<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Your Favorite Pixar Film?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/23/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-pixar-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/23/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-pixar-film/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/23/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-pixar-film/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/polls/" rel="tag">Polls</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/wall_e_pod_hires_jpg-(2).jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />Well, the time has finally come for another funtastic Pixar film to hit the big screen. This Friday, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/wall-e/28116/main"><em>Wall<strong>&middot;</strong>E </em></a>touches down on earth, and naturally its impending arrival has got us thinking about those nutty dudes over at Pixar who took giant risks, worked their asses off and revolutionized the world of animation. I'm fully aware that naming your favorite Pixar film is kinda like naming your favorite child, but it's fun to look back over the years and attempt to come up with the one Pixar flick that entertained us the most.<br /><br />Which do you hold closest to your heart? I'm sure everyone has a soft spot for the original <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/toy-story/1756/main"><em>Toy Story</em>,</a> but most folks I've spoken with feel<em> <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-incredibles/15960/main">The Incredibles</a></em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1214230869984*/"> </a>was the best all-around Pixar film. Me? I'm a<em> <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/monsters-inc/10057/main">Monsters, Inc. </a></em>guy. Yup, that's my favorite Pixar film. I just remember having so much fun watching <em>Monsters, Inc.</em> for the first time -- more fun than I had watching any other Pixar flick (with <em>Toy Story</em> and <em>The Incredibles</em> following closely behind). My least favorite is <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/cars/18763/main"><em>Cars</em>, </a>though I was sick the one time I watched it and have been meaning to give it another chance. Should I? Which is your favorite Pixar film (feature, not short)? Feel free to tell us why in the comments below ...<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/23/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-pixar-film/#poll15894">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/23/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-pixar-film/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1233758/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/23/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-pixar-film/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cars</category><category>cinematical</category><category>inc</category><category>monsters</category><category>pixar</category><category>the incredibles</category><category>TheIncredibles</category><category>toy story</category><category>ToyStory</category><category>wall-e</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Who's Down for 'Hulk' Sequels?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/16/monday-morning-poll-whos-down-for-hulk-sequels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/16/monday-morning-poll-whos-down-for-hulk-sequels/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/16/monday-morning-poll-whos-down-for-hulk-sequels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="274" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/hulk25-%282%29-%282%29.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br />First off, I need to apologize because I was supposed to provide our second <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-incredible-hulk/26921/main"><em>Incredible Hulk</em></a> review late last week, but life got in the way and I never produced it for you. I know, I'm a horrible person and I've given myself 27 lashings as punishment, though I'm sure <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/11/review-the-incredible-hulk-scotts-take/">Scott's review of the film</a> helped you decide whether to see it or not. Truth be told, I wasn't that crazy about it -- but I'm also not a huge fan of Bruce Banner or the Hulk as characters. Banner, to me, is too depressing; how do you root for a guy who wants to hide in the corner? Sure, there are other loners like Batman and Spider-Man, but both of those guys have some fun toys to play with (like a car and a web). Banner has the Hulk, who, well, smashes things. Yay!<br /><br />But anyway, Marvel gave fans a good flick with tons of action, crazy special effects and more than a few geeky nods to the comics and to <em>The Avengers</em>. Following the successful opening weekend of <em>Iron Man</em>, all we talked about was the sequel. Now that<em> The Incredible Hulk</em> seems to have won back more than a few fans, what are your feelings on a sequel? I've heard some say they'd rather Hulk return as a villain in <em>The Avengers </em>film (tentatively due out in 2011), but would you rather the guy get another solo flick too? Where are you at with this character? Do you want a franchise? Can you picture one?<br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/16/monday-morning-poll-whos-down-for-hulk-sequels/#poll15653">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/16/monday-morning-poll-whos-down-for-hulk-sequels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1226516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/16/monday-morning-poll-whos-down-for-hulk-sequels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>marvel</category><category>the avengers</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><category>the incredible hulk sequel</category><category>TheAvengers</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulkSequel</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: 'The Happening' or 'The Hulk'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/09/monday-morning-poll-the-happening-or-the-hulk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/09/monday-morning-poll-the-happening-or-the-hulk/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/09/monday-morning-poll-the-happening-or-the-hulk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="329" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/happhulk-(2).jpg" /><br /><br />The summer weekends are about to get a whole lot more competitive starting this Friday with the debut of two pretty big flicks,<em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-incredible-hulk/26921/main"> The Incredible Hulk</a></em> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-happening/29354/main"><em>The Happening</em></a>. On one hand, you have the return of a character who didn't do so well last time he was in theaters. On the other, you have the return of a writer-director who didn't do so well last time he was in theaters. Thus, both men (or monsters) are looking for a bit of redemption this time around. But who will get your money, that's what we're interested in finding out this week. Who will you be giving a second chance to? The Incredible Hulk or The Incredible M. Night Shyamalan? <br /><br /><em>The Happening</em> marks M. Night's first R-rated feature, which means the film's audience is already somewhat limited. Meanwhile, <em>The Incredible Hulk </em>(rated PG-13) has already <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/09/tony-starks-incredible-hulk-cameo-revealed-in-new-tv-spot/">started using the success</a> of Marvel's <em>Iron Man</em> to help launch its opening weekend at the box office. That said, I think it's pretty obvious as to which film will make more money than the other, so instead of going down that road, tell us which one you'll be seeing and why. Or, perhaps, you're not interested in either one? Sound off below ...