<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Box Office: Shutter at the Thought</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/19/box-office-shutter-at-the-thought/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/19/box-office-shutter-at-the-thought/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/19/box-office-shutter-at-the-thought/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office-predictions-1/" rel="tag">Box Office Predictions</a></p>The ability to sustain a sense of Seuss in a CGI scenario (I can't rhyme like the good doctor, but I can alliterate with the best of them) worked in the favor of <em>Horton Hears a Who</em>, last week's number one flick by a country mile, giving it the biggest opening weekend of 2008 so far. Like many of the folks taking part in our weekly box office competition (see the bottom of this post for details) I underestimated the tale of teen angst and kickboxing that is <em>Never Back Down</em> while overestimating the drawing power of the apocalypse with <em>Doomsday,</em> which finished seventh for the week with a mere $4.9 million. <em>10,000 B.C.</em> dropped only as far as second place for its second week, though its total so far of $61.5 million has a ways to go before exceeding the film's $105 million budget. Here are the numbers for last weekend:<br /><strong><br /><em>1. </em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/horton-hears-a-who/24695/main"><em>Horton Hears a Who:</em></a> $45 million <br /><em>2. </em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/10000-bc/23948/main"><em>10,000 B.C.</em></a>: $16.7 million<br /><em>3. </em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/never-back-down/30649/main"><em>Never Back Down: </em></a>$8.6 million<br /><em>4. </em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/college-road-trip/30382/main"><em>College Road Trip:</em></a> $7.8 million<br /><em>5.</em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/vantage-point/26378/main"><em> Vantage Point:</em></a> $5.5 million<br /><br /></strong>If you're determined to see something new this week, you have your choice of laughs, screams, and family drama. Here are this week's newbies:<br /><strong><br /></strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/drillbit-taylor/26638/main"><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/03/drillbit_boxoff.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></strong></a><strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/drillbit-taylor/26638/main"><em>Drillbit Taylor</em></a><br />What's It All About: </strong>A comedy in which a group of high school nerds search the ads in <em>Soldier of Fortune</em> magazine for a body guard to protect them from the school bully. They hire a homeless guy named Drillbit Taylor (it never pays to go with the lowest bidder) played by <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/owen-wilson/200996/main">Owen Wilson</a>.<strong><br />Why It Might Do Well: </strong>Wilson, of course, has many comedic credits to his name, including <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/wedding-crashers/19899/main"><em>Wedding Crashers</em></a> which pulled in $209 million domestically. Also, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/seth-rogen/297862/main">Seth Rogen</a> seems to have the midas touch and he co-wrote the screenplay. <br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well: </strong>Based on the TV spots I keep seeing, people who aren't comfortable with nerd on nerd violence may stay away.<br /><strong>Number of Theaters: </strong>2,700<strong><br />Prediction:</strong> $12 million<strong><br /></strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/tyler-perrys-meet-the-browns/30371/main"><strong></strong></a><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/19/box-office-shutter-at-the-thought/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Box Office: Shutter at the Thought</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/19/box-office-shutter-at-the-thought/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1143556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/19/box-office-shutter-at-the-thought/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cinema</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Drillbit Taylor</category><category>DrillbitTaylor</category><category>Movies</category><category>Owen Wilson</category><category>OwenWilson</category><category>Shutter</category><category>Tyler Perry's Meet the Browns</category><category>TylerPerry'sMeetTheBrowns</category><dc:creator>Matt Bradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Ten Best Films of 2007 - Polowy's Picks</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/12/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-polowys-picks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/12/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-polowys-picks/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/12/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-polowys-picks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/michael-moore/" rel="tag">Michael Moore</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-clooney/" rel="tag">George Clooney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a></p><img alt="Once" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/once-440" /><br /><br />It was a damn fine year for movies, 2007. It's hard enough picking 10 top flicks from the crop after a just-decent year, so the task was especially tricky this time around. (At least at Moviefone <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/best-movies-of-2007">we're able to pick the 50 best.</a>) That's why I'm thankful for the unwritten critics' rule that Top 10 lists can start with a tie, so long as there's common thematic bond between them. Here are my <strike>11</strike> 10 favorite movies of the 007.<br /><br /><strong>10. Tie: <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/dan-in-real-life/23761/main" target="_blank"><em>Dan in Real Life</em></a> / <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/grace-is-gone/25431/main" target="_blank"><em>Grace is Gone</em></a> (Widower Special)</strong><br />What can I say, I'm a sucker for widowers. Some critics found the loving family in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/steve-carell/10850/main" target="_blank">Steve Carell's</a> poignant dramedy <em>Dan</em> unrealistic. I feel sorry for some critics. Plot contrivances aside, it succeeds both in capturing the dynamics of a large clan and telling a helluva love story. In a career-best performance in <em>Grace</em>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/john-cusack/16329/main">John Cusack</a> is a flag-waving father of two whose wife is killed in Iraq. This tear-jerking drama might be misconstrued as a political statement, but finally it's a heartrending tale of human loss.<br /><br /><strong>9.</strong> <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/hot-fuzz/26460/main"><em><strong>Hot Fuzz</strong></em></a><br />Yes, this hilarious send-up of (tribute to?) Bruckheimer schlock tops <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/shaun-of-the-dead/19617/main"><em>Shaun of the Dead</em></a>, the brilliant debut from Brits <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/simon-pegg/307202/main">Simon Pegg</a>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/nick-frost/394251/main">Nick Frost</a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/edgar-wright/203553/main">Edgar Wright</a>. Whereas <em>Shaun's</em> first hour is pure bliss, it loses some steam in the third act. <em>Fuzz</em> gets better as it speeds along, offering up surprises and side-splitters in equal measure. Really, who would've thought anyone would ever pay homage to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/bad-boys-ii/13892/main"><em>Bad Boys II</em></a>? <br /><br /><strong>8. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/no-end-in-sight/28945/main" target="_blank"><em>No End in Sight</em></a></strong><br />As you can surmise from the title, this ain't exactly a sunshiney look at the Iraq War. But it's the most thorough, eye-opening detailing of the mega-blunders made the Bush Administration in planning and executing the war to date (so THAT'S where the insurgency came from!), with nary a <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/michael-moore/103383/main" target="_blank">Michael Moore</a> stunt in sight. Prepared to be educated, maddened.<br /><br /><strong>7. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/ratatouille/25522/main"><em>Ratatouille</em></a></strong><br />Like I've been saying it for a while now: The machines at Pixar appear to be challenging themselves more and more with each release: "What DON'T audiences think they'll fall in love with? How about a rat who cooks? Better yet, a French rat!" And of course, after 111 minutes of Pixar magic, most of us left with a newfound respect for rodents. (Reminds me of '91 when I saw <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/beauty-and-the-beast-1991/5406/main" target="_blank"><em>Beauty and the Beast</em></a>; haven't been afraid of beasts since.)<br /><br /><strong>6. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/superbad/26917/main" target="_blank"><em>Superbad</em></a></strong><br />Forget <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/knocked-up/25372/main"><em>Knocked Up</em></a>. Forget <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/walk-hard-the-dewey-cox-story/27117/main"><em>Walk Hard</em></a>. This deliciously raunchy buddy comedy/love story will stand the test of time and prevail as the most influential Apatow movie of '07, defining a generation like <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/dazed-and-confused/8466/main"><em>Dazed and Confused</em></a> and<em> Fast Times at Ridgemont High</em> did before it. Here's hoping <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/christopher-mintz-plasse/491705/main">Christopher Mintz-Passe</a> (a.k.a. McLovin) will ever be able to convincingly play another character, though I wouldn't mind more McLovin.