there's much difference in the number of updates on Twilight and the number of updates in the Batman series.
We all know, of course, that this kinda thing won't stop...
Reply
11-18-2009 @ 10:04AM
Felicia said...
Thank you! That is exactly what I would say. I'm not a big Twilight fan but I did kind of enjoy the books and I actually liked the movie better. It wasn't great but it didn't suck. I really liked the TDK as well, even though I don't consider it the masterpiece others do but it is spoken of as the best movie ever and I'm sorry but there were real problems with it. The ending is a good example; but it gets plent of raves without a comparable backlash. Twilight's backlash seems out of proportion with its popularity and that is a scary thing considering what a monster its marketing machine has become. On some websites--AICN--Twilight can't even be mentioned without loads of hate being thrown at it and some of the comments seem viciously directed toward the fans.
If you can't give me rational, well-thought out reasons for not liking something beyond "it just sucked, man" than I feel it is acceptable to overlook your opinion and maybe even wonder if you are sincere in your hate and maybe even like it a little and refusing to admit it to seem "cool".
11-18-2009 @ 9:51AM
Eric H said...
One thing I like about DVRing nearly everything I watch, and of course choosing what I read online is that it allows me to filter out a great deal of the overhype, if I want to see a movie, I read a little about it and go on, that greatly reduces the hype factor. That being said, backlash is totally lamer, fake hate is worse than over praise.
Reply
11-18-2009 @ 10:06AM
Michael said...
Overhype is to be expected. Backlash is way worse -- there's two types of it and they're both awful.
Type #1: Pissing on Fresh Talent. Indie filmmaker makes good, and all of a sudden we hate them because everybody's talking about them. "But Diablo Cody's dialogue is so unrealistic!" So is all movie dialogue, she's actually succeeded in doing something original.
Type #2: Pissing on a Phenomenon. Lots of people love something, therefore I will hate it. Hey, we can have a reasoned discussion about how Twilight is anti-feminist crap, but hating all the actors in the movies just because they happened to get cast is ignorant and grating.
Reply
11-18-2009 @ 11:20AM
Wexler said...
I would rather see a movie overhyped and end up hating it then miss a good movie because I never heard about it. That said, I would argue backlash, while necessary to help balance out the hype, is definitely lamer.
Reply
11-23-2009 @ 12:18PM
Holly said...
Hype can be fun (cheering and clapping in a theatre for a midnight Harry Potter release, hell yeah!) but backlash is far less so. I hate when people expect you to apologize for still loviing something because they assume you only liked it because it was cool to do so at the time.
For instance, Shakespeare In Love is still smart, really funny, sexy and heartbreaking and totally deserved it's Oscars. I'm sorry if you think comedy is worthless, but you're wrong
Just had to get that off my chest
Reply
11-24-2009 @ 6:08PM
SexySmell said...
Backlash wouldnt exist without overhyping. Besides that i dont think backlash is an actual reaction to the movies themselves but the culture of overhyping. Often i use it as a tactic to find out if a movie really is good or not. An overhyper will suggest that the backlasher is a 'hater' or perhaps that it is their personality that prevents them from liking the film.
Whereas someone who genuinely liked the film will say " are you kidding me did you SEE the cinematography in that one scene?" etc. etc.
Backlash is the one tool we have against habitual movie-ruiners.
Reply
12-02-2009 @ 7:30AM
Justin Michaels said...
i think backlashing something just for the sake of it is kinda lame, but if you do genuinely dislike something its okay.
one man's work of genius is always going to be another's dislike though - http://rossvross.com/2009/11/26/top-five-guilty-dislikes/
Reply