<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Cinematical</title>
<link>http://www.cinematical.com</link>
<description>Cinematical</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><itunes:new-feed-url>http://podcasts.cinematical.com/rss.xml</itunes:new-feed-url><itunes:author>Cinematical</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Cinematical.com welcomes you to their podcasts -- featuring both audio interviews with top stars and directors and &apos;The Rocchi Review,&apos; bi-weekly interviews with journalists and filmmakers featuring Cinematical"s James Rocchi. For more information -- or more movie news and reviews -- just go to www.cinematical.com.</itunes:summary><itunes:image href="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/feedlogo.gif" /><item><title>'Speed Racer' Crashes at the Box Office</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/11/speed-racer-crashes-at-the-box-office/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/11/speed-racer-crashes-at-the-box-office/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/11/speed-racer-crashes-at-the-box-office/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="300" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/speedracermain-(2).jpg" /><br /><br />According to early estimates from <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2008&amp;wknd=19&amp;p=.htm">Box Office Mojo</a>, this summer's second big-budgeted extravaganza failed to pick up more than $20 million at the box office this weekend, with the poorly-reviewed comedy <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/what-happens-in-vegas/30164/main"><em>What Happens in Vegas</em> </a>finishing right behind in third. Of course,<em> <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main">Iron Man</a></em> took the top spot for a second week in a row with roughly $50 million, while <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/review-speed-racer/"><em>Speed Racer</em></a> -- which some projected to take home at least $30-40 million -- came in second with $20.2 million, as <em>What Happens in Vegas</em> slid into third with $20 million. Rounding out the top five were <em>Made of Honor </em>($7.6 million) and <em>Baby Mama</em> ($5.7 million). <br /><br />So what happened to <em>Speed Racer</em>? Part of the reason had to do with its targeted audience, which, supposedly, was kids, though kids weren't very familiar with the cartoon the film was based on. That, and the flick clocked in at over two hours -- a running time that's been mentioned a lot this weekend, as well as one that's way too long for a PG-rated kiddie adventure. That said, its PG-rating scared away those adults who grew up with the cartoon; people who, most likely, were looking for something a bit more skewed toward adults (especially when <em>Iron Man</em> came out the weekend before and kicked a whole lot of ass). Nevertheless, I'm pretty sure we can rule out that <em>Speed Racer </em>franchise at this point.<br /><br />Coupla questions for ya: Why do you think <em>Speed Racer</em> failed to power across the finish line in spectacular fashion? Also, what happens to the Wachowski Brothers now? Will folks think twice before giving them $150 million and free reign?<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/11/speed-racer-crashes-at-the-box-office/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1192273/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/11/speed-racer-crashes-at-the-box-office/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>baby mama</category><category>BabyMama</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>cinematical</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>speed racer</category><category>SpeedRacer</category><category>what happens in vegas</category><category>WhatHappensInVegas</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-11T13:32:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-05-11T13:32:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Box Office: Go, Speed Racer, Go</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/box-office-go-speed-racer-go/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/box-office-go-speed-racer-go/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/box-office-go-speed-racer-go/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office-predictions-1/" rel="tag">Box Office Predictions</a></p>I knew I was being a little conservative on my $62 million prediction for<em> Iron Man</em>, but HOLY JEEZ! The comic book adaptation had the tenth highest opening weekend in history, and the second biggest for a non-sequel. In addition to the $98.6 million Marvel's armored avenger made domestically, he also pulled in $96.8 million overseas, putting the $140 million budgeted film comfortably into the black. Last week's other newbie <em>Made of Honor </em>took second with a comparatively reserved but still respectable $14.7 million. Here's the rundown:<br /><em><strong><br />1. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main">Iron Man:</a> </strong></em><strong>$98.6 million</strong><em><strong><br />2. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/made-of-honor/28433/main">Made of Honor: </a></strong></em><strong>$14.7 million</strong><em><strong><br />3. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/baby-mama/27651/main">Baby Mama:</a></strong></em><strong> $10 million</strong><em><strong><br />4. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/harold-and-kumar-escape-from-guantanamo-bay/28210/main">Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay:</a> </strong></em><strong>$6.1 million</strong><em><strong><br />5. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/forgetting-sarah-marshall/30383/main">Forgetting Sarah Marshall</a>: </strong></em><strong>$6 million<br /><br /></strong>Again, just two new ones this week:<br /><strong><br /><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/speed-racer-2008/28066/main"><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/spdracer_boxoff.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Speed Racer</em></a><br />What's It All About: </strong>Andy and Larry Wachowski, the team behind the <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Matrix </span>trilogy, adapt the classic 60's anime <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Speed Racer</span> using a visual style reminiscent of Japanese animation melded with a modern video game aesthetic. <strong><br />Why It Might Do Well: </strong>The trailer was amazing, and <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Cinematical's</span> own James Rocchi describes the film as "a blast of pure pop family fun" in his review, which you can read <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/james-rocchi/">right here</a>.<br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well: </strong>The 40% rating on <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/speed_racer/">Rottentomatoes.com</a> suggests this one may have trouble knocking <em>Iron Man</em> out of first place. <strong><br />Number of Theaters: </strong>3,600<strong><br />Prediction: </strong>$43 million<strong><br /></strong><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/box-office-go-speed-racer-go/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Box Office: Go, Speed Racer, Go</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/box-office-go-speed-racer-go/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1187355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/box-office-go-speed-racer-go/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Cinema</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Movies</category><category>Speed Racer</category><category>SpeedRacer</category><category>What Happens In Vegas</category><category>WhatHappensInVegas</category><dc:creator>Matt Bradshaw</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-07T18:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-05-07T18:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>'The Spirit' Moves to Prime Christmas Spot</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/the-spirit-moves-to-prime-christmas-spot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/the-spirit-moves-to-prime-christmas-spot/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/the-spirit-moves-to-prime-christmas-spot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lionsgate-films/" rel="tag">Lionsgate Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/spirit.jpg" />After presenting <em>The Spirit</em> at last month's New York Comic-Con, Lionsgate feels good enough about <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0588340/">Frank Miller</a>'s solo directorial debut to move it from its January 16th dead zone of a release date to Christmas Day, 2008. So instead of going up against <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1114740/"><em>Mall Cop</em></a>, starring <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0416673/">Kevin James</a> as a wacky security guard, and the Notorious B.I.G. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0472198/">biopic</a>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-spirit/26912/main"><em>The Spirit</em></a> will face off against Adam Sandler's <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0960731/"><em>Bedtime Stories</em></a>, the supposedly ultra-heartwarming <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0822832/"><em>Marley &amp; Me</em></a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0420238/"><em>The Tale of Despereaux</em></a>, and the aftershocks of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1099212/"><em>Twilight</em></a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0970416/"><em>The Day the Earth Stood Still</em></a>.