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/12/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-polowys-picks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Ten Best Films of 2007 - Polowy's Picks</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/12/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-polowys-picks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1084861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/12/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-polowys-picks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>best movies of 2007</category><category>BestMoviesOf2007</category><category>dan in real life</category><category>DanInRealLife</category><category>grace is gone</category><category>GraceIsGone</category><category>hot fuzz</category><category>HotFuzz</category><category>Juno</category><category>Michael clayton</category><category>MichaelClayton</category><category>No Country for Old men</category><category>no end in sight</category><category>NoCountryForOldMen</category><category>NoEndInSight</category><category>Once</category><category>ratatouille</category><category>superbad</category><category>the king of kong</category><category>TheKingOfKong</category><category>top 10 list</category><category>Top10List</category><dc:creator>Kevin Polowy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Kansas City Critics Love 'Blood,' 'Juno,' and 'Old Men'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/08/kansas-city-critics-love-blood-juno-and-old-men/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/08/kansas-city-critics-love-blood-juno-and-old-men/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/08/kansas-city-critics-love-blood-juno-and-old-men/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><img alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/11/twbb-11162007.jpg" align="right" border="1" />Did you know that the <a href="http://www.kcfcc.org/">Kansas City Film Critics Circle</a> is the second oldest critics group in the country? Yep, they've been voting for their favorites since 1966, which is when they gave <em>Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?</em> their highest accolade. Members of the KCFCC include <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/">Loey Lockerby</a>, <a href="http://www.kcactive.com/">Russ Simmons</a> and my good pal <a href="http://www.efilmcritic.com/hbs.cgi?reviewer=382">Dan Lybarger</a> ... but even if you're not familiar with their work, it sure looks like the whole crew has some pretty excellent taste in movies.<br /><br />So here's what the KCFCC threw some love towards as part of their 42nd(!) annual awards presentation...<br /><br /><strong>Best Film</strong><br /><em>There Will Be Blood</em><br /><br /><strong>The Robert Altman Award for Directing</strong><br />(TIE!)<br />Paul Thomas Anderson, <em>There Will Be Blood</em><br />Julian Schnabel, <em>The Diving Bell and the Butterfly</em><br /><br /><strong>Best Actor</strong><br />Daniel Day-Lewis, <em>There Will Be Blood</em><br /><br /><strong>Best Actress</strong><br />Marion Cotilliard, <em>La Vie en Rose</em><br /><strong><br />Best Supporting Actor</strong><br />Javier Bardem, <em>No Country for Old Men</em><br /><br /><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong><br />Tilda Swinton, <em>Michael Clayton</em><br /><strong><br />Best Original Screenplay</strong><br />Diablo Cody, <em>Juno</em><br /><br /><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong><br />Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, <em>No Country for Old Men</em><br /><br /><strong>Best Animated Film</strong><br /><em>Ratatouille</em><br /><strong><br />Best Foreign Language Film</strong><br /><em>The Diving Bell and the Butterfly</em><br /><br /><strong>Best Documentary</strong><br /><em>In the Shadow of the Moon</em><br /><br /><strong>The Vince Koehler Award for Outstanding Science Fiction, Fantasy or Horror Film</strong><br /><em>Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street<br /><br /></em>So there you have it. Kansas City has spoken!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/08/kansas-city-critics-love-blood-juno-and-old-men/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1081556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/08/kansas-city-critics-love-blood-juno-and-old-men/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>juno</category><category>kansas city film critics circle</category><category>KansasCityFilmCriticsCircle</category><category>no country for old men</category><category>NoCountryForOldMen</category><category>there will be blood</category><category>ThereWillBeBlood</category><category>year end awards</category><category>YearEndAwards</category><dc:creator>Scott Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Ten Worst Films of 2007 -- James's Take</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-worst-films-of-2007-jamess-take/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-worst-films-of-2007-jamess-take/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-worst-films-of-2007-jamess-take/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/theheartbreakkid1.gif" vspace="4" border="1" /><br /><br />Want to know a dirty little secret? <br /><br />Contrary to what you've <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/ratatouille/25522/main">heard recently</a>, critics hate writing bad reviews. <br /><br />No, they're not fun to write; they're <em>exhausting</em>. No, they're not less work than a good review; they're more difficult. And when you love movies -- which you better, as a critic -- you don't sit down in the dark before a film and think, "<em>Boy, I hope the next two hours of my life will be wasted</em>." But every movie is not, in fact, good -- and these were the high marks among the low points in 2007, from one critic's highly subjective perspective. <br /><br />1. <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/05/review-the-heartbreak-kid/">The Heartbreak Kid</a><br /></em><br />Racist, sexist, misogynist -- and, even worse, not funny. The Farrelly Brothers proved their "King Midas in reverse" touch by turning a <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-heartbreak-kid-1972/32134/main">classic piece of comedy gold</a> into a lump of trash. The only possible bright side comes in the fact that the Farrelly's status as box-office kings has now been tarnished, hopefully hastening their slide to straight-to-video film making.<em><br /></em><span class="nfakPe"><br /></span><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-worst-films-of-2007-jamess-take/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Ten Worst Films of 2007 -- James's Take</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-worst-films-of-2007-jamess-take/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1065515/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-worst-films-of-2007-jamess-take/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>300</category><category>Because I Said So</category><category>BecauseISaidSo</category><category>Charlie Wilson's War</category><category>CharlieWilson'sWar</category><category>Flanders</category><category>I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry</category><category>In the Valley of Elah</category><category>INowPronounceYouChuckAndLarry</category><category>InTheValleyOfElah</category><category>Into the WIld</category><category>IntoTheWild</category><category>Spider-Man III</category><category>Spider-manIii</category><category>The Heartbreak Kid</category><category>TheHeartbreakKid</category><category>Transformers</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Ten Best Films of 2007 -- Patrick's Picks</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-patricks-picks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-patricks-picks/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-patricks-picks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-in-theaters/" rel="tag">New in Theaters</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-clooney/" rel="tag">George Clooney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><img width="439" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="308" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/knocked-up.jpg" /><br /><br />The best movie year since 1999, 2007 offered a staggering bounty of cinematic delights. I keep track of all the movies I see in a given year and give each a letter grade, "A" through "F". Usually my Top Ten list consists of all of the "A's" and a few "B's." This year, "A" pictures made up my top <span style="font-style: italic;">twenty</span>. With so many great films, I won't wallow through a "Worst of the Year" list, I'll simply present you with a few that didn't fully satisfy:<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Biggest Disappointment:</span> <em><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Darjeeling Limited</span> -- </em>A Louis Vuitton commercial stretched to feature length. <span style="font-style: italic;">The Darjeeling Limited</span> is a perfect title for the film because it makes plain what a limited filmmaker the once great Wes Anderson has become. Hey Wes, people running in slow-motion while a Kinks song plays is always going to look pretty neat. But if there's absolutely nothing else going on in the scene, then that's all it is -- people running in slow-motion while a Kinks song plays. We all think it's really cool that you like The Kinks. Hell, I love those guys! The Rolling Stones are awesome, too! But I wouldn't ask them to do my job for me. <br /><br />and...<br /><br style="font-weight: bold;" /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Biggest Question Mark: </span><em><span style="font-weight: bold;">There Will Be Blood</span><br /><br /></em>Undoubtedly one of the year's most impressive technical achievements,<em> There Will Be Blood</em> is frequently stunning. It's so stunning, in fact, that it's easy to overlook how infuriatingly empty it all is. The film focuses on two main characters, and neither one changes a lick in thirty years and 158 minutes. How did Paul Thomas Anderson, creator of such deeply emotional rides as <em>Boogie Nights, Magnolia</em>, and <em>Punch Drunk Love</em> come up with a movie completely devoid of human emotion? (I'm not counting greed.) Beautiful, brilliant, and boring in equal doses, I've seen <em>Blood</em> twice, and I still don't know if it's a masterpiece or a mess. I just know I felt...nothing watching it. It's as hollow, as frustrating, as difficult to know as its "hero," Daniel Plainview.