<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>New to Me: Twilight Zone: The Movie</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/02/new-to-me-twilight-zone-the-movie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/02/new-to-me-twilight-zone-the-movie/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/02/new-to-me-twilight-zone-the-movie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/12/cine-twilight-zone.jpg" alt="" />I'd seen enough episodes of "The Twilight Zone" as a kid to get the gist of it - bite-sized morality tales that always came with a twist and often gave me the willies. However, I hadn't caught up with 1983's <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/twilight-zone-the-movie/34798/main"><em>Twilight Zone: The Movie</em></a></em> until just last night.<br />
<br />
Now, I was looking for pictures to go along with my reaction when it became apparent that our own Eric D. Snider had <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/17/retro-cinema-twilight-zone-the-movie/">already written</a> about the movie at length two years back. Never content with just keeping my thoughts to myself, I've decided to instead streamline them into a nice, no-nonsense list of bullet points past the jump...<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/02/new-to-me-twilight-zone-the-movie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New to Me: Twilight Zone: The Movie</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/02/new-to-me-twilight-zone-the-movie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19261089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/02/new-to-me-twilight-zone-the-movie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>george miller</category><category>GeorgeMiller</category><category>joe dante</category><category>JoeDante</category><category>john landis</category><category>john lithgow</category><category>JohnLandis</category><category>JohnLithgow</category><category>kathleen quinlan</category><category>KathleenQuinlan</category><category>new to me</category><category>NewToMe</category><category>scatman crothers</category><category>ScatmanCrothers</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><category>the twilight zone</category><category>TheTwilightZone</category><category>twilight zone</category><category>twilight zone the movie</category><category>TwilightZone</category><category>TwilightZoneTheMovie</category><category>vic morrow</category><category>VicMorrow</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Does 'Paranormal Activity' Deserve a Best Picture Nomination?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/01/does-paranormal-activity-deserve-a-best-picture-nomination/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/01/does-paranormal-activity-deserve-a-best-picture-nomination/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/01/does-paranormal-activity-deserve-a-best-picture-nomination/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" height="301" border="1" align="middle" width="450" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/12/paranormalactivity-(2)-1256395141.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.ifc.com/blogs/indie-eye/2009/12/spirit-award-nominees.php">Indie Spirit Awards</a> announced their nominations this morning, honoring a whole bunch of films that were only seen by film critics, artsy intellectuals and/or people who accidentally walked into the wrong theater while on their way to watch <em>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.</em> I kid, of course, because if it wasn't for shows like the Spirit Awards, a number of really great independent films (and performances) would probably go unnoticed. So I command you to check out the list of nominees after the jump and start tracking them down one by one (either in theaters or on DVD). Go! Now!<br />
<br />
This year's crop of nominees is definitely stirring the pot a little bit. Surprises include Maria Bello for Best Female Lead in <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/21/sundance-review-downloading-nancy/">Downloading Nancy</a>,</em> a film that all of about one person (me!) actually enjoyed. <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/500-days-of-summer/33968/main?icid=movsmartsearch">500 Days of Summer</a> </em>also took home a couple nods for Best Feature and Best Male Lead (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), and even the viciously panned <em>Gentlemen Broncos</em> walked away with a nod for Best Supporting Male (Jermaine Clement). One of the more interesting (and talked-about) nominations went to <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/paranormal-activity/33046/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Paranormal Activity</em></a> in the Best First Feature category, alongside other notable indies like <em>A Single Man, Crazy Heart, Easier with Practic</em>e and <em>The Messenger.</em> <br />
<br />
But does <em>Paranormal Activity </em>really belong there, or is it being honored more because of what it achieved at the box office versus how good it actually is? I've seen some already poking fun at the nomination on Twitter, as if it doesn't deserve to shine the shoes of the other films listed alongside it. But is that just because it doesn't fit the 'Best Picture" mold? Is it because it's become a "fanboy" film?<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/01/does-paranormal-activity-deserve-a-best-picture-nomination/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does 'Paranormal Activity' Deserve a Best Picture Nomination?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/01/does-paranormal-activity-deserve-a-best-picture-nomination/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19260088/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/12/01/does-paranormal-activity-deserve-a-best-picture-nomination/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>indie spirit awards</category><category>IndieSpiritAwards</category><category>paranormal activity</category><category>ParanormalActivity</category><category>TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Scenes We Love: L.A. Confidential (Again!)</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/28/scenes-we-love-l-a-confidential-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/28/scenes-we-love-l-a-confidential-again/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/28/scenes-we-love-l-a-confidential-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/noir/" rel="tag">Noir</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scenes-we-love/" rel="tag">Scenes We Love</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/pearsespacey.jpg" /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><br />
It's the most wonderful time of the year! The time of year when I watch <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/l-a-confidential/4759/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>L.A. Confidential</em></a> a dozen times because "It's Christmassy!", complain that it didn't win Best Picture, and fall in love with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/russell-crowe/1503048/main">Russell Crowe</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/guy-pearce/1946462/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Guy Pearce</a> all over again. It's not as if I don't watch this at any other time of the year, but this film is like my holiday heroin. It's the perfect antidote to the holly and the ivy. Yeah, I posted a scene from it <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/04/scenes-we-love-l-a-confidential/">earlier this year</a>, but as its been taken down by YouTube, I figured I'd post another in honor of the upcoming holidays. There's not a lot of scenes available (my favorite Rollo Tomasi moment still eludes me), but luckily one of the reader favorites was up for grabs.  So, today's Scene We Love is indeed a scene we all love: "She <em>is</em> Lana Turner." <br />
