Awards »
Discuss: Do You Like the "Ten Best Picture Nominees" Idea?
Filed under: Awards, Oscar Watch

When the Academy announced last June that it would be expanding the Best Picture category from five to ten films, my first thought was: maybe The Hurt Locker has a shot to be nominated now. At the time, I was pretty sure I was in for a fight to help promote my favorite film of 2009, but a good buzz took hold and hasn't yet let up. But that first hope was also a good first impulse. Maybe the list of ten nominees would include some of the offbeat films that don't usually get considered. It might be a good chance to nominate the kinds of things that were snubbed in the past: some comedies like Tropic Thunder or Hot Fuzz, or some exceptional summer action movies like The Dark Knight or The Bourne Ultimatum. Or perhaps some odd indie movies like Che or Wendy and Lucy.
But then the reality set in. This would require the Academy to adopt an entirely new way of thinking, not just the simple changing of a number. Indeed, everything that is nominated this year fits a certain criteria; they're not actually picking the best films of the year. They're picking the best of a certain kind of film. It has to be prestigious in some way. It has to be somewhat important, either with a message or in tackling a certain kind of serious problem. If it's a comedy, it has to be a bittersweet comedy and not a flat-out funny comedy. It can't be a genre film unless it's a very long one or a hugely popular one, and it can't be a sequel (or a reboot; hence the snub for Star Trek).
AMC Best Picture Showcase Details
Filed under: Awards, Fandom, Exhibition, Oscar Watch

We know a lot of our readers (and even some of our writers) like to partake in AMC's annual tradition of showing all of the best picture nominees on one day, which is why every year we like to give you the details on it when they become available. Of course, the whole 10 best picture nominees thing has thrown a small wrench in the usual one-day marathon, and, as such, this year AMC has decided to break it up into two days: February 27th and March 6th, both Saturdays.
The exact schedules haven't been announced yet, but AMC is currently asking you to vote on which four movies they should show alongside a 3D version of Avatar on February 27th. (If it was up to me, I'd vote District 9, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds and Up, this way you start out with fantasy, move toward sci-fi, and then back-to-back war films, capping it all off with a nice, sweet adventure story. The perfect program, in my opinion ... but what do you think?)
Details can be found over on the AMC website. The tickets for this event will run you about $60 for a two-day pass (if purchased online; $50 at the box office), and $30 for a one-day pass. That ticket gets you entry to the theater, as well as a free large popcorn and unlimited refills. Not a bad way to spend your Saturday, no?
So who's going this year?
Which Oscar Movies Do You Have Left on Your List?
Filed under: Awards, Oscar Watch
There are plenty of movies I don't get a chance to see, due to the fact that I actually require sustenance and sleep. Sometimes I just don't have the time; sometimes I think the movie looks like it will be a waste of my time. But either way, there are always Oscar-nominated movies that I haven't managed to catch yet. And, of course, now is the time when I will scramble to see them all, or at least the major contenders. In fact, AMC Theaters offers a "Best Picture Showcase" for us slackers -- get the details here. So which are on my list? Well, you can probably guess from some of my previous posts that I've been admittedly quite judgmental and have avoided The Blind Side so far. And by happenstance, I've also managed to miss Up, A Serious Man, Crazy Heart, The Last Station, The Princess and the Frog, and, well, The Secret of Kells doesn't count because I don't even think it screened in New York. I also haven't seen any of the nominated documentaries or foreign language pictures. I'm really not sure I'll be able to see all of them in time without the aid of nauseating, taurine-tainted beverages and/or meth.
What about you? Are you obsessive when it comes to watching every Oscar-nominated movie before the show? Do you and your coworkers or friends bet on the winners ahead of time or print out ballots the night of the show? Do you go back and watch them later to see what the big deal was? Which ones are still left on your list to check off?
Fan Rant: Irritating Things About the Oscar Nominations

The first most irritating thing was James Horner's nomination for Avatar. I expected it, of course, but to actually see it in print yesterday morning set off a whole new wave of irritation. Horner has annoyed me for years. Whenever I see a movie in which the score is so loud and obvious and overwhelming that it draws you out of the movie (rather than doing its job and drawing you in), I check the credits to see who is to blame. And four times out of five, it's Horner. Not to mention that he has been associated with some of the most irritating movies of the past 30 years (although I forgive him a little for his work on The New World).
The second most irritating thing was Matt Damon's nomination for Invictus. It's not that Damon doesn't deserve a nomination; he's a terrific actor. And I like Invictus very much; it has some classically brilliant filmmaking by Clint Eastwood. But the movie was overreaching and Damon's character was underdeveloped. We only saw Francois Pienaar (Damon) in relation to Nelson Mandela (Morgan Freeman); we hardly come to know Francois on his own terms. Indeed, the movie could have been improved by narrowing the focus to the friendship between the two men, rather than trying to take the temperature of an entire nation. Not to mention that Damon's clever performance in The Informant! was a great deal more impressive. But the real reason I was irritated was that Damon's appearance here edged out Christian McKay for Me and Orson Welles.
Five (Semi)-Big Snubs & Other 2009 Oscar Facts
Filed under: Awards, Oscar Watch

