<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Coders Crack the Netflix Cinematch Algorithm</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/29/coders-crack-the-netflix-cinematch-algorithm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/29/coders-crack-the-netflix-cinematch-algorithm/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/29/coders-crack-the-netflix-cinematch-algorithm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/06/netflix.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Netflix began a contest in 2006 for coders to win $1,000,000 if they could improve Netflix's Cinematch algorithm by at least 10%, and because coders like a good challenge (and people like money), folks have been steadily tinkering with their 1's and 0's ever since. (You can read more about the contest and its rules <a href="http://www.netflixprize.com">here.</a>) Three years later, two teams came together with the winning code, which was confirmed Friday. Netflix's VP of corporate communications Steve Swasey told <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/06/winning-teams-join-to-qualify-for-1-million-netflix-prize/"><em>Wired</em>,</a> "This has been terribly exciting. It's like watching the Belmont Stakes, the Preakness and the Indy 500 all at once -- for geeks." </p>
<p>There are still a few hurdles for the team to jump through; the Netflix contest site states, "your qualifying submissions must have the largest accuracy improvement verified by the Contest judges, you must share your method with (and non-exclusively license it to) Netflix, and you must describe to the world how you did it and why it works."<br /><br />As <em>Wired</em> points out, Netflix isn't the only company to dip its toes into "so-called Prize economics," which is when these companies offer prize incentives to outsiders to basically do work for free with an outside chance of winning big bucks. But doesn't this say to companies that it's okay to try and get lots and lots of hours from (some) highly skilled professionals for free? It would have cost Netflix far more than $1M to get consultants and coders on the job, especially for full-time gigs with all the benefits and trimmings. I'm not a code geek, but if I were, I'd probably be interested in this sort of challenge as well. On the other hand, perhaps I'd rather have a full-time job at Netflix writing code all day along with, you know, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">insurance.</span></p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/29/coders-crack-the-netflix-cinematch-algorithm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Coders Crack the Netflix Cinematch Algorithm</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/29/coders-crack-the-netflix-cinematch-algorithm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19081720/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/29/coders-crack-the-netflix-cinematch-algorithm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>netflix</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>An 'Antichrist' of a Video Game</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/24/an-antichrist-of-a-video-game/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/24/an-antichrist-of-a-video-game/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/24/an-antichrist-of-a-video-game/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/06/antichrist.jpg" />What does Willem Dafoe's junk, a talking fox, and a dead child all have in common? Well, they're going to star in a video game adaptation of Lars von Trier's <em>Antichrist</em> courtesy of Morten Iversen, a developer with some serious credentials in the world of game geekery. Formerly of Io Interactive, Iversen now works at von Trier's Zentropa production company.<br /> <br /> Russ Frushtick over at <a href="http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2009/06/19/antichrist-game-director-absolutely-not-available-in-wal-mart/">MTV Multiplayer</a> tracked down Iversen to ask him what the hell is up with this project, so to speak, and here's what he had to say.<br /> <br /> "Von Trier has been extremely fond of video games for ages, and has been an avid player of 'Alone in the Dark,'" explained Iverson. "He's been circulating the idea internally... that making games would be a good idea." He describes it as "a nightmarish version of 'Myst.'"<br /> <br /> ("Alone in the Dark"? <em>Really?</em> Come on, Lars!)<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.horrorsquad.com/2009/06/23/yep-the-antichrist-video-game-seriously/"> More on HorrorSquad</a>!