<br /><br />"Adult" Christmas counterprogramming has not traditionally fared too well. Last year's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/aliens-vs-predator-requiem/25981/main"><em>Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem</em></a> actually did okay, but remember <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/black-christmas-2006/24388/main"><em>Black Christmas</em></a>? No? What about <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/darkness/17951/main"><em>Darkness</em></a>? The move is indeed a vote of confidence, but it might up throwing the film to the wolves. The key is to position it as a prestige picture rather than a throwaway. There's been enough fanfare around the promotional materials released thus far to make that look like a possibility. If Lionsgate can put it on people's radar in advance as a Christmas Movie to See, rather than have it randomly show up to compete against the holiday heavy-hitters, it could work. <br /><br />Take a look at the trailer for <em>The Spirit</em> <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-spirit/26912/video/trailer-no-1/2114779">here</a>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/the-spirit-moves-to-prime-christmas-spot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1188472/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/the-spirit-moves-to-prime-christmas-spot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>bedtime stories</category><category>BedtimeStories</category><category>frank miller</category><category>FrankMiller</category><category>marley and me</category><category>MarleyAndMe</category><category>the day the earth stood still</category><category>the spirit</category><category>the tale of despereaux</category><category>TheDayTheEarthStoodStill</category><category>TheSpirit</category><category>TheTaleOfDespereaux</category><dc:creator>Eugene Novikov</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-07T10:32:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-05-07T10:32:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Is 'Speed Racer' in Trouble?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/06/is-speed-racer-in-trouble/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/06/is-speed-racer-in-trouble/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/06/is-speed-racer-in-trouble/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><div align="left"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/speedracer.jpg" alt="" />Well, as probably the biggest <em>Speed Racer </em>booster on this blog (I see the movie Tuesday night, and James's <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/review-speed-racer/">review</a> was music to my ears), I guess it falls to me to report the bad news as well. If you believe tracking numbers -- and you might justifiably be skeptical about them (<a href="http://www.mcnblogs.com/thehotblog/">David Poland</a> likes to hammer on the point that they don't capture the teen demographic) -- then there's good reason to think that the movie might come in a distant second to <em>Iron Man</em> when it hits theaters this Friday. <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3id14e99b005fa29e4051e68f8efd34e2d"><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></a>'s sources peg it at $25-35 million for the weekend, which would be perfect positioning for it to eat <em>Iron Man</em>'s dust. Warner Bros.' efforts to control expectations notwithstanding, it would also be a pretty big disappointment for one of its major summer tentpoles.<br /><br />I can't say I'm surprised -- as I <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-speed-racer/">warned</a> a couple of weeks ago, this is an expensive brand-name release where the target audience has never heard of the brand name. As someone with a soft spot for the Wachowskis (I only abandoned ship on <em>The Matrix</em> after <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-matrix-revolutions/12327/main"><em>Revolutions</em></a> rather than <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-matrix-reloaded/12326/main"><em>Reloaded</em></a><em>, </em>and one day I'll write up a defense of the latter film), I was hoping to see them return to the top of the A-list. But if we're being honest, the <em>Hollywood Reporter</em>'s estimate seems right to me. So I'd settle for a bow that isn't embarrassing. <br /><br />Who's going this weekend? Anyone?<br /><br /><br /><br /></div><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/06/is-speed-racer-in-trouble/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1187334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/06/is-speed-racer-in-trouble/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>speed racer</category><category>SpeedRacer</category><category>summer2008</category><category>Wachowski Brothers</category><category>WachowskiBrothers</category><dc:creator>Eugene Novikov</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-06T12:32:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-05-06T12:32:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Weekend Box Office: 'Mister Lonely' Not So Lonely</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/indie-weekend-box-office-mister-lonely-not-so-lonely/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/indie-weekend-box-office-mister-lonely-not-so-lonely/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/indie-weekend-box-office-mister-lonely-not-so-lonely/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/misterlonely-sm.jpg" alt="" />Big budget <em><span style="font-style: italic;">Iron Man</span></em> racking up big box office? Not a shock. The latest from Harmony Korine (<em>Gummo</em>, <em>Julian Donkey-Boy</em>) topping the indie box office chart? That's a surprise. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/mister-lonely/33207/main"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Mister Lonely</span></a> (IFC Films) only opened at one theater in Manhattan, but it took in $19,100 for the highest per-screen average among indies this weekend, according to estimates compiled by <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=18&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm"><span style="font-style: italic;">Box Office Mojo</span></a>. Diego Luna plays a Michael Jackson impersonator; Samantha Morton, Denis Levant and filmmaker Werner Herzog also star. Our own <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/11/sxsw-review-mister-lonely/">Jeffrey M. Anderson</a> wrote: "Though <em>Mister Lonely</em> seems sweeter and more mainstream than Korine's other films, it still has that sense of randomness, of pathetic luck and habit and wisdom all combining to make up a life, or a collision of lives."<br /><br />David Mamet's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/redbelt/30128/main"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Redbelt</span></a> (Sony Classics) pulled in $11,433 per screen at six locations. Chiwitel Ejiofor stars as the honorable owner of a Jiu-jitsu studio who is drawn into the world of "pay-per-view mixed martial arts," as <span style="font-style: italic;">Cinematical's</span> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/02/review-redbelt/">James Rocchi</a> described it. He did not feel the film matched the writer/director's best work; "still, even minor Mamet can be a source of major satisfaction, especially with an actor as compelling as Ejiofor in the lead."<br /><br /><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/son-of-rambow/28980/main"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Son of Rambow</span></a> (Paramount Vantage) averaged $10,500 each at five theaters. Garth Jennings' delightful kids' adventure follows two boys as they create their own action movie epic featuring John Rambo. <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/02/review-son-of-rambow/">James Rocchi</a> called it "a brilliant celebration of the exuberance and thrill of bad storytelling, of making art, of having dreams."<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/indie-weekend-box-office-mister-lonely-not-so-lonely/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Indie Weekend Box Office: 'Mister Lonely' Not So Lonely</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=18&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/indie-weekend-box-office-mister-lonely-not-so-lonely/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1186885/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/indie-weekend-box-office-mister-lonely-not-so-lonely/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>fugitive pieces</category><category>FugitivePieces</category><category>indie weekend box office</category><category>IndieWeekendBoxOffice</category><category>mister lonely</category><category>MisterLonely</category><category>redbelt</category><category>son of rambow</category><category>SonOfRambow</category><category>the visitor</category><category>TheVisitor</category><dc:creator>Peter Martin</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-05T17:35:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-05-05T17:35:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Discuss: Is Hollywood Misogynistic?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/faris.jpg" alt="" style="width: 243px; height: 183px;" />In these supposedly progressive times, gender equality is one of those touchy issues relegated to the last paragraph of a trend piece nobody reads. When <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/03/fan-rant-katherine-heigl-calls-knocked-up-sexist/">Katherine Heigl suggested to <em>Vanity Fair</em> </a>that <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/judd-apatow/188203/main">Judd Apatow</a>'s movies were sexist, the assertion came across like an after-the-fact shrug of acceptance. Ever the galvanizing provocateur, <em>New York Times</em> critic Manohla Dargis <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/movies/moviesspecial/04dargi.