The nominations for the 82nd Annual Academy Awards have been announced and they have everyone saying the same four words - "The Secret of Kells?" Yes, "the animated story of the boy behind the famed Book of Kells" (as goes the IMDB synopsis) grabbed one of the five slots for Best Animated Feature. It has to be the biggest surprise of the morning just because nobody has ever heard of it. But there were certainly a few others as well.
THE FIVE BIGGEST SNUBS (not involving The Secret of Kells)
1.Invictus for Best Picture
This is what qualifies as a snub despite many of us being aware that it was in the bottom five (maybe even the bottom three) for consideration. Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon both got their nominations. Eastwood was on everyone's list as a potential wild card for Director, but the lukewarm response must have finally caught up with it and the Academy chose to go with a bad box office success (The Blind Side) than a decent box office disappointment.
2. (500) Days of Summer for Best Original Screenplay
The best thing that can be said about this snub is that it didn't involve being replaced by either Avatar or The Hangover. It was The Messenger that took its place, taking a little but not all of the sting out of it for Scott Neustadter & Michael H. Weber
3. Julianne Moore for Best Supporting Actress
In the category that opened the nominees, we must have all been a little worried that we were in for a surprise-filled morning. Penelope Cruz has been in the conversation all through awards season, but the Nine backlash figured her for the cutting room floor. But Maggie Gyllenhaal for Crazy Heart? The least believable aspect (her character, not the performance) of the entire film? Mo'Nique, Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick were the only true locks, so it's not out there to suggest the other two were up for grabs. But you could have gone with Diane Kruger or Samantha Morton and not drawn as much attention to the snubbing.
The 82nd Academy Award Nominations!
Filed under: Awards, Newsstand, Oscar Watch

Some people wait all year for Christmas morning. Others start prepping their Halloween costumes on November 1st. But movie nerds, industry insiders, journalists, and anyone who likes to sound smart at dinner parties think Oscar season is the most magical time of the year. And today, at 5:38 AM Pacific, Anne Hathaway and AMPAS prez Tom Sherak are announcing the nominations for this year's Academy Awards. Seems a particularly cruel time to pick since Hollywood will be sleeping (or still awake from the night before, perhaps), but such is life. The envelope, please...
BEST PICTURE
"Avatar" James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers
"The Blind Side" Nominees to be determined
"District 9" Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers
"An Education" Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers
"The Hurt Locker" Nominees to be determined
"Inglourious Basterds" Lawrence Bender, Producer
"Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire" Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers
"A Serious Man" Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers
"Up" Jonas Rivera, Producer
"Up in the Air" Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, Producers
BEST DIRECTOR
"Avatar" James Cameron
"The Hurt Locker" Kathryn Bigelow
"Inglourious Basterds" Quentin Tarantino
"Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire" Lee Daniels
"Up in the Air" Jason Reitman
BEST ACTOR
Jeff Bridges in "Crazy Heart"
George Clooney in "Up in the Air"
Colin Firth in "A Single Man"
Morgan Freeman in "Invictus"
Jeremy Renner in "The Hurt Locker"
BEST ACTRESS
Sandra Bullock in "The Blind Side"
Helen Mirren in "The Last Station"
Carey Mulligan in "An Education"
Gabourey Sidibe in "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire"
Meryl Streep in "Julie & Julia"
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Matt Damon in "Invictus"
Woody Harrelson in "The Messenger"
Christopher Plummer in "The Last Station"
Stanley Tucci in "The Lovely Bones"
Christoph Waltz in "Inglourious Basterds"
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Penélope Cruz in "Nine"
Vera Farmiga in "Up in the Air"
Maggie Gyllenhaal in "Crazy Heart"
Anna Kendrick in "Up in the Air"
Mo'Nique in "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire"
The Movieman's Oscar Nomination Predictions: Best Picture, Director & All The Rest
Filed under: Awards, Oscar Watch

Finally, it comes down to this. 10 Best Pictures. Only 5 Best Directors. The suspense is fierce over which five films would not have normally been nominated and have absolutely zero chance in actually winning. Testing that theory over just how honored it is to be nominated when the cynical amongst us see ten nominees as a way to boost interest in generally one of the most watched televised events of the year anyway. Will guilt over The Dark Knight sneak in less worthy blockbusters or a tripling of fanboy genre representation? Do any indie films really stand a chance? Is this the year when a second animated feature cracks the best-of-the-year list, thus guaranteeing its win in its own specialized category? The questions will be answered this Tuesday, Feb. 2 and the debate will reign on long after the winners announced on March 7. But first, the potential nominees.
THE LOCKS
Four groups with critics of varying respects and three major Guilds will make up this particular breakdown. As we did with the actors and the screenplays, we will look at what has been lauded by the Broadcast "Film Critics" Association, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (aka The Golden Globes), the Chicago Film Critics Association, the British Academy of Film And Television (or BAFTA) and three Guilds made up of Producers, Writers and Directors. Seven groups that have nominated 13 films in unison since 2001 (when the BFCA began nominations.)
A Beautiful Mind (2001), The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001), The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003), Brokeback Mountain (2005), Good Night and Good Luck (2005), Babel (2006), The Departed (2006), Little Miss Sunshine (2006), No Country For Old Men (2007), There Will Be Blood (2007), The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button (2008), Slumdog Millionaire (2008)
Girls on Film: Kathryn Bigelow Becomes First Female DGA Winner
Filed under: Awards, Girls on Film