<br />
It's also good timing, as this week we finally get to see a glimpse of Pearce in <em>The Road</em>. It's another one of those maddening cameos he likes to tease us with (no spoiler intended, it's just a fact), and I constantly wish he'd take bigger and more high profile roles. A <em>Bedtime Stories</em> is all well and good, and I have great hopes for <em>Don't Be Afraid of the Dark</em>, but I long for him to land another role like Lt. Ed Exley. <br />
<em><br />
Go below the jump for the scene</em></div><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/28/scenes-we-love-l-a-confidential-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Scenes We Love: L.A. Confidential (Again!)</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/28/scenes-we-love-l-a-confidential-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19252193/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/28/scenes-we-love-l-a-confidential-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>guy pearce</category><category>GuyPearce</category><category>Kevin Spacey</category><category>KevinSpacey</category><category>l.a. confidential</category><category>L.a.Confidential</category><category>Russell Crowe</category><category>RussellCrowe</category><category>Scenes We Love</category><category>ScenesWeLove</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Tommy Lee Jones Ditches Matthew McConaughey's 'Lincoln'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/24/tommy-lee-jones-ditches-matthew-mcconaugheys-lincoln/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/24/tommy-lee-jones-ditches-matthew-mcconaugheys-lincoln/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/24/tommy-lee-jones-ditches-matthew-mcconaugheys-lincoln/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/tommy-lee-jones-academy-award-oscar-nominee-best-actor-2008.jpg" alt="" />A mere month ago, it seemed like Michael Connelly's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-lincoln-lawyer/50214/main"><em>The Lincoln Lawyer</em></a> was set for a top notch adaptation thanks to the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/14/tommy-lee-jones-the-lincoln-lawyer/">arrival of Tommy Lee Jones</a>. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tommy-lee-jones/1804405/main">Jones</a> was interested in directing and costarring in the film, which gave us all hope that he could help makeover <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/matthew-mcconaughey/1937316/main">Matthew McConaughey </a>into something serious and shirt wearing. But alas, it's not to be. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118011757.html?categoryid=1236&amp;cs=1"><em>Variety</em></a> reports that Jones has departed <em>The Lincoln Lawyer</em>, leaving it idling and spitting fumes.<br />
<em><br />
</em>Jones departed for that vague and all-encompassing reason "creative differences." <em>Variety</em> reports that he had issues with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/john-romano/2000217/main">John Romano's</a> script, and neither Jones nor Lakeshore Entertainment were willing to budge. The studio is currently on the hunt for a new director, and hopes to be shooting by spring.<br />
<br />
So, feel free to speculate on just what script issues there might have been. I know we have some Connelly fans who were looking forward to this, and who know more about the book than I do. Given that it <em>is</em> a star vehicle for McConaughey, and the character is a bit of a legal freewheeler, I wonder if the script is more of a comedic departure from the book. We've cracked a lot of jokes about bongo drums and shirtlessness, but could that actually have been what Jones departed over? It's sleazy and easy to jump to that conclusion, and I can't really believe a Connelly book could be adapted into <em>Fool's Gold</em>. But this is Hollywood. Stranger things have happened.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/24/tommy-lee-jones-ditches-matthew-mcconaugheys-lincoln/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19251985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/24/tommy-lee-jones-ditches-matthew-mcconaugheys-lincoln/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>John Romano</category><category>JohnRomano</category><category>Lakeshore Entertainment</category><category>LakeshoreEntertainment</category><category>Matthew McConaughey</category><category>MatthewMcconaughey</category><category>Michael Connelly</category><category>MichaelConnelly</category><category>The Lincoln Lawyer</category><category>TheLincolnLawyer</category><category>Tommy Lee Jones</category><category>TommyLeeJones</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Who Will Be The Crow?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/the-crow-remake-casting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/the-crow-remake-casting/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/the-crow-remake-casting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="The Crow" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/thecrow.jpg" />Oh, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-crow/8970/main"><em>The Crow!</em></a> I loved you so! I had the poster, the comic book by James O'Barr, the T-shirt, and the unrequited crush on Brandon Lee, whose tragic death only fanned the flames of my teenage desire. I even went to see the sequel, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-crow-city-of-angels/2459/main"><em>The Crow: City of Angels,</em></a> which featured the spectacularly bad line, "F*ck you, bird d*ck!" uttered by none other than Iggy Pop. (I did, however, forget to light a candle for <a href="http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/10/26/the-crow-15-years-of-devils-night/">its 15th anniversary</a> earlier this fall. Sniff.)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/the-crow-remake-prepares-to-take-flight/">As previously reported,</a> there is a relaunch being written by Stephen Norrington, who will also direct, that might not even include Eric Draven, the main character (<em>sacre bleu!</em>). The last time that Norrington took a crack at directing a beloved comic book was the 2003 stinker <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-league-of-extraordinary-gentlemen/14631/main"><em>The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen,</em></a> but as <a href="http://io9.com/5387392/crow-revamp-takes-off-with-positive-script-reviews">io9.com</a> reported, so far the script is getting good reviews. Meredith Woerner at <a href="http://io9.com/5410643/the-crow-relaunch-moves-forward-with-casting">io9.com</a> coaxed some details from producer Ryan Kavanaugh (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/nine/29835/main"><em>Nine,</em></a> <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/brothers/31198/main"><em>Brothers,</em></a> <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/zombieland/35587/main"><em>Zombieland</em></a>), and while he wouldn't reveal which actor is going to be smearing himself with makeup to wreak vengeance on those who violated and murdered his beloved, he did say it will be "a whole relaunch of the franchise, much more of a dark superhero type" and starring an already-established actor.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/the-crow-remake-casting/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who Will Be The Crow?