<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/09/monday-morning-poll-the-happening-or-the-hulk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Monday Morning Poll: 'The Happening' or 'The Hulk'?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/09/monday-morning-poll-the-happening-or-the-hulk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1219697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/09/monday-morning-poll-the-happening-or-the-hulk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>m. night shyamalan</category><category>M.NightShyamalan</category><category>the happening</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><category>TheHappening</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Memorial Day Poll: Should They Continue the Indiana Jones Franchise?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img width="433" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="289" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indycs2.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />Happy Memorial Day Weekend everyone! While I've been spending most of the weekend out at my imaginary mansion in The Hamptons, the rest of you were busy reserving just over two hours of your time for<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/25/cinematical-indy-week-in-review/"><em> Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a>. We've already asked you <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/discuss-so-how-was-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-cryst/">what you thought of the film</a> (and we'll be asking again later to catch up with those who saw it at the end of the weekend), so now it's time to jump ahead and ask ourselves whether we want this franchise to continue. <br /><br />Both George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have said they'll <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/18/cannes-2008-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/">continue making Indiana Jones films</a> if the fans want them. Since Harrison Ford is getting up there in age, one imagines a fifth film would involve <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/17/shia-labeouf-to-take-indy-franchise-forward/">handing the franchise over </a>to Shia LaBeouf, though we don't know that for sure. What say you? Is it time to retire Indy once and for all? Did this latest installment prove there's not much gas left in this tank? Or, did you absolutely love the film, wonder why it took so long for a fourth one to hit screens and immediately ponder a wonderful future with lots more Indiana Jones-related films? <br /><br />Sound off ...<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/#poll14706">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1205979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>harrison ford</category><category>HarrisonFord</category><category>indiana jones 5</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJones5</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>indy2008</category><category>shia labeouf</category><category>ShiaLabeouf</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Your Favorite Indiana Jones Sidekick</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/19/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-sidekick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/19/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-sidekick/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/19/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-sidekick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/polls/" rel="tag">Polls</a></p><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="293" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indyconnery-(2).jpg" /><br /><br />If there's one thing we've come to expect from every Indiana Jones film, it's that Indy will be joined by a sidekick (and a beautiful woman) on all his adventures. These sidekicks are there for comedic support, mostly, but also to help Jones get himself out of (and into) a jam or three. In <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/raiders-of-the-lost-ark/3348/main">Raiders of the Lost Ark</a>,</em> the large, round and cuddly Sallah (John Rhys-Davies) helped Indy search for the Ark of the Covenant -- but, really, how could you count out the tough-as-nails Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen), who also acted as a sidekick (and lover) in this one. <br /><br /><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-temple-of-doom/6804/main"><em>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom</em></a> introduced us to Short Round (Jonathan Ke Quan), who stuck with Indy through thick and thin from start to finish and was, perhaps, Indy's most loyal sidekick. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-last-crusade/2401/main"><em>Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade</em></a> found our hero partnering with two old dudes: Professor Henry Jones (Sean Connery) and Dr. Marcus Brody (Denholm Elliott); the latter of which finally got to leave campus and join Indy for what we all thought would be his final big-screen adventure. Which brings us to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main"><em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a>, where, this time, Indy is once again teamed with someone much younger than he is: Mutt Williams (Shia LaBeouf). Oh, and there's also 'Mac' George McHale (Ray Winstone), though I don't know how big of a role he plays as sidekick because, well, I don't see <em>Crystal Skull</em> until tomorrow. For the purpose of this poll, though, we'll include everyone (so you can come back to vote after you see the latest installment). <br /><br />After you vote in the poll, definitely tell us why you chose who you did in the comments section below. <br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/19/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-sidekick/#poll14409">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/19/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-sidekick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1199360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/19/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-sidekick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>indiana jones</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>indiana jones and the last crusade</category><category>indiana jones and the temple of doom</category><category>indiana jones sidekicks</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom</category><category>IndianaJonesSidekicks</category><category>indy2008</category><category>raiders of the lost ark</category><category>RaidersOfTheLostArk</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: What Could've Helped 'Speed Racer'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/12/monday-morning-poll-what-couldve-helped-speed-racer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/12/monday-morning-poll-what-couldve-helped-speed-racer/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/12/monday-morning-poll-what-couldve-helped-speed-racer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img width="433" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="254" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/speed4-(2)-(2).jpg" /><br /><br />Ever since <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/11/speed-racer-crashes-at-the-box-office/">the numbers were released yesterday</a>, anyone and everyone (as well as anyone <em>who is</em> everyone) has been talking <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/review-speed-racer/"><em>Speed Racer</em></a> -- specifically, how a $120 million Hollywood blockbuster could open with only $20 million at the box office. You can blame <em>Iron Man</em>, you can blame the marketing, you can blame the blogs for trashing the film all year long, you can blame Christina Ricci's weird haircut, or you can blame that judge on <em>Project Runway</em> for saying, "You can never have too much color!" Fact is, it missed the mark. <br /><br />But what could've helped <em>Speed Racer</em> make more money in its opening weekend? The running time has been mentioned a lot in the past 24 hours, but a running time doesn't exactly woo audiences into the theater. Is the film's marketing 100% to blame? Should the trailers have been cut differently? Should they have stressed that this was a film for kids? Should they have added a little viral action into the mix? Or what about overall? From the beginning, were the Wachowski Brothers the right folks for the job? Should they have gone the animated route instead -- or maybe the animated 3-D route? Should they have made this a film for older kids; slap on a PG-13 rating? <br /><br />In your opinion, what could've helped <em>Speed Racer</em> -- both in its opening weekend and in its development as a feature film?