<br /><br />On to my list. First, ten that didn't quite make the cut. Here's #20 through #11: <span style="font-weight: bold;">(</span><em style="font-weight: bold;">#20) Breach, (#19) Once, (#18) The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, (#17) Sicko, (#16) Sweeney Todd, (#15) The Lives of Others, </em><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><em><span style="font-weight: bold;">(#14) Eastern Promises, (#13) Zodiac, (#12) Atonement, (#11) Before the Devil Knows You're Dead</span><br /></em><br />And my Top Ten is after the jump...<em><br /></em><br /><br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-patricks-picks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Ten Best Films of 2007 -- Patrick's Picks</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-patricks-picks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1069898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-patricks-picks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>2007</category><category>best of 2007</category><category>BestOf2007</category><category>darjeeling limited</category><category>DarjeelingLimited</category><category>emile hirsch</category><category>EmileHirsch</category><category>george clooney</category><category>GeorgeClooney</category><category>gone baby gone</category><category>GoneBabyGone</category><category>in the valley of elah</category><category>InTheValleyOfElah</category><category>into the wild</category><category>IntoTheWild</category><category>javier bardem</category><category>JavierBardem</category><category>judd apatow</category><category>JuddApatow</category><category>knocked up</category><category>KnockedUp</category><category>michael clayton</category><category>MichaelClayton</category><category>no country for old men</category><category>NoCountryForOldMen</category><category>sean penn</category><category>SeanPenn</category><category>seth rogen</category><category>SethRogen</category><category>the mist</category><category>TheMist</category><category>there will be blood</category><category>ThereWillBeBlood</category><category>tilda swinton</category><category>TildaSwinton</category><category>tommy lee jones</category><category>TommyLeeJones</category><category>tony gilroy</category><category>TonyGilroy</category><dc:creator>Patrick Walsh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>2007: The Year in Horror. All of It. Seriously.</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/2007-the-year-in-horror-all-of-it-seriously/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/2007-the-year-in-horror-all-of-it-seriously/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/2007-the-year-in-horror-all-of-it-seriously/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><img border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/09/orphanagepic.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />I've already done <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/scott-weinbergs-top-ten-of-2007-and-some-real-stinkers-too/">an "official" top ten list</a> and all that year-end movie-critic jazz, but since today's my birthday I figured I'd spend an hour or two on a piece I'll simply enjoy writing. Most of the solid horror sites have done their own top / bottom lists, so I thought it would make sense to try a different approach. So let's start waaaay back in January and just tiptoe through the year in horror together. And then at the end we'll figure out how the horror geeks were treated in 2007. (All links lead to my review of that particular film, be it from <em>FEARnet</em>, <em>eFilmCritic, DVDTalk</em>, <span style="font-style: italic;">DVD Clinic</span>, or right here at good ol' <em>Cinematical</em>.)<br /><br /><strong>January!</strong><br /><br />01/02 -- <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/08/18/review-snakes-on-a-plane-scotts-take/"><em>Snakes on a Plane</em></a> arrives on DVD. "The internet" still refuses to make it a hit. (0)<br />01/12 -- Giant croc flick <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/13/review-primeval/"><em>Primeval</em></a> advertised as a serial killer film. Doesn't help the box office. (-1)<br />01/16 -- <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/06/review-texas-chainsaw-massacre-the-beginning-scotts-take/"><em>Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning</em></a> arrives on DVD. Thousands give it a second shot and realize it still sucks. (-1)<br />01/19 -- A predictably horrible remake of <a href="http://www.fearnet.com/NewsDetail.aspx?catid=31&amp;mid=8011"><em>The Hitcher</em></a> arrives in theaters. Nobody cares. (-1)<br />01/23 -- <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/30/review-saw-3/"><em>Saw 3</em></a> hits DVD and sells a whole bunch of copies, despite the fact that all the horror fans know a double-dip is arriving in 11 months. Weird. (0)<br />01/26 -- <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=28174"><em>Blood and Chocolate</em></a>. Ew, no thanks. (-1)<br />01/30 -- Forgotten Ricci flick <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=25963"><em>The Gathering</em></a> (finally) arrives on DVD. Turns out it was shelved for good reason. (-1)<br /><br />January Total: -5 horror points!<br /><br /><strong>February!</strong><br /><br />02/02 -- J-horror knock-off latecomer <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/02/03/review-the-messengers/"><em>The Messengers</em></a> hits theaters. With a PG-13. (-1)<br />02/06 -- <em>The Grudge 2</em> hits DVD. Thousands realize oh yeah, there was a sequel. (-1)<br />02/09 -- A well-shot but horribly unnecessary prequel arrives in the form of <a href="http://www.fearnet.com/NewsDetail.aspx?catid=31&amp;mid=5380"><em>Hannibal Rising</em></a>. Collective yawn. (-1)<br />02/13 -- The "so good it's gotta be remade because it's foreign" <em>13 (Tzameti)</em> arrives on DVD. (+1)<br />02/16 -- The comics nerds get a little (very little) horror infusion with the very silly <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/02/16/review-ghost-rider-scotts-review/"><em>Ghost Rider</em></a>. (-1)<br />02/20 -- Lionsgate slaps the words "<em>Open Water 2</em>" onto a movie called "<em>Adrift</em>." (-1)<br />02/23 -- After Dark (brilliantly) chooses their dullest flick (<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/02/24/review-the-abandoned/"><em>The Abandoned</em></a>) for a solo theatrical release. (-1)<br />02/23 -- Jim Carrey tries to get grim (and ends up goofy) in <em>The Number 23</em>. (-1)<br />02/27 -- <a href="http://www.fearnet.com/NewsDetail.aspx?catid=31&amp;mid=6079"><em>The Return</em></a> arrives on DVD. Hundreds remember that the movie exists. (-1)<br /><br />February Total: -7 horror points!!<strong><br /></strong><u><em><strong></strong></em><strong></strong></u><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/2007-the-year-in-horror-all-of-it-seriously/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2007: The Year in Horror. All of It. Seriously.</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/2007-the-year-in-horror-all-of-it-seriously/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1073231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/31/2007-the-year-in-horror-all-of-it-seriously/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>best</category><category>cinematical</category><category>journal</category><category>scott weinberg</category><category>ScottWeinberg</category><category>the year in horror</category><category>TheYearInHorror</category><category>worst</category><dc:creator>Scott Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Rocchi Review with Cinematical's Erik Davis -- Now on iTunes!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/30/the-rocchi-review-with-cinematicals-erik-davis-now-on-itunes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/30/the-rocchi-review-with-cinematicals-erik-davis-now-on-itunes/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/30/the-rocchi-review-with-cinematicals-erik-davis-now-on-itunes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-rocchi-review-online-film-community-podcast/" rel="tag">The Rocchi Review: Online Film Community Podcast</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/03/sutro-copy.jpg" /><br /><br />What are the movies that got away in 2007? What's the point of all these Top Ten lists, anyhow? When is hype welcome, and when is hype <span style="font-style: italic;">hype</span>? And what movies are making us smile in anticipation for 2008? Tackling these questions -- and many more -- alongside James this week is Cinematical's Editor-in-Chief <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/erik-davis/">Erik Davis</a>, rounding up 2007 and looking ahead to 2008. And speaking of looking forward, Cinematical's Podcast content is now in iTunes; <a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=219262705">you can subscribe at this link</a>. Also, you can listen directly here at Cinematical by clicking below: <br /><br /><object width="290" height="24" data="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> <param value="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf" name="movie" /> <param value="soundFile=http://podcasts.cinematical.com/podcasts/RR23F.mp3&amp;leftbg=0xb7b7db&amp;rightbg=0xcdeb8b" name="FlashVars" /> <param value="high" name="quality" /> <param value="false" name="menu" /> <param value="transparent" name="wmode" /></object><br /><br />As ever, you can download the entire podcast <a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/cinematical/podcasts/RR2340.mp3">right here</a> -- and those of you with RSS Podcast readers can find all of Cinematical'<em>s</em> podcast content <a href="http://podcasts.cinematical.com/rss.xml">at this link</a>.