<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>The Original Pitch for 'Monsters, Inc.'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/monsters-inc-original-pitch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/monsters-inc-original-pitch/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/monsters-inc-original-pitch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" height="303" border="1" align="middle" width="450" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/monstersinc-(2).jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Kudos to <em>Cinematical </em>reader <a href="http://tumblr.com/xpy40s28w">Kashif Pasta</a> for sending this our way. On the latest episode of the <a href="http://creativescreenwritingmagazine.blogspot.com/">Creative Screenwriting Magazine Podcast</a> (which I didn't know existed, but now do and will totally listen more often), <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/up/30386/main"><em>Up </em></a>and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/monsters-inc/10057/main"><em>Monster's, Inc</em></a> director <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/pete-docter/1941675/main">Pete Docter </a>revealed the original pitch for <em>Monsters, Inc.</em> -- which was very different from what eventually hit the screen, and kinda reminded me of <em>Where the Wild Things Are </em>in a sorta-ish way. On this blog, Kashif separated the segment of the podcast where Docter reveals the original pitch (which came at about 22 minutes in), and it went something like this:<br />
<br />
"Well, my idea was that what it was about was about a 30 year old man who is like an accountant or something, he hates his job, and one day he gets a book with some drawings in it that he did when he was a kid from his mom, and he doesn't think anything of it and he puts it on the shelf and that night, monsters show up. And nobody else can see them. He thinks he's starting to go crazy, they follow him to his job, and on his dates, and all this- and it turns out these monsters are fears that he never dealt with as a kid. And each one of them represents a different kind of fear. As he conquers those fears, the guys who he slowly becomes kind of friends with- they disappear as he conquers those fears. It's this bittersweet kinda ending where they go away, and so not much of that stayed<br />
<br />
[...]<br />
<br />
it sounds better as a pitch than it did at the time- anyway. " <br />
<br />
Sounds like a pretty cool punch-in-the-gut kinda movie to me; something with real intense emotion. I like Docter in that way. I feel he likes to create these beautiful child-like movies with some pretty intense adult emotions behind them. It's part of what makes that Pixar crew so great and unique and powerful. You can listen to the audio from the Docter podcast <a href="http://www.kashifpasta.com/post/243173984/pete-docters-1-min-pitch-for-the-original">over here</a>.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/monsters-inc-original-pitch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19239517/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/monsters-inc-original-pitch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>inc</category><category>monsters</category><category>peter docter</category><category>PeterDocter</category><category>pixar</category><category>up</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Hansel and Gretel' to Get the Nazi Zombie Treatment</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/dead-snow-director-goes-from-nazi-zombies-to-hansel-and-grete/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/dead-snow-director-goes-from-nazi-zombies-to-hansel-and-grete/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/dead-snow-director-goes-from-nazi-zombies-to-hansel-and-grete/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.horrorsquad.com/media/2009/11/hanselundgretel-large.jpg" /><em>By: Alison Nastasi</em><br />
<br />
Gotta love those dark Germanic fairy tales. They are ripe with strange folklore, the supernatural, and some of the most grotesque creatures ever imagined. These stories are intrinsically woven into the fabric of horror culture. You would think there would be more amazing fairy tale film adaptations, but only a few immediately come to mind: <em>The Company of Wolves, Little Otik, Snow White and the Seven Dwarf </em>and<em> Labyrinth. </em>Perhaps they hold more magic on paper, but it's inevitable that filmmakers will continue to turn to these tales for inspiration.<br />
<br />
Earlier this year it was reported that Tommy Wirkola, the Norwegian director behind the Nazi-zombie flick <em>Dead Snow</em> will make his first U.S. feature with <em>Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters</em>. The film is being produced by Gary Sanchez Productions--the Paramount company run by Will Ferrell, Adam McKay, Chris Henchy and Kevin Messick.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.horrorsquad.com/2009/11/12/dead-snow-director-goes-from-nazi-zombies-to-hansel-and-grete/"><strong>Read the rest over at Horror Squad</strong></a><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/dead-snow-director-goes-from-nazi-zombies-to-hansel-and-grete/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19239403/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/13/dead-snow-director-goes-from-nazi-zombies-to-hansel-and-grete/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Dante Harper</category><category>DanteHarper</category><category>Dead Snow</category><category>DeadSnow</category><category>Gary Sanchez Productions</category><category>GarySanchezProductions</category><category>Hansel and Gretel</category><category>Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters</category><category>HanselAndGretel</category><category>HanselAndGretel:WitchHunters</category><category>Tommy Wirkola</category><category>TommyWirkola</category><dc:creator>Cinematical staff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Kristen Stewart Goes Southern in 'The Yellow Handkerchief'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/kristen-stewart-the-yellow-handkerchief/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/kristen-stewart-the-yellow-handkerchief/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/kristen-stewart-the-yellow-handkerchief/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/yellowhankie.jpg" /></div>
<br />
She's about to open the <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-twilight-saga-new-moon/36045/main">second-biggest film of her career</a>, so what better timing than now to point you to a new peek at <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/kristen-stewart/2035239/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Kristen Stewart'</a>s next non-<em>Twilight </em>film? Check out the new trailer for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-yellow-handkerchief/32578/main"><em>The Yellow Handkerchief</em></a>, a Sundance entry that follows three strangers in post-Katrina Louisiana - Martine (Stewart), Gordy (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/eddie-redmayne/2240675/main">Eddie Redmayne</a>), and Brett (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/william-hurt/1218890/main">William Hurt</a>) -- as they search together for life, love, and the perfect Southern accent. <br />
<br />
Ok, so it seems the Southern slangin' is done primarily by Stewart, while Brit Redmayne goes American and Hurt rocks the ex-con handlebar mustache. As they embark on a road trip together, the two teens listen to Brett's tale of the woman who got away (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/maria-bello/1434843/main">Maria Bello</a>) while they navigate the murky waters of young love. (Read Erik Davis's Sundance review <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/19/sundance-review-yellow-handkerchief/">here</a>.)<br />
<br />