<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://".$GLOBALS["HTTP_HOST"]."/photos/speed-racer/">Speed Racer</a></strong></p><a href="http://".$GLOBALS["HTTP_HOST"]."/photos/speed-racer/766502/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/speedracer08_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://".$GLOBALS["HTTP_HOST"]."/photos/speed-racer/766501/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/speedracer07_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://".$GLOBALS["HTTP_HOST"]."/photos/speed-racer/766500/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/speedracer06_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://".$GLOBALS["HTTP_HOST"]."/photos/speed-racer/766499/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/speedracer05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://".$GLOBALS["HTTP_HOST"]."/photos/speed-racer/766498/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/speedracer04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/12/monday-morning-poll-what-couldve-helped-speed-racer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1192904/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/12/monday-morning-poll-what-couldve-helped-speed-racer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>christina ricci</category><category>ChristinaRicci</category><category>cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>speed racer</category><category>SpeedRacer</category><category>the wachowski brothers</category><category>TheWachowskiBrothers</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Will 'Iron Man's' Awesome Weekend Help 'The Incredible Hulk'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/monday-morning-poll-will-iron-mans-awesome-weekend-help-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/monday-morning-poll-will-iron-mans-awesome-weekend-help-the/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/monday-morning-poll-will-iron-mans-awesome-weekend-help-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img width="440" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="264" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/hulk1.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br />In case you haven't heard by now,<a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main"> <em>Iron Man</em></a> took home a whopping $201 million worldwide over the weekend, with that amount pretty much split right down the middle between domestic and international. Not only is it the second best non-sequel opening ever, but it also proved that Marvel (now self-financing their films) is in it to win it ... big time. Fortunately, folks won't have to wait long to see if Marvel will strike gold twice -- in a little over a month from now (on June 13, to be exact), <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-incredible-hulk/26921/main"><em>The Incredible Hulk</em></a> will debut in theaters. Last time a <em>Hulk </em>film was in theaters, Ang Lee directed and Marvel did not self-finance the flick. After seeing what <em>Iron Man</em> did to the box office over the weekend (and what fans thought of the film), something tells me we're in for a completely different kind of re-boot this time around.<br /><br />Right from the start, folks haven't been giving <em>The Incredible Hulk </em>a fair shake, myself included. It took a long time to get those first images, and even longer for a trailer. But now that the film's marketing campaign is in full swing, I'm starting to see the fans turn. I witnessed the full "field scene" from the trailer at New York Comic Con last month, and I can assure you it looked awesome. Everyone is talking up the <em>Iron Man</em> cast, but have you noticed that <em>The Incredible Hulk</em> cast is just as good (not to mention I think Tim Roth will play a better villain than Jeff Bridges)? And now that <em>Iron Man</em> killed, does that change anything for <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>? Do more people now want to see it? Are expectations higher? Sound off below in the poll and in the comments section ...<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/monday-morning-poll-will-iron-mans-awesome-weekend-help-the/#poll13747">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/monday-morning-poll-will-iron-mans-awesome-weekend-help-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1186620/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/monday-morning-poll-will-iron-mans-awesome-weekend-help-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>jeff bridges</category><category>JeffBridges</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>tim roth</category><category>TimRoth</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Will the Seas be Smooth for Del Toro's 'Hobbit'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/monday-morning-poll-will-the-seas-be-smooth-for-del-toros-hob/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/monday-morning-poll-will-the-seas-be-smooth-for-del-toros-hob/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/monday-morning-poll-will-the-seas-be-smooth-for-del-toros-hob/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/deltoro042808.jpg" />After waves of speculation and mass musing, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/24/breaking-guillermo-del-toro-confirmed-for-the-hobbit-movies/">Scott brought us</a> the news we've been wondering about for months last week: <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/guillermo-del-toro/166461/main">Guillermo del Toro</a> is going to the land of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-hobbit-2010/28832/main"><em>The Hobbit</em></a>. Since then, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/27/del-toro-not-right-for-hobbit/">we've got questions</a> about whether or not this news is actually welcome, and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/ian-mckellen-and-andy-serkis-on-board-for-the-hobbit-at-least/">just this morning</a>, rumored word that Ian McKellen and Andy Serkis are on board -- "all bureaucracy pending."<br /><br />Del Toro plans to use Peter Jackson's films "as canon," but there will be changes afoot. As Eugene noted earlier, there will be a different color palette for the world of the hobbits, and instead of inundating us with a film full of stunning CGI, Guillermo is anxious to make a lot more use of animatronics.<br /><br />Will this change only be subtle, or will it look like an entirely new film that only has a few familiar faces? It's certainly possible to make a film that visually fits -- each <em>Harry Potter</em> director has added touches to their films to make them stand out while still creating a cohesive series. However, we've got to keep in mind that the seas haven't been smooth where Peter Jackson and this fantasy world is concerned. Eric Kohn brought up the "smells of George Lucas" thoughts in his post, and you have to wonder if Guillermo will be free to build his world in peace, and if behind-the-scenes issues could tarnish this whole affair.