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/the-crow-remake-casting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19251256/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/the-crow-remake-casting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>brandon lee</category><category>BrandonLee</category><category>casting</category><category>james obarr</category><category>JamesObarr</category><category>rumors</category><category>Ryan Kavanaugh</category><category>RyanKavanaugh</category><category>stephen norrington</category><category>StephenNorrington</category><category>the crow</category><category>TheCrow</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Michael Fassbender Goes From One Bronte To the Next</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/michael-fassbender-goes-from-one-bronte-to-the-next/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/michael-fassbender-goes-from-one-bronte-to-the-next/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/michael-fassbender-goes-from-one-bronte-to-the-next/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/focus-features/" rel="tag">Focus Features</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/michael-fassbender.jpg" />The Brontes are all the rage for adaptation right now. It's undoubtedly due to Edward and Bella bestowing their favor on <em>Wuthering Heights</em>, and had they chosen <em>Great Expectations</em>, perhaps we'd see Dickens adaptations flinging themselves to the big screen. I love corsets and cravats, so I'm not going to complain, and I'm certainly not going to whine if <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/cary-joji-fukunaga/2239447/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Cary Fukunaga</a> gets <em>this</em> cast for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/jane-eyre/33970/main"><em>Jane Eyre</em></a>. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118011645.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1"><em>Variety</em></a> is reporting that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/michael-fassbender/2143301/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Michael Fassbender</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/mia-wasikowska/458244/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Mia Wasikowska </a>are in talks to play Jane and Rochester for Fukunaga, and oh, how torrid it would be!<br />
<br />
This is actually the second time Fassbender has circled a Bronte adaptation. Last May, he was said to be <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/12/natalie-portman-ditches-wuthering-heights/">in talks for <em>Wuthering Heights</em>,</a> but Ed Westwick stepped into that particular waistcoat. It's a shame. I think Fassbender would have made an excellent Heathcliff, and may have been the first one to actually snarl, bang his head against a tree, and slap people convincingly. But he will make a very simmering Rochester, and is the only actor who could top <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/toby-stephens/1962145/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Toby Stephens'</a> wonderful turn in 2006.<br />
<br />
Wasikowska is still a bit of a dark horse. She's becoming one of those much-discussed names, but most of us have yet to really meet her until Tim Burton's <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> hits theaters. She's very pretty, but is just "ordinary" (if that doesn't sound too terrible) enough to fit the part of plain Jane, and as an Aussie, she'll be able to turn on an English accent better than Ellen Page. If this is the <em>Jane Eyre</em> that makes it to the screen, I'll be happy. Let the eerie screams, mysterious fires, and lingering looks commence.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/michael-fassbender-goes-from-one-bronte-to-the-next/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19247693/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/michael-fassbender-goes-from-one-bronte-to-the-next/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cary fukunaga</category><category>CaryFukunaga</category><category>Charlotte Bronte</category><category>CharlotteBronte</category><category>Focus Features</category><category>FocusFeatures</category><category>Jane Eyre</category><category>JaneEyre</category><category>mia wasikowska</category><category>MiaWasikowska</category><category>Michael Fassbender</category><category>MichaelFassbender</category><category>Moira Buffini</category><category>MoiraBuffini</category><category>Ruby Films</category><category>RubyFilms</category><category>Toby Stephens</category><category>TobyStephens</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Scenes We Love: Miller's Crossing</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/scenes-we-love-millers-crossing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/scenes-we-love-millers-crossing/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/scenes-we-love-millers-crossing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/noir/" rel="tag">Noir</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scenes-we-love/" rel="tag">Scenes We Love</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/miller9.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><br />
In the Great Coen Debates that occur among film fans, there's one that I never feel gets enough love: <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/millers-crossing/3574/main">Miller's Crossing.</a> </em> It's probably my favorite next to <em>The Big Lebowski</em>. The film is deliciously dark and dreary (you can watch this in summer and still feel cold), but punctuated by that startling Coens humor. The dialogue and character quirks are not as exaggerated as they are in other Coen films, and when a character does get theatrical, it's appropriate to the setting. These are thugs who find themselves in positions of great wealth and power, after all, and they'll never know quite how to behave in the real world. <br />
<br />
The film has a level of tension I don't think the Coens matched until <em>No Country For Old Men. </em>Tom's white-knuckle walk into Miller's Crossing is probably my favorite scene (actually, it's difficult to pick just one), but it doesn't appear to be on YouTube. So, here's another moment of violence that just doesn't go the way you think it will, and features the best use of <em>Danny Boy </em>in history. I really want to believe that the gramophone is a nod to Sean Connery's death scene in <em>The Untouchables</em>, but I suspect it's a noir standard that ushered many a mobster and cop into his grave.<br />
</div><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/scenes-we-love-millers-crossing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Scenes We Love: Miller's Crossing</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/scenes-we-love-millers-crossing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19226130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/scenes-we-love-millers-crossing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Ethan Coen</category><category>EthanCoen</category><category>Joel Coen</category><category>JoelCoen</category><category>Millers Crossing</category><category>MillersCrossing</category><category>Scenes We Love</category><category>ScenesWeLove</category><category>the coen brothers</category><category>TheCoenBrothers</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Review: The Box</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/review-the-box/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/review-the-box/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/review-the-box/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/theatrical-reviews/" rel="tag">Theatrical Reviews</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/cine-box-review.jpg" /><br />
<br />