<strong>Watch the trailer after the jump. </strong><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/kristen-stewart-the-yellow-handkerchief/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kristen Stewart Goes Southern in 'The Yellow Handkerchief'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/kristen-stewart-the-yellow-handkerchief/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19234003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/kristen-stewart-the-yellow-handkerchief/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Eddie Redmayne</category><category>EddieRedmayne</category><category>kristen stewart</category><category>KristenStewart</category><category>Maria Bello</category><category>MariaBello</category><category>William Hurt</category><category>WilliamHurt</category><category>Yellow Handkerchief</category><category>YellowHandkerchief</category><dc:creator>Jen Yamato</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>James Cameron Never Wanted to Make 'Titanic'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/james-cameron-titanic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/james-cameron-titanic/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/james-cameron-titanic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" height="290" border="1" align="middle" width="440" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/james-cameron-(2).jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Perhaps the most comically brilliant interview of the month will come sandwiched between naked ladies as a lengthy chat with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/james-cameron/1494317/main">James Cameron</a> will be featured in December's issue of <a href="http://www.playboydigital.com/"><em>Playboy</em></a>. While we don't have the actual interview for you to read, Playboy sent over a whole batch of quotes that were just too good to resist. Based on the quotes, it would appear the interview covers everything from Cameron's directorial approach to his inspiration (<em>Star Wars</em>) to his personal life (married five times) to his films to Christian Bale's famous on-set tirade ("Man, I have to take my hat off to this guy. I could not pull a rant like that if I had to.' I mean, I can get on a roll but not like that. I just had to bow down."). <br />
<br />
And speaking of his films, Cameron was quite candid when <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/titanic/5332/main"><em>Titanic </em></a>came up, admitting there was only one reason why he wanted to make that film and it wasn't to get Kate Winslet topless. "I made <em>Titanic </em>because I wanted to dive to a shipwreck, not because I particularly wanted to make the movie...<em>Titanic </em>was about 'f*ck you' money," he said. And on Kate Winslet almost dying while filming: "[On the set of Titanic] we simply let Kate [Winslet] think she was nearly drowning. A little sputtering and coughing does not count in my book, because I have almost drowned several times...Anybody who signs on [with me] is going to be tested." Right on! James Cameron: The director who will let you think you're dying in order to get the best performance!<br />
<br />
Check out a few more choice Cameron quotes after the jump (like why you'll never see him on Twitter), and you can read the entire interview in the <a href="http://www.playboydigital.com/">December issue of Playboy</a>, which hits newstands and online on November 13th.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/james-cameron-titanic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>James Cameron Never Wanted to Make 'Titanic'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/james-cameron-titanic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19234892/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/james-cameron-titanic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>avatar</category><category>cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>james cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>playboy</category><category>titanic</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Megan Fox's Scratched SNL Hitler/Michael Bay Joke</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/megan-fox-michael-bay-hitler-snl-joke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/megan-fox-michael-bay-hitler-snl-joke/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/megan-fox-michael-bay-hitler-snl-joke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" height="300" border="1" align="middle" width="450" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/megan-fox-transformers-2-(2).jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
If you have a few minutes today I'd strongly recommend reading this fascinating five-page <em>New York Times Magazine</em> story on <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/megan-fox/2106006/main">Megan Fox </a>called <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/magazine/15Fox-t.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"><strong>The Self-Manufacture of Megan Fox</strong></a>. I know, you're not really interested in reading another "OMG, she said that!" article on the overly hyped, sexified actress, but this one is a little different. Yes, it touches on just about everything controversial that's crossed her plate -- from her much-publicized spat with Michael Bay to her longterm off-screen relationship with Brian Austin Green -- but it also digs beneath the surface and exposes the way in which she's sort of self-manufactured her own image depending on where she is and who she's speaking to in order to expand her brand, which, she'll admit, isn't the most glamorous or family-friendly, but it's what's keeping her working.<br />
<br />
Fox admits that she got herself into the whole <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/03/megan-fox-compares-michael-bay-to-hitler/">Michael Bay mess</a>, and wonders why no one came to her defense when that nasty <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/12/transformers-crew-members-absolutely-trash-megan-fox/">crew letter surfaced online</a> ("I think it's because I'm a girl. They left me out there to be bludgeoned to death"). Another interesting fact was that they were going to include a Hitler/Michael Bay joke when Fox hosted Saturday Night Live, but dropped it because it wasn't appropriate. Fox explains, "They wanted me to do a Q. and A. with the audience for the opening monologue. And Hitler is in the audience. Hitler stands up and says, 'Why did you compare me to Michael Bay?' " Fox laughed. "Which is funny, but we can't do that."<br />
<br />
Watch the actual monologue and read more after the jump.<br />
<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/megan-fox-michael-bay-hitler-snl-joke/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Megan Fox's Scratched SNL Hitler/Michael Bay Joke</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/megan-fox-michael-bay-hitler-snl-joke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19234070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/12/megan-fox-michael-bay-hitler-snl-joke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>hitler</category><category>judy garland</category><category>JudyGarland</category><category>megan fox</category><category>MeganFox</category><category>michael bay</category><category>MichaelBay</category><category>new york times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>snl</category><category>the wizard of oz</category><category>TheWizardOfOz</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>J.J. Abrams Not Adapting King's 'Dark Tower' Series</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/j-j-abrams-not-adapting-kings-dark-tower-series/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/j-j-abrams-not-adapting-kings-dark-tower-series/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/j-j-abrams-not-adapting-kings-dark-tower-series/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" height="266" border="1" align="middle" width="450" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/dark-tower2sm.jpg" /><br />
<br />
Bad news folks (or good depending on your personal King beliefs): Turns out J.J. Abrams and Damon Lindelof will not be adapting <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_%28series%29">Stephen King's <em>Dark Tower </em>series </a>for the big screen like originally planned. The film rights to the epic seven-book series were said <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/11/the-next-lord-of-the-rings-j-j-abrams-and-the-dark-tower/">to have been purchased </a>by Abrams and Lindelof for $19 (a number that recurs throughout the novels). As recently as this summer, Lindelof claimed they were all too busy finishing up <em>Lost </em>to think about Dark Tower. "The last thing <span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_m_contentLBL"><span>we want to think about is how to adapt a seven book <span class="IL_SPAN">series</span> of, you know, basically the writer who we admire the most and look up to most and has inspired our work the most, and do anything with that," he said.<br />