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/30/the-rocchi-review-with-cinematicals-erik-davis-now-on-itunes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1071957/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/30/the-rocchi-review-with-cinematicals-erik-davis-now-on-itunes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Scott Weinberg's Top Ten of 2007 (and some real stinkers, too)</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/scott-weinbergs-top-ten-of-2007-and-some-real-stinkers-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/scott-weinbergs-top-ten-of-2007-and-some-real-stinkers-too/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/scott-weinbergs-top-ten-of-2007-and-some-real-stinkers-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/sweenetbigpic.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />Even at the end of the lamest movie years, this is always too hard. I'm supposed to take a list of over 200 movies and cramp it down into one 10-title list? No way. That's not to say that there were too many films jockeying for position on my "best" list, but hell, I spent a LOT of hours watching all these movies, and I'll be damned if I'm only gonna cover ten of 'em!<br /><br />Last year I went a little insane and did ten different top ten lists, but I have a little more of a social life this year, so I'm just going to list my favorite films and trash the year's biggest stinkpiles (and then, in a separate post, recap the year in horror). Let's try and generate a little tension by starting at the end. (That's what she said!)<br /><br />10. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0467406/"><em>Juno</em></a>, <em><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0478311/">Knocked Up</a></em> &amp; <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0473308/"><em>Waitress</em></a> -- I hate it when critics put multiple movies in one spot, but I just had to cheat on my number ten, because it's really weird how the three best comedies of the year ... all have to do with pregnant chicks. One movie per slot from here on out, I promise.<br /><br />9. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0440963/"><em>The Bourne Ultimatum</em></a> -- The perfect capper to a stellar trilogy. Masterful action, fantastic performances, and an energy that just never lets up.<br /><br />8. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0443706/"><em>Zodiac</em></a> -- I went in expecting <em>Silence of the Lambs</em>, but got a fantastic "newspaper" story instead. And even at 160 minutes, I was never bored.<br /><br />7. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0425112/"><em>Hot Fuzz</em></a> -- Pegg, Frost and Wright strike again in this wonderfully clever action flick send-up. It took multiple viewings before the flick really clicked with me, but it's easily the funniest movie of the year that doesn't have any pregnant women in it. (<em>Superbad</em> being a close second.)<br /><br />6. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0408236/"><em>Sweeney Todd</em></a> -- It's not exactly the sort of musical I'm used to (that Sondheim is pretty weird), but between the stellar leads, the grimly gorgeous look of the piece, and enough gallows humor to fill ten good flicks -- this just might be Tim Burton's best movie yet.<em><strong></strong></em><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/scott-weinbergs-top-ten-of-2007-and-some-real-stinkers-too/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Scott Weinberg's Top Ten of 2007 (and some real stinkers, too)</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/scott-weinbergs-top-ten-of-2007-and-some-real-stinkers-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1072126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/scott-weinbergs-top-ten-of-2007-and-some-real-stinkers-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>best of 2007</category><category>BestOf2007</category><category>cinematical</category><category>scott weinberg</category><category>ScottWeinberg</category><category>top ten</category><category>TopTen</category><category>worst of the year</category><category>WorstOfTheYear</category><dc:creator>Scott Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Ten Really Bad Moments in 2007 Cinema</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/ten-really-bad-moments-in-2007-cinema/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/ten-really-bad-moments-in-2007-cinema/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/ten-really-bad-moments-in-2007-cinema/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/gay-and-lesbian/" rel="tag">Gay &amp; Lesbian</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/religious/" rel="tag">Religious</a></p><p><img width="434" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="291" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/reignoverme.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Once upon a time, back when I started out this line of work, it was my aim to see every movie ever made. Then came the VHS player. Once the direct-to-video market began, numerous filmmakers stopped thinking of the pleasures and rigors of making films for the big screen. Instead, they started thinking of a quick payoff. VHS financed the rise of the indie movie for good (or often, ill). It all added up to a huge increase in the number of films released. Eventually, I realized if I wanted to do some ordinary things--hoisting an ale, listening to music, reading a book--I was going to have to let a few films slide. Coming attractions have been a huge help in picking which ones to avoid, particularly the ones that reveal every single plot point and the most likely resolution of the problem. So how can I really do a worst of 2007 list? I ducked a lot of contenders. <em>Underdog,</em> for instance. <br /><br />I missed <em>P.U., I Hate You,</em> as those slashing wits at <em>Cracked</em> magazine will be calling it, but I really felt<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/21/review-p-s-i-love-you/ "> James Rocchi's personal agony at witnessing the last of Hilary Swank's</a> trio of evil movies this year. Though some would call it a duo; some people fell for <em>Freedom Writers. </em>Maybe this kind of story can be told without <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_222"><em>Room 222</em></a>-levels of obviousness and manipulation...perhaps from the POV of one of the students, instead of the earnest white teacher? I'm not going to get any prizes for prescience by saying Swank's agent needs to be renditioned to some country with deep dark dungeons. <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/14/film-threat-releases-annual-frigid-50-list/">Swank's Lost Year has already been celebrated elsewhere</a>. <br /><br />But <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-reaping/25378/main">The Reaping</a> </em>(#1) was the worst of the three; no one wants to see this actress's career reaped anymore. The low-water mark of this swamps-of-blood Christian thriller was the scene where Swank is told by a yokel, "Some people just don't want to go to heaven." Meaning her, and the atheists, agnostics, and Odin-worshippers in the audience.</p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/ten-really-bad-moments-in-2007-cinema/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ten Really Bad Moments in 2007 Cinema</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/ten-really-bad-moments-in-2007-cinema/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1070686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/29/ten-really-bad-moments-in-2007-cinema/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Adam Sandler</category><category>AdamSandler</category><category>Epic Movie</category><category>EpicMovie</category><category>Hannibal Rising</category><category>HannibalRising</category><category>Hilary Swank</category><category>HilarySwank</category><category>I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry</category><category>INowPronounceYouChuckAndLarry</category><category>Into The Wild</category><category>IntoTheWild</category><category>Juno</category><category>Mennen Yapo</category><category>MennenYapo</category><category>Premonition</category><category>Reign Over Me</category><category>ReignOverMe</category><category>Spy Kids</category><category>SpyKids</category><category>The Number 23</category><category>The Reaping</category><category>TheNumber23</category><category>TheReaping</category><dc:creator>Richard von Busack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Ten Best Films of 2007 -- James's Take</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/28/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-jamess-take/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/28/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-jamess-take/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/28/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-jamess-take/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/12-days-of-cinematicalmas/" rel="tag">12 Days of Cinematicalmas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/ncfombard.jpg" vspace="4" border="1" /> </p>
<p>If I had to think of one moment that summed 2007 up for me as a critic and moviegoer, then that moment came before an early-morning press screening at Cannes. Two film writers were speaking about a film from the day before -- excited, animated, engaged. One of them said "<em>Le Scaphandre et le Papillion</em>?" She then made a hand gesture worth a thousand words, and then exclaimed "<em>Cinema</em>!" And I felt the same way about T<em>he Diving Bell and the Butterfly</em> as she did -- that it was a work of pure cinema, using every possible element of film to make a powerful piece of art, one that was engaged with the real world we live in while also existing as a strong, expressive creative work in and of itself. That's worth looking for, at the movies -- and, this year, it was easier than you might think to find it. These, then, are the films that made me exclaim '<em>Cinema!"</em> in 2007, in no particular order after #1. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>1. <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/20/cannes-review-no-country-for-old-men/"><em>No Country for Old Men</em></a></p>