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/24/an-antichrist-of-a-video-game/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19075866/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/24/an-antichrist-of-a-video-game/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>antichrist</category><category>charlotte gainsbourg</category><category>CharlotteGainsbourg</category><category>guillermo del toro</category><category>GuillermoDelToro</category><category>lars von trier</category><category>LarsVonTrier</category><category>video game</category><category>VideoGame</category><category>willem dafoe</category><category>WillemDafoe</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>WTF? Sylvester Stallone's Dongle</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/22/wtf-sylvester-stallones-dongle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/22/wtf-sylvester-stallones-dongle/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/22/wtf-sylvester-stallones-dongle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/06/rocky-usb_small.jpg" alt="" />File this under "Things that have brought the world this much closer to the apocalypse." Introducing the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084602/"><em>Rocky III</em></a> joke USB drive, with Sylvester's goods as the USB connector. You can also pick up a fake drive that looks like Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers) or Clubber Lang (Mr. T). They do sit ups when you insert them into your USB drive. These obviously high-quality doodads will set you back <span class="regular-price" id="product-price-581"><span class="price">&yen; 2,850.00 each (or about $30), or you can buy all three for </span></span><span class="label"><span class="price-notice"><span class="price">&yen; 5,150.00. And the worst part? You can't even store anything on them; they're just pieces of plastic that do sit-ups when you plug them in to your USB drive. If you feel a burning desire to buy one, <a href="http://www.geekstuff4u.com/usb-crunching-rocky-iii.html">here's the link,</a> but don't say we didn't warn you.</span></span></span> Take a peek at all three in the gallery below.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/rocky-iii-usb-drives/">Rocky III USB Drives</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/rocky-iii-usb-drives/2098167/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/06/carlweathers_large_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/rocky-iii-usb-drives/2098166/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/06/rocky-usb_large_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/rocky-iii-usb-drives/2098165/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/06/mrt_large_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><br />(via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5296975/rockys-third-leg-usb-drive-pumps-the-abs">Gizmodo</a>)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/22/wtf-sylvester-stallones-dongle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19073224/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/22/wtf-sylvester-stallones-dongle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Apollo Creed</category><category>ApolloCreed</category><category>Carl Weathers</category><category>CarlWeathers</category><category>Mr. T</category><category>Mr.T</category><category>rocky balboa</category><category>Rocky III</category><category>RockyBalboa</category><category>RockyIii</category><category>WTF</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>New Web Series 'Purefold' Takes 'Blade Runner' and Runs</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/05/new-web-series-purefold-takes-blade-runner-and-runs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/05/new-web-series-purefold-takes-blade-runner-and-runs/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/05/new-web-series-purefold-takes-blade-runner-and-runs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/07/blade_runner_poster-wikipedia.png" />We could argue for days if androids really dream of electric sheep or what those damn origami unicorns mean, but one thing we can know for sure is that copyright laws are more confusing than Mormon underwear. An excellent example of this is a new project from Ridley Scott's <a href="http://www.rsafilms.com/">RSA Films'</a> called <span style="font-style: italic;">Purefold.</span><br /> <br /> Free Scott, a part of Ridley Scott Associates Films, is hooking up with indie studio Ag8 to develop <em>Purefold,</em> a web series that will grapple with the themes in <em>Blade Runner</em> without actually referencing that world in any direct fashion. The web shorts, will could eventually become a TV series, will evoke the grand themes of the sci-fi classic -- compassion, humanity, identity, a dystopian future -- without using anything from the book it was based on ... due to copyright issues.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/05/new-web-series-purefold-takes-blade-runner-and-runs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Web Series 'Purefold' Takes 'Blade Runner' and Runs</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/05/new-web-series-purefold-takes-blade-runner-and-runs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19058109/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/05/new-web-series-purefold-takes-blade-runner-and-runs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>blade runner</category><category>BladeRunner</category><category>purefold</category><category>ridley scott</category><category>RidleyScott</category><category>web series</category><category>WebSeries</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>What's Up with the 'Where the Wild Things Are' Game?