<br />
Now things have changed, and according to an interview with <a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/11/10/jj-abrams-will-not-be-building-his-dark-tower/">MTV</a>, the <em>Lost </em>crew have decided to leave <em>Dark Tower</em> behind, despite how much they love and respect the series, as well as how much it's influenced their work over the years. "The <em>Dark Tower</em> thing is tricky," Abrams said. "The truth is that Damon and I are not looking at that right now." In an earlier interview with USA Today, <strike>Abrams </strike>Lindelof added comments that, quite frankly, make a lot of sense. He says, "After working six years on 'Lost,' the last thing I want to do is spend the next seven years adapting one of my favorite books of all time. I'm such a massive Stephen King fan that I'm terrified of screwing it up. I'd do anything to see those movies written by someone else. My guess is they will get made because they're so incredible. But not by me."<br />
<br />
Honestly, if Abrams and his clan won't tackle it, I'm not sure who could. I think something this epic might be best on television, but I feel the lower budgets might hinder the overall outcome -- making it look somewhat cheap. What do you <em>Dark Tower</em> fans think? Is there someone out there who could adapt this behemoth? Should they make seven films? Would people go see them? Sound off below ...<br />
<br />
</span></span><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/j-j-abrams-not-adapting-kings-dark-tower-series/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19231799/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/j-j-abrams-not-adapting-kings-dark-tower-series/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>damon lindelof</category><category>DamonLindelof</category><category>j.j. abrams</category><category>J.j.Abrams</category><category>lost</category><category>stephen king</category><category>StephenKing</category><category>the dark tower</category><category>TheDarkTower</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Shazam' Movie Still Has a Pulse at Warner Bros.</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/shazam-movie-still-has-a-pulse-at-warner-bros/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/shazam-movie-still-has-a-pulse-at-warner-bros/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/shazam-movie-still-has-a-pulse-at-warner-bros/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img hspace="4" height="232" border="1" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.scifisquad.com/media/2009/11/shazam.jpg" alt="" /><em>By: John Gholson</em><br />
<br />
Screenwriter <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/john-august/2005077/main">John August</a> declared the <em>Shazam </em>feature film completely dead in January 2009, unable to come up with a screenplay that seemed to satisfy Warner Bros. "By "dead," I mean that it won't be happening. I don't think it's on the studio's radar at all, " August <a href="http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/shazam-done">stated in a blog post</a>. <br />
<br />
I'm happy to report that John August was wrong. <em>Shazam</em> is most definitely on Warner Bros radar, and they've tasked DC Comics scribe Geoff Johns and rookie screenwriter Bill Birch with a new version of the script. Birch spoke to <a href="http://www.cinefools.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleID=1360">CineFOOLS</a> about the project, "The way the story is shaking out, Geoff and I see this not as 'dark' as <em>Dark Knight</em> but definitely as cool...Tonally, I think it's important to successfully find the balance of comedy and danger in the story. That's a major aspect I'm focusing on. Frankly, hitting the right tone is what's going to either get this made or keep it in development hell."<br />
<a href="http://www.scifisquad.com/2009/11/10/once-dead-shazam-movie-is-still-alive-at-warner-bros/"><em><strong><br />
Read the rest over at SciFi Squad</strong></em></a><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/shazam-movie-still-has-a-pulse-at-warner-bros/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19231266/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/shazam-movie-still-has-a-pulse-at-warner-bros/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bill burch</category><category>BillBurch</category><category>captain marvel</category><category>CaptainMarvel</category><category>DC Comics</category><category>DcComics</category><category>geoff johns</category><category>GeoffJohns</category><category>john august</category><category>john hamm</category><category>JohnAugust</category><category>JohnHamm</category><category>Peter Segal</category><category>PeterSegal</category><category>shazam</category><dc:creator>Cinematical staff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Sgt. Rock' Looks to the Future with Francis Lawrence</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/sgt-rock-looks-to-the-future-with-francis-lawrence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/sgt-rock-looks-to-the-future-with-francis-lawrence/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/sgt-rock-looks-to-the-future-with-francis-lawrence/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/rock1-760735.jpg" />Once upon a time, <em>Sgt. Rock</em> was <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/14/guy-ritchie-to-direct-sgt-rock/">in the hands of Guy Ritchie</a>, and many an Easy Company fan was upset. But you'll undoubtedly wish that Ritchie and Joel Silver had made it to the finish line, because <em>Sgt. Rock</em> will not make it to the big screen in a form you'll recognize. According to <a href="http://www.heatvisionblog.com/2009/11/sgt-rock-francis-lawrence-akiva-goldsman-joel-silver.html"><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></a>, he has a new director in <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/francis-lawrence/2043958/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Francis Lawrence</a> and a whole new space-time continuum. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/joel-silver/1275021/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Joel Silver</a> is still on board as producer, and he's bringing <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/akiva-goldsman/1916020/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Akiva Goldsman</a> on board to help. They've hired newcomer <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3203841/">Chad St. John</a> to pen the script. <br />
<br />
As you may or may not know, Sgt. Rock is a WWII soldier. He's always fought in WWII. The poor guy has never even gotten to leave the European theater. (It was rumored in <em>Swamp Thing</em> that he was transferred to the Pacific, but never confirmed.) Any attempt at a movie adaptation has always gone forward with this central idea of keeping him in his element. But budget, politics, and popularity has always been an issue, and no one believes you can make <em>The Dirty Dozen</em> in this day and age unless you're Quentin Tarantino. So Warner Bros has decided to bypass the drama, and put Sgt. Rock in the future. CG is cheaper than Nazis, and a nondescript soldier of the future is less problematic than an American fighting a good fight. (While no war is a good war, I do think we can all agree that fighting Nazis <em>was</em> a good thing.)<br />
<br />