History was made on Saturday night when Kathryn Bigelow became the first female director to win Best Direction in a Feature Film from the Directors' Guild of America. While not an upset or out-of-nowhere win -- every awards follower and pundit wondered about The Hurt Locker and Bigelow's chances -- it's a stunning victory, and one that has every eye looking towards the Oscars.
Bigelow will, most definitely, receive an Oscar nomination tomorrow morning, and she has a really good shot of taking home the Academy's top honor as well. In the last 61 years, over 90% of the DGA winners went on to receive that gold statue, the only upsets being Anthony Harvey in 1968, Francis Ford Coppola in 1972, Steven Spielberg in 1985, Ron Howard in 1995, Ang Lee in 2000, and Rob Marshall in 2002.
It's so close, but yet so far -- an almost-sure course to the Oscars, but one that could still go either way. So close, but so far ... really, that's been the theme of this year's awards circuit, especially when it comes to Bigelow and The Hurt Locker. The DGA Award is, at once, both a wonderful achievement and an emblem of how far we have to go.
The Movieman's Oscar Nomination Predictions: The Screenplays
Filed under: Awards, Oscar Watch

If it ain't on the page it ain't in the actors' mouths. Or some applicable rhyme. Of the 20 Lead and Supporting actors on my list, which ones will be told they did it all by themselves and which will see their guidelines in the running. We have 10 open spots and at least 21 scripts with a shot to claim one of them.
THE LOCKS
With the actors we were following five voting groups. Since the Screen Actors Guild obviously don't have a screenplay category, naturally we will look to the Writers' Guild for support. Not that they did anyone any favors by disqualifying half of the scripts written in 2009, but we will make due with how they lineup anyway with the Broadcast "Film Critics" Association, the Golden Globes, the Chicago Film Critics Association and the BAFTAs. 15 times since 2001 have these five groups all agreed on a nomination, whether it be Original, Adapted or just an overall Best Screenplay or Writer, depending on the year when they did not want to differentiate between a blank page and something that had already been jotted down. And of those 15 times, six were original (Lost In Translation, Good Night and Good Luck, Crash, The Queen, Babel, Juno) and nine were adaptations (A Beautiful Mind, Adaptation, Sideways, Brokeback Mountain, The Departed, No Country For Old Men, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Slumdog Millionaire). Fifteen were nominated. That is great news for Mark Boal (The Hurt Locker) and Jason Reitman & Sheldon Turner (Up In The Air). Even better news for them is that since 2001, there has only been one year (2002) when one of these 15 didn't pick up either the Original or Adapted Screenplay Oscar. In 2004 & 2007, both categories won. Could possibly have been a third year to double up if the WGA had not taken Quentin Tarantino (Inglourious Basterds) out of contention. We'll just chalk that up to semantics and consider that a lock as well.
Razzies Nominate 'New Moon' and Sandra Bullock as Worst of 2009
Filed under: Awards, Newsstand
What was the worst movie of 2009? According to the Razzie Award nominations, which were announced this morning, the five contenders for that title are G.I. Joe: The Rise of the Cobra, Old Dogs, Land of the Lost, Transformers: Rise of the Fallen and All About Steve. That last film also featured one of the worst actresses of 2009: Sandra Bullock, who has otherwise had a more honorable year with Best Actress wins at the Golden Globes and the SAG Awards (and an expected Oscar nomination, to be announced tomorrow morning) for her dramatic turn in The Blind Side and a Best Actress Golden Globe nomination for The Proposal. Her competition for the Razzie includes Beyonce, Miley Cyrus, Sarah Jessica Parker and Megan Fox (for both Jennifer's Body and the Transformers sequel).Worst lead male performances of the year came from Will Ferrell, Steve Martin, Eddie Murphy, John Travolta and all three Jonas Brothers, who share a nomination for their eponymous 3-D concert film (did they not just appear as themselves?). The Jonas' are also up for the Razzie for Worst Screen Couple, where their challengers include Kristen Stewart and "EITHER Robert Pattinson OR Taylor Whatz-His-Fang." Twilight fans will be furious to learn Pattinson is up for Worst Supporting Actor and New Moon is nominated for Worst Remake, Rip-Off or Sequel and Worst Screenplay, too. Surprisingly, the first film in the franchise avoided any nominations last year.
For this special 30th-anniversary year, the Razzies will also (dis)honor the worst of the past decade. Film nominees include Battlefield Earth, Freddy Got Fingered, Gigli, I Know Who Killed Me and the Guy Ritchie-directed Swept Away remake. Worst actor and actresses of the decade include Rob Schneider, Eddie Murphy, John Travolta, Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton and Madonna.
Check out a full list of nominees after the jump.