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">confronts the issue head-on</a> with a thorough analysis of the gender bias in this year's summer blockbusters. <br /><br />With "Iron Man, Batman, Big Angry Green Man" and other massive expressions of virility invading the box office, female roles appear to be relegated to the back of the multiplex. Dargis touches on the rumors that Warner Bros head Jeff Robinov <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/warners-robinoff-gets-in-catfight-with-girls/">believes no woman has been able to sell a movie</a> since <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/julia-roberts/60634/main">Julia Roberts</a> (a point that <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/natalie-portman/197461/main">Natalie Portman</a> might contest, but not <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/paris-hilton/358949/main">Paris Hilton</a>) before sizing up numerous upcoming studio releases, with particular attention paid to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/anna-faris/277709/main">Anna Faris</a>, "who could be the next <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/person/32908/Judy-Holliday?inline=nyt-per" title="">Judy Holliday</a> but without the right material will, alas, probably end up the next Brittany Murphy." It's the kind of pronouncement that hits you in gut.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Discuss: Is Hollywood Misogynistic?</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/movies/moviesspecial/04dargi.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1185883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>amy poehler</category><category>AmyPoehler</category><category>anna faris</category><category>AnnaFaris</category><category>baby mama</category><category>BabyMama</category><category>batman</category><category>brittany murphy</category><category>BrittanyMurphy</category><category>film critic</category><category>film criticism</category><category>FilmCritic</category><category>FilmCriticism</category><category>gregg araki</category><category>GreggAraki</category><category>iron man</category><category>iron man movie photos</category><category>IronMan</category><category>IronManMoviePhotos</category><category>judd apatow</category><category>JuddApatow</category><category>judy holliday</category><category>JudyHolliday</category><category>julia roberts</category><category>JuliaRoberts</category><category>katherine heigel wed...</category><category>katherine heigl</category><category>katherine heigle</category><category>KatherineHeigelWed...</category><category>KatherineHeigl</category><category>KatherineHeigle</category><category>manola dargis</category><category>ManolaDargis</category><category>misogynistic</category><category>misogyny</category><category>misogynyinfilm</category><category>natalie portman</category><category>NataliePortman</category><category>new york times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>paris hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>smiley face</category><category>SmileyFace</category><category>the dark knight</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><category>TheDarkKnight</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>tina fey</category><category>TinaFey</category><category>vanity fair</category><category>VanityFair</category><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-04T17:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-05-04T17:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>The Definitive Downey, Jr.</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/the-definitive-downey-jr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/the-definitive-downey-jr/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/the-definitive-downey-jr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/downey.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Well, Grand Theft Auto or no Grand Theft Auto, <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/29/review-iron-man/">Iron Man</a> </em>wins at life, raking in somewhere from $32 to 35 million on Friday, depending on whom you believe. That puts it on track for an opening weekend between $90 million and $100 million, ensuring a string of sequels and a big champagne bash over at Paramount. But it may also mean a great deal for the future of one <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000375/">Robert Downey, Jr.</a>, who tackled the title role with spectacular wit and charm. If an &uuml;ber-lucrative mainstream career is what he wants, it's probably now his for the taking. His role as a blackface-donning thespian in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/tropic-thunder/29232/main"><em>Tropic Thunder</em></a> later this summer should help even more.<br /><br />All this is by way of introduction to the <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/features/full?&amp;id=content_6763">fantastic long-player</a> on Downey that is this month's <em>GQ</em> cover story. It covers the bases of the actor's famous checkered past -- the arrests, the tumultuous rehab stints, Matt Palmieri's violent intervention -- but also his slow-and-steady return, and his current precarious, drug-free perch at the top. Matthew Klam spent the day with the actor, hanging out at Downey's Brentwood Mansion, going indoor skydiving, and having a kung fu training session during which Downey punched him in the face. He lets loose with all sorts of candid details about the man's life and recovery (endless health shakes and vitamin pills, a butler-slash-best-friend), but it's more than just a piece of celebrity gossip -- it's a genuinely interesting look at a multifaceted, one-of-a-kind talent who's been through a lot. Take a look.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/the-definitive-downey-jr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1185776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/the-definitive-downey-jr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>GQ</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>robert downey jr</category><category>RobertDowneyJr</category><dc:creator>Eugene Novikov</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-04T11:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-05-04T11:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Box Office: At last... Iron Man!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/30/box-office-at-last-iron-man/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/30/box-office-at-last-iron-man/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/30/box-office-at-last-iron-man/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office-predictions-1/" rel="tag">Box Office Predictions</a></p>The trend of successful pregnancy comedies led by <em>Knocked Up</em> and <em>Juno</em> continued as <em>Baby Mama</em> took top honors. <em>Harold and Kumar</em> took second but still managed to pull in almost $3million over its $12 million budget. Last week's other new release, <em>Deception</em>, fell way behind the pack and took in only $2.3 million to finish in tenth place. Here are the final numbers:<strong><br /><br />1. <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/baby-mama/27651/main">Baby Mama:</a></em> $17.4 million<br />2. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/harold-and-kumar-escape-from-guantanamo-bay/28210/main"><em>Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay:</em></a> $14.9 million<br />3. <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-forbidden-kingdom/29832/main">The Forbidden Kingdom:</a></em> $11.2 million <br />4. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/forgetting-sarah-marshall/30383/main"><em>Forgetting Sarah Marshall: </em></a>$11 million<br />5. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/nims-island/30174/main"><em>Nim's Island:</em></a> $4.5 million<br /><br /></strong>Only two new releases this week, but one of them is a doozy.<br /><br /><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/box_off_iron_man.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><em><strong>Iron Man</strong></em></a><br /><strong>What's It All About: </strong>At this point I doubt this film needs any introduction, but here goes. Based on the long running Marvel comic,<em> Iron Man</em> stars <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/robert-downey-jr/19966/main">Robert Downey Jr.</a> as Tony Stark, a wealthy arms manufacturer (because an impoverished arms manufacturer would just be silly). When Stark is captured and forced to build a dangerous weapon, he instead makes a high tech suit of armor and uses it to escape. He further refines the suit and uses it to stop a conspiracy that threatens the world.<br /><strong>Why It Might Do Well: </strong>Well, we're talking one of the widest releases we've seen in awhile, a 90% fresh rating at <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/iron_man/">Rottentomatoes.com</a>, and some kickass trailers and clips that have been generating a lot of buzz. Also, we've got a lead actor with some serious star power, and a supporting cast that includes <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/terrence-howard/33528/main">Terrence Howard</a>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/jeff-bridges/3197/main">Jeff Bridges</a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/gwyneth-paltrow/54871/main">Gwyneth Paltrow</a>. Obviously this is next week's number one flick, the question is just how much will it rake in?