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/monday-morning-poll-will-the-seas-be-smooth-for-del-toros-hob/#poll13416">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/monday-morning-poll-will-the-seas-be-smooth-for-del-toros-hob/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1179456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/28/monday-morning-poll-will-the-seas-be-smooth-for-del-toros-hob/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cinematical</category><category>Guillermo del Toro</category><category>GuillermoDelToro</category><category>Peter Jackson</category><category>PeterJackson</category><category>The Hobbit</category><category>TheHobbit</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: "Twilight" Watch -- Which Character Are You Most Like?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/monday-morning-poll-twilight-watch-which-character-are-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/monday-morning-poll-twilight-watch-which-character-are-you/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/monday-morning-poll-twilight-watch-which-character-are-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><img height="150" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/twilight150.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />My daughter and I are huge fans of the <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Twilight-Book-1-Stephenie-Meyer/dp/0316160172/ref=si3_rdr_bb_product">Twilight</a></em> series. We've both read all three existing books -- <em>Twilight, New Moon, and Eclipse</em> -- and are marking the days off on a mental calendar until the August 2 release date of the fourth book, <em>Breaking Dawn</em>, and my daughter and I could discuss the books endlessly. </p>
<p>We've had countless conversations about whether Bella should become a vampire, or if Stephenie Meyer will ever stop teasing us with that and let Edward turn her, already. And whether Bella will have a vampire "superpower" once she does turn, and what that power might be. And which characters we like the most. And so on, and so on, as I'm sure the rest of you hardcore <em>Twilight</em> fans do. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/monday-morning-poll-twilight-watch-which-character-are-you/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Monday Morning Poll: "Twilight" Watch -- Which Character Are You Most Like?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/monday-morning-poll-twilight-watch-which-character-are-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1166474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/monday-morning-poll-twilight-watch-which-character-are-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bella swan</category><category>breaking dawn</category><category>BreakingDawn</category><category>edward cullen</category><category>EdwardCullen</category><category>stephenie meyer</category><category>twilight</category><category>twilight moms</category><category>twilight movie</category><category>TwilightMovie</category><category>vampires</category><category>werewolves</category><dc:creator>Kim Voynar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Who Wants a 'Cloverfield' Sequel?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/monday-morning-poll-who-wants-a-cloverfield-sequel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/monday-morning-poll-who-wants-a-cloverfield-sequel/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/monday-morning-poll-who-wants-a-cloverfield-sequel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/cloverfield.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />A copy of the brand spanking new <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/cloverfield/30641/main"><em>Cloverfield </em></a>DVD (which hits shelves on April 22) arrived in the mail late last week, and after only watching the special features, I have to say I was pretty pleased with it. The two alternate endings (<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/couple-of-cloverfield-alternate-endings-make-their-way-to-the/">which we posted earlier today</a>) weren't that mind-blowing, but the behind-the-scenes featurettes are fun to watch. Out of the deleted scenes and bloopers, my favorite part was watching how they shot the party scene in the beginning. There's no music in the background (that was all added later on), and so you have this packed apartment with kids, and Hud is shouting, but the entire room is silent, pretending to talk and dance. Very comical to watch. (You also get previously-released trailers for <em>Star Trek</em> and <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em>.)<br /><br />Anyway, as we approach the DVD release date, a ton more viral material is starting to hit the web. To be completely honest with you, I get lost in this stuff and don't have the time or patience to spend hours sifting through it all. For those interested, check out posts over at <a href="http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/11827">Bloody Disgusting</a> and <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/07/cloverfield-teddy-hanssen-last-seen-12072007/">Slashfilm </a>to get caught up. Reaction was certainly mixed after <em>Cloverfield </em>finally debuted back in January, and after an initial surge at the box office, numbers dropped off significantly. But that won't stop folks <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/31/its-official-cloverfield-2-is-coming/">from pumping out a sequel</a>, which may or may not focus on the <em>Cloverfield </em>monster's mother. (On the DVD, a special effects dude does clarify that the monster is an infant and scared. Oh, and another guy refers to the monster as "Clover." Unfortunately, no one mentioned a thing about the satellite that falls into the water at the very end. However, I did not listen to Reeves' full commentary on the film; only on the endings.)<br /><br />I was one of those that really enjoyed <em>Cloverfield </em>for what it was -- a creepy, original monster flick designed for the YouTube generation. That said, I'm not sure they could deliver another completely unique experience in a sequel. But what do you think?<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/monday-morning-poll-who-wants-a-cloverfield-sequel/#poll12314">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/monday-morning-poll-who-wants-a-cloverfield-sequel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1160387/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/monday-morning-poll-who-wants-a-cloverfield-sequel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>cloverfield</category><category>cloverfield 2</category><category>Cloverfield2</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Best Summer Blockbuster Trailer?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/monday-morning-poll-best-summer-blockbuster-trailer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/monday-morning-poll-best-summer-blockbuster-trailer/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/monday-morning-poll-best-summer-blockbuster-trailer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img width="433" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="288" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/03/ironnman.jpg" /><br /><br />(Note: Above image was chosen totally at random. Yup. We'll go with that.)