Nothing else is known about this storyline, so I hate to jump to a knee-jerk conclusion as to who or what Sgt. Rock will face there, or whether he will be transported to the future from WWII. But I think this is an unfortunate thing to do to a character who resides in WWII for a very specific and honorable reason. The last thing he should become is a <em>Universal Soldier</em> or <em>Terminator</em> ripoff.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/sgt-rock-looks-to-the-future-with-francis-lawrence/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19230268/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/10/sgt-rock-looks-to-the-future-with-francis-lawrence/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Akiva Goldsman</category><category>AkivaGoldsman</category><category>DC Comics</category><category>DcComics</category><category>francis lawrence</category><category>FrancisLawrence</category><category>guy ritchie</category><category>GuyRitchie</category><category>joel silver</category><category>JoelSilver</category><category>Sgt. Rock</category><category>Sgt.Rock</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Kick-Ass' Is Coming! Get Ready!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/kick-ass-is-coming-get-ready/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/kick-ass-is-coming-get-ready/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/kick-ass-is-coming-get-ready/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lionsgate-films/" rel="tag">Lionsgate Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/posters/" rel="tag">Posters</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/kick-ass-20091105023449635.jpg" /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><br />
Exclusives have become tricky things in our field that I held off sharing these <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/kick-ass/39243/main"><em>Kick-Ass</em></a> posters, which debuted on <a href="http://movies.ign.com/articles/104/1042741p1.html">IGN</a> on Friday. But now you might need some inspiration for your Monday in the form of home made teenage vigilantes. <em>Kick-Ass</em> is based on the Mark Millar miniseries, and is directed by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/matthew-vaughn/1981022/main">Matthew Vaughn</a>. It's had a pretty crazy ride to the big-screen, as when <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/15/from-mclovin-to-mcbadass/">it was first optioned</a> no studio wanted to touch it because of its teenage violence and foul language. Vaughn went the indie route and it's paid off with a lot of <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/24/sdcc-kick-ass-lives-up-to-its-name-and-then-some/">ComicCon buzz</a>, fan enthusiasm, and a distributor in Lionsgate. <br />
<br />
So far, Lionsgate is handling the marketing well. The poster designs are quite classy (I've put a high-res version in the gallery), which go with the daring approach of not showing a single face. Instead we only get the, ahem, asses of Red Mist, Kick-Ass, Hit Girl, and Big Daddy. I particularly like the nod to Nite Owl in Big Daddy's silhouette. Very appropriate for something that borrows from the real world "heroes" of <em>Watchmen</em>, no? <br />
<br />
In a sign that its April 16, 2010 date isn't too far away, <a href="http://iamkick-ass.com/">the official site </a>went live on Friday and the trailer is set to debut on MySpace in 12 days. We'll bring it to you here on <em>Cinematical</em>, so no need for you to stress ... just us! Hey, we're vigilantes in our own way.<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/kick-ass/">Kick-Ass</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/kick-ass/2435626/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/kick-ass-high-res_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/kick-ass-is-coming-get-ready/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19228470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/kick-ass-is-coming-get-ready/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Chloe Moretz</category><category>ChloeMoretz</category><category>christopher mintz-plasse</category><category>ChristopherMintz-plasse</category><category>Kick Ass</category><category>KickAss</category><category>Lionsgate Films</category><category>LionsgateEntertainment</category><category>LionsgateFilms</category><category>Mark Millar</category><category>MarkMillar</category><category>Matthew Vaughn</category><category>MatthewVaughn</category><category>Nicolas Cage</category><category>NicolasCage</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Robert Pattinson Talks 'Breaking Dawn' &amp; 'Unbound Captives'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/07/robert-pattinson-talks-breaking-dawn-and-unbound-captives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/07/robert-pattinson-talks-breaking-dawn-and-unbound-captives/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/07/robert-pattinson-talks-breaking-dawn-and-unbound-captives/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/western/" rel="tag">Western</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/robert-pattinson.jpg" alt="" />Good news, <em>Twilight</em> fans. You have the first official news for the fourth <em>Twilight</em> installment, courtesy of our own Jen Yamato, <a href="http://www.fearnet.com/blogs/new_moon/b17265_robert_pattinson_confirms_fall_2010.html">FearNet</a> and the <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-twilight-saga-new-moon/36045/main"><em>New Moon</em></a> junket.* The magically-coiffed <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/robert-pattinson/2159062/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Robert Pattinson</a> has confirmed that <em>Breaking Dawn</em> will begin filming in Fall 2010, and that it's penciled into his schedule for next year.<br />
<br />
Of course, <em>Dawn </em>remains unconfirmed by Summit. The most controversial installment of the <em>Twilight</em> series, rumors swirl that the studio is hesitant to take it to the big screen. If it is made, it seems likely that it could be split into two films a'la <em>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows</em>. Personally, I don't see Summit risking the money they'd make on #4, and they'll find a way to steer around the gorier aspects of the book. But now you know when to look for it, though you still have the madness of <em>Eclipse</em> pre-production to get through.<br />
<br />
Pattinson also dished on the movie I want to mark on <em>my</em> calender (Sorry, I dig boots and spurs more than vampires), a Western called <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/unbound-captives/37960/main">Unbound Captives.</a> </em>The directorial debut of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/madeleine-stowe/1832812/main">Madeleine Stowe</a>, it stars <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/hugh-jackman/1373085/main">Hugh Jackman</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/rachel-weisz/1955812/main">Rachel Weisz</a>, and Pattinson. The young heartthrob revealed that it's tenatively scheduled to begin shooting in early 2010, and he sounds enthusiastic for a role that'll be miles away from Edward Cullen. "I'm playing a kid who is kidnapped by Comanches when he was four years old, and he is brought up by them. His mother spends her entire life trying to find me and my sister. When she finds us, we can't remember who she is and can't remember anything about the Western culture she grew up in. I speak Comanche the whole movie. You can't really speak more differently from Edward."<br />
<br />
[Special thanks also goes to <a href="http://www.collider.com/2009/11/06/breaking-dawn-film-news-robert-pattinson-says-tentative-plan-is-to-film-fall-2010/">Collider</a> who apparently pried the <em>Breaking Dawn</em> date out of Mr. Pattinson]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/07/robert-pattinson-talks-breaking-dawn-and-unbound-captives/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19227359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/07/robert-pattinson-talks-breaking-dawn-and-unbound-captives/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Breaking Dawn</category><category>BreakingDawn</category><category>featured</category><category>hugh jackman</category><category>HughJackman</category><category>madeleine stowe</category><category>MadeleineStowe</category><category>New Moon</category><category>NewMoon</category><category>rachel weisz</category><category>RachelWeisz</category><category>robert pattinson</category><category>RobertPattinson</category><category>Summit Entertainment</category><category>SummitEntertainment</category><category>The Twilight Saga</category><category>The Twilight Saga Breaking Dawn</category><category>the twilight saga: new moon</category><category>TheTwilightSaga</category><category>TheTwilightSaga:NewMoon</category><category>TheTwilightSagaBreakingDawn</category><category>twilight</category><category>unbound captives</category><category>UnboundCaptives</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Gwyneth Paltrow Joins Nicole Kidman in 'The Danish Girl'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/gwyneth-paltrow-nicole-kidman-the-danish-girl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/gwyneth-paltrow-nicole-kidman-the-danish-girl/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/gwyneth-paltrow-nicole-kidman-the-danish-girl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/gay-and-lesbian/" rel="tag">Gay &amp; Lesbian</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/gwyneth-paltrow.jpg" />The upcoming <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-danish-girl/35818/main"><em>The Danish Girl</em></a> is one of those independent, edgy films that has all the right elements for something brilliant, but it's subject matter is so tricky that it could end up becoming a farce. Based on David Ebershoff's novel, <em>The Danish Girl </em>is the story of the world's first post-operative transsexual, Einar Wegener, and his wife, Greta. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tomas-alfredson/2132159/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Tomas Alfredson</a> is set to direct, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/nicole-kidman/1485331/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Nicole Kidman</a> has long been attached to play Einar, and <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/bfdealmemo/2009/11/paltrow-joins-kidman-in-danish-girl-.html"><em>Variety</em></a> reports that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/gwyneth-paltrow/1424761/main">Gwyneth Paltrow </a>has stepped in to play Greta. She's stepping in for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/charlize-theron/2155271/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Charlize Theron</a>, who originally held the role, but has dropped out for unspecified reasons.<br />
<br />
The story takes place in 1920s Denmark. Greta* was a portrait painter, and needed a model. She asked Einar to step into a dress, stockings, and heels, and created some kind of awakening in Einar. In women's clothes, her husband became an outrageous character named Lili. The paintings of Lili became extremely popular, few realizing a man had stood in for them. Lili than took on a public life of her own, and Greta often introduced Lili as her sister. Eventually, Einar / Lili decided to commit to gender reassignment surgery, a dangerous and experimental procedure at the time. Greta stood beside her husband until his transformation was complete, and then their marriage was declared null and void by the King of Denmark.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/gwyneth-paltrow-nicole-kidman-the-danish-girl/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gwyneth Paltrow Joins Nicole Kidman in 'The Danish Girl'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/gwyneth-paltrow-nicole-kidman-the-danish-girl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19227120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/gwyneth-paltrow-nicole-kidman-the-danish-girl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>charlize theron</category><category>CharlizeTheron</category><category>David Ebershoff</category><category>DavidEbershoff</category><category>Einar Wegener</category><category>EinarWegener</category><category>featured</category><category>Gerda Wegener</category><category>GerdaWegener</category><category>Greta Wegener</category><category>GretaWegener</category><category>Gwyneth Paltrow</category><category>GwynethPaltrow</category><category>Lili Wegener</category><category>LiliWegener</category><category>Nicole Kidman</category><category>NicoleKidman</category><category>the danish girl</category><category>TheDanishGirl</category><category>Tomas Alfredson</category><category>TomasAlfredson</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Lost Charlie Chaplin Film Pops Up on eBay</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/lost-charlie-chaplin-film-pops-up-on-ebay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/lost-charlie-chaplin-film-pops-up-on-ebay/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/lost-charlie-chaplin-film-pops-up-on-ebay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/chaplin110509.jpg" />One day, a man named Morace Park is surfing around eBay, looking for antiques, when he's intrigued by an item listed as an "old film." Housed in a funky antique tin, the man bids and wins it for the super-reasonable price of &pound;3.20. He buys and sells antiques, so when the package arrives, it sits around for a bit. When he finally gets around to opening it, he unfurls some of the film to see what it is. The title reads: <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/charlie-chaplin/2009519/main">Charlie Chaplin</a> in <em>Zepped</em>.<br />
<br />
Yes, folks, as a story in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/nov/05/charlie-chaplin-ebay-reel-tin">Guardian</a> attests, this is a forgotten film that there's no record of. Almost seven minutes long, the short "is a mixture of footage of Chaplin and exuberant animation that reminded Park of Monty Python sequences." Park's neighbor John Dyer says: "It starts with live shots of Chaplin. It then turns into a dreamscape. We see a Zeppelin bombing attack. And then we see Chaplin taking the mickey out of the Zeppelin, at the time a powerful instrument of terror." They deduce that the film is a propaganda piece from the first World War. Park and Dyer have traveled to Los Angeles to learn more about the short, with filmmaker Hammad Khan recording their journey for a documentary. <br />
<br />
One has got to assume that whoever sold it never bothered to open the film and see what this "old film" was. Just goes to show you -- old cinematic junk on eBay can lead to stunning discoveries, and never be so lazy as to not see what a film is before selling it.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/lost-charlie-chaplin-film-pops-up-on-ebay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19225834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/lost-charlie-chaplin-film-pops-up-on-ebay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Charlie Chaplin</category><category>CharlieChaplin</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>lost film</category><category>LostFilm</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bradley Cooper Gains Superpowers In 'Dark Fields'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/bradley-cooper-gains-superpowers-in-dark-fields/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/bradley-cooper-gains-superpowers-in-dark-fields/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/bradley-cooper-gains-superpowers-in-dark-fields/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/universal/" rel="tag">Universal</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/05/bradley-cooper.jpg" alt="" />The future Faceman may have lost the chance to fly as the Emerald Knight, but DC isn't the only place you can gain superpowers. You can also score them from top secret pharmaceuticals! (Don't try this at home, kids.) According to<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i6a7d4a8a91f5bb2ab39704b43729e213"><em> The Hollywood Reporter</em></a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/bradley-cooper/2029479/main">Bradley Cooper</a> is set to star in <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/dark-fields/1394087/main">Dark Fields</a>,</em> a thriller directed by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/neil-burger/2056597/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Neil Burger</a> and based on the book by Alan Glynn. <br />
<br />
Cooper will play a writer down on his luck who manages to get his poor paws on a secret drug that promises to make one smarter. He doesn't go ask Alice before popping them, and finds that it's a wonder drug. He enjoys writing success, wealth and women until the side effects kick in. They're long lasting, potentially lethal, and have the extra kick of making time appear as a stop-motion movie. As if that doesn't suck enough, mysterious and unpleasant men begin pursuing him. Do they look like Shia LaBeouf, who was originally set to star? Hopefully not. <br />
<br />
