Review: The Road
Filed under: Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Theatrical Reviews

By: Eugene Novikov, reprinted from the Telluride Film Festival '09
Just before the kid was born, the world burned. We don't know why, and the characters don't talk about it -- perhaps they don't quite know themselves, or maybe they've decided that it no longer matters. The Boy's universe is grey, full of ash, dust, and the ruins of a civilization he never saw. This is all he knows. His mother, seeing no point in going on, killed herself shortly after his birth. She was not alone. Many of those who didn't take their own lives were soon murdered by the desperate and hungry.
Skip ahead nine or ten years. The kid and his father wander the barren roadways heading south toward the coast for no clear reason other than that it gives them a tangible goal toward which to strive. (And there's always the hope that the ocean will be something other than gray.) Every day is a knock-down, drag-out fight for survival. They run, hide, starve, and fight off attackers who want their food, or their clothes, or, at one point, their flesh.
I set the stage like this not to horrify you or to gross you out, but to give you a sense of the relentless, pervasive grimness of The Road -- and then to turn around and say that The Road may be the most profoundly optimistic and life-affirming film you will see this year. Those who have read Cormac McCarthy's novel of the same name won't be surprised by this. John Hillcoat's faithful, near-perfect adaptation beautifully captures McCarthy's synthesis of all-encompassing darkness and enduring hope.
The father (Viggo Mortensen) and the son (Kodi Smit-McPhee) are driven -- kept alive, really -- by different things. For the Man, the Boy is all that matters. "The child is my warrant," he tells us in mournful voiceover. "And if he is not the word of God, then God never spoke."
What keeps the Boy going is the notion that, in a world of murderers and thieves, he and his dad are the Good Guys. They're "carrying the fire." When they pass friendly, desperate wanderers, the Boy pesters his father to donate some food. When dad decides to strip and abandon a man who tried to steal their possessions, the boy begs him to stop. It is here that McCarthy and Hillcoat begin to reveal their fundamentally positive view of human nature. The murderers and thieves are trying to recapture, by whatever means necessary, remnants of the world they used to know. The Boy is more or less a clean slate, and his empathy and kindness are instinctive, innate.
The Road is unremittingly focused on the Man and the Boy. This is not really an "apocalyptic thriller," though it has genre elements, and plenty of suspense. The father will do anything to protect his son, including putting a bullet in the Boy's brain if it comes to that. The Boy is the father's sole reason for carrying on, but the reverse is not true. It's really the Boy who's "carrying the fire." He is humanity, in every sense.
Viggo Mortensen is excellent here, but The Road is anchored by Kodi Smit-McPhee, whose performance is staggering in both its force and its surprising, artful understatement. I don't know how it's even possible to get a performance like this in a role this demanding and intense (he's in all but a few scenes) from an 11-year old boy -- who, by the way, is from Australia and is all the while doing a beautiful American accent. The 11-year olds I've known couldn't sit still for long enough to watch a movie, never mind make one. (An aside: Smit-McPhee was awesome during the post-screening Q&A, too, quickly improvising a charming answer to a rambling non-question from moderator Ken Burns.)
The ending, which brought me to tears, is not merely optimistic or hopeful -- it is uplifting, and the uplift is earned. The movie is a moving gesture of faith in our species. Doomsaying about the fate of mankind is as old as civilization: wrath of the Gods, nuclear war, global warming, what have you. The Road insists that we're going to be okay -- and I think I believe it.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-25-2009 @ 8:08PM
directing_mind said...
I am so glad that you wrote this review the way you did. This is almost exactly how I describe the book when recommending it. The book is a disgusting, beautiful, hopeless, hopeful piece of art that left me crying at the end also. All I must say to all who read the book or see the movie.....what would you do?
Reply
11-25-2009 @ 8:21PM
Dean said...
Very nice review. What is the deal with the limited release? I've been waiting for this movie all year only to find out that it isn't showing here.
Reply
11-26-2009 @ 12:41AM
Dugle said...
Wow, I had no idea this was being made but now just knowing it is with Viggo in it, I'm pretty excited.
Reply
11-26-2009 @ 1:47AM
Not A Fan of Spoilers said...
Did you really just give a spoiler in the first paragraph of a review? I would think a movie blog would know better..
Reply
11-26-2009 @ 8:29AM
Dugle said...
It's not a spoiler, its context. All that happens before the period the film portrays and its the situation we're in when the film starts (or it is in the book).
11-26-2009 @ 4:42PM
Reuben said...
It is no spoiler, just setting. All of that takes place before the movie even begins.
11-26-2009 @ 9:04AM
jasfoto said...
Wow. Saw it last night. The performances are amazing. Hillcoat did a fabulous job of staying true to book. It's just about as perfect an adaption as one can imagine. Just like the book it rips out your heart and stomps on it and then gives it back right at the very end. Best movie I've seen all year. Good Review.
Reply
11-29-2009 @ 9:18PM
Craig English said...
I hope an UNCUT non-rated version of this film will be released later on DVD. I've read the book and just saw the theatrical "R" rated movie. I think it could have been a much more powerful film truer to the book by keeping the deleted "roasted baby on a spit" scene for example. Such a brutal image provides a counterpoint to McCarthy's theme of love and humanity surviving amidst the absolute nadir of human civilization represented by such cannibalism. Perhaps there was economic pressure to coerce self-censorship to gain the MPAA rating for wider distribution for the almighty dollar.
Reply
12-09-2009 @ 5:58PM
Movie Guru said...
This movie was excellent. I disagree regarding the baby on a spit comment. In the context of a movie, the inclusion of this scene may have been interpreted as sensational and its true intent overlooked.
Reply
12-22-2009 @ 1:54PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
Yeah, at first I was disappointed they left it out. But now that I think about it, the tone would have been totally different when seeing it on film than when reading it in a book.
12-22-2009 @ 2:11PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
Just now reading this because I just now saw the movie. Liked the review but I have a question concerning the amount of time passage you mention at the beginning.
I realize saying the mom killed herself "shortly after his birth" is relative, but doesn't the boy seem to be the same age in the flashbacks. Obviously he's played by the same actor so there's not really much they can do. But surely nine or tens year have not passed since that time depicted.
I don't bring this up to quibble with your review but to raise the question of exactly how old the boy is supposed to be. It's never stated in either the book or the film, though it's less limited in the book since there's no physical appearance.
Some of my friends who read it thought the boy was 9 or 10. While others, myself included, think he was more like 5 or 6, which makes the reality he has to face that much harsher.
I thought the actor did a great job playing the boy, and I can't imagine getting as good of a performance out of a much younger kid. But still, him being older than I imagined took some getting used to.
Reply
1-31-2010 @ 4:05PM
adele said...
Watch it online here: http://free-movies-on-line.com/
http://movies-land.net/
http://watch-movie-online-free.com/
Reply