<br /><br />It's beginning to look a lot like summer blockbuster season everywhere you go. <br /><br />I've heard the words "calm before the storm" mentioned more times in the past week than I have all year. That's because it's almost April, which means the official start to the summer movie season is only one month away. One month! That's it! Are all of you as excited as we are? (Don't all stand up and cheer at the same time.) Anyway, pretty much all of the big summer flicks have released trailers by now (with the exception of <em>The Mummy 3</em> ... and maybe something else that I'm forgetting -- it <em>is </em>Monday after all). <br /><br />We've seen trailers for <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/15/that-dark-knight-trailer-is-now-everywhere-but-still-not-offi/"><em>The Dark Knight</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/05/explosive-international-iron-man-teaser-hits-net/"><em>Iron Man</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/14/a-new-speed-racer-trailer-that-wont-disappear/">Speed Racer</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/14/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull-trailer-onl/"><em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/12/the-incredible-hulk-trailer-is-here/"><em>The Incredible Hulk</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/08/new-cute-and-cuddly-wall-e-trailer/"><em>WALL-E</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/05/prince-caspian-trailer-arrives/"><em>Prince Caspian</em></a>, <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/20/the-hellboy-2-trailer-coooool/">Hellboy II</a></em>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/27/new-x-files-2-trailer-leaked-online/"><em>The X-Files</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/06/slow-motion-mayhem-new-wanted-trailer-premieres/"><em>Wanted</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/15/new-trailer-for-m-night-shyamalans-the-happening/"><em>The Happening</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/17/first-trailer-for-will-smiths-hancock/"><em>Hancock </em></a>... and so on. Of course, some films have been a little more aggressive than others -- like <em>Iron Man </em>(which comes out first), <em>WALL-E </em>(a few trailers, teasers and a very early viral campaign) and <em>The Dark Knight</em> (one teaser, one trailer and 50 billion viral sites). Indy's shoveled out a bunch of videos, as well as a trailer, and <em>The Incredible Hulk</em> has given us one trailer and a few images. One imagines all of these films will ramp up their marketing as their release dates draw closer.<br /><br />But here's our question today: Which summer blockbuster trailer pumped you up most to see the film? Feel free to answer the poll below or write in your favorite in the comments section. (Me? I'm going with <em>The Dark Knight</em>.) <br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/monday-morning-poll-best-summer-blockbuster-trailer/#poll11976">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/monday-morning-poll-best-summer-blockbuster-trailer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1153393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/monday-morning-poll-best-summer-blockbuster-trailer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>hancock</category><category>hellboy II</category><category>HellboyIi</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>prince caspian</category><category>PrinceCaspian</category><category>summer2008</category><category>the dark knight</category><category>the happening</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><category>the x-files</category><category>TheDarkKnight</category><category>TheHappening</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>TheX-files</category><category>trailers</category><category>wall-e</category><category>wanted</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Your Favorite "Green" Movie Character</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/17/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-green-movie-character/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/17/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-green-movie-character/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/17/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-green-movie-character/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/03/hulk11.jpg" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></p>
<p>Since today is St. Patrick's Day, and since it's practically a law to wear green on St. Patty's Day, we figured why not come up with a list of characters (most of which appear in movies, or have movies being made about them) who wear green and ask you which one is your favorite. This one was a fun list to create -- truth be told, I went back and forth with Monika over IM for about a half hour tossing out a number of characters. To coincide with the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/12/the-incredible-hulk-trailer-is-here/">recently-released trailer</a>, the first character we have to name is The Incredible Hulk. He's big, he's nasty, he kicks a whole lot of ass ... and he's green! Other green monsters? How about Frankenstein and Mrs. Frankenstein. Back to green comic book characters, we also have Green Lantern, Green Arrow, Green Goblin and Poison Ivy. Additionally, the upcoming spoof flick <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0426592/">Superhero Movie</a></em> also features a lead character called Dragonfly who -- you guessed it -- wears green. (I'm sure I'm forgetting some random green-wearing comic book characters, so feel free to chime in down below.) </p>
<p>Moving away from the comics, we have my favorite green character -- Kermit the Frog. He's perhaps the nicest green character there is; I mean, even when Kermit gets mad, he still sounds funny ... kinda like Jerry Seinfeld (who I've never seen wear anything green). My second favorite? C'mon ... Yoda! Moving across the spectrum, villains can also wear green -- like Leprechaun (horror version), the Wicked Witch of the West or that darn Grinch who stole Christmas. And finally, how can I leave out the lovable green Ogre ... Shrek! Green is a popular color, eh?</p>
<p>Since there's way too many characters for an official poll, feel free to tell us who your favorite green folks are in the comments below ... and definitely let me know who we forgot. Happy St. Patty's Day!</p>
<p> </p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/17/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-green-movie-character/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1141887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/17/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-green-movie-character/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>green</category><category>green hornet</category><category>green lantern</category><category>kermit the frog</category><category>poison ivy</category><category>shre</category><category>shrek</category><category>st. patrick's day</category><category>superhero movie</category><category>SuperheroMovie</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Has Will Ferrell Lost His Magic Touch?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/03/monday-morning-poll-has-will-ferrell-lost-his-magic-touch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/03/monday-morning-poll-has-will-ferrell-lost-his-magic-touch/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/03/monday-morning-poll-has-will-ferrell-lost-his-magic-touch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><img height="150" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/semi-pro-thumb.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Despite an intense marketing push, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0002071/">Will Ferrell's</a> latest sports comedy just couldn't hold up to his previous two efforts. <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/28/review-semi-pro/">Semi-Pro</a></em> <em>did</em> take the <a href="http://news.aol.com/entertainment/movies/movie-news-story/ar/_a/semi-pro-scores-at-box-office/20080302192609990001?ecid=RSS0001">number one spot at the box office</a> this weekend, but it did so with a measly $15 million. Compared to last year's <em>Blades of Glory</em> (opened with $33 million) and <em>Talladega Nights</em> (opened with $47 million), that $15 million doesn't look so great -- and it's certainly not the way New Line wanted to go out (even though they are, technically, going out on top). </p>
<p>So why didn't anyone go see this film? Granted, people <em>did</em> go see it (enough for $15 million), but it played in over 3,000 theaters. Did the R rating actually hurt the film? Keep in mind, both <em>Blades</em> and <em>Talladega Nights</em> were PG-13 -- so did a raunchy, foul-mouthed Ferrell keep audiences away? Or was it the supporting cast? Woody Harrelson and Andre Benjamin aren't Jon 'Napoleon Dynamite" Heder and Sacha "Borat" Baron Cohen. Did Ferrell need a little more juice around him in order to score bigger buckets? Maybe the whole '70s basketball thing wasn't so appealing? I guess the bigger question should be: Does this $15 million opening signal the beginning of the end of Ferrell's reign over the box office? </p>