The screenplay was penned by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/leslie-dixon/1849902/main">Leslie Dixon</a>, and is said to be similar to <em>Fight Club</em> and <em>The Game</em>, which might be a big spoiler as to the nature of those mysterious antagonists, which is why you shouldn't think about it too much. There's no start date, but hopefully he has no time between <em>The A-Team</em> and <em>Dark Fields</em> to squish in another frightening romantic comedy.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/bradley-cooper-gains-superpowers-in-dark-fields/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19225777/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/bradley-cooper-gains-superpowers-in-dark-fields/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bradley cooper</category><category>BradleyCooper</category><category>Dark Fields</category><category>DarkFields</category><category>Leslie Dixon</category><category>LeslieDixon</category><category>neil burger</category><category>NeilBurger</category><category>Relativity Media</category><category>RelativityMedia</category><category>Universal</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Yogi Bear' Will Cry Me A River With Its Cast</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/yogi-bear-will-cry-me-a-river-with-its-cast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/yogi-bear-will-cry-me-a-river-with-its-cast/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/yogi-bear-will-cry-me-a-river-with-its-cast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" height="180" border="1" align="right" width="180" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/justin-timberlake-(2).jpg" />Yogi Bear and Boo Boo are bringing sexy back -- and that image should make you ripe for nightmares tonight. If you doubt me, look to <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010941.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1"><em>Variety, </em></a>who reports that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/dan-aykroyd/1039064/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Dan Aykroyd</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/anna-faris/2015517/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Anna Faris</a>, and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/justin-timberlake/1341374/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Justin Timberlake </a>are set to go to Jellystone in <em>Yogi Bear</em>, which <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/eric-brevig/1916196/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Eric Brevig</a> is directing for Warner Bros. <br />
<br />
Aykroyd will be voicing Yogi, and he really is the most obvious choice to play the picnic basket thief. He's funny, he sounds gruff, and if it was live-action it would be a very terrifying thing to see. So thank goodness this is being done as a CG / live-action hybrid. <br />
<br />
Timberlake will be voicing Boo Boo. Yep. The man who wants to love your mother, put his d*ck in a box, and who will cry you a river will lend his vocal talents to playing Yogi's diminutive sidekick. In this update of the Hanna-Barbera cartoon, expect Boo Boo to be a lot more of a smart aleck. (I was going to say "sassy," but I think that would be a far different Boo Boo.) <br />
<br />
Though Faris has done voice work before, it sounds as though she might be one of the live action elements to this unholy hybrid. Variety says she's set to play a documentary filmmaker. Presumably she discovers the tourist robbing bears, and makes a film of them. Or she has to help them preserve Jellystone against evil developers. Either way, she'll have to talk to big rubbery CG bears, and it might be kind of weird. What would be even weirder is if one or both bears fell in love with her, so let's hope she falls into the arms of whoever plays Ranger Smith. Shooting is expected to start in New Zealand next month.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/yogi-bear-will-cry-me-a-river-with-its-cast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19225787/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/yogi-bear-will-cry-me-a-river-with-its-cast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>anna faris</category><category>AnnaFaris</category><category>dan aykroyd</category><category>DanAykroyd</category><category>eric brevig</category><category>EricBrevig</category><category>featured</category><category>hanna barbera</category><category>HannaBarbera</category><category>Jellystone</category><category>Justin Timberlake</category><category>JustinTimberlake</category><category>yogi bear</category><category>YogiBear</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>John C. Reilly and Mary-Louise Parker Go 'Red'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/john-c-reilly-and-mary-louise-parker-go-red/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/john-c-reilly-and-mary-louise-parker-go-red/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/john-c-reilly-and-mary-louise-parker-go-red/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/mary-louise-parker.jpg" alt="" />When Warren Ellis' <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/12/warren-ellis-red-optioned/"><em>Red </em>was first optioned</a>, I wasn't particularly excited. As readers have pointed out, Ellis has many books that would be more exciting to see on the big screen. The initial casting of Bruce Willis and Morgan Freeman didn't inspire a lot of excitement, either. (I love both, but Willis as an ex-assassin? Hardly inspired.) But as Robert Schwentke has filled out his cast, things have gotten a lot more interesting. According to <a href="http://www.heatvisionblog.com/2009/11/john-c-reilly-marylouise-parker-film-red-bruce-willis-morgan-freeman-helen-mirren.html"><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/mary-louise-parker/1820991/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Mary-Louise Parker</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/john-c-reilly/1824847/main?icid=movsmartsearch">John C. Reilly</a> are in talks to join <em>Red </em>alongside Freeman, Willis, and Helen Mirren.<br />
<br />
Reilly would play a retired CIA agent who is paranoid that everyone is out to kill him. Willis' predicament will naturally prove him right, and it's the frantic, nervous role that Reilly specializes in. Again, it's not the most inspired casting, but it's exciting to see Reilly finally land a comic book role. I like to see actors drawn into this world, even if it is in a more "standard" storyline. <br />
<br />
Parker will play Willis' love interest, an ordinary employee of the federal pension office who becomes embroiled in his struggle to stay alive. As if relationships aren't hard enough, it's "Honey! My former employers are trying to kill me! Get your passport, we have to hide in Bruges." She is a talented actress, so I sincerely hope she gets a little more to do than run around and be frightened. Perhaps she can be trained in the arts of action by Mirren's character. <br />
<br />
It's a really good cast so far, and there's undoubtedly more to come as Willis' opponents are lined up. This could be something a little more in the mold of <em>A History of Violence,</em> which would be a refreshing change from the flashy adaptation attempts like <em>Wanted</em>. <em> Red</em> is officially on my radar.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/john-c-reilly-and-mary-louise-parker-go-red/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19224273/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/john-c-reilly-and-mary-louise-parker-go-red/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bruce willis</category><category>BruceWillis</category><category>helen mirren</category><category>HelenMirren</category><category>john c. reilly</category><category>JohnC.Reilly</category><category>Mary-Louise Parker</category><category>Mary-louiseParker</category><category>Morgan Freeman</category><category>MorganFreeman</category><category>Red</category><category>robert schwentke</category><category>RobertSchwentke</category><category>Summit Entertainment</category><category>SummitEntertainment</category><category>Warren Ellis</category><category>Warren Ellis Red</category><category>WarrenEllis</category><category>WarrenEllisRed</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>J.J. Abrams to Produce 'Micronauts' Movie?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/j-j-abrams-to-produce-micronauts-movie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/j-j-abrams-to-produce-micronauts-movie/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/j-j-abrams-to-produce-micronauts-movie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" height="283" border="1" width="400" vspace="4" alt="Micronauts photo by flickr user " argonaut="" x="" http:="" www.flickr.com="" photos="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.scifisquad.com/media/2009/11/micronauts.jpg" /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><em>By: John Gholson</em></div>