<strong><br />Why It Might Not Do Well: </strong>If every single person involved with this film went on network television tomorrow and shot a puppy, people would still flock to this one.<br /><strong>Number of Theaters: </strong>3,800<strong><br />Prediction: </strong>$62 million<br /><br /><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/made-of-honor/28433/main"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/box_off_made_honor.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><em><strong>Made of Honor</strong></em></a><br /><strong>What's It All About: </strong>When Tom's (<a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/patrick-dempsey/18549/main">Patrick Dempsey</a>) best friend Hannah (<a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/michelle-monaghan/359743/main">Michelle Monaghan</a>) leaves for a six week business trip he sees how empty his life is without her. He resolves to propose when she returns, but Hannah surprises Tom with the announcement of her engagement to someone else, and a request that he be her "maid" of honor. <strong><br />Why It Might Do Well: </strong>This romantic comedy is different enough from <em>Iron Man</em> to snap up the remainder of the audience that's not into the super hero stuff. <br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well: </strong>The fact that this is the only other film being released the same weekend as what will probably be one of the biggest movies of the year seems to indicate a film the studio has little faith in. <br /><strong>Number of Theaters: </strong>2,700<br /><strong>Prediction:</strong> $14 million<br /><br />This seems like the most straightforward prediction we've had in a long while, which is a sure fire sign we're heading into the Summer blockbuster season. Here's how I see things working out:<br /><strong><em>1. Iron Man<br />2. Made of Honor<br />3. Baby Mama<br />4. Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay<br />5. Forgetting Sarah Marshall</em></strong><br /><br />Still no perfect scores this week, but our group average is up over last week. Here's how everyone did in our weekly box office prediction competition. <br />1. Ray: 13<br />1. Mario: 13<br />1. Brent Todd: 13<br />1. kevin: 13<br />2. Erin: 11<br />3. Matt: 9<br />3. matt: 9<br />3. AJ Wiley: 9<br />3. Chris: 9<br />4. cubitfox: 8<br />4. zach: 8<br />4. Mike: 6<br />4. Sam: 6<br />4. plinstrot: 6<br />5. Matthew: 4<br />5. I Eat Robots: 4<br />5. DarkAgair: 4<br />5. Aaron: 4<br />5. Awesomepants: 4<br />5. Prateek S: 4<br /><br />Will the latest feature film from Marvel rule with an iron fist? Yeah, probably, but what about the rest of the top five? Join in on the fun. Post your predictions for the top five movies in the comments section below before 5:00PM Eastern Time on Friday. One point for every top five movie correctly named, two points for every correct placement, and one extra point for the top movie.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/30/box-office-at-last-iron-man/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1179790/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/30/box-office-at-last-iron-man/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Cinema</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Made of Honor</category><category>MadeOfHonor</category><category>Movies</category><category>Robert Downey Jr.</category><category>RobertDowneyJr.</category><dc:creator>Matt Bradshaw</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-30T15:31:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-30T15:31:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Weekend Box Office: 'Roman de Gare' Takes Top Spot</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/indie-weekend-box-office-roman-de-gare-takes-top-spot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/indie-weekend-box-office-roman-de-gare-takes-top-spot/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/indie-weekend-box-office-roman-de-gare-takes-top-spot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony-classics/" rel="tag">Sony Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thinkfilm/" rel="tag">ThinkFilm</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-searchlight/" rel="tag">Fox Searchlight</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/samuel-goldwyn-films/" rel="tag">Samuel Goldwyn Films</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/roman-de-gare-sm.jpg" />A French master topped an American actress' directorial debut this weekend. Claude Lelouch's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/roman-de-gare/32367/main"><em><strong>Roman de Gare</strong></em></a> (Samuel Goldwyn) opened at two theaters in Manhattan and grossed $25,500, for a very nice $12,750 per-screen average, according to estimates compiled by <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=17&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm"><em>Box Office Mojo</em></a>. The French-language thriller scored 73% positive at <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/roman_de_gare/"><em>Rotten Tomatoes</em></a>, though a number of critics had reservations about its twisty, playful nature.<br /><br />Helen Hunt's comedy/drama <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/then-she-found-me/25660/main"><em><strong>Then She Found Me</strong></em></a> (ThinkFilm) hauled in $8,266 per-screen at nine locations. Hunt plays a teacher who must deal with an unlikely fiancee (Matthew Broderick), a volatile love interest (Colin Firth), and the unexpected appearance of her mother (Bette Midler). <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/13/tiff-review-then-she-found-me/">Ryan Stewart felt</a> that the story is "as old as the hills," but that it was "still executed with style." <br /><br /><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/standard-operating-procedure/32586/main"><em><strong>Standard Operating Procedure</strong></em></a> (Sony Classics), the latest doc by Errol Morris, has generated controversy not only because of its subject matter -- the story behind the notorious Abu Gharib prison photos -- but because Morris has admitted to paying some of the interviewees. Reviews were mostly positive (79%, according to <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/standard_operating_procedure/"><em>Rotten Tomatoes</em></a>). Opening at two theaters in Manhattan, the film averaged $7,450 per screen. <br /><br />Two holdovers continued to perform well. Tom McCarthy's excellent <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/18/sundance-review-the-visitor/"><em><strong>The Visitor</strong></em></a> (Overture) expanded into 76 theaters nationwide and averaged $6,684 per screen in its third week of release. Stephen Walker's heartwarming music doc <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/10/review-young-at-heart/"><em><strong>Young @ Heart</strong></em></a> (Fox Searchlight) expanded from 23 to 56 locations and grossed an average of $4,017 per screen.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=17&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/indie-weekend-box-office-roman-de-gare-takes-top-spot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1179971/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/indie-weekend-box-office-roman-de-gare-takes-top-spot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>indie weekend box office</category><category>IndieWeekendBoxOffice</category><category>roman de gare</category><category>RomanDeGare</category><category>standard operating procedure</category><category>StandardOperatingProcedure</category><category>the visitor</category><category>then she found me</category><category>ThenSheFoundMe</category><category>TheVisitor</category><dc:creator>Peter Martin</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-28T18:32:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-28T18:32:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Five Reasons Why You Shouldn't Forget Sarah Marshall</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/five-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-forget-sarah-marshall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/five-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-forget-sarah-marshall/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/five-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-forget-sarah-marshall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/smars042608.jpg" />Despite an excellent review showing on <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/forgetting_sarah_marshall/">Rotten Tomatoes</a>, some people forgot about <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/forgetting-sarah-marshall/30383/main"><em>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</em></a>. As <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/box-office-deception-at-guantanamo-bay/">Matt Bradshaw notes</a> in his Box Office column, the comedy came in second to <em>The Forbidden Kingdom</em>, bringing in just $17.3 million. <a href="http://news.fantasymoguls.com/originalcontent/2008/04/last-minute-wee.html">Steve Mason</a> says we might be suffering from "Judd Apatow fatigue." Whether that's the case or not, it's a shame. <br /><br />While I tried to fight off my high expectations for the film to save myself from potential disappointment, I failed. I was ridiculously eager to see the film, so I grabbed my friend and ran to watch it on Friday night. Luckily, I didn't need to quash the anxiety. We both laughed hysterically and loved it. In fact, I enjoyed it more than both <em>Knocked Up</em> and <em>Superbad</em>.<br /><br />If you don't agree, fair enough, but for those who might be apprehensive about going out to see the comedy, I want to give you a few reasons why you should give it a chance. Head after the jump for 5 reasons to see <em>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</em>.