<p>Why did you stay away from <em>Semi-Pro</em>, which I heard was actually pretty damn funny? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/03/monday-morning-poll-has-will-ferrell-lost-his-magic-touch/#poll10706">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/03/monday-morning-poll-has-will-ferrell-lost-his-magic-touch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1129458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/03/monday-morning-poll-has-will-ferrell-lost-his-magic-touch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>blades of glory</category><category>box office</category><category>cinematical</category><category>semi pro</category><category>SemiPro</category><category>talladega nights</category><category>will ferrell</category><category>woody harrelson</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Oscar's Biggest Upset?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/25/monday-morning-poll-oscars-biggest-upset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/25/monday-morning-poll-oscars-biggest-upset/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/25/monday-morning-poll-oscars-biggest-upset/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><img height="225" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/02/marionc1-(2).jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />I have such a huge <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/24/oscar-winners/">Oscars hangover this morning</a>. Did anyone theme it for the night? I cooked some mean-ass burgers in honor of <em>Juno</em>, then attempted to make a few milkshakes (in honor of <em>There Will be Blood</em>) before realizing I had no ice cream. Anyone get nutty and make Ratatouille? Anyway, when it comes to the day after the Oscars, talk usually surrounds the big surprises. What were the shockers? Personally, I totally thought <em>Transformers</em> would walk away with at least one Oscar for special effects or sound, and Marion Cotillard winning best actress came somewhat as a surprise. I mean, a French actress winning best actress for a foreign language film that practically NO ONE saw? </p>
<p>And Tilda Swinton? Really? Do cracked-out single mothers not mean anything to the Academy voters? Amy Ryan definitely should've won in that category. Other surprises -- who the hell let Gary Busey onto the red carpet? Did you see him lick Jennifer Garner's neck? Poor girl. Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/25/video-jimmy-kimmel-is-f-king-ben-affleck/">her husband was f**king Jimmy Kimmel</a> at the time and couldn't be there to rescue her. But anyway, last night's biggest upset? In your opinion, who was it? (And is it okay to say that my new crush is Marion Cotillard. Holy crap did she look fantastic!)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/25/monday-morning-poll-oscars-biggest-upset/#poll10366">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/25/monday-morning-poll-oscars-biggest-upset/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1123738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/25/monday-morning-poll-oscars-biggest-upset/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>academy awards' oscar upsets</category><category>AcademyAwards'OscarUpsets</category><category>cinematical</category><category>juno</category><category>marion cotillard</category><category>the bourne ultimatum</category><category>there will be blood</category><category>tilda swinton</category><category>transformers</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Tuesday Morning Poll: No Love for 'The Incredible Hulk?'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/19/tuesday-morning-poll-no-love-for-the-incredible-hulk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/19/tuesday-morning-poll-no-love-for-the-incredible-hulk/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/19/tuesday-morning-poll-no-love-for-the-incredible-hulk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><img width="433" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="306" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/02/hulk2-(2)-(2).jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>I'm still amazed that we've only seen two images from this summer's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-incredible-hulk/26921/main"><em>The Incredible Hulk</em></a> so far (<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/15/new-awesome-incredible-hulk-photos/">not counting toys</a>), considering the other big summer blockbuster flicks have already shelled out loads of images, trailers, behind-the-scenes featurettes -- what have you? At this point, we've seen more from the new <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/star-trek-2008/29301/main">Star Trek</a></em> film (which bows in May, 2009) than we have <em>The Incredible Hulk</em> (which comes out on June 13). And at the beginning of each week, I usually predict the <em>Hulk</em> trailer is only two or three days away -- but alas, it never comes. Could this be why fans are so hesitant to put <em>Hulk</em> on their must-watch list this summer?</p>
<p>We recently asked you which <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/12/discuss-which-2008-movies-are-you-excited-about/">films you were most anticipating in 2008</a>, and only a very small amount put <em>The Incredible Hulk</em> on their list. Furthermore, <a href="http://www.moviehole.net/news/20080219_special_feature_new_hulk_will.html">Moviehole</a> cites a recent Blockbuster poll (asking readers which summer film they were anticipating the most) which found the flick coming in dead last with 1% of the vote, behind S<em>peed Racer</em>. Yet, it's hard to imagine why folks would be so iffy on this new version of the Hulk when the cast absolutely rocks (c'mon -- Tim Roth is your friggin' villain!). So why isn't there more love? Is it because the Ang Lee version left a sour taste? Is it because the studio refuses to promote the film? Is it because there are that many better looking films to choose from? Let's try to figure this one out in the poll below -- and please answer honestly. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/19/tuesday-morning-poll-no-love-for-the-incredible-hulk/#poll9981">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/19/tuesday-morning-poll-no-love-for-the-incredible-hulk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1118653/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/19/tuesday-morning-poll-no-love-for-the-incredible-hulk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>speed racer</category><category>star trek</category><category>summer2008</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>tim roth</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Your Favorite 'Indiana Jones' Film?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/11/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/11/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-film/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/11/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-film/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/02/01/exclusive-photo-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/" target="_blank"><img height="301" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/02/indyjones1-(2).jpg" width="433" align="middle" vspace="4" border="1" /></a></p>