<p>The best film of the year -- wildly engaging, supremely confident, completely thrilling. Lesser filmmakers would have turned Cormac McCarthy's book into a tedious shoot-'em-up; thanks to Joel and Ethan Coen, we get a pulse-pounding, thought-provoking existential action flick -- a Greek tragedy with shotguns, a story of the American West whose true themes and concerns are eternal. I've seen <em>No Country for Old Men</em> five times now, and I get something new out of it every time -- it's a rich and dense work that also has sugar-rush surface-level pleasures. With three of the best male performances of the year (Josh Brolin, Tommy Lee Jones and Javier Bardem) and a tone that somehow both fulfills and thwarts what we expect from the movies, <em>No Country for Old Men</em> may be the Coen's masterpiece. <br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/28/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-jamess-take/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Ten Best Films of 2007 -- James's Take</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/28/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-jamess-take/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1065514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/28/the-ten-best-films-of-2007-jamess-take/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days</category><category>4Months,3Weeks,2Days</category><category>Great World of Sound</category><category>GreatWorldOfSound</category><category>I'm Not There</category><category>I'mNotThere</category><category>No Country for Old Men</category><category>No End in Sight</category><category>NoCountryForOldMen</category><category>NoEndInSight</category><category>Persepolis</category><category>The Bourne Ultimatum</category><category>The Diving Bell and the Butterfly</category><category>TheAssasinationOfJesseJamesByTheCowardRobertFord</category><category>TheAssassinationOfJesseJamesByTheCowardRobertFord</category><category>TheBourneUltimatum</category><category>TheDivingBellAndTheButterfly</category><category>There WIll Be Blood</category><category>ThereWillBeBlood</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Erik's 2007 Awesome Awards!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/27/eriks-2007-awesome-awards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/27/eriks-2007-awesome-awards/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/27/eriks-2007-awesome-awards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><p><img height="291" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/09/darjeelinglimited.jpg" width="435" align="middle" vspace="4" border="1" /></p>
<p>This will be my third time crossing over into a new year while writing for <em>Cinematical</em>, and I've never once shelled out a top ten list. And every year, as January approaches, I always say to myself, "This will be the year I write a top ten list." Recently, it was more like, "You're the editor of the friggin' site -- you <em>need</em> to write a top ten list. It's, like, mandatory and punishable by death in some states." You'll notice that <em>Cinematical</em> has officially kicked off our year-end extravaganza; it began earlier this month with our <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/10/cinematicals-25-hottest-of-2007/">Hot</a> and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/11/cinematicals-25-lamest-of-2007/">Lame</a> in 2007 lists, and now we'll end the year allowing several of our writers to give their top picks of 2007 (including a few posts on the worst films of the year as well). But when I looked at everything we were doing, I noticed one element was absent: Awesome Awards! So, instead of giving you another top ten list, here are my official awesome awards for 2007:</p>
<p><strong>The Awesome Award for Best Action Scene Featuring Uncomfortable Male Nudity Goes to ...</strong></p>
<p>The bath house scene in <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/15/tiff-review-eastern-promises/"><strong>Eastern Promises</strong></a></em> -- David Cronenberg's <em>Eastern Promises</em> has wound up on a lot of year-end lists, and will most likely find a spot in the best picture category at the Oscars in 2008, but when you talk about the film there's one scene that immediately comes to mind: the bath house scene. Viggo Mortensen plays a guy with ties to the Russian mob, and when a couple of dudes are sent to off him at a bath house, we get one of the best action sequences in all of 2007 ... and Viggo is completely naked the entire time. It's extremely uncomfortable and wildly exhilarating to watch all at the same time. </p>
<p><strong>The Awesome Award for Best Scene Featuring a Nerd Attempting to Woo the Girl Next Door Goes to ...</strong></p>
<p>Sam Witwicky gives Mikaela Banes a "ride" in <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/03/review-transformers-scotts-review/"><strong>Transformers</strong></a></em> -- You won't see this film anywhere near a top ten best-of list this year, but Michael Bay's <em>Transformers</em> did include one genuine, well-written, cutesy moment early on in the film when Shia LaBeouf's character attempts to "pick up" Megan Fox on the side of the road in his new set of wheels and finds the yellow and black clunker has a mind of its own. While Fox is hardly the girl next door (more like the hottie on your next door neighbor's Playboy calendar), it was fun to watch LaBeouf reacting to this bizarre situation, while still trying to make sense of it and woo the girl of his dreams. In a film full of giant f**king robots, this was the most human scene ... if that makes any sense.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/27/eriks-2007-awesome-awards/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Erik's 2007 Awesome Awards!</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/27/eriks-2007-awesome-awards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1071722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/27/eriks-2007-awesome-awards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>awesome awards</category><category>before the devil knows you're dead</category><category>cinematical</category><category>eastern promises</category><category>juno</category><category>marisa tomei</category><category>no country for old men</category><category>the darjeeling limited</category><category>the dark knight</category><category>the simpsons movie</category><category>TheDarjeelingLimited</category><category>tom hanks</category><category>transformers</category><category>viggo mortensen</category><category>wes anderson</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Lame in 2007: Torture Porn (#5)</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/04/lame-in-2007-torture-porn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/04/lame-in-2007-torture-porn/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/04/lame-in-2007-torture-porn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a></p><table width="99%" cellspacing="" cellpadding="" border="0" style="border: 0px solid black;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" id="img1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/captivity-billboard2.jpg" /><strong>Lame because:</strong> The "torture porn" boom-that-wasn't didn't fill 2007 with dull movie series (<em>Hostel II</em>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/26/review-saw-4/"><em>Saw</em><em> IV</em></a>) and lame attempts to cash in (<em>Captivity</em>, <em>Turistas</em>) that uniformly failed to deliver at the box office; it also led to even more tedious <a href="http://www.timeout.com/film/features/show-feature/3058/">op-ed pieces</a> and <a href="http://www.libertyfilmfestival.com/libertas/?p=7119">blog posts</a> decrying the trend as yet another sign of the decline of civilization or defending it as a form of expression. I sincerely don't know which is worse; Eli Roth's inability to make a real movie, or people complaining about the movies he makes so badly. (Asked about where you can go as a direction for future artistic exploration with 'torture porn' by <em>The New York Times</em>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/movies/10zino.html">Roth's witty rejoinder was</a> ""They say there is more than one way to skin a cat. Well, there are many ways to skin a human." Congratulations, Mr. Roth, but is it just the one trick that your pony does?) Another tedious element of talking about "torture porn" is that it reframes talking about horror films as <em>good vs. evil</em>, as opposed the way a reasonable person would go about framing the discussion, which is as <em>good vs. bad.</em> Anyone who thinks excessive violence is a modern trend in pop culture is invited to flip open a copy of Shakespeare's <em>Titus Andronicus</em> or some of the more choice bits of the <em>Old Testament</em>; the high-pitched whine about 'torture porn' that came at us in stereo from the <a href="http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/entertainmentcolumn/2007/col20070823.asp">restrictive right</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jill-soloway/remove-the-rating-for-em_b_44404.html">liberal left</a> in 2007 is yet another droning tone in the mass-media chorus that drowns out any attempt to talk about the realities behind violence in this country -- underfunded policing and public psychiatric care, guns in the hands of people who shouldn't have them, the failure of individual responsibility. It's easier to talk about violent movies as a cause of violence than it is to tackle any of the things that actually cause violence but, really, when <em>High School Musical</em> was at the top of the charts, did you see a lot of singing and dancing in the streets? <br /><br /><strong>How to turn it around:</strong> The better question is, why would you want to? Hopefully, studios will look at the dwindling return-on-investment these films represent (even if Lionsgate is threatening to run the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/18/director-hired-for-saw-v-and-saw-vi-source-says/"><em>Saw</em> series into the ground</a>) and realize that, hey, audiences might be interested in horror films that scare instead of disgust (<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/07/tiff-review-the-orphanage/"><em>The Orphanage</em></a>) or are made by actual talents (the upcoming <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/16/trailer-for-funny-games-remake/"><em>Funny Games</em></a>) as opposed to hacks who only know where to get a bulk rate on fake blood and plastic sheeting.