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/five-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-forget-sarah-marshall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Five Reasons Why You Shouldn't Forget Sarah Marshall</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/five-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-forget-sarah-marshall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1175597/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/five-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-forget-sarah-marshall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Cinematical</category><category>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</category><category>ForgettingSarahMarshall</category><category>Jason Segel</category><category>JasonSegel</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-23T16:32:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-23T16:32:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Box Office: Deception at Guantanamo Bay</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/box-office-deception-at-guantanamo-bay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/box-office-deception-at-guantanamo-bay/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/box-office-deception-at-guantanamo-bay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office-predictions-1/" rel="tag">Box Office Predictions</a></p>Everyone who took part in last week's competition, myself included, failed to foresee <em>The Forbidden Kingdom</em> outdoing <em>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</em>, but the martial arts actioner was the clear winner. <em>Prom Night</em> held on to third place, content in the knowledge that it had already earned back its $20 million budget last week. Here's the rundown:<br /><strong><br />1. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-forbidden-kingdom/29832/main"><em>The Forbidden Kingdom:</em></a> $20.9 million<br />2. <a style="" href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/forgetting-sarah-marshall/30383/main"><em>Forgetting Sarah Marshall: </em></a>$17.3 million<br />3. <a style="" href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/prom-night-2008/28584/main"><em>Prom Night:</em></a> $9.1 million<br />4. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/88-minutes/23213/main">88 Minutes:</a> $6.8 million<br />5. <a style="" href="http://movies.aol.com/search/movieresults.adp?query=Nim%27s+Island"><em>Nim's Island:</em></a> $5.7 million<br /><br /></strong>Opening this week, we have:<strong><br /></strong><em><strong><br /></strong></em>
<div align="left"><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/baby-mama/27651/main"><strong><em></em></strong></a><strong><em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/harold-and-kumar-escape-from-guantanamo-bay/28210/main"><strong><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/baby_mama_boxoff.jpg" /></em></strong></a></em></strong><em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/baby-mama/27651/main"><strong>Baby Mama</strong></a></em><br /></div>
<strong>What's It All About: </strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tina-fey/336261/main">Tina Fey</a> plays an executive dying to be a mother, and when she finds out she's unable to conceive, she must turn to a flaky but fertile <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/amy-poehler/273694/main">Amy Poehler</a><br /><strong>Why It Might Do Well: </strong>Fey is awesome on <em>30 Rock</em>, and though I usually get flack for saying this, I thought the Fey/Poehler Weekend Update team on <em>SNL</em> was one of the best in the show's history. And with a supporting cast that includes <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/sigourney-weaver/75144/main">Sigourney Weaver,</a> <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/steve-martin/101485/main">Steve Martin</a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/maura-tierney/70973/main">Maura Tierney,</a> I am so there. The 88% fresh rating from <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/baby_mama/">Rottentomatoes.com</a> is icing on the cake. <br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well:</strong> The poster is so darn zany I could just puke.<br /><strong>Number of Theaters: </strong>2,500<strong><br />Prediction: </strong>$18 million<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/box-office-deception-at-guantanamo-bay/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Box Office: Deception at Guantanamo Bay</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/box-office-deception-at-guantanamo-bay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1174139/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/box-office-deception-at-guantanamo-bay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>amy poehler</category><category>AmyPoehler</category><category>Baby Mama</category><category>BabyMama</category><category>Cinema</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Deception</category><category>Ewan McGregor</category><category>EwanMcgregor</category><category>Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay</category><category>HaroldAndKumarEscapeFromGuantanamoBay</category><category>Hugh Jackman</category><category>HughJackman</category><category>Movies</category><category>Neil Patrick Harris</category><category>NeilPatrickHarris</category><category>Tina Fey</category><category>TinaFey</category><dc:creator>Matt Bradshaw</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-23T16:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-23T16:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Picks: Get Smart</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-get-smart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-get-smart/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-get-smart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/getsmart.jpg" /><br /><br /><strong>Why We Can't Wait to See It:</strong> Because in pretty much every film he's made -- <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/21/review-evan-almighty-jettes-review/">big, boring, insipid not-quite-sequels excepted</a> -- <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/steve-carell/10850/main">Steve Carell</a> brings the funny. The trailers look surprisingly solid, and the cast -- including <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/anne-hathaway/292630/main">Anne Hathaway</a>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/dwayne-johnson/476559/main">Dwayne Johnson</a>, Alan Arkin and Terence Stamp -- is top-notch. <br /><br /> <strong>Why It Might Do Well</strong>: Because people just plain like Carell -- and the film's plot pitch where a secret agency's having their top people exposed forces them to shove unknown agents out into the field is, in fact, a solid story-driven reason for an incompetent like Max to placed in harm's way. ...<br /><br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well</strong>: We may be a little tired of Baby Boomer-era nostalgia TV getting splashed up on the big screen; anyone else remember how well <em>I Spy</em> turned out? <br /><br /><strong>Fun Fact</strong>: <em>Get Smart </em>was created by Buck Henry and Mel Brooks -- yes, the men behind <em>The Graduate</em> and<em> Young Frankenstein</em><em>. </em> <br /><br /><strong>Trivia</strong>:<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-get-smart/#poll13118">View Poll</a></p><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-answer-key/">Answer Key</a><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/get-smart/">Get Smart</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/get-smart/766791/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/gsg10_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/get-smart/766790/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/gsg09_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/get-smart/766789/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/gsg08_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/get-smart/766788/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/gsg07_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/get-smart/766787/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/gsg06_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-hancock/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/cinenext.jpg" /></a></div><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-get-smart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1174782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-get-smart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Alan Arkin</category><category>AlanArkin</category><category>Anne Hathaway</category><category>AnneHathaway</category><category>Buck Henry</category><category>BuckHenry</category><category>dwayne johnson</category><category>DwayneJohnson</category><category>Get Smart</category><category>GetSmart</category><category>Mel Brooks</category><category>MelBrooks</category><category>Steve Carell</category><category>SteveCarell</category><category>Terence Stamp</category><category>TerenceStamp</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-23T16:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-23T16:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Picks: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/ijkcs.jpg" /><br /><br />Why We Can't Wait to See It:</strong> Well, it's Indy. That alone is pretty much all you have to say, isn't it? <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/harrison-ford/24238/main">Harrison Ford</a> is back as Dr. Jones, and while some of the folks around for the ride are new (<a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/cate-blanchett/215038/main">Cate Blanchett</a>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/shia-labeouf/350236/main">Shia LeBouf</a> and others), the return of Karen Allen as Marion Ravenwood is reason enough for old-school fans to be excited. <br /><br /><strong>Why It Might Do Well</strong>: Again, it's Indy -- and a long-anticipated return to the big screen for one of the most beloved movie franchises of modern times. Plus, the only big opener the week before is <em>Prince Caspian</em> -- which, while anticipated, probably won't pull people from the ticket lines opening week.