Review: Planet 51
Filed under: Action, Animation, Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Sony, Theatrical Reviews

As voiced by Dwayne "the artist formerly known as The Rock" Johnson, astronaut Chuck Baker is the paragon of all-American achievement -- that is, until he conquers a far off world with an unexpected population, one inexplicably steeped in our '50s-era culture and terrified by the prospect of an alien invader in human form. More unfortunately for us, Chuck has landed smack-dab in the middle of Planet 51, a short-sighted assembly of sci-fi references and scatalogical humor that should nonetheless placate undemanding tots and, by extension, their undiscerning parents for ninety minutes or so.
The basic premise is lifted from The Day The Earth Stood Still, as green-skinned astronomer Lem (voiced by Justin Long) has to hide the new visitor from the military that stand between him and his ship. Chuck harps on relentlessly about "the right stuff," as if today's kids know their Gus Grissom from their Buzz Lightyear. We get an alien pet with a tongue within a tongue (instead of a mouth within a mouth) that urinates acid (instead of bleeding it). There's your token E.T. "over the moon" visual cue, and forgive me if I imagined a 2001 reference that actually wasn't in there (although I'm fairly certain a Singin' in the Rain bit was). It all just sort of blurs together after a while.
Oh, and just in case you feared all of that might go whizzing right over the little ones' heads, there's a Macarena joke and a Facebook reference. Welcome to 2009, y'all.
Writer Joe Stillman was one of four writers to receive an Academy Award nomination for their snappy Shrek screenplay, but by the time we get to corks being offered as butt plugs to prevent probing and an exposed (off-screen) penis being mistaken for an antenna, I can't help but wonder if he isn't that group's answer to Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer being touted as two of the six writers of Scary Movie (you know, the worst ones).
Beyond all that, the script fails to justify why some planet unknown to ours would speak English and be seemingly stuck in a culture identical to our own in the 1950s -- it's simply reason enough to have the role reversal scenario play out amidst a relentless soundtrack of sugar-coated pop covers and a wardrobe of era-appropriate shirts (although not a single creature in sight bothers with wearing pants). Did we send some sort of Americana capsule to this planet that caused the white picket fences and the round convertibles and the duck-and-cover drills? Is there any sort of implication about our country's knack for colonization, before the era and since? Nope. Nothing. It's retro just because it can be.
Johnson could voice cocky swagger in his sleep, and might as well have; same with Long and whiny panic. Gary Oldman earns a paycheck as a generally threatening general, while John Cleese does likewise as his lackey scientist. Jessica Biel happens to be the love interest, though she's more often than not keeping company with an aggravating hippie equivalent (Alan Marriott). Seann William Scott plays Long's initially paranoid pal who falls hard for Johnson's own sidekick, a rock-collecting space rover named... Rover. (Was it legal to have creature-machine relations in these fake-fifties? Oh, never mind...)
To some extent, Planet 51 does demonstrate how the bar for mediocre computer-generated animation has been raised, if only in terms of visuals. Clothing textures or fire dynamics simply couldn't have looked this good a decade back, and it doesn't take Pixar to make a cartoon pretty. It does, though, take them to make a cartoon matter, and knowing full well that Up is now on DVD or that the new old-fashioned likes of Fantastic Mr. Fox will soon by playing on a neighboring screen (if not already) means that I can't really recommend something this lackluster with a good conscience.
Sure, it's bright and shiny and will keep your kids stationary for an hour and a half, but parents? Try and hold out for the intelligent 'toons. I promise that they're out there, waiting to be discovered by you and yours.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-20-2009 @ 9:31PM
Mariah said...
Planet 51 was funny if u like classic sci-fi and don't mind trite, predictable plots. Kids loved it!
Reply
11-21-2009 @ 12:39PM
sa said...
…drum roll please…
I’m sure the following comment is as predictable as this review = “William Goss, do you have any children?”