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/27/whats-up-with-the-where-the-wild-things-are-game/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/27/whats-up-with-the-where-the-wild-things-are-game/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/27/whats-up-with-the-where-the-wild-things-are-game/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/10/wild-things---peekaboopicks.com.jpg" alt="" />Folks far and wide are eagerly awaiting the film adaptation of Maurice Sendak's classic <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/"><span style="font-style: italic;">Where the Wild Things Are, </span></a>which, if you live under a rock, is being directed by Spike Jonze. (He also wrote the adaptation with Dave Eggers, so here's hoping Jonze could keep the twee to a minimum.) The <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/22/new-images-where-the-wild-things-are/">photos</a> and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/25/first-where-the-wild-things-are-trailer/">trailer</a> are so fantastic, I could cry. What's the rumpus, you say?<br /><br />Last year <a href="http://kotaku.com/5054290/">Kotaku</a> reported a rumor that Brash Entertainment would be developing a video game based on the film. Brash aimed to make great video games based on movie licenses, but instead ended up making games like<span style="font-style: italic;"> Alvin and the Chipmunks.<br /><br /></span>Interestingly enough, one of the cofounders of Brash, Thomas Tull, is also the head of Legendary Pictures, one of the production companies behind <span style="font-style: italic;">Wild Things.</span> However, Tull quit and Brash folded. <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2008/10/thomas-tull-lea.html">Variety</a> reported, "Tull is believed to have been disappointed with the quality of Brash's games, as well as the company's strategic direction." This left many titles in the lurch, including <span style="font-style: italic;">Wild Things.</span> <br /> <br /> So, what now? Sounds like Amaze Entertainment will be taking over, as per the bio of <a href="http://www.amazeent.com/company/">Michael Waite,</a> Studio Head / Executive Producer, which some blogger stumbled upon. <br /> <br /> "Michael's contributions include Electronic Arts' best-selling <span style="font-style: italic;">Need for Speed</span> and <span style="font-style: italic;">Harry Potter</span> series, and other top tier franchises including titles such as <span style="font-style: italic;">Call of Duty: Roads to Victory,</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">Shrek the Third,</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">Lord of the Rings: Tactics, Lemony Snicket's: A Series of Unfortunate Events,</span> as well as two titles due out later this year: <span style="font-style: italic;">Where The Wild Things Are</span> on all console platforms and <span style="font-style: italic;">Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings</span> for PSP."<br /> <br />But! Amaze is still looking for a publisher for <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/05/where-the-wild-things-are-video-game-looking-for-a-new-publisher.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">Wild Things.</span></a> With <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/25/warner-bros-s-brave-new-techie-world/">Warner Bros.</a> talking big about its interest in technology, will they be the ones to snap it up? And more importantly, will it be any good?!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/27/whats-up-with-the-where-the-wild-things-are-game/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19049470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/27/whats-up-with-the-where-the-wild-things-are-game/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>rumor</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><category>where the wild things are</category><category>WhereTheWildThingsAre</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>WTF: Paul Blart Web Games</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/26/wtf-paul-blart-web-games/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/26/wtf-paul-blart-web-games/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/26/wtf-paul-blart-web-games/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><center><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/05/mallcop.jpg" alt="" /></center><br /><br />If you're feeling bored at your desk and you don't feel like playing good games while toggling between work documents and your desktop, might we suggest a few <em>Paul Blart</em> time-wasters? (And by suggest, I mean, go straight to <a href="http://popcap.com/">PopCap Games</a> and get Peggle or Plants vs. Zombies.)<br /><br />You have two choices for Blart-tastic web-based fun, and one downloadable game as well. In "<a href="http://www.shockwave.com/gamelanding/mallcop.jsp?extcmp=1_mallcop_online_df_OL_action">Mall Cop The Game,</a>" you ride your Segway around the mall looking for criminals, alarms, and special goodies that increase your time or give you extra points. And in <a href="http://www.addictinggames.com/mallcopslalom.html"><em>Paul Blart: Mall Cop</em> Slalom,</a> you're just zooming away on your little Segway trying to avoid a skateboarding punk, potted plants, and benches. <a href="http://www.sonypictures.com/homevideo/paulblartmallcop/mallmazegame/"><em>Paul Blart: Mall Cop</em> - Mall Maze</a> is actually the best of the bunch, relatively speaking, as it's a sort of Pac-Man game where you avoid criminals and collect candy and badges.