<p>Seeing as <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/07/confirmed-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/">we'll finally get to watch</a> the first <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main"><em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a> trailer later this week (it will officially air on <em>Good Morning America</em> this Thursday, then arrive online right afterwards on <a href="http://www.indianajones.com/site/index.html">IndianaJones.com</a>), I figured we'd take a look back in this week's Monday Morning Poll and attempt to find out which Indy flick the fans most enjoy. On paper, it seems the obvious choice is <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082971/">Raiders of the Lost Ark</a></em>, however throughout the years I've met folks who adore <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087469/">Temple of Doom</a></em> and some who thought the addition of Sean Connery rose <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097576/">The Last Crusade</a></em> up above the rest. I'll probably revisit this topic once <em>Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em> arrives in theaters (on May 22), but for now let's take a look at the Indy films already available to us.</p>
<p>It's hard not to absolutely love <em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em>. It's the original -- first time we met Indy -- and this adventure established all the themes and character traits we'd go on to see in the sequels. But then you get <em>Temple of Doom</em>; the odd one of the bunch. It's still Indy, he's still fighting with some gal, and it includes who is perhaps Indy's most beloved sidekick (Short Round), but it's really nothing like the other two films in the franchise. Some people like that about this film -- how it's different, unexpected. What about you? <em>The Last Crusade</em> brings us back to the type of Indiana Jones film we saw in <em>Raiders</em>, except the love angle isn't as strong. But there's no denying the superb buddy chemistry Ford and Connery displayed on screen as father and son. </p>
<p>So, as we await the trailer for what could be the last <em>Indiana Jones</em> adventure, I ask you: What's your favorite <em>Indiana Jones</em> film?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/11/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-film/#poll9337">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/11/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-film/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1111835/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/11/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-indiana-jones-film/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>harrison ford</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>raiders of the lost ark</category><category>sean connery</category><category>temple of doom</category><category>the last crusade</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Your Favorite Superbowl Trailer?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/04/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-superbowl-trailer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/04/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-superbowl-trailer/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/04/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-superbowl-trailer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><p><img height="255" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/02/ironman1-(2).jpg" width="433" align="middle" vspace="4" border="1" /></p>
<p>For those who don't know, I've lived in New York my entire life and have grown up in a family full of die hard Giants fans. So I think it's fair to say we all partied like it was 1990 last night. While I don't have a voice this morning, and didn't pay much attention to the commercials (too tough when your team is playing), I did catch most of the trailers. And, unlike previous years, there were quite a few previews to devour. From what I could tell, we saw commercials for <em><strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main">Iron Man</a></strong></em>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/wall-e/28116/main"><em><strong>Wall-E</strong></em>,</a> <strong><em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/wanted/28120/main">Wanted</a></em></strong>, <em><strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-chronicles-of-narnia-prince-caspian/24862/main">Prince Caspian</a></strong></em> and <em><strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/leatherheads/27495/main">Leatherheads</a></strong></em> (though I'm probably missing one or two smaller films as well). </p>
<p>Personally, I liked <em>Wall-E</em> and <em>Iron Man</em> the most, though part of me also enjoyed the <em>Wanted</em> trailer. That film looks flashy, and it's full of sexy Angelina Jolie poses, but it definitely has the eye candy factor -- and when we're talking big summer popcorn fluff, aren't we always looking for that eye candy factor? Unfortunately, we didn't get a trailer for <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main">Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</a></em>, which I'm sure is the one trailer everyone wanted to see the most. Word is that will be coming real soon, but it would've been a treat to be surprised with an Indy teaser at some point during the game. In your opinion, did they leave any trailers out? And out of the ones they did show, which was your favorite -- and/or which films shows the most promise?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/04/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-superbowl-trailer/#poll9075">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/04/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-superbowl-trailer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1105829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/04/monday-morning-poll-your-favorite-superbowl-trailer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>iron man</category><category>leatherheads</category><category>superbowl trailers</category><category>wall-e</category><category>wanted</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Do You Want More Rambo?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/monday-morning-poll-do-you-want-more-rambo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/monday-morning-poll-do-you-want-more-rambo/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/monday-morning-poll-do-you-want-more-rambo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/rambo121407.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Ah, now that Sundance is over (though our coverage will continue through the next day or so), I can finally get back to writing about things that <em>mean</em> something. Case in point: Harvey Weinstein is apparently so happy with the opening for <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/sylvester-stallone/112464/main">Sly Stallone's</a> latest <em><strong><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/rambo/29696/main">Rambo</a></strong></em> installment that he's considering doing another one. Even though <em>Rambo</em> failed to take the number one spot at the box office this weekend (<em>Meet the Spartans</em>? Really America?), that won't stop Weinstein from gushing over the future prospects of our old man in the jungle. <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wkd-box-office-slys-violent-rambo-cant-beat-300-spoof/"><em>Deadline Hollywood</em></a> tells us Harv feels <em>Rambo</em> will easily do $50 million domestic and about $100 to $150 million overseas. I don't know about you, but those made-up numbers certainly indicate a sequel is warranted.</p>