Well, I do. I have two sons, ten and six. I consider them bright, emotionally sensitive, and happy-go-lucky. To demonstrate his maturity/intelligence, my ten year old is an avid reader who has already read all of the Harry Potter books and is now working on the Percy Jackson series. My six year old has somewhat rejected “kiddy” shows (e.g. sesame street) in favor of anything his big brother likes.
While we expose them to a wide range of cultural experiences (art & natural history museums, ballet/dance, live theater, classical music concerts, sports, hiking/camping, etc) going to the movies is one of our favorite regular activities and we’ve seen a lot of the recent animated movies. My wife and I are avid movie fans and we try to be discerning when it comes to age appropriate entertainment for the boys. For some reason, we tend to avoid live action violence (no x-men or transformers) and I respect the boy’s personal preferences (for example, they have no interest in flicks that look “creepy” = A Christmas Carol, or “9”, or Coraline).
While The Incredibles set a bar for the genre of animated movies my ten year-old loves, his recent favorites have been Monsters vs. Aliens and Ice Age 3. As for the recent critical darlings = he was lukewarm about Wall-E and “Up” and didn’t really like Where the Wild Things Are. We’ve had discussions about how people choose to watch certain movies because they want to experience the main emotional theme of that particular movie. Adults like to be scared silly (and usually don’t suffer from nightmares) so they go to horror movies. If you want to experience falling in love, you go see a love story.
Right or wrong, developmentally, my kids prefer a fun roller-coaster ride at the movies and the big screen adds to the experience (Ponyo and Astro Boy were also recent favorites). While I will continue to expose my kids to “intelligent” movies, is it really necessary for you to insult my judgment if I take my kids to see Planet 51? Are you saying everyone should avoid amusement parks because roller coasters aren’t intelligent enough?
I’ll admit that I had a tear in my eye during the beginning of Up and I found the love story touching in Wall-E. However, I think it is ok if my pre-teen children don’t fully appreciate the timelessness of a tragic love story or wildly praise being made to experience the pathos of facing our inevitable mortality with dignity.
They like the trailer for Planet 51 and I’ll take your jaded and condescending statement that it should “placate undemanding tots and, by extension, their undiscerning parents for ninety minutes or so”, as a green light.
I like animation, including animation intended for older audiences (I count Aramaki’s Appleseed movies and many by Hayao Miyazaki as personal favorites), and I would never go see Planet 51 if I didn’t have kids. I’m sorry Planet 51 so insulted your sensibilities. I guess the point of this long screed is that I would appreciate it if you didn’t insult me as a bad parent if I want to take my kids to see a movie intended for kids. One of my favorite things about Cinematical is that most reviews are from the perspective of movie lovers. Maybe you should feel embarrassed to have to see a kid’s movie and review it, however, it would serve your readers better if you concentrated on reviewing the movie instead of slamming the audience.
As a parent, I have an infinite number of choices for entertaining my kids. As it’s a cold & rainy weekend here, a trip to the movies will be a magical and exciting event for my boys, even if the film is a bit mediocre.
Reply
12-03-2009 @ 5:06PM
lasassy said...
did u seriously write all that out? i mean how long did that take you? you honestly need to put forth more time for FUNacademics for your kids so they dont turn into someone like you who writes a book about their lives on a review! FREAK!
Reply
12-19-2009 @ 4:49PM
P. Take said...
lol, love your comment, ( it makes you wunder, what planet some people are on)
12-19-2009 @ 4:50PM
William Goss said...
Our reviews always run about 600-800 words long here at Cinematical. We don't put forth any less of an effort just because some kids' movie does the same.
12-13-2009 @ 10:04PM
Anna said...
Full of little hints here and there.... Very interesting movie.
Reply
2-03-2010 @ 3:03PM
vito said...
what is the name of the song playing on gramophone when chuck and lem were dancıng and chuck was giving lem the 3 step romance tips
Reply