<br /><br />So where are the <em>Observe and Report</em> games? It could be totally old school, with Ronnie as Pac-Man trying to collect his pills and avoiding Detective Harrison and Brandi as Ms. Pac-Man collecting lipsticks and margaritas. The Yuen brothers could be like Super Mario Brothers. Or <em> Hey, 2K Games! Call me!</em><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/26/wtf-paul-blart-web-games/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1555939/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/26/wtf-paul-blart-web-games/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Observe and Report</category><category>ObserveAndReport</category><category>Paul Blart</category><category>paul blart mall cop</category><category>PaulBlart</category><category>PaulBlartMallCop</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Warner Bros.'s Brave New Techie World</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/25/warner-bros-s-brave-new-techie-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/25/warner-bros-s-brave-new-techie-world/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/25/warner-bros-s-brave-new-techie-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2005/08/rings01.jpg" alt="" />Just days after reports surfaced that Warner Bros. is bidding on <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118004074.htm">Midway Games,</a> which filed for Chapter 11 in February, and also took over the rights to EA's <em>Lord of the Rings</em> video game franchise*, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118004114.html">Variety</a> is reporting that the studio is getting ready to jump into the iPhone game. <br /><br />Sony, Paramount, and Warner Bros. have all been vying for attention from mobile gamers with releases like a <em>Star Trek</em> comic book app, an <em>Angels and Demons</em> video game app, and more. However, according to Warner Digital Distribution director of worldwide marketing Stephanie Bohn, WB is planning to release about 40 iPhone applications by the end of the year. WB just released a <em>Terminator</em> comic app tied to the opening of <em>Terminator: Salvation</em> and has more in the works for upcoming releases, as well as ideas for "animated episodic video apps and other apps built around Warner brands."<br /><br />As a recent survey by marketing research team <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10797_3-10245437-235.html">NPD</a> showed, more people are playing video games than going to the movies, and one distinct reason the numbers are rising isn't just the price of movie tickets. The numbers of casual video game players is increasing exponentially, partially due to the popularity, ease, and increasing quality of games available on iPhones and other handhelds. If movie studios get involved directly with video game developers, will the video game tie-ins improve? And as Bohn points out, "It doesn't cost a lot to launch an app... Relative to a TV show or a film, it's nothing." So, could this new strategy also mean good news for studios' sagging bottom lines (and for iPhone gaming addicts)?<br /><br />* Gamers are already suspicious of the newest <em>Lord of the Rings </em>game, <em> Lord of the Rings: Aragorn's Quest, </em>because it's being billed as family-friendly. EA's license for the franchise expired and reverted back to <em>New Line,</em> thus Warner Bros.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/25/warner-bros-s-brave-new-techie-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1554839/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/25/warner-bros-s-brave-new-techie-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>games</category><category>iphone</category><category>paramount</category><category>sony</category><category>terminator</category><category>terminator salvation</category><category>TerminatorSalvation</category><category>warner bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Righteous Kill 2' -- The Video Game!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/24/righteous-kill-didnt-get-a-sequel-but-the-video-game-did/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/24/righteous-kill-didnt-get-a-sequel-but-the-video-game-did/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/24/righteous-kill-didnt-get-a-sequel-but-the-video-game-did/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-games/" rel="tag">Movie Games</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/05/righteouskill.jpg" id="img1" alt="" />The predictably and sadly stinky <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/09/12/review-righteous-kill/"><em>Righteous Kill</em></a>, starring Al Pacino and Robert De Niro as cranky old cops trying to solve a possible serial killer case and make old rights wrong etc. etc ad infinitum, has a video game. No, I didn't know it either! Probably because it was put out by Merscom and Starz Media and is a downloadable PC game that can be yours for just $6.99 via <a href="http://www.bigfishgames.com/download-games/3864/righteous-kill/index.html">Big Fish Games.