            <p> </p>
            </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td align="right">Next up: <em>Stop being greedy!</em> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/28/lame-in-2007-amptp/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/11/cinenext3.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<br />
<h2 align="center">Where did they rank?</h2>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/29/lame-in-2007-john-travolta-in-drag/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/travolta8hot_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/29/lame-in-2007-jessica-biel/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/jessicabiel---4_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/29/lame-in-2007-new-line-vs-peter-jackson/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/peterjackson---2_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/04/lame-in-2007-torture-porn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1054908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/04/lame-in-2007-torture-porn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Moviefone's Best Christmas Movies of All Time</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/moviefones-best-christmas-movies-of-all-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/moviefones-best-christmas-movies-of-all-time/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/moviefones-best-christmas-movies-of-all-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a></p><p><img alt="Best Christmas Movies" hspace="8" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/best-christmas-movies-elf-150" align="right" vspace="8" border="0" />The Christmas season is a time for celebration, family and, of course, watching copious amounts of Christmas movies. Like any true movie buffs would, the editors at Moviefone honored the holiday by watching Christmas movies for days and days -- everything from lumps of coal/rancid turds such as <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/surviving-christmas/17043/main">Surviving Christmas</a></em> and <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/reindeer-games/7146/main">Reindeer Games</a></em> (thanks for nothing, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/ben-affleck/426/main">Ben Affleck</a>!) to glorious cinematic gifts such as <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/its-a-wonderful-life/1253/main">It's a Wonderful Life</a></em> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/elf/14259/main"><em>Elf</em> </a>-- to bring you the definitive list of the 25 <a href="http://movies.aol.com/holiday-movies/best-christmas-movies">Best Christmas Movies</a> ever to grace the silver screen. (Sorry, <em>Grinch</em> and <em>Rudolph</em> aficionados, no TV specials or made-for-TV movies here.)</p>
<p>Rather than ruin the surprise and unwrap the full list right now, however, Moviefone is providing trivia clues to the identity of each film and revealing just one movie every day until we unveil No. 1 on Christmas Eve. It's kind of like an Advent calendar for cinema buffs. So place your guesses to the mystery movies here, and have a very merry Christmas.</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/moviefones-best-christmas-movies-of-all-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1052002/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/moviefones-best-christmas-movies-of-all-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>best christmas movies</category><category>BestChristmasMovies</category><category>elf</category><category>holiday movies</category><category>HolidayMovies</category><category>it's a wonderful life</category><category>It'sAWonderfulLife</category><category>reindeer games</category><category>ReindeerGames</category><category>surviving christmas</category><category>SurvivingChristmas</category><dc:creator>Tommy DiChiara</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Four Months, Three Weeks, Two Days ... and One Week?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/26/four-months-three-weeks-two-days-and-one-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/26/four-months-three-weeks-two-days-and-one-week/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/26/four-months-three-weeks-two-days-and-one-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/ifc/" rel="tag">IFC</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/11/4months.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />One of the most controversial -- and acclaimed -- films of the year is coming to America a little earlier than expected. As reported at <a href="http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/archives/2007/11/new_ifc_4_month.php"><em>Hollywood Elsewhere</em></a>, Christian Mungiu's <em>4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days,</em> the Romanian film that won the Palme D'Or at Cannes, was going to be released January 25th 2008; now, though, the film will be playing a one-week engagement in L.A. starting December 21st. This move is entirely a decision by American releasing studio IFC to make it easier for film critics to put <em>4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days</em> on their year-end Best-of lists. It's easy to see the challenge for IFC: without a 2007 opening, <em>4 Months</em> could fail to capitalize on the momentum it's built at Cannes, Telluride and Toronto in the past year's festival season; at the same time, with only festival screenings and a one-week run in L.A., the film may not have a broad enough footing to land on enough major Top Ten and critic's groups listings. <br /><br />I was fortunate enough to see <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/17/cannes-review-4-months-3-weeks-and-2-days/">4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days</a> </em>at Cannes<em>,</em> and it's an amazing, breathtaking, knockout film; IFC purchased the film at Cannes, and began a strong publicity strategy, including bringing Mungiu to Toronto for interviews, including <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/10/tiff-interview-4-months-3-weeks-and-2-days-writer-director-chri/">one with <em>Cinematical</em></a>. At the same time, I can easily think of other acclaimed films that have plenty of buzz for 2007 that have yet to play San Francisco -- or, for that matter, anywhere outside of the festival circuit or L.A. and New York (<em>Lake of Fire</em> is the first film that comes to mind for this year, or how <em>The Lives of Others</em> didn't play in SF prior to January 2007). The announcements from The New York, L.A., Chicago and San Francisco critic's groups will begin in the second week in December -- and until then, there's no way to know if IFC's gamble will pay off ...<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/26/four-months-three-weeks-two-days-and-one-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1048199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/26/four-months-three-weeks-two-days-and-one-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days</category><category>4Months,3Weeks,2Days</category><category>Christian Mungiu</category><category>ChristianMungiu</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Moviefone Ranks the 25 Best Raunchy R-Rated Comedies of All Time</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/15/moviefone-ranks-the-25-best-raunchy-r-rated-comedies-of-all-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/15/moviefone-ranks-the-25-best-raunchy-r-rated-comedies-of-all-time/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/15/moviefone-ranks-the-25-best-raunchy-r-rated-comedies-of-all-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a></p><p><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/best-raunchy-comedies" target="_new"><img height="150" alt="Best Raunchy Comedies" hspace="8" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/best-raunchy-comedies-animal-house-150" width="150" align="right" vspace="8" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>It takes cojones to make an R-rated movie these days, when the proven money-makers are PG and PG-13 movies that can attract a wider audience and thus rake in the big bucks. Still, there is a great tradition of hard-R classics in Hollywood, dating back to the likes of <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-kentucky-fried-movie/1019155/main">Kentucky Fried Movie</a></em>, <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/national-lampoons-animal-house/4526/main">Animal House</a></em> and <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/national-lampoons-vacation/887/main">Vacation</a></em> in the late '70s and early '80s, and continuing down through the ages. But while these flicks continued to be produced, they rarely took off at the box office. All that is changing now, thanks to the one-two money-making punch of <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/wedding-crashers/19899/main">Wedding Crashers</a></em> and <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-40-year-old-virgin/20946/main">The 40-Year-Old Virgin</a></em> in the summer of 2005. This summer has already seen one hard-R smash-hit in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/knocked-up/25372/main">Knocked Up</a></em> and will hopefully see another one in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/superbad/26917/main">Superbad</a></em>.</p>