<br /><br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well</strong>: The question's less if it will <em>do well </em>than if it will <em>be good</em>; interviews have suggested that George Lucas has taken a heavy hand in the writing this time around -- which, frankly, hasn't been a good sign in recent years. Plus there's that disturbing gimmick in the trailer with Indy saying "I thought that was closer ..."; back in the day, Spielberg, Lucas and Ford would have let that go unsaid. ...<br /><br /><strong>Fun Fact</strong>: <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main"><em>Crystal Skull</em></a> takes place 19 years after the events of <em>Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade</em> -- the same amount of time it's been since we've seen Indy on-screen. <br /><br /><strong>Trivia</strong>:<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal/#poll13102">View Poll</a></p><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-answer-key/">Answer Key</a><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/">Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/795087/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indy421-(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/795086/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indy422-(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/795084/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indy414-(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/795083/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indy413-(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/795082/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indy412-(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-speed-racer/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/cinenext.jpg" /></a></div><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1174774/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/cinematical-picks-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>cate blanchett</category><category>CateBlanchett</category><category>harrison ford</category><category>HarrisonFord</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>indiana jones 4</category><category>indiana jones and th...</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>IndianaJones4</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTh...</category><category>shia labeouf</category><category>ShiaLabeouf</category><category>summer2008</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-23T15:37:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-23T15:37:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>'Superman' Sequel Might Reveal an "Angry God"</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/superman-sequel-might-reveal-an-angry-god/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/superman-sequel-might-reveal-an-angry-god/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/superman-sequel-might-reveal-an-angry-god/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/22/superman-sequel-superman-as-an-angry-god/#comments"><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/superman.jpg" alt="" /></em></a>There was a report in the <a href="http://www.hamilton.edu/news/more_news/display.cfm?id=13939">Hamilton College student newspaper</a> about a recent visit paid to the school by Thomas Tull (a Hamilton alumnus), chairman and CEO of <a href="http://www.legendarypictures.com/">Legendary Pictures</a>, the successful production company responsible for respectable hits like <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/batman-begins/18647/main"><em>Batman Begins</em></a>, deplorable indulgences like <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/10000-bc/23948/main"><em>10,000 BC</em></a>, and middle-of-the-road successes like <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/superman-returns/21653/main"><em>Superman Returns</em></a>. The article surveys numerous issues from Tull's visit, most of which pertain to his professional history. Near the end, however, it's noted that Tull "hopes to invoke more of the image of 'an angry god'" with the next <em>Superman</em> film. Subtitled <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/superman-man-of-steel/30634/main"><span style="font-style: italic;">Man of Steel</span></a>, it's a sequel that's been in the works for quite some time. <br /><br />Wonders <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/22/superman-sequel-superman-as-an-angry-god/"><em>Slashfilm</em>: </a>"Maybe <span style="font-style: italic;">Man of Steel </span>will have a Superman who begins to make irrational emotion-based decisions, throwing cars around out of anger, which will paint him as an Angry God in The Daily Planet?" Maybe, but that's a big deduction for what appears to be a throwaway statement. Whether or not Tull even has specific details about the content of the next <em>Superman</em> film isn't clear, but his emphasis on the character's strength, rather than his pathos, sounds like a response to criticisms of the last movie. Many audiences found it light on action and heavy on a lot of needless other things. <span style="font-style: italic;">Superman Returns</span> was hardly a flop, grossing over $200 million in the U.S. alone, but it could have done much bigger business if it sacrificed some of the contemplative drama for a little more speed. <br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/superman-sequel-might-reveal-an-angry-god/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Superman' Sequel Might Reveal an "Angry God"</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hamilton.edu/news/more_news/display.cfm?id=13939>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/superman-sequel-might-reveal-an-angry-god/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1175434/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/23/superman-sequel-might-reveal-an-angry-god/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>legendary pictures</category><category>LegendaryPictures</category><category>slashfilm</category><category>superman man of steel</category><category>superman returns</category><category>superman sequel</category><category>SupermanManOfSteel</category><category>SupermanReturns</category><category>SupermanSequel</category><category>thomas hull</category><category>ThomasHull</category><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-23T11:32:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-23T11:32:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Fan Rant: 'Expelled' Is Awful, But Let's at Least Be Honest About It</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/fan-rant-expelled-is-awful-but-lets-at-least-be-honest-abou/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/fan-rant-expelled-is-awful-but-lets-at-least-be-honest-abou/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/fan-rant-expelled-is-awful-but-lets-at-least-be-honest-abou/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/religious/" rel="tag">Religious</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/teacher1.jpg" />Up front, let me confess an error I made regarding <em><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1091617/">Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed</a></em>, the new documentary about the Intelligent Design movement. In Friday's edition of <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/18/the-mostly-indie-film-calendar-april-18-24/">"The (Mostly) Indie Film Calendar,"</a> I said the movie was "a documentary about how people who believe in evolution are big meanies who don't understand why 'Intelligent Design' (i.e., that God made everything) should be taught in science classes, too." This was a mistaken summary of what Intelligent Design is.<br /><br />Having now watched the film -- which is terrible, filled with specious reasoning, false dichotomies, and self-contradiction -- I find that I did learn a thing or two. I had assumed that Creationism and Intelligent Design were the same thing. They are not. Creationism is the belief that God created the Earth more or less the way it's described in Genesis. Intelligent Design merely holds that certain things about life on this planet are best explained by something supernatural. Where there are gaps in scientific knowledge, ID fills 'em in. <br /><br />There is plenty of overlap between Creationism and ID, of course, and I guess you could say all Creationists are also ID-ists. But you can certainly believe in ID without believing God made the world in six days. The film says that this misunderstanding is why so many scientists are so virulently anti-ID -- because they think it's Creationism, which truly doesn't have much scientific evidence in its favor.