</a> And now there's a sequel called <a href="http://www.bigfishgames.com/download-games/5446/righteous-kill-2/index.html">Righteous Kill: Revenge of the Poet Killer, </a>which can also be yours for $6.99. <br /> <br /> Both games have the barest connections to the actual movie. Here's the description of the first game:<br /> <br /> "Step into the shoes of Erica Dean as she investigates crime scenes in New York City. It`s a man hunt for a vigilante on a killing spree through 16 locations containing over a thousand hidden objects. With the help of Sergeant Vasquez, Erica will use clues she collects in a number of detective-themed mini games. Inspired by the motion picture film, <em>Righteous Kill</em> features clips from the movie and 15 animated levels."<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/24/righteous-kill-didnt-get-a-sequel-but-the-video-game-did/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Righteous Kill 2' -- The Video Game!</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/24/righteous-kill-didnt-get-a-sequel-but-the-video-game-did/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1554850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/24/righteous-kill-didnt-get-a-sequel-but-the-video-game-did/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>al pacino</category><category>AlPacino</category><category>righteous kill</category><category>RighteousKill</category><category>robert de niro</category><category>RobertDeNiro</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 10:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>GameStop Offers Some Sucky Games for Movie Stubs</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/18/gamestop-offers-some-sucky-games-for-movie-stubs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/18/gamestop-offers-some-sucky-games-for-movie-stubs/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/18/gamestop-offers-some-sucky-games-for-movie-stubs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/05/ghostbusters.jpg" alt="" />In an interesting video game/movie tie-in, GameStop has a promo running until June 30, 2009 ("or until all e-Movie Cash tickets have been distributed, whichever comes first," natch) called <a href="http://%20http://www.gamestop.com/gs/landing/ltmltg/default.aspx">"Love the Movie - Live the Game,"</a> and it's definitely a mixed bag.<br /><br />Basically, if you buy one of the following games, you can get a $10 voucher for select movies at participating theaters that's only good until July 31, 2009. That's a lot of ifs, especially if you check out the games they're offering, which are not all tied in to current releases. And some of them will make real gaming geeks bleed from the eyes. Take a look.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/18/gamestop-offers-some-sucky-games-for-movie-stubs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GameStop Offers Some Sucky Games for Movie Stubs</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/18/gamestop-offers-some-sucky-games-for-movie-stubs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1549118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/18/gamestop-offers-some-sucky-games-for-movie-stubs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>ghostbusters</category><category>hannah montana</category><category>HannahMontana</category><category>ice age</category><category>IceAge</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>night at the museum</category><category>NightAtTheMuseum</category><category>resident evil 5</category><category>ResidentEvil5</category><category>terminator salvation</category><category>TerminatorSalvation</category><category>UP</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><category>wolverine</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Movie Marketing Invades Twitter - Do You Even Care?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/06/movie-marketing-invades-twitter-do-you-even-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/06/movie-marketing-invades-twitter-do-you-even-care/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/06/movie-marketing-invades-twitter-do-you-even-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/05/twitter_logo.jpg" alt="" />So, who out there is already sick of hearing about Twitter? I know there are a few people in my life that can't help but roll their eyes when they even hear the word, but I'll totally admit it to being full fledged <a href="http://twitter.com/Jess1975">addict</a>. The number of smart-phone users and people on social networks like Twitter are reaching all-time highs, and in a <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118003119.html?categoryid=3614&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2564">piece</a> for <em>Variety</em>, Susan Lambert looked at some of the ways in which movie studios are looking to cash in. But the bad news is that nobody is quite sure about whether or not this new style of advertising is a success. Now that four out of the six majors already have Twitter accounts, and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/19/crank-2-poster-debuts-on-twitter/ ">poster launches</a> and ARG games are popping up daily, it would seem that everyone loves a new toy -- whether it works or not.