<p>To salute those filmmakers and studios that still have the stones to make hard-R flicks, <a href="http://movies.aol.com">Moviefone</a> has ranked the <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/best-raunchy-comedies">25 Best Raunchy Comedies</a> of all time, celebrating those R-rated movies that contain a cornucopia of cursing, drinking and gratuitous nudity and generally blow straight by the line between good taste and off-the-charts offensive. Check out the list, then hit us with your two cents: What do you think are the best raunchy R-rated comedies ever made?<br /></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/15/moviefone-ranks-the-25-best-raunchy-r-rated-comedies-of-all-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/966368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/15/moviefone-ranks-the-25-best-raunchy-r-rated-comedies-of-all-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>40-year-old virgin</category><category>40-year-oldVirgin</category><category>best r-rated comedies</category><category>best raunchy comedies</category><category>BestR-ratedComedies</category><category>BestRaunchyComedies</category><category>cinematical</category><category>kentucky fried movie</category><category>KentuckyFriedMovie</category><category>moviefone</category><category>national lampoon's animal house</category><category>national lampoon's vacation</category><category>NationalLampoon'sAnimalHouse</category><category>NationalLampoon'sVacation</category><category>superbad</category><category>wedding crashers</category><category>WeddingCrashers</category><dc:creator>Tommy DiChiara</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Matt Damon's Best &amp; Worst Movie Roles</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/02/matt-damons-best-and-worst-movie-roles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/02/matt-damons-best-and-worst-movie-roles/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/02/matt-damons-best-and-worst-movie-roles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a></p><p><a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/matt-damon/16762/main"><img alt="Matt Damon's Best &amp; Worst Movie Roles" hspace="8" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/matt-damon-best-worst-movies-bourne-stuck-on-you-186x124" align="right" vspace="8" border="0" />Matt Damon</a>'s come a long way since playing the lobster-challenged little brother to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/julia-roberts/60634/main">Julia Roberts</a>' love interest in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/mystic-pizza/13015/main">Mystic Pizza</a></em>. He's come even longer since appearing as an extra in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/field-of-dreams/2360/main">Field of Dreams</a></em> (he was the guy next to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/ben-affleck/426/main">Ben Affleck</a>). And while he may not be quite as "celebrated" a celebrity as close pals and <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/search/movieanddvdresults?query=Ocean%27s">Ocean's</a></em> co-stars <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/brad-pitt/56988/main">Brad Pitt</a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/george-clooney/13722/main">George Clooney</a> (though it's safe to say he's left Ben in the dust), he's got one major advantage: his OWN booming franchise.<br /><br />Not only do they rake in the cash, but the <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/search/movieanddvdresults?query=Bourne">Bourne</a></em> movies seem to get better and better (just check out the <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bourne_ultimatum/">reviews for <em>Ultimatum</em></a>). That <em>never</em> happens. So is it safe to say amnesiac spy Jason Bourne is the best role of Damon's career? Or was it as <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/good-will-hunting/5293/main">Good Will Hunting</a></em>, the movie that introduced Matt and Ben to the world and earned Damon a Best Actor Oscar nomination. Or maybe it was one of Damon's two triumphs in 2006, <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-good-shepherd/26924/main">The Good Shepherd</a></em> or <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-departed/26367/main">The Departed</a></em>. And what was his worst? Moviefone takes a crack at ranking <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/matt-damon-best-worst-roles"><strong>Damon's best and worst roles</strong></a>. Check it out, then argue the fine (and not-so-fine) points below.<br /></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/02/matt-damons-best-and-worst-movie-roles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/956367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/02/matt-damons-best-and-worst-movie-roles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kevin Polowy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The 25 Worst Movie Remakes of All Time</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/26/the-25-worst-movie-remakes-of-all-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/26/the-25-worst-movie-remakes-of-all-time/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/26/the-25-worst-movie-remakes-of-all-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/summer-movies-1/" rel="tag">Summer Movies</a></p><p><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/worst-movie-remakes" target="_new"><img height="150" alt="Worst Movie Remakes" hspace="8" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/psycho-vince-vaughn-150" width="150" align="right" vspace="8" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Remaking a film, whether it's a classic or not, can be a tricky thing: The source material needs to be solid, there has to be an audience that will want to see the film, and -- most importantly -- there has to be a legitimate reason for an update. Regarding the final point, this "legitimate reason" cannot be making a crap-ton of money by fast-tracking a dud. It should be, as in the case of 2005's <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/king-kong-2005/19886/main">King Kong</a></em>, that an update adds something to the original, such as kick-ass special effects that weren't available back in the '70s (the last time Kong graced screens), or simply makes it more accessible to modern audiences. Alas, too few movies heed this final point, and that is why so many remakes, from <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/planet-of-the-apes/9787/main">Planet of the Apes</a></em> to <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/psycho/1131058/main">Psycho</a></em>, fall short of expectations.</p>
<p><a href="http://movies.aol.com">Moviefone</a> has ranked the <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/worst-movie-remakes">25 Worst Movie Remakes</a> of all time, beginning with the moderately misguided and finishing up with the flagrantly bad and unnecessary. Check out the list, then share your picks for the worst remakes. Did we miss any stinkers? Did we include any that, in your opinion, are brilliant reimaginings? And, lastly, do you think <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/helena-bonham-carter/7266/main">Helena Bonham Carter</a> still looks hot as an ape?<br /></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/26/the-25-worst-movie-remakes-of-all-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/950090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/26/the-25-worst-movie-remakes-of-all-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>helena bonham carter</category><category>HelenaBonhamCarter</category><category>king kong</category><category>KingKong</category><category>movie</category><category>moviefone</category><category>planet of the apes</category><category>PlanetOfTheApes</category><category>psycho</category><category>worst movie remakes</category><category>WorstMovieRemakes</category><dc:creator>Tommy DiChiara</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Harry Potter Villains: The Best of the Worst</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/11/harry-potter-villains-the-best-of-the-worst/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/11/harry-potter-villains-the-best-of-the-worst/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/11/harry-potter-villains-the-best-of-the-worst/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/harry-potter/" rel="tag">Harry Potter</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/summer-movies-1/" rel="tag">Summer Movies</a></p><p><img alt="Harry Potter villains" hspace="8" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix-fiennes-150b" align="right" vspace="8" border="0" />Few villains in movie history have inspired as much ire, as much fear and as much nausea as the man known alternately as You Know Who, He Who Must Not Be Named, the Dark Lord, Tom Marvolo Riddle and -- last but not least -- Voldemort (<a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/ralph-fiennes/23390/main">Ralph Fiennes</a>). The <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix/24593/main">Harry Potter</a></em> archvillain has the bald head and winning personality of Darth Vader, the crusty face of a leper, the thin forked nostrils and flat nose of a serpent, and the dental hygeine of an Englishman circa 1800. In summary, he is one ugly mother, inside and out.</p>