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/fan-rant-expelled-is-awful-but-lets-at-least-be-honest-abou/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fan Rant: 'Expelled' Is Awful, But Let's at Least Be Honest About It</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/fan-rant-expelled-is-awful-but-lets-at-least-be-honest-abou/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1173979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/fan-rant-expelled-is-awful-but-lets-at-least-be-honest-abou/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>ben stein</category><category>BenStein</category><category>expelled</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-22T12:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-22T12:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Weekend Box Office: 'The Visitor' Continues Its Reign</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/21/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-continues-its-reign/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/21/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-continues-its-reign/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/21/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-continues-its-reign/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/music-and-musicals/" rel="tag">Music &amp; Musicals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/ifc/" rel="tag">IFC</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-searchlight/" rel="tag">Fox Searchlight</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/thevisitor-small.jpg" />College professors rule! Well, at least the one that <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/richard-jenkins/35464/main">Richard Jenkins</a> plays so well in Tom McCarthy's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-visitor-2008/27428/main"><em><strong>The Visitor</strong></em></a> (Overture Films). The comedy-drama expanded to 18 theaters in its second week of release and averaged $9,055 per-screen to remain in the #1 position, according to estimates compiled by <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=16&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm">Box Office Mojo</a>. Check the film's <a href="http://www.thevisitorfilm.com/main.html">web site</a> to see where it will be opening in the next couple of weeks (click on "in select theaters now").<br /><br />Debuting indie films did not fare so well, judging strictly by per-screen averages, but it's notable that <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/expelled-no-intelligence-allowed/32416/main"><em><strong>Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed</strong></em></a> (Rocky Mountain Pictures), opened on more than 1,000 screens and made $2,997 per location for a total of more than $3 million for the weekend. The doc follows <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/ben-stein/67884/main">Ben Stein</a> as he chases down Ferris Bueller ... oops, wrong movie! This one's about "intelligent design" in the classroom.<br /><br />Opening on just one screen, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/anamorph/31834/main"><em><strong>Anamorph</strong></em></a> (IFC Films) grossed $3,000. Willem Dafoe stars as an NYPD detective investigating a serial killer. Critics were not kind: <em>Anamorph</em> scored just 28% positive at <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/anamorph/"><em>Rotten Tomatoes</em></a>. David Hudson at <a href="http://daily.greencine.com/archives/005841.html"><em>GreenCine Daily</em></a> rounds up pertinent quotes. <br /><br />Two other holdovers did better as they expanded their runs. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/young--heart/32265/main"><em><strong>Young At Heart</strong></em></a> (Fox Searchlight), the "elderly folk chorus that sings modern rock songs" documentary, increased its theater count to 33 and averaged $4,393 per screen. Hou Hsiao-Hsien's gentle drama <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-flight-of-the-red-balloon-le-voyage-du-ballon-rouge/31377/main"><em><strong>The Flight of the Red Balloon</strong></em></a> (IFC Films) proved its appeal beyond New York City, making $3,572 per-screen at 11 locations.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=16&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/21/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-continues-its-reign/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1172793/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/21/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-continues-its-reign/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>anamorph</category><category>ben stein</category><category>BenStein</category><category>expelled no intelligence allowed</category><category>ExpelledNoIntelligenceAllowed</category><category>indie weekend box of...</category><category>IndieWeekendBoxOf...</category><category>richard jenkins</category><category>RichardJenkins</category><category>the flight of the red balloon</category><category>the visitor</category><category>TheFlightOfTheRedBalloon</category><category>TheVisitor</category><category>tom mccarthy</category><category>TomMccarthy</category><category>willem dafoe</category><category>WillemDafoe</category><category>young at heart</category><category>YoungAtHeart</category><dc:creator>Peter Martin</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-21T08:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-21T08:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Box Office: Forgetting the Forbidden</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/16/box-office-forgetting-the-forbidden/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/16/box-office-forgetting-the-forbidden/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/16/box-office-forgetting-the-forbidden/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office-predictions-1/" rel="tag">Box Office Predictions</a></p>It was a tough race to call, but looking back and realizing that if I had just swapped <em>Prom Night </em>and<em> Street Kings</em> I would have had a perfect prediction, all I can say is "D'oh!" The slasher reimagining took the lead by quite a margin, with the Keanu Reeves cop drama taking the silver. Say what you will about PG-13 horror and/or horror remakes, but <em>Prom Night</em> made back its $20 million budget in a single weekend, so we can probably expect more of the same. <em>Smart People</em>, last week's third new release, came in seventh. Here's the top five:<em><strong><br /><br />1. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/prom-night-2008/28584/main">Prom Night:</a> </strong></em><strong>$20.8 million</strong><em><strong><br />2. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/street-kings/29236/main">Street Kings:</a> </strong></em><strong>$12.4 million</strong><em><strong><br />3. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/21-2008/29674/main">21: </a></strong></em><strong>$10.4 million</strong><em><strong><br />4. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/nims-island/30174/main">Nim's Island:</a> </strong></em><strong>$9.1 million</strong><strong><br /></strong><em><strong>5. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/leatherheads/27495/main">Leatherheads:</a> </strong></em><strong>$6.2 million</strong><em><strong><br /><br /></strong></em>What's new for this week? Glad you asked:<em><strong><br /><br /></strong></em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/88-minutes/23213/main"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/88_boxoff.jpg" alt="" /></a><em><strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/88-minutes/23213/main">88 Minutes</a><br /></strong></em><strong>What's It All About: </strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/al-pacino/54596/main">Al Pacino</a> plays a university professor and an expert in forensic psychiatry, and he's just been informed via an anonymous phone call that he has only 88 minutes left to live. Kind of a cross between <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042369/"><em>DOA</em></a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0285331/"><em>24</em></a>.<br /><strong>Why It Might Do Well: </strong>Pacino is still the man ...<br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well: </strong>...however, his star power may not carry much weight with younger ticket buyers, and a 22% rating from <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/88_minutes/">Rottentomatoes.com</a> does not bode well. Also, of this week's new flicks, this one is hitting the smallest number of theaters. <br /><strong>Number of Theaters: </strong>2,000<br /><strong>Prediction: </strong>$9 million<em><strong><br /></strong></em><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/16/box-office-forgetting-the-forbidden/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Box Office: Forgetting the Forbidden</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/16/box-office-forgetting-the-forbidden/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1168811/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/16/box-office-forgetting-the-forbidden/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>88 Minutes</category><category>88Minutes</category><category>Cinema</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</category><category>ForgettingSarahMarshall</category><category>Movies</category><category>The Forbidden Kingdom</category><category>TheForbiddenKingdom</category><dc:creator>Matt Bradshaw</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-16T18:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-16T18:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Discuss: The Best of the Doldrums</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/15/discuss-the-best-of-the-doldrums/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/15/discuss-the-best-of-the-doldrums/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/15/discuss-the-best-of-the-doldrums/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/otherboleyngirl.