<p>Says Weinstein, "I like the idea of an older guy kicking ass. Maybe it's because I'm older, too." The big man also dished out a possible plot scenario should Rambo return once again to brutally mutilate tons of bad guys, noting that he'd be down with "bringing the character back to the United States." Yes, please -- and maybe this time it could be set in Central Park where Sly would face off against the <em>Cloverfield</em> monster. Now <em>that's</em> something I'd pay double to see. But what about you? Are you interested in seeing older guys kick ass on screen, or are you automatically attracted to much younger action heroes? And would you be interested in yet another installment in the <em>Rambo</em> franchise?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/monday-morning-poll-do-you-want-more-rambo/#poll8732">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/monday-morning-poll-do-you-want-more-rambo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1099248/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/monday-morning-poll-do-you-want-more-rambo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>cloverfield</category><category>harvey weinstein</category><category>rambo</category><category>sequel</category><category>sylvestor stallone</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: Golden Globes Non-Hangover</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/14/monday-morning-poll-golden-globes-non-hangover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/14/monday-morning-poll-golden-globes-non-hangover/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/14/monday-morning-poll-golden-globes-non-hangover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><p><img height="233" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/01/gg-(2).jpg" width="167" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Don't even get me started on last night's crapfest. I tuned in to NBC thinking they were going to air this so-called press conference, only to get an abbreviated <em>Access Hollywood</em> special that left out certain awards like best foreign language, best score and best song. And because I was still high on my Giants beating the Cowboys, I didn't realize NBC was on a delay, or that other channels had the press conference, etc ... It was awful. The entire thing was horrific. And then, to boot, the Hollywood Foreign Press clearly screwed over American filmmakers (moreso this year than in year's past), opting to shovel out several awards to individuals and films that were simply not the best of the year. <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/atonement/26636/main">Atonement</a></em> wins over <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/no-country-for-old-men/25145/main">No Country for Old Men</a></em> and <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/there-will-be-blood/25014/main">There Will be Blood</a></em>? <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/julian-schnabel/214355/main">Julian Schnabel</a> wins best director over the Coen Brothers and P.T. Anderson? <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/cate-blanchett/215038/main">Cate Blanchett</a> wins best supporting actress over <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/amy-ryan/264377/main">Amy Ryan</a>? </p>
<p>It's still too early to tell whether this whole debacle will hurt the Globes moving forward. And we still don't know whether something similar will happen with the Oscars (though I imagine the writers will have a much harder time f**king with Hollywood's grandest circle-jerk). The good news is that it's finally over. No more Golden Globe nonsense to deal with. But assuming you actually care about who wins and who doesn't, what was the biggest surprise/mistake of the evening in your mind?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/14/monday-morning-poll-golden-globes-non-hangover/#poll8261">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/14/monday-morning-poll-golden-globes-non-hangover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1086208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/14/monday-morning-poll-golden-globes-non-hangover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>2008 golden globe winners</category><category>2008GoldenGlobeWinners</category><category>amy ryan</category><category>atonement</category><category>cate blanchett</category><category>cinematical</category><category>julian schnabel</category><category>no country for old men</category><category>there will be blood</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Monday Morning Poll: What Makes a Film a Real "Indie" Film?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/07/monday-morning-poll-what-makes-a-film-a-real-indie-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/07/monday-morning-poll-what-makes-a-film-a-real-indie-film/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/07/monday-morning-poll-what-makes-a-film-a-real-indie-film/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-searchlight/" rel="tag">Fox Searchlight</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/polls/" rel="tag">Polls</a></p><img height="150" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/01/juno-cropped.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />I was having an interesting <strike>heated argument </strike>friendly little discussion over IM yesterday afternoon with one of my Cinematical colleagues about what exactly designates a film as an "indie" film. Does it have more to do with the money spent on making it, or the artistic style of the film? Is a film an indie film if it's financed by an indie arm of a studio, like <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/juno/24692/main"><em>Juno</em></a>? Or does it have to be financed by filmmakers on their credit cards, ala <a href="http://www.foureyedmonsters.com/"><em>Four Eyed Monsters</em></a>? What if it gets financed independently by a rich guy, like <em>Little Miss Sunshine</em>, and then bought by a studio for $10 million? And if an indie film gets bought by a studio and goes on to get Oscar nods, has it "sold out" like an indie band hitting the Top 40?<br /><br />As you might expect, it was <em>Juno</em> that started this whole discussion. To me, <em>Juno </em>is clearly an indie film: it was financed not by Fox, but by Fox Searchlight, which is a studio arm set up specifically to buy and create indie films. Artistically, it certainly feels "indie" to me, although crossover hits like <em>40 Year Old Virgin, Knocked Up</em>, and <em>Little Miss Sunshine</em> have helped to blur the line between indie comedy and mainstream. If Jason Reitman had gotten independent financing for it instead of getting it done through Searchlight, I don't think anyone would question its indie status. I understand, though why some folks feel a film like <em>Juno</em>, which had the benefit of backing by a studio to get it made, and a tremendous, well-executed marketing push, is straddling the indie line. <br /><br />Personally, I see <em>Juno</em> as nothing but great news for other indie films, and I think Fox was smart to recognize both the power and passion of indie filmmakers, and that they don't know how to make indie films themselves. Partnering with filmmakers like Jason Reitman, who have both a solid background and a good eye for what works, especially with indie comedy, allows Fox Searchlight to target the indie market with films that are likely to also appeal to a broader audience. They've found a niche that works, they're both making and acquiring good films, and if all that expands the audience for indie films in general, opens up the popcorn crowd to checking out more indie fare, and ultimately paves the way for more indie films to be funded that's a good thing.<br /><br />What makes a film an indie flim? Let us know what you think in the poll, and make your arguments in the comments. <br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/07/monday-morning-poll-what-makes-a-film-a-real-indie-film/#poll7852">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/07/monday-morning-poll-what-makes-a-film-a-real-indie-film/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1079261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/07/monday-morning-poll-what-makes-a-film-a-real-indie-film/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>diablo cody</category><category>four eyed monsters</category><category>FourEyedMonsters</category><category>indie film</category><category>IndieFilm</category><category>jason reitman</category><category>juno</category><dc:creator>Kim Voynar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>