Richard Matheson's original short story, "Button, Button," was a nifty little morality tale about a couple faced with a peculiar opportunity -- if they push a button in a box, they'll get a sum of money but kill a stranger in doing so. That version of the story ended with the wife pushing the button and killing her husband, a man she didn't really know. As an episode of<span style="font-style: italic;"> </span>"The Twilight Zone" in 1986, the story ended with the couple paid off and assured that the device would then go to another couple to whom they qualify as strangers. Now, Richard Kelly's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-box/30572/main"><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Box</span></span></a> takes that same basic premise and spins it into a mind-bender of the most baffling degree, starting out as another "Twilight Zone"-worthy variant but eventually reaching the outer limits of both patience and reason.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/review-the-box/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Review: The Box</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/review-the-box/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19225958/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/review-the-box/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>button button</category><category>ButtonButton</category><category>cameron diaz</category><category>CameronDiaz</category><category>frank langella</category><category>FrankLangella</category><category>james marsden</category><category>JamesMarsden</category><category>richard kelly</category><category>richard matheson</category><category>RichardKelly</category><category>RichardMatheson</category><category>the box</category><category>the twilight zone</category><category>TheBox</category><category>TheTwilightZone</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Discuss: Which Trailers Are You Sick Of?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/discuss-which-trailers-are-you-sick-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/discuss-which-trailers-are-you-sick-of/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/discuss-which-trailers-are-you-sick-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/focus-features/" rel="tag">Focus Features</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-clooney/" rel="tag">George Clooney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/cine-goats-trailer.jpg" />I'm grateful for this Friday, because that's the day that <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/29/fantastic-fest-review-the-men-who-stare-at-goats/">The Men Who Stare at Goats</a></em> comes out and I can stop seeing <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/themenwhostareatgoats/">its trailer</a> relentlessly attached to anything and everything I see (and given that I try to see most anything and everything out there, it's really only a 'me' problem, I suppose). One night, I had myself a triple feature and saw the preview not one, not two, but three times; as a pal put it, he had "more than a feeling" that I was getting sick of it.<br />
<br />
Before that, it was a summer of <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/focus_features/takingwoodstock/"><em>Taking Woodstock</em></a> time and time again, and it would already seem that <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/shutterisland/"><em>Shutter Island</em></a>'s move to February will insure that I'll be sitting there, trying to piece the thing together for the next three months when not perfecting my New England Leo impersonation.<br />
<br />
So, whether currently or in your own formative years, what trailers have you been just absolutely burnt out on? Did you and your friends quote along with them as they played? Were you actually ever turned off from seeing a film because you had it advertised to you too much? Come on, let it all out...<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/discuss-which-trailers-are-you-sick-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19221085/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/discuss-which-trailers-are-you-sick-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>ang lee</category><category>AngLee</category><category>demetri martin</category><category>DemetriMartin</category><category>ewan mcgregor</category><category>EwanMcgregor</category><category>featured</category><category>george clooney</category><category>GeorgeClooney</category><category>leonardo dicaprio</category><category>LeonardoDicaprio</category><category>martin scorsese</category><category>MartinScorsese</category><category>shutter island</category><category>ShutterIsland</category><category>taking woodstock</category><category>TakingWoodstock</category><category>the men who stare at goats</category><category>TheMenWhoStareAtGoats</category><category>trailers</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Moon' and 'Fish Tank' Lead BIFA Nods</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/ifc/" rel="tag">IFC</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony-classics/" rel="tag">Sony Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fantastic-fest/" rel="tag">Fantastic Fest</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/cine-bifa-nods.jpg" />Fall brings with it awards season, and among our first round of nominations are those of the British Independent Film Awards. According to <a href="http://www.empireonline.com/news/feed.asp?NID=26141">Empire</a>, Andrea Arnold's acclaimed <em>Fish Tank</em> took the lead with eight, while Duncan Jones' similarly lauded <em>Moon</em> came up with seven, including one for lead actor Sam Rockwell.<br />
<br />
I'm personally happy to see the savage political satire <em>In the Loop</em> getting due notice, especially its expletive-laden screenplay, since it'll likely go overlooked when it comes to Yank laurels (sad but true, although I'll be happy if it's not). Meanwhile, the multiple nods for <em>An Education</em> and <em>Bright Star</em> only parallel their warm reception Stateside and their likely contention in next year's Oscar race.<br />
<br />
And after being quietly <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/05/fantastic-fest-review-down-terrace">blown away</a> by it at Fantastic Fest a few weeks back, I'm also glad to see <em>Down Terrace</em> get some love under the Raindance Award category. Enough of these awards, and maybe that puppy'll earn some distribution in our neck of the woods. (You listening, IFC?)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19212441/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>abbie cornish</category><category>AbbieCornish</category><category>an education</category><category>andrea arnold</category><category>AndreaArnold</category><category>AnEducation</category><category>armando iannucci</category><category>ArmandoIannucci</category><category>bright star</category><category>BrightStar</category><category>carey mulligan</category><category>CareyMulligan</category><category>down terrace</category><category>DownTerrace</category><category>duncan jones</category><category>DuncanJones</category><category>fish tank</category><category>FishTank</category><category>in the loop</category><category>InTheLoop</category><category>michael fassbender</category><category>MichaelFassbender</category><category>moon</category><category>nick hornby</category><category>NickHornby</category><category>peter capaldi</category><category>PeterCapaldi</category><category>sam rockwell</category><category>SamRockwell</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>So Here's That 'Paranormal Activity' Ending You Didn't See</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/so-heres-that-paranormal-activity-ending-you-didnt-see/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/so-heres-that-paranormal-activity-ending-you-didnt-see/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/so-heres-that-paranormal-activity-ending-you-didnt-see/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/paranormalactivity-(2).jpg" alt="" /></div>
