Review: The Princess and the Frog
Filed under: Animation, New Releases, Disney, Theatrical Reviews, New in Theaters

With The Princess and the Frog, the Disney Studios have gone back to hand-drawn animation for the first time since Home on the Range (2004), which, along with Brother Bear (2003), convinced executives that the future was in CGI. (The scripts had nothing to do with it, of course.) Perhaps more importantly, the new film also features the first African-American heroine in a Disney animated film, though the mere mention of this has caused some heated debate of the sort that used to surround Song of the South (1946). Some have pointed out that the heroine spends most of the film not as an African-American girl, but as a frog. And others have pointed out that her handsome prince has Caucasian features while the villain has African-American features.
It goes on. The film takes place in New Orleans, which brings up Hurricane Katrina guilt as well as more racial issues. It also takes place during the early part of the 20th century (a newspaper headline mentions President Wilson); while the film faintly suggests the segregation of the time, everyone mostly gets along just fine. We also get a faintly stereotypical use of voodoo and blank magic as the source of the antagonist's villainy. There are many other complaints, including the usual absence of one parent, the anthropomorphic sidekicks, and the focus on marriage as a means to an end. But even taking them all into consideration, I have to say that I really enjoyed this film.
Anika Noni Rose provides the singing and speaking voice for Tiana, who is not a princess. Rather, she's the poor daughter of a cook who continues her father's dream of opening her own restaurant. She works two jobs and saves her tips for her big down payment. At the same time, Prince Naveen (voiced by Bruno Campos) arrives in town, and almost immediately gets conned by the Shadow Man, a.k.a. Dr. Facilier (a smooth Keith David). With a bit of voodoo, the prince is transformed into a frog and the prince's overworked footman Lawrence (Peter Bartlett) is transformed into a likeness of the prince. The frog prince turns up on Tiana's balcony and convinces her to kiss him, but instead of the frog turning back into a prince, Tiana turns into another frog.
After a frenzied chase, the two frogs wind up in the swamp, where they befriend a jazz-trumpet-playing alligator, Louis (voiced by Michael-Leon Wooley) and a Creole firefly, Ray (voiced by Jim Cummings), with a jagged smile of random teeth. They set out to find Mama Odie (voiced by Jenifer Lewis) in the hopes of becoming human again. Unfortunately, the Shadow Man is in need of the prince's blood to keep his spell working, and sends out an army of creepy shadow specters to track him down. Tiana still wants to open her restaurant, and the prince is resigned to marry the wealthy blonde Charlotte (voiced by Jennifer Cody), but of course, the two protagonists fall in love.
The voodoo stuff may be cliché in some quarters, but it inspires some of the richest and most dazzling hand-drawn animation I've seen in ages. The sheer nightmarish creepiness of it sent me all the way back to Disney's daring, early Silly Symphony shorts The Skeleton Dance and Hell's Bells (both 1929) as well as some of the scary parts in Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937). It also reminded me of Saludos Amigos (1942) and The Three Caballeros (1944), which were the fruits of Disney's goodwill trip to Brazil (chronicled, somewhat in the recent documentary Walt & El Grupo). Those films were culturally clueless, but artistically astonishing. They reveled in an outsider's perspective of the culture, reworking it to fit a classic, reliable mold of entertainment. The Princess and the Frog does the same thing: it may not adhere strictly to the time and place, or to the culture or mood, but it's a an expert, entertaining movie.
But, yes, there are drawbacks. It's obvious that Disney executives are salivating at the notion of adding Tiana to their "Princesses" line of merchandise (and thereby coercing young girls to buy all-new items), but at least this princess has other things on her agenda than just finding a man. My biggest question was why the filmmakers hired Randy Newman of all people to create the hot jazz-influenced musical numbers. Better him than Elton John, I suppose, but though the songs sometimes cook onscreen, the Randy Newman lyrics have the effect of cooling the heat. Thankfully, the frogs have enough chemistry to warm things up again, romantically speaking, and the set designs are consistently amazing, including some jazz-age artwork reserved for fantasies and dream sequences. It's even a great food movie. Just try to come out not craving a bowl of gumbo.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-12-2009 @ 11:40AM
Julie said...
I saw the film yesterday and greatly enjoyed it as well. I think people who whine that this film doesn't instantly wipe out all of Disney's past wrongs have pretty unrealistic expectations - at least Disney's trying. And in terms of segregation and racism of the time, that crossed my mind too, but there was really no way to work that in there. It's a kid's movie, after all, and it's not worth belaboring every historical fact. Ultimately, I think it's healthier to show racial harmony, especially since to the younger kids it's not even apparent that the film doesn't take place in modern day.
Reply
12-13-2009 @ 4:57AM
KC said...
I'm so glad that Disney finally created an African American Princess. I would have preferred that it was based in Africa after the many African Princesses like Hatshepsut, Amina, Njinga, Tata Ajache, Taytu Bethul, and Elizabeth of Toro.
Reply
12-20-2009 @ 8:27PM
BuddyR said...
I saw this movie last night, and i must say it was rather enjoyable. I came in very skeptical, as I did not believe that an ENTIRE movie could be made based on a premise of kissing a frog, yet I was proven wrong. the film really feels fresh and upbeat, never boring you for an instant. As regards to racism, i have two words for critics: SHOVE IT. The movie is not trying to tackle racism, is it simply trying to have a good time and a black protagonist. It is because of whiners like this that the title of the movie was changed from "The Frog Princess" to it's current one, and after seeing the movie you would agree "the frog Princess" is a better title. Antyways, its a fresh take on a disney princess and a movie I think everyone should enjoy
Reply
12-23-2009 @ 3:13PM
AngelEyes said...
No, the Princess and the Frog is a great title. Let's remember that she is a human that becomes a frog. Where I do appreciate Disney's effort and look forward to more films with African American princesses, let us remember that African American girls were never "considered" princesses until 2009 and that African American humanity and worth is still an issue. So, until the problematic is enlightened, as a mother of an African American girl, I deserve the right to be cautious, concern and most of all protective without being called a whiner.
12-25-2009 @ 3:06PM
BuddyR said...
The main reason that there have been no black princesses is simply that none of the original fairy tales have blacks in them, and it would look strange if there was a story like Cinderella with her being an African American, requiring major story changes. With TPATF, however, the entire story was written to have African Americans, but still make sense. Most of the things that people would say are racist in this movie are just story mistakes. When someone wants to find racism in a movie, they will find everywhere, even if it doesn't make any sense
12-25-2009 @ 3:53PM
Anemone said...
"none of the original fairy tales have blacks in them"
None of the original *European* fairy tales have blacks in them. I, for one, wouldn't mind seeing more fairy tales from other parts of the world.
1-07-2010 @ 8:01AM
drue said...
Randy Newman was raised in New Orleans as a child, which probably gave hime preference over some other more well known non-New Orleans artists, and some other less well known, but better New Orleans artists, like Allen Toussant.
Additionally, New Orleans has had a history of "princesses" since at least 1905 with the emergence of the Krewe of Zulu and the paperbag Creole balls before, very interesting if you've never heard the stories. If your skin was darker than a paperbag, you were not allowed to attend. Look it up if you get the chance, it is a staggering indictment of black on black racism, which in some circles still exists even today.
Reply