<br />
Hasbro continues their steamrolling of Hollywood with the announcement that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jj-abrams/1450688/main">J.J. Abrams</a> (<em>Star Trek)</em> is in negotiations to produce a film based on their Micronauts property. The Japanese science-fiction action figure line from Takara was brought to the States in the 1970's by Mego (with some items replicated for the collector's market in 2002 by Palisades), but has kept a pretty low profile since the line's cancellation in 1980.<br />
<br />
Most fans are familiar with The Micronauts from the officially licensed Marvel Comic series, which ran throughout the 1980's, long after the toys had vanished from shelves. Image Comics and Devil's Due Publishing both tried their hand at a Micronauts comic book revival during the last decade, but were met with little success.<br />
<br />
The original Micronauts figures were an odd-looking assortment of strange heroes and bizarre aliens, and many of the toys featured interchangeable parts. While no over-arching story was created for the toys upon release (marking it as one of the few action figure assortment at the time with no built-in storyline), the comic versions of the Micronauts have positioned the characters as defenders of a microscopic universe, attempting to overthrow the evil Baron Karza.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scifisquad.com/2009/11/05/hasbro-keen-on-j-j-abrams-for-micronauts-revival/">More over at SciFi Squad</a><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/j-j-abrams-to-produce-micronauts-movie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19225322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/j-j-abrams-to-produce-micronauts-movie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>hasbro</category><category>J. J. Abrams</category><category>J.J.Abrams</category><category>Marvel Comics</category><category>MarvelComics</category><category>mego</category><category>micronauts</category><category>takara</category><dc:creator>Cinematical staff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Danny Boyle Knows Where He'll Spend '127 Hours'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/danny-boyle-knows-where-hell-spend-127-hours/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/danny-boyle-knows-where-hell-spend-127-hours/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/danny-boyle-knows-where-hell-spend-127-hours/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-searchlight/" rel="tag">Fox Searchlight</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/dannyboyle.jpg" alt="" />After a year of speculation (Will it be James Bond? Will it be <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/12/is-danny-boyle-going-back-to-mumbai/"><em>Maximum City</em></a>? <em>Trainspotting 2</em>?), <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/danny-boyle/1393366/main">Danny Boyle</a> has finally settled on his next project. <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/bfdealmemo/2009/11/boyle-searchlight-firm-mountaineer-tale.html"><em>Variety </em></a>reports that it will be <em>127 Hours</em>, the tale of mountain climber Aron Ralston. Boyle has been loosely attached to the project since June when the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2009/06/danny-boyle-fox-searchlight-sign-longterm-deal.html"><em>LA Times </em></a>reported that Boyle and Fox Searchlight had signed a long term, best friends forever deal. Boyle has already penned a treatment, and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/simon-beaufoy/1969349/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Simon Beaufoy</a> is in talks to write the script. <br />
<br />
In this age of flashmob media stories, you might have forgotten the tale of Ralston. Like your humble authoress and Balloon Boy, Ralston hails from Colorado. He became famous for a Utah climbing accident in 2003, when an 800 lb boulder shifted and crushed his hand. Ralston was forced to choose between life and limb, and in a stomach-turning story heard around the world, he amputated his own hand with a pocketknife. In the media frenzy that followed, Ralston was hailed as a hero and as an idiot, because he had chosen to go climbing alone and without notifying anyone. It was particularly intense locally, and I still remember the heroism debate Ralston sparked in my American Culture class. (It even inspired one student's final project!) Since those heady days of early fame, Ralston has enjoyed success with his autobiography, continues to climb, and is a motivational speaker. <br />
<br />
The director is already on the casting hunt for the part of Ralston, which <em>Variety </em>declares will be "a plum job" because it will force an actor to work solo for most of the shoot. Below the jump, I've embedded a video of Ralston describing his amputation. Watch it to prepare for two hours of unflinching detail, and sound off on who you think should be lucky enough to act out a very painful <em>127 Hours. </em><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/danny-boyle-knows-where-hell-spend-127-hours/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Danny Boyle Knows Where He'll Spend '127 Hours'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/danny-boyle-knows-where-hell-spend-127-hours/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19224224/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/05/danny-boyle-knows-where-hell-spend-127-hours/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>127 Hours</category><category>127Hours</category><category>Aron Ralston</category><category>AronRalston</category><category>Danny Boyle</category><category>DannyBoyle</category><category>featured</category><category>Fox Searchlight</category><category>FoxSearchlight</category><category>Simon Beaufoy</category><category>SimonBeaufoy</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Johnny Depp Might Be 'The Tourist'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/johnny-depp-might-be-the-tourist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/johnny-depp-might-be-the-tourist/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/johnny-depp-might-be-the-tourist/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/angelina-jolie/" rel="tag">Angelina Jolie</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/johnny-depp/" rel="tag">Johnny Depp</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/johnny-depp.jpeg" />Sony's thriller <em>The Tourist</em> just keeps sending its talent packing. Originally set to be <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/11/04/charlize-theron-recruits-tom-cruise-in-the-tourist/">a vehicle for Tom Cruise and Charlize Theron</a>, it shifted gears last month and was re-cast with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/angelina-jolie/1804211/main">Angelina Jolie</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/sam-worthington/2015713/main">Sam Worthington</a>. But once again, <em>The Tourist </em>finds itself without travel arrangements for a male lead as <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/bfdealmemo/2009/11/depp-charges-the-tourist-.html"><em>Variety </em></a>reports that Worthington is out due to "creative disagreements" and<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/johnny-depp/1148905/main"> Johnny Depp</a> is in. <br />
<br />
Depp is still in talks to play the hapless American tourist, and with the way this film is going, one can't assume it's finalized. But if it is, it might just be the casting coup of 2010. A Depp-Jolie pair-up has been something dreamed about by a lot of producers and studios over the years. Once upon a time, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/02/01/angelina-jolie-and-johnny-depp-to-new-heights/">rumor even had them attached to play</a> Cathy and Heathcliff in <em>Wuthering Heights. </em> People want to see them having onscreen sex. It'd be the hottest thing since ... well, Brad Pitt and Jolie having sex onscreen. (And off. Hey, I'm just being honest. There was a reason everyone wanted to see their offspring.)<br />