<br />
I know, you might be bordering on a <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/paranormal-activity/33046/main"><strong><em>Paranormal Activity</em></strong></a> overdose at this point. It's been slowly rolling out for weeks, every person in America is talking about it, and it so totally scared your best friend, but certainly not <em>you</em>. Well, as you likely know, what is currently playing in theaters is not the original ending to Oren Peli's haunted house triumph. In fact, the new theatrical cut features an ending suggested by Steven Spielberg.<br />
<br />
The original ending, as <a href="http://www.horrorsquad.com/2009/10/11/so-what-was-paranormal-activitys-original-ending/">detailed here</a> by our own William Goss, hasn't played in theaters for over a year and a half, but now that the film is king of the demonic world, someone has provided the service of actually putting the alternate ending online. This is actually just one of several endings, as explained in our <a href="http://www.horrorsquad.com/2009/10/09/a-brief-chat-with-oren-peli-writer-director-of-paranormal-acti/">interview with the director</a>, but until the far-off DVD of the film is released, this is the only way you're going to see it. And I kind of have a feeling that may not be the case for long, so catch it while you can over <a href="http://www.horrorsquad.com/2009/10/28/watch-this-paranormal-activitys-original-ending/">at <strong>Horror Squad</strong></a>!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/so-heres-that-paranormal-activity-ending-you-didnt-see/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19213287/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/so-heres-that-paranormal-activity-ending-you-didnt-see/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Oren Peli</category><category>OrenPeli</category><category>Paranormal Activity</category><category>Paranormal Activity Original Ending</category><category>ParanormalActivity</category><category>ParanormalActivityOriginalEnding</category><dc:creator>Peter Hall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>"Matt Damon!" New Trailers for 'Invictus' and 'Green Zone'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/universal/" rel="tag">Universal</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/cine-damon-invictus.jpg" />August gave us the voice of Matt Damon in <em>Ponyo</em>, September gave us the inner voice of Matt Damon in <em>The Informant!</em>, and now October has brought us a look at his next two performances.<br />
<br />
Clint Eastwood's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/invictus/30532/main"><em>Invictus</em></a> is one of the last big likely contenders of the awards season, though it is as of yet unseen (unless those very few who have seen it are very good at being very quiet). Damon plays real-life rugby captain Francois Pienaar, whose team saw the support of Nelson Mandela (Morgan Freeman) as a rallying point around which they might lift the spirits of South Africa in the wake of apartheid. It's political! It's underdog! It's opening in December! It's Oscar bait for certain, and <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/invictus/">Apple</a> has the exclusive trailer.<br />
<br />
Paul Greengrass' <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/green-zone/30373/main"><em>Green Zone</em></a>, on the other hand, was shuffled out of the Oscar race once Universal decided to <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/29/release-date-shuffle-wolf-man-and-matt-damon-banished-to-2010/">sort out its slate</a> after a lackluster summer at the box office, and that may have been a wise move. <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/premieres/16313721/standardformat/">Yahoo</a>'s trailer (which is also embedded below) comes across as more of a straight-up actioner than a ready-made contender, with Damon back in <em>Bourne</em> mode as a betrayed soldier on the hunt first for WMDs, and then for answers. Based on the best-seller <em>Imperial Life in the Emerald City</em>, it opens on March 12, 2010.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>"Matt Damon!" New Trailers for 'Invictus' and 'Green Zone'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19212448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>amy ryan</category><category>AmyRyan</category><category>Apartheid</category><category>clint eastwood</category><category>ClintEastwood</category><category>green zone</category><category>GreenZone</category><category>greg kinnear</category><category>GregKinnear</category><category>invictus</category><category>matt damon</category><category>MattDamon</category><category>Morgan Freeman</category><category>MorganFreeman</category><category>Paul Greengrass</category><category>PaulGreengrass</category><category>rugby</category><category>RugbyWorldCup</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Seven: Best Villain-Hero Romances</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/cinematical-seven-best-villain-hero-romances/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/cinematical-seven-best-villain-hero-romances/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/cinematical-seven-best-villain-hero-romances/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/gay-and-lesbian/" rel="tag">Gay &amp; Lesbian</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/noir/" rel="tag">Noir</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cinematical-seven/" rel="tag">Cinematical Seven</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/catwoman.jpg" /></div>
<br />
We love it when our heroes fall for the suspicious types: the wolves in sheep's clothing, the dangerous femme fatales. It happens often in film noir and a heckuva lot in comics, and provides some of the best last-act twists and turns as our hearts palpitate along with those of our protagonists... up until the bitter end. Can't that evil love interest turn out to have a heart of gold, so we can all have a happily ever after? Sometimes, yes. Most of the time, no. <br />
<br />
What is it about these doomed romances that we love so much? Perhaps it's the futility of it all; you can't have your cake and eat it when you're a superhero or a (wo)man on a mission to right wrongs, even if you'd rather be kissing that beguiling bad guy than fighting them, arresting them, or foiling their evil plans. Turning down a chance at love is the ultimate sacrifice for a hero or heroine to make -- it proves their commitment to the side of good. Hence, loving a villain makes a hero even more heroic. How tragic!<br />
<br />