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />In the next week or two, we're going to be emerging from what's generally considered a miserable cinematic wasteland -- a time when Hollywood treads water between Oscar season and summer, getting rid of scores of movies it doesn't have a lot of confidence in. It's a season most movie buffs dread, since the odds of a worthwhile trip to the theater are low, and time seems better spent contemplating the summer films that seem impossibly far away. Given the amount of time we've spent daydreaming about <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main"><em>Iron Man</em></a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/speed-racer-2008/28066/main"><em>Speed Racer</em></a> here at <em>Cinematical</em>, we're clearly not immune from the winter and spring haze. <br /><br />Before you know it, Apatow cash cows, long-awaited sequels, and Wachowski extravaganzas will start making their way to the multiplexes. But I wanted to take a quick look back and ask what, if anything, you've <em>liked</em> from this sad stretch. I don't mean what the best film of 2008 is -- winter and spring can actually be quite a good season for festivals and indies, so one could come up with a number of worthy contenders from that stock. I mean the bright spots of the mainstream wide release dumping ground.<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/15/discuss-the-best-of-the-doldrums/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Discuss: The Best of the Doldrums</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/15/discuss-the-best-of-the-doldrums/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1168094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/15/discuss-the-best-of-the-doldrums/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>bank job</category><category>BankJob</category><category>charlie bartlett</category><category>CharlieBartlett</category><category>featured</category><category>other boleyn girl</category><category>OtherBoleynGirl</category><category>penelope</category><dc:creator>Eugene Novikov</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-15T12:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-15T12:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Weekend Box Office: 'The Visitor' Beats Out 'Young At Heart'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-beats-out-young-at-hear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-beats-out-young-at-hear/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-beats-out-young-at-hear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/ifc/" rel="tag">IFC</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-searchlight/" rel="tag">Fox Searchlight</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/miramax/" rel="tag">Miramax</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/samuel-goldwyn-films/" rel="tag">Samuel Goldwyn Films</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/thevisitor-sm.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />"A damn fine film with a good heart and some really excellent performances" finished atop the indie weekend box office charts. The quote is from our own <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/18/sundance-review-the-visitor/">Scott Weinberg's review</a> of Tom McCarthy's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-visitor-2008/27428/main"><em><strong>The Visitor</strong></em></a> (Overture), and I agree wholeheartedly. The film earned $22,000 per-screen at four theaters, according to estimates compiled by <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=15&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm"><em>Box Office Mojo</em></a>. Richard Jenkins stars as a college professor who strikes up a friendship with an immigrant couple he finds living in his NYC apartment. It's even better -- and deeper -- than that description might sound.<br /><br />An elderly chorus sings a repertoire of modern pop and rock songs in Stephen Walker's documentary <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/young--heart/32265/main"><em><strong>Young @ Heart</strong></em></a> (Fox Searchlight); audiences responded to the tune of $13,075 per screen at four locations. <em>Cinematical's</em> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/10/review-young-at-heart/">James Rocchi wrote</a>: "Even for all its flaws and failures it still succeeds in showing us friends who -- through song and art and community and, yes, love -- are doing their best to face it with everything that they've got."<br /><br />David Ayer's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/street-kings/29236/main"><em><strong>Street Kings</strong></em></a> (Fox Searchlight) should be included, I suppose, because it's distributed by an studio specialty division known for its indie releases, though not much about the police drama screams "indie." By the per-screen numbers, it finished third, earning an average of $4,864 at each of 2,467 engagements. "As yet another tale of dirty criminals and even dirtier cops," <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/12/review-street-kings/">Scott Weinberg opined</a>, "<em>Street Kings</em> works well enough, albeit strictly in a 'been there, seen that' sort of way."<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-beats-out-young-at-hear/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Indie Weekend Box Office: 'The Visitor' Beats Out 'Young At Heart'</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=15&amp;sort=avg&amp;order=DESC&amp;p=.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-beats-out-young-at-hear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1166082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/indie-weekend-box-office-the-visitor-beats-out-young-at-hear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>bella</category><category>david ayer</category><category>DavidAyer</category><category>indie weekend box office</category><category>IndieWeekendBoxOffice</category><category>my blueberry nights</category><category>MyBlueberryNights</category><category>priceless</category><category>smart people</category><category>SmartPeople</category><category>stephen walker</category><category>StephenWalker</category><category>street kings</category><category>StreetKings</category><category>the flight of the red balloon</category><category>the visitor</category><category>TheFlightOfTheRedBalloon</category><category>TheVisitor</category><category>tom mccarthy</category><category>TomMccarthy</category><category>young at heart</category><category>YoungAtHeart</category><dc:creator>Peter Martin</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-14T09:02:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-14T09:02:00 00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>More Bad Buzz for 'Incredible Hulk'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/10/more-bad-buzz-for-incredible-hulk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/10/more-bad-buzz-for-incredible-hulk/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/10/more-bad-buzz-for-incredible-hulk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/hulk11.jpg" /><br /><br />Are some franchises cursed? That looks like the implication of today's article in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/movies/10hulk.html"><em>The New York Times</em></a> about the intense reactions to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-incredible-hulk/26921/main"><em>The Incredible Hulk</em></a>, which has divided fans online and elsewhere ever since <a href="http://incrediblehulk.marvel.com/">the trailer </a>came out last month. According to reporter Brooks Barnes, the preview was released "to vanquish memories of the 2003 film." Instead, it resurrected them with complaints that the character looked too fake. Hollywood has acknowledged pre-release backlash before -- remember how <em>Ain't It Cool News</em> supposedly impacted the reception of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/batman-and-robin/1112524/main"><em>Batman and Robin</em></a> over a decade ago -- and they've adapted to it, as demonstrated by the way all the anti-Brett Ratner venom leading up to the release of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/x-men-the-last-stand/18650/main"><em>X-Men: The Last Stand</em> </a>didn't affect its box office reception one bit. <br /><br />Commercial prospects aside, it would've been nice if Marvel and Universal had turned to the source material to uncover the best possible <em>Hulk</em> material for the big screen. I've always felt that the <em><a href="http://www.marvel.com/universe/Planet_Hulk">Planet Hulk</a> </em>series (continuing now as <a href="http://www.marvel.com/comics/World_War_Hulk"><em>World War Hulk</em></a>), which found the Angry Green Giant on a foreign planet adapting to alien culture, does the best job of tapping into the character's fragility while simultaneously illustrating his ability to kick major ass. Plus, it brings other Marvel characters into the mix -- which is something the studios are trying out with <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/05/new-incredible-hulk-promo/">the confirmed Tony Stark/Robert Downey, Jr. </a>cameo in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-incredible-hulk/26921/main"><em>Incredible Hulk</em></a>. Then again, maybe the best stories shouldn't get butchered by less-than-stellar adaptations. Remember the goofy symbiote in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/spider-man-3/18651/main"><em>Spider-Man 3</em></a>? I've tried to forget it.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/10/more-bad-buzz-for-incredible-hulk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1164063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/10/more-bad-buzz-for-incredible-hulk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-10T15:32:00 00:00</dc:date><pubDate>2008-04-10T15:32:00 00:00</pubDate></item></channel></rss>