<br /> <br /> If you think back to a year ago, the studios were all about creating viral campaigns (Blame <a href="http://television.aol.com/celebs/jj-abrams/1450688/main">J.J. Abrams</a> if you must) and fans could spend hours pouring over HTML code to find a hidden message that located a secret 'hatch' or a photo of a <a href="http://www.1-18-08.com/">mutated whale</a>. But the original ARG-style viral campaigns have already faded away, and while there are still a few of them out there, they haven't exactly been a success (case in point: how many of you out there signed up for Emmerich's <a href="http://www.instituteforhumancontinuity.org/">IHC lottery</a>? That's what I thought). I think the biggest deterrent for fans was that if you wanted to play along, it was going to be an awful lot of work. But with the automation of services like Twitter or a dedicated movie app on your smart-phone, it's a one time deal. If you don't have time to take down Skynet by engaging in a complicated treasure hunt, why not just <a href="http://twitter.com/ResistSkynet">sign up</a> as part of the Human Resistance and John Connor will do the work for you? <br /> <br /> <em>After the jump find out if Twitter is really that different from any other advertising medium...</em><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/06/movie-marketing-invades-twitter-do-you-even-care/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Movie Marketing Invades Twitter - Do You Even Care?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118003119.html?categoryid=3614&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2564>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/06/movie-marketing-invades-twitter-do-you-even-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1535234/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/06/movie-marketing-invades-twitter-do-you-even-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>marketing</category><category>skynet</category><category>technology</category><category>terminator</category><category>the crazies</category><category>TheCrazies</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>"Tourists" Snap Shots for 'Demons,' or: Why Opie's Going to Hell</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/27/tourists-snap-shots-for-demons-or-why-opies-going-to-hell/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/27/tourists-snap-shots-for-demons-or-why-opies-going-to-hell/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/27/tourists-snap-shots-for-demons-or-why-opies-going-to-hell/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/religious/" rel="tag">Religious</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/summer-movies/" rel="tag">Summer Movies</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/04/cine-angels-demons-pos.jpg" />I actually think this is sort of clever, in a "we can afford to do this" kind of way (which is more than I can say for <em>The Da Vinci Code</em>, am I right?!). Apparently, when the production of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/angels-and-demons/28282/main"><em>Angels &amp; Demons</em></a> had been <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/16/angels-and-demons-forbidden-from-the-vatican/">refused permission</a> to shoot key scenes in the Vatican, special effects director Ryan Cook had a team of people blend in with tourists and take about 250,000 pictures and shoot hours of video to use as reference back in Los Angeles.<br /> <br /> Said Cook in an interview with an Italian movie magazine (then excerpted by <a href="http://news.scotsman.com/entertainment/Fake-tourists-used-to-create.5207260.jp">The Scotsman</a>, and further excerpted here): "The ban really put us in a lot of trouble because we could not use the precision instruments which are used to take photographs and make reconstructions in the computer."<br /> <br /> On a mild tangent, I have to ask whether or not our readers are getting excited for the film itself. Of all the anticipation for summer blockbusters, and especially out of the May offerings, this seems to be the quietest title of the bunch (though twice-baked, half-volume controversy and the lack of a Cannes bow will do that to a film). I've only been assured that this book was better than its predecessor (I know, this one's a prequel), so did anyone here like <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-da-vinci-code/21002/main"><em>Da Vinci</em></a>? And whether you did or didn't care for that film, are any of you specifically psyched for round two?