In what will surely spur controversy, I've whittled my favorite villain-hero romances down to the seven best pairings in cinema. No, <em>Phantom of the Opera</em> didn't make it. That would have been too easy. Instead, find odd couples, would-be perfect pairs, star-crossed lovers, and yes, the world's most legendary bromance after the jump.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/cinematical-seven-best-villain-hero-romances/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cinematical Seven: Best Villain-Hero Romances</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/cinematical-seven-best-villain-hero-romances/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19208996/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/cinematical-seven-best-villain-hero-romances/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Basic Instinct</category><category>BasicInstinct</category><category>Batman</category><category>Batman Returns</category><category>BatmanReturns</category><category>bromance</category><category>Catwoman</category><category>D.E.B.S.</category><category>heroes</category><category>indiana jones and the last crusade</category><category>Kill Bill</category><category>KillBill</category><category>maltese falcon</category><category>MalteseFalcon</category><category>Point Break</category><category>PointBreak</category><category>romance</category><category>Villain-Hero Romance</category><category>Villain-heroRomance</category><category>villains</category><category>villains09</category><dc:creator>Jen Yamato</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Poster Premiere: Ed Wood Meets 007 in 'Modus Operandi'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/poster-premiere-ed-wood-meets-007-in-modus-operandi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/poster-premiere-ed-wood-meets-007-in-modus-operandi/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/poster-premiere-ed-wood-meets-007-in-modus-operandi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/noir/" rel="tag">Noir</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/mopic2.jpg" />I'll give you a few details and some material from the press release right here ... but I've made an executive decision to place the brand-new poster for Frankie Latina's<em><strong> Modus Operandi </strong></em>beneath the jump -- but only because it's slightly "adult" in nature. Anyway, this flick sounds like a weird one, and of course I mean that in the nicest way possible.<br />
<br />
Described by the Las Vegas Weekly as "<em>a James Bond film directed by Ed Wood</em>," the 8mm <em>Modus Operandi</em> is about ... heck, I'll let the press notes tell you: "Two briefcases with mysterious contents are stolen from top Presidential candidate Squire Parks, setting off a deadly series of double-crosses and betrayals. Desperate warring factions of subterranean organizations will stop at nothing to gain possession of the sensitive material. A covert branch of the CIA calls on notorious black ops agent Stanley Cashay, who has been barely existing in a semi-comatose twilight since the murder of his wife. Cashay is offered the identity of his wife's killer in exchange for locating and returning the cases." And it gets even crazier after that! (More post-jump.)<br />
<br />
What has me intrigued is the responses from folks like Eric Kohn at <a href="http://www.indiewire.com">IndieWire</a> ("<em>A mondo B-movie that holds nothing back ... Modus Operandi is a movie utterly content with its own insanity</em>.") and Stephen Zeitchik of <a href="http://www.thehollywoodreporter.com">The Hollywood Reporter</a> ("<em>It bursts with campiness and odes to '70s movie outrageousness</em>.") Sounds right up my alley.<br />
<br />
Check post-jump for the poster premiere and more of that rather amusing plot synopsis...<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/poster-premiere-ed-wood-meets-007-in-modus-operandi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Poster Premiere: Ed Wood Meets 007 in 'Modus Operandi'?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/poster-premiere-ed-wood-meets-007-in-modus-operandi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19209382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/poster-premiere-ed-wood-meets-007-in-modus-operandi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>afi fest</category><category>AfiFest</category><category>danny trejo</category><category>DannyTrejo</category><category>frankie latina</category><category>FrankieLatina</category><category>mark borchardt</category><category>MarkBorchardt</category><category>modus operandi</category><category>ModusOperandi</category><dc:creator>Scott Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Exclusive: 'Sherlock Holmes' Poster Premiere!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/exclusive-sherlock-holmes-poster-premiere/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/exclusive-sherlock-holmes-poster-premiere/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/exclusive-sherlock-holmes-poster-premiere/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/posters/" rel="tag">Posters</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/dom_sherlock-(3).jpg" alt="" /><br />
<strong>Click image below to view full poster</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Cinematical</em> has just received this exclusive new poster for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/sherlock-holmes/35683/main"><strong><em>Sherlock Holmes</em></strong></a>, due in theaters on Christmas Day. No more reserved stuffiness for this detective -- there's not a magnifying glass and classic hat in sight! Talk about a poster that boils the feel of a film down to one snazzy collection of images. Color us not surprised -- <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/robert-downey-jr/1789971/main">Robert Downey Jr.'s</a> confident smirk alone is enough to tantalize, but there's also <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jude-law/1435488/main">Jude Law</a> with the campy and inquisitive Watson brow and a background of images ranging from a bottle of poison (cyanide, not any sort of booze) to faded glimpses of Rachel McAdams and Mark Strong. As the trailer and now this poster attest, Downey Jr. and Law are itching for roguish fun of a whole new flavor.<br />
<br />
Set in 1891, Guy Ritchie's take on the famous detective finds Holmes and Watson battling an evil cult leader named Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong), whose devilish schemes could give the crime-fighting duo their toughest challenge yet. "Revealing fighting skills as lethal as his legendary intellect, Holmes will battle as never before to bring down a new nemesis and unravel a deadly plot that could destroy the country" (read the full synopsis after the jump). Of course, with a depravity that knows no bounds as he brawls and flirts his way to the truth.<br />
<br />
Sounds like the perfect roguish antidote to sappy holiday fare, doesn't it? Click on the image below to view the full poster.<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/sherlock-holmes-poster/">'Sherlock Holmes' Poster</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/sherlock-holmes-poster/2394926/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/dom_sherlock-(4)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/exclusive-sherlock-holmes-poster-premiere/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Exclusive: 'Sherlock Holmes' Poster Premiere!</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/exclusive-sherlock-holmes-poster-premiere/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19209545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/26/exclusive-sherlock-holmes-poster-premiere/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>Jude Law</category><category>JudeLaw</category><category>Robert Downey Jr.</category><category>RobertDowneyJr.</category><category>Sherlock Holmes</category><category>SherlockHolmes</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Tobey Maguire and Leonardo DiCaprio Remaking 'The Third Man'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/24/tobey-maguire-and-leonardo-dicaprio-remaking-the-third-man/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/24/tobey-maguire-and-leonardo-dicaprio-remaking-the-third-man/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/24/tobey-maguire-and-leonardo-dicaprio-remaking-the-third-man/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/noir/" rel="tag">Noir</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/harry-lime.jpg" />An intriguing remake rumor has popped up on <a href="http://chud.com/articles/articles/21274/1/IS-LEONARDO-DICAPRIO-THE-THIRD-MAN/Page1.html">CHUD</a>. Devin Faraci is reporting that longtime friends <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tobey-maguire/1937226/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Tobey Maguire</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/leonardo-dicaprio/1290208/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Leonardo DiCaprio</a> might star in a remake of Carol Reed's classic thriller <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-third-man/4656/main">The Third Man</a>. </em> Canal Plus is said to be shopping around the project, which includes a screenplay penned by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1140275/">Steven Knight. </a><br />
<br />
The details are scarce (and it may not happen at all), so it's not known whether this would be a straight up-remake or a rewrite, or who Maguire or DiCaprio would be playing. But the idea is enough to undoubtedly cause reactions of anger and panic around film fans, but think about this calmly. It's not as though Maguire, DiCaprio, or Knight are untalented slouches, and it's the kind of story that <em>could </em>be given a modern rewrite and stand on its own feet. I would actually love to see this rewritten, and set in Iraq or Afghanistan. I'd love to see it set it in years immediately preceding the Soviet Union, putting Harry Lime and Holly Martins in the dangerous, free-for-all Yeltsin economy. (Faraci suggests making it sci-fi, which would be very brave and very awesome.)<br />
<br />
<em>The Third Man</em> is one of those stories like Dashiell Hammet's <em>Red Harves</em>t that is flexible enough to work in another adaptation and lose nothing of its original power. I'm very curious to see if this comes together, and in what form. DiCaprio would be the perfect actor to play the smirking Lime. I just hope they don't mimic <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/17/scenes-we-love-the-third-man/">my favorite scene</a>. Some things are better left to Welles.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/24/tobey-maguire-and-leonardo-dicaprio-remaking-the-third-man/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19208070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/24/tobey-maguire-and-leonardo-dicaprio-remaking-the-third-man/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Canal Plus</category><category>CanalPlus</category><category>leonardo dicaprio</category><category>LeonardoDicaprio</category><category>Steven Knight</category><category>StevenKnight</category><category>The Third Man</category><category>The Third Man remake</category><category>TheThirdMan</category><category>TheThirdManRemake</category><category>tobey maguire</category><category>TobeyMaguire</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Jane Eyre' Loses Ellen Page, But Has A New Director</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/jane-eyre-loses-ellen-page-but-has-a-new-director/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/jane-eyre-loses-ellen-page-but-has-a-new-director/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/jane-eyre-loses-ellen-page-but-has-a-new-director/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/20090323_cary_250x375.jpg" alt="" />Bronte and Austen movie adaptations are cyclical things. Every young actress seems to get her shot at playing Elizabeth Bennet, Emma Woodhouse, Jane Eyre, or Catherine Earnshaw. Five years later, they're now Mature Actresses, and watching the next crop come through the English classics. Right now, we're on the Brontes (spurred undoubtedly by Bella and Edward) and Ruby Films' adaptation of<em> Jane Eyre</em> spurred a lot of talk when <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/07/discuss-can-you-see-ellen-page-as-jane-eyre/">it hooked Ellen Page</a> as its poor and plain heroine. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010174.html?categoryid=3768&amp;cs=1"><em>Variety</em></a> reports that Page has officially dropped out of the project, but that it's landed <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/cary-joji-fukunaga/2239447/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Cary Fukunaga</a> as its director. <br />
<br />
Fukunaga has earned a lot of positive buzz for his feature debut <em>Sin Nombre,</em> which nabbed him a Best Director award at this year's Sundance Film Festival. Since then he's landed writing-directing deals at Universal and Focus, and it will undoubtedly surprise many that he's eying an English classic as his next film. But hey, if Gothic dramas are good for young actresses, why not young directors too?<br />
<br />
As the project now boasts Fukunaga and Moira Buffini (one of Britain's rising screenwriters) Ruby Films now plans to "ramp up casting" for the roles of Jane and Rochester. With Page uninterested, which ingenue will leap at the chance to be one of literature's finest heroines? What brooding hunk will they cast as Rochester? As a lifelong Bronte addict, I await the news with fluttery, Victorian breaths.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/jane-eyre-loses-ellen-page-but-has-a-new-director/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19203671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/jane-eyre-loses-ellen-page-but-has-a-new-director/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>BBC Films</category><category>BbcFilms</category><category>cary fukunaga</category><category>CaryFukunaga</category><category>Charlotte Bronte</category><category>CharlotteBronte</category><category>Ellen Page</category><category>EllenPage</category><category>Jane Eyre</category><category>JaneEyre</category><category>Moira Buffini</category><category>MoiraBuffini</category><category>Ruby Films</category><category>RubyFilms</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'The Crow' Remake Prepares To Take Flight</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/the-crow-remake-prepares-to-take-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/the-crow-remake-prepares-to-take-flight/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/the-crow-remake-prepares-to-take-flight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/180px-graphic_novel_cover.jpg" alt="" />Last December, many Goths wept and fans of the late Brandon Lee took to message boards all over our great Internet to protest <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/steve-norrington/1865023/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Stephen Norrington's</a> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/12/15/the-crow-to-resurrect-and-fly-again/">remake of </a><em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/12/15/the-crow-to-resurrect-and-fly-again/">The Crow.</a> </em>News on the project has been so scarce that you've probably forgotten all about it, or even assumed it was dead and buried. But like its supernatural character, Norrington's <em>Crow </em>is alive and flying and <a href="http://www.mania.com/crow-flies-forward_article_118360.html#">Comics2Film</a> is reporting that Norrington's script has been "very well received" by Relativity Media, and the film is set to go forward with casting. Cue the angry rants. <br />
<br />
While the news sparked a lot of angry comments, there were a few fans of James O'Barr's graphic novel who wanted to see a new adaptation that might stay truer to the book. But earlier this summer, Comics2Film ran a rumor that Norrington wasn't going to use the character of Eric Draven, but was inventing <a href="http://www.mania.com/new-crow-movie-not-remake_article_116025.html">a completely new character</a> and storyline for his remake / reboot. Let me stress that little item hasn't been confirmed, but if it's true, it certainly raises the question of "Why bother?" O'Barr fans want their guiding crow and self-mutilation back. <br />
<br />