<p>In honor of Voldemort's vile return to the big screen in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/harry-potter-villains-voldemort-malfoy">Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix</a></em>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com">Moviefone</a> has ranked the <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/harry-potter-villains-voldemort-malfoy">best of the worst <em>Harry Potter</em> villains</a>, beginning with the dubiously diabolical and powering straight on through to the most wretched, foul-smelling, remorseless, compassionless fiends in Hogwarts history.</p>
<p>Check out Moviefone's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/harry-potter-villains-voldemort-malfoy"><em>Harry Potter</em> Villains: The Best of the Worst</a> gallery, then tell us who you think are the most odious evildoers in the <em>Potter</em>-verse. Did we miss any on our list? Did we include any that shouldn't be on there? And, lastly, do you think Voldemort would ever consider rhinoplasty?<br /></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/11/harry-potter-villains-the-best-of-the-worst/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/937972/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/11/harry-potter-villains-the-best-of-the-worst/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix</category><category>Harry Potter villains</category><category>HarryPotterAndTheOrderOfThePhoenix</category><category>HarryPotterVillains</category><category>Voldemort</category><dc:creator>Tommy DiChiara</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Moviefone's 25 Worst Sequels of All Time</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/21/moviefones-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/21/moviefones-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/21/moviefones-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/harry-potter/" rel="tag">Harry Potter</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/summer-movies-1/" rel="tag">Summer Movies</a></p><p><img alt="Worst Movie Sequels" hspace="8" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/worst-sequels-star-wars-episode-i-150x150" align="right" vspace="8" border="0" />Everywhere you look this summer, there's a poster for another movie sequel: a third <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/oceans-thirteen/24822/main">Ocean's</a></em> installment, a second <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/fantastic-four-rise-of-the-silver-surfer/24293/main">Fantastic Four</a></em>, a fifth go-around with the hapless Hogwarts crew of <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix/24593/main">Harry Potter</a></em> ... So in honor of 95% of the season's flicks being part twos, threes or fives, Moviefone decided to rank <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/worst-movie-sequels">the 25 worst movie sequels of all time</a>. Why be so negative, you may ask? Why focus on the steaming piles of cinematic horse manure when we could focus on all the gleaming gold? Well, for one, Moviefone has already ranked <a href="http://movies.aol.com/feature/summer_movies/photos/best-movie-sequels">the 25 best movie sequels of all time</a>. And for another, there's a whole lot of crap out there -- and it's damn fun to write about it.</p>
<p>In fact, there's so much excrement in the vast universe of sequels that we had to be a bit discerning when coming up with our "top" 25 worst. As much as it broke our hearts to omit <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/teen-wolf-too/1035037/main">Teen Wolf, Too</a></em> and <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/leprechaun-back-2-tha-hood/1244466/main">Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood</a></em> (yes, that is a real movie), we had to limit our picks to sequels that we actually thought -- even for a brief moment -- might be good. And although we admire <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/jennifer-aniston/1831/main">Jennifer Aniston's</a> stellar work in the original <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/leprechaun/7732/main">Leprechaun</a></em>, our hopes weren't exactly high for any of the follow-ups. On the other hand, we were super stoked for <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/star-wars-episode-i-the-phantom-menace/5220/main">Star Wars: Episode I -- The Phantom Menace</a></em> before <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/george-lucas/100308/main">George Lucas</a> crushed our spirits by introducing us to the most galactically annoying character in movie history (damn you, Jar Jar!).</p>
<p>What do you think are the <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/worst-movie-sequels">worst sequels of all time</a>? Did we miss any on our list? And, most importantly, when can we expect another <em>Leprechaun</em> movie?<br /></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/21/moviefones-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/923422/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/21/moviefones-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>fantastic four</category><category>FantasticFour</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>jennifer aniston</category><category>JenniferAniston</category><category>leprechaun</category><category>ocean's 13</category><category>Ocean's13</category><category>teen wolf, too</category><category>TeenWolf,Too</category><category>worst movie sequels</category><category>WorstMovieSequels</category><dc:creator>Tommy DiChiara</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Best Models Turned Actors</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/15/the-best-models-turned-actors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/15/the-best-models-turned-actors/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/15/the-best-models-turned-actors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-in-theaters/" rel="tag">New in Theaters</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/best-worst/" rel="tag">Best/Worst</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hold-the-fone/" rel="tag">Hold the 'Fone</a></p><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo-ffx/models-who-act-cameron-diaz-amber-valletta" target="blank"><img height="150" alt="Amber Valletta" hspace="8" src="http://www.aolcdn.com/aolmovies/models-who-act-amber-valletta-150b" width="150" align="right" vspace="8" border="0" /></a>
<p>It seems like every actress these days either got her start as a model or scored an Estee Lauder/Noxema/Gap modeling contract after she hit it big in film. But when you think about it, there really aren't too many actresses who were actually <em>well-known</em> models before breaking into film or TV. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/amber-valletta/277767/main">Amber Valletta</a>, star of not one but two new films out this week (<em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/premonition-2007/23640/main">Premonition</a></em> and <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/dead-silence/27143/main">Dead Silence</a></em>), is one such actress. She was a recognizable staple of women's fashion magazine covers, the star of Versace and Calvin Klein ad campaigns, and the host of MTV's <em>House of Style</em> long before landing the plum role of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/harrison-ford/24238/main">Harrison Ford's</a> undead mistress in the 2000 hit <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/what-lies-beneath/7674/main">What Lies Beneath</a></em>. Since then, she's starred in a slew of films, including the <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/will-smith/66596/main">Will Smith</a> blockbuster <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/hitch/17497/main"><em>Hitch</em></a><em> </em>and the action smash <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-transporter-2/22260/main"><em>Transporter 2</em></a>.</p>
<p>Of course, a symmetrical face, ample bosoms, sexy legs and perfectly formed buttocks do not necessarily equate to acting prowess -- so we decided to rank the success of runway walkers, Sports Illustrated swimsuit models, fashion mag goddesses and Victoria's Secret Angels who were first famous for modeling and only later broke into the movie biz. Check out our gallery of the <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo-ffx/models-who-act-cameron-diaz-amber-valletta">Top 20 Models Turned Actors</a>, then tell us how accurate our model-turned-actress-ranking skills are.</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/15/the-best-models-turned-actors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/853495/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/15/the-best-models-turned-actors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>actors</category><category>Amber Valletta</category><category>AmberValletta</category><category>Dead Silence</category><category>DeadSilence</category><category>Harrison Ford</category><category>HarrisonFord</category><category>Hitch</category><category>House of Style</category><category>HouseOfStyle</category><category>models</category><category>MTV</category><category>Premonition</category><category>What Lies Beneath</category><category>WhatLiesBeneath</category><category>Will Smith</category><category>WillSmith</category><dc:creator>Tommy DiChiara</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:31:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>