<br />
<em>The Tourist </em>is also on the hunt for a director. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/florian-henckel-von-donnersmarck/437857/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck</a> was circling the project, but departed alongside Worthington over those whispery creative differences. Reportedly, a lot of directors are interested, including <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/alfonso-cuaron/1848529/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Alfonso Cuaron</a>. While shake-ups can be be a sign of a bad film, I'd like to think that a thriller that winds up with Jolie, Depp, and Cuaron came together exactly as it was meant to.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/johnny-depp-might-be-the-tourist/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19223882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/johnny-depp-might-be-the-tourist/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Alfonso Cuaron</category><category>AlfonsoCuaron</category><category>angelina jolie</category><category>AngelinaJolie</category><category>charlize theron</category><category>CharlizeTheron</category><category>Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck</category><category>FlorianHenckelVonDonnersmarck</category><category>johnny Depp</category><category>JohnnyDepp</category><category>sam worthington</category><category>SamWorthington</category><category>The Tourist</category><category>TheTourist</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Roger Rabbit Sequel Will Contain Both 2D and Mo-Cap Animation</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/roger-rabbit-sequel-will-contain-both-2d-and-mo-cap-animation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/roger-rabbit-sequel-will-contain-both-2d-and-mo-cap-animation/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/roger-rabbit-sequel-will-contain-both-2d-and-mo-cap-animation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/noir/" rel="tag">Noir</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/roger_rabbit.jpg" />As Peter reported a few days ago, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/robert-zemeckis/1137687/main">Robert Zemeckis</a> is going forward with <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/01/roger-rabbit-sequel-moving-forward/">a Roger Rabbit sequel</a>. We all seem to be intrigued by the possibility of returning to Toontown, but Zemeckis' obsession with motion capture really casts a Judge Doom-like shadow over the project. Will he motion capture Roger Rabbit and his Toontown friends? Or will Zemeckis return to the old school of hand-drawn animation?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/11/03/exclusive-robert-zemeckis-indicates-hell-use-performance-capture-and-3-d-in-roger-rabbit-sequel/">MTV</a> caught up with Zemeckis, who was quick to assure fans of the bumbling Roger that he will remain his cuddly 2D self. "I wouldn't use it for the cartoon characters, because I think they should stay two-dimensional because that's what - I wouldn't dimensonalize Roger," he said. "And I couldn't dimensonalize Jessica even if I wanted to because she doesn't have a nose. We wouldn't want to give her a nose." But motion capture will be a part of <em>Roger Rabbit 2</em>. The technology is like Zemeckis' whale, and he's determined to exploit every possibility with it. His current plan appears to involve using motion-capture for the human performances. "All the other characters that [the cartoons] would sort of have fun with would be magnificent in performance capture technology." <br />
<br />
There's that Judge Doom shadow again. The clumsy way humans and toons interacted was the point of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/who-framed-roger-rabbit/1039070/main"><em>Who Framed Roger Rabbit?</em></a> It was the contrast that was interesting and fun. Having animated humans just seems to take it on a trip into the Uncanny Valley. The project is still in its early stages, so maybe Zemeckis will surprise us, and have the technology be part of the story. Everyone on the interwebs seems to be championing the idea of the toons having to deal with technological advances. We can hope for that, and not that Zemeckis will just shove in a motion-captured cast just because he can't stop himself.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/roger-rabbit-sequel-will-contain-both-2d-and-mo-cap-animation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19223740/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/roger-rabbit-sequel-will-contain-both-2d-and-mo-cap-animation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>motion capture</category><category>MotionCapture</category><category>Robert Zemeckis</category><category>RobertZemeckis</category><category>Roger Rabbit 2</category><category>Roger Rabbit sequel</category><category>RogerRabbit2</category><category>RogerRabbitSequel</category><category>who framed roger rabbit</category><category>WhoFramedRogerRabbit</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Guttenberg, Danson and Selleck = 'Three Men and a Bride'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/guttenberg-danson-and-selleck-three-men-and-a-bride/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/guttenberg-danson-and-selleck-three-men-and-a-bride/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/guttenberg-danson-and-selleck-three-men-and-a-bride/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/disney/" rel="tag">Disney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/threemenbaby.jpg" />We are now in the age of the 20-year-old sequel. <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,</em> <em>Wall Street 2</em>, <em>Who Framed Roger Rabbit?</em>, <em>Beverly Hills Hop 4</em>, <em>The Untouchables: Capone Rising. </em>It hasn't been "too long," it isn't awkward to go back. It'll make you feel young again! Now we've reached the pinnacle of past grabs, as WENN is reporting that<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/steve-guttenberg/1798281/main?icid=movsmartsearch"> Steve Guttenberg</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tom-selleck/2146537/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Tom Selleck,</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/ted-danson/1787384/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Ted Danson</a> are reuniting for <em>Three Men and a Bride. <br />
<br />
</em>"Disney's developing <em>Three Men and a Bride</em>. That's going to be a smash. A smash hit. They're bringing everybody back for that," says Guttenberg. "Nobody knows about it. I'm the first to talk about it."<br />
<br />
Guttenberg might just become king of the <em>It's Never To Late To Return!</em> movement, as he dreams of reviving all of his past franchises. "It's definitely time for another <em>Police Academy.</em> And I think they could make another <em>Cocoon.</em> They're surefire hits and I think they're good for the world. They make the world a better place and that's what it's all about." Hopefully, he's not setting his hopes on reviving <em>Short Circuit</em>, as that has become someone else's dream to live. But I think there were a lot of unanswered questions about <em>The Day After,</em> and nothing's trendier than the apocalypse. It's only been twenty-five years ....<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/guttenberg-danson-and-selleck-three-men-and-a-bride/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19223768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/guttenberg-danson-and-selleck-three-men-and-a-bride/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Disney</category><category>Steve Guttenberg</category><category>SteveGuttenberg</category><category>Ted Danson</category><category>TedDanson</category><category>three men and a baby</category><category>Three Men and a Bride</category><category>ThreeMenAndABaby</category><category>ThreeMenAndABride</category><category>tom selleck</category><category>TomSelleck</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>