At this point, all we know is that Norrington is aiming to make it "realistic, hard-edged and mysterious, almost documentary-style." Now that I've seen more of the graphic novel (thanks, Google Images), I can't think of a poorer approach to something so deliberately introspective. But who knows? If it's truly a whole new character who just happens to have a crow as a pal, the shaky-cam approach might work just fine.<br />
<br />
[via<a href="http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/17776"> Bloody-Disgusting</a>]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/the-crow-remake-prepares-to-take-flight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19203729/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/the-crow-remake-prepares-to-take-flight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Brandon Lee</category><category>BrandonLee</category><category>Eric Draven</category><category>EricDraven</category><category>James OBarr</category><category>JamesObarr</category><category>Relativity Media</category><category>RelativityMedia</category><category>Stephen Norrington</category><category>StephenNorrington</category><category>Steve Norrington</category><category>SteveNorrington</category><category>The Crow</category><category>The Crow remake</category><category>TheCrow</category><category>TheCrowRemake</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Villains We Love: John Doe in 'Se7en'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/villains-we-love-john-doe-se7en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/villains-we-love-john-doe-se7en/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/villains-we-love-john-doe-se7en/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/brad-pitt/" rel="tag">Brad Pitt</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/john_doe_spacey.jpg" /><br />
<br />
I'll always remember David Fincher's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/seven/1538/main"><em>Se7en</em></a> for a few different reasons (I even had to write an essay once about the opening credits) but the number one reason this film sticks in my brain is John Doe. Now usually when it comes to on-screen villains, you tend to remember the big personalities. In the words of <em>Buffy</em>, "strait up, black hat, tied to the train tracks, soon my electro-ray will destroy Metropolis," types. But as scary as the big bad wolf can be, sometimes the evil you never see coming is the one that becomes the stuff of nightmares.<br />
<br />
In Fincher's thriller about a serial killer with a penchant for Dante and the wrath of god, we don't even get to see the bad guy until about half way through the movie. But when Doe (played to perfection by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/kevin-spacey/1238425/main">Kevin Spacey</a>) calmly walks into the police station to hand himself over, you know that this is not your run of the mill psycho. Recently I took a look at some <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/09/villains-too-charismatic-for-their-own-good/">movie villains</a> that manage to win you over with a little charm and charisma, and Doe definitely isn't one of those guys. He's the kind of guy you would cross the street to avoid, but only if you got to know him -- and that's what makes him scary, he is completely average. Instead of letting the audience get used to the idea of him, we only see his handiwork (as gruesome as it may be), and just like Mills (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/brad-pitt/1822652/main">Brad Pitt</a>) and Somerset (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/morgan-freeman/1030592/main">Morgan Freeman</a>), we are just witnesses to the aftermath.<br />
<br />
<em>After the jump; Why Doe still scares the crap out of me, and his horrible plan is made complete...</em><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/villains-we-love-john-doe-se7en/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Villains We Love: John Doe in 'Se7en'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/villains-we-love-john-doe-se7en/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19196118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/villains-we-love-john-doe-se7en/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>brad pitt</category><category>BradPitt</category><category>David Fincher</category><category>DavidFincher</category><category>Kevin Spacey</category><category>KevinSpacey</category><category>Morgan Freeman</category><category>MorganFreeman</category><category>se7en</category><category>seven</category><category>villains</category><category>villains09</category><category>VillainsWeLove</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Review: The Stepfather</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/the-stepfather-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/the-stepfather-review/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/the-stepfather-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/theatrical-reviews/" rel="tag">Theatrical Reviews</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/stepfather.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<br />
Indifference is, perhaps, one of the most frustrating attitudes one can have towards a film. If you love a film, singing its praises is a natural by-product. Hating a film can often times be an even more cathartic experience than loving a film, as vitriol is always easily on tap. But not particularly caring one way or the other? That's oddly frustrating for me. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-stepfather/33563/main"><strong><em>The Stepfather</em></strong></a>, the most recent collaboration between producer J.S. Cardone and director Nelson McCormick (the last being their remake of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/prom-night/28584/main"><em>Prom Night</em></a>, a project I feel safe calling the most annoying horror film of 2008, and even that's being diplomatic), is another entry to a new Hollywood tradition of finding vaguely recognizable films from the 1980s and remaking them on the cheap. Now, I'm not one to bemoan this business model; it's fine if the end result has enough originality to it that there is at least the illusion that the film is something more than a commodity to draw in a big opening weekend. <br />
<br />
Fortunately <em>The Stepfather</em> does have enough airiness to it and enough interesting performers in it to convince even a hardened cynic that money wasn't the only motivation for all involved, that creatively the team behind it did want to deliver to new audiences a story of the reverse-black widow, of a man who lulls vulnerable single-mothers into thinking he wants to join their family, only to bite their heads off (figuratively, there's no actual cannibalism involved) when their back is turned.<br />
<br />
Read the rest at <strong><a href="http://www.horrorsquad.com/2009/10/16/movie-review-the-stepfather/">Horror Squad</a></strong>!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/the-stepfather-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19198145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/16/the-stepfather-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Amber Heard</category><category>AmberHeard</category><category>Dylan Walsh</category><category>DylanWalsh</category><category>J.S. Cardone</category><category>J.s.Cardone</category><category>Nelson McCormick</category><category>NelsonMccormick</category><category>Penn Badgley</category><category>PennBadgley</category><category>Sela Ward</category><category>SelaWard</category><category>The Stepfather</category><category>The Stepfather 2009</category><category>TheStepfather</category><category>TheStepfather2009</category><dc:creator>Peter Hall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:48:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>