<br /> <br /> [via <a href="http://www.moviecitynews.com/">MCN</a>]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/27/tourists-snap-shots-for-demons-or-why-opies-going-to-hell/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1528797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/27/tourists-snap-shots-for-demons-or-why-opies-going-to-hell/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>angels and demons</category><category>AngelsAndDemons</category><category>dan brown</category><category>DanBrown</category><category>ewan mcgregor</category><category>EwanMcgregor</category><category>ron howard</category><category>RonHoward</category><category>the da vinci code</category><category>the vatican</category><category>TheDaVinciCode</category><category>TheVatican</category><category>tom hanks</category><category>TomHanks</category><category>vatican</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Life After 3D: Henry Selick Hearts Holograms</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/22/life-after-3d-henry-selick-hearts-holograms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/22/life-after-3d-henry-selick-hearts-holograms/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/22/life-after-3d-henry-selick-hearts-holograms/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a></p><img hspace="5" border="1" align="right" vspace="5" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/04/selick.jpg" />Henry Selick, the magic man behind painstaking puppetry in movies like <em>Coraline</em> and <em>The Nightmare Before Christmas,</em> is thinking way out of the 3D box. As the featured keynote speaker at this year's <a href="http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Press_Releases1&amp;TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&amp;CONTENTID=14017">National Association of Broadcasters</a> event in Las Vegas, Selick discussed "how digital technology has helped to revitalize the handcrafted approach of stop-motion animation." This was clearly apparent from <em>Coraline,</em> which even in its limited theatrical run made $74.8M, according to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=coraline.htm">BoxOfficeMojo.com.<br /></a><br />Selick also discussed the limits of 3D filmmaking; besides the cost and the time involved, 3D films have a limited time on the big screen because there just aren't as many theaters able to project 3D films. Now that the industry is hyping 3D, there are more films competing for those precious few theaters equipped with the technology. (Whether or not anyone really needed to see the Jonas Brothers's purity rings up close in three glorious dimensions is another story altogether.) Pixar's <em>Up</em> is even premiering at Cannes. <br /><br />Meanwhile, DreamWorks's Jeffrey Katzenberg has been talking up 3D tech for years, and at a mini-preview of <em>Monsters vs. Aliens</em> I attended, even discussed the possibility of people eventually buying their own hip, stylish 3D glasses. Personally, I think 3D can make even the shoddiest movie ten times cooler -- I mean, what other reason is there to see the remake of <em>My Bloody Valentine</em> other than to duck a very realistic pick-axe aiming for your eye?<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/22/life-after-3d-henry-selick-hearts-holograms/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Life After 3D: Henry Selick Hearts Holograms</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/22/life-after-3d-henry-selick-hearts-holograms/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1524884/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/22/life-after-3d-henry-selick-hearts-holograms/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>3d</category><category>coraline</category><category>dreamworks</category><category>henry selick</category><category>HenrySelick</category><category>pixar</category><category>Up</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Ridley Scott Joins the 3D Club for 'Forever War'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/31/ridley-scott-joins-the-3d-club-for-forever-war/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/31/ridley-scott-joins-the-3d-club-for-forever-war/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/31/ridley-scott-joins-the-3d-club-for-forever-war/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/the_forever_war.jpg" />If you were watching the box office over the weekend, you might have noticed that the success of <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/monsters-vs-aliens/28117/main">Monsters vs. Aliens</a></em> has everyone talking about 3D again. Everywhere you look, <a href="http://www.riskybusinessblog.com/2009/03/3d-movies-monsters-aliens.html">critics are weighing in</a> on whether 3D really is the wave of the future, or another last gasp of a fad that will fall by the wayside soon enough. Well, I don't know about that, but one thing is for sure; I think we all better get used to wearing those goofy goggles, because another director is looking to get into the 3D game. During a reception at the British Film Institute for director <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/ridley-scott/1134845/main">Ridley Scott</a>, he spoke about his upcoming sci-fi actioner, <em>The Forever War</em>, and he <a href="http://www.wharf.co.uk/2009/03/ridley-scott-on-alien-3d-and-s.html">told reporters</a> that after getting a glimpse of James Cameron's <em>Avatar</em>, "...I've got to go 3D. It's going to be phenomenal." <br /><br />The film is based on the 1974 science fiction novel by Joe Haldeman and was <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/10/13/ridley-scott-returns-to-sci-fi-with-the-forever-war/">announced</a> last October. But, Scott has had his hands full with his <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/Nottingham/">Robin Hood update</a>, the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/04/ridley-scott-set-to-direct-the-story-of-gucci/#comments">story of Gucci</a>, and the inexplicable decision to <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/03/new-story-details-for-candy-land-monopoly-and-ouija/">bring Monopoly to the big screen</a>. <em>Forever War</em> looks to be a little more in line with Scott's usual fare; sci-fi, and politically charged action flicks, and is described as, "Both an action-laden and contemplative story of an interstellar war between humanity and the enigmatic Tauran species, it deals with themes like the inhumanity of both war and its attendant bureaucracy". The book was considered to be a response to the authors own military service during the Vietnam War, even using a 'time-travel glitch' that would return soldiers centuries later as a parallel to the US military experience when soldiers returned home.<br /><br />Since the release of <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/beowulf/23494/main">Beowulf</a></em>, I have been hoping that a filmmaker would finally get a strong enough story on screen that would complement the technology which has become jaw-dropping. I'll keep my fingers crossed that between Cameron and Scott, the two will make 3D something more than the standard for kids films; or even worse, just another gimmick.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.wharf.co.uk/2009/03/ridley-scott-on-alien-3d-and-s.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/31/ridley-scott-joins-the-3d-club-for-forever-war/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1502296/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/31/ridley-scott-joins-the-3d-club-for-forever-war/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>3d</category><category>avatar</category><category>james cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>monopoly</category><category>ridley scott</category><category>RidleyScott</category><category>the forever war</category><category>TheForeverWar</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Who Wants a Custom DVD From Warner Bros?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/23/who-wants-a-custom-dvd-from-warner-bros/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/23/who-wants-a-custom-dvd-from-warner-bros/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/23/who-wants-a-custom-dvd-from-warner-bros/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/warner-bros-logo-thumb.jpg" />Offering custom, burn-to-order DVDs seems like such a no-brainer that it's a wonder no one has come up with it before -- but Warner Bros has done it first, and that's what counts.  According to <em><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i2ded48a3101e540b15e37163179e3905">The Hollywood Reporter</a></em>, the studio is opening its archives and offering film fans the chance to order old films that have never been released on DVD before. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.wbshop.com/Warner-Archive/MOVIEARCHIVE,default,sc.html">The Warner Archive</a> currently offers 150 films from Warner Bros, RKO, and MGM. They're all $19.95, and they'll be adding 20 titles a month, hoping to have 300 films and television shows available by the end of the year.  It's not quite as good as offering them up for instant watch, but it's a brilliant way to reintroduce some lost films to the public. It's also rather eco-friendly ... there won't be hundreds of unwanted copies of <em>Wichita</em> being dumped in a garbage bin if it's made to order. <br /><br />There's some pretty cool stuff to pick from already ... my fingers are itching at all the Clark Gable and Cary Grant selections, wondering if <em>The Abdication</em> is as good as it sounds, and laughing at the truly hideous poster art so many of them have. <br /><br />Warners hasn't forgotten about new technology either -- they'll also be launching an iTunes podcast called <em>The Golden Age of Hollywood</em> that will feature archival footage. I hate to sound cheesy, but this is the kind of preservation the Internet was meant for. It's nice to see a studio taking advantage of it.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/23/who-wants-a-custom-dvd-from-warner-bros/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1495384/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/23/who-wants-a-custom-dvd-from-warner-bros/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>burn to order DVDs</category><category>BurnToOrderDvds</category><category>The Warner Bros Archive</category><category>TheWarnerBrosArchive</category><category>Warner Bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Crank 2' Poster Debuts on Twitter</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/19/crank-2-poster-debuts-on-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/19/crank-2-poster-debuts-on-twitter/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/19/crank-2-poster-debuts-on-twitter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lionsgate-films/" rel="tag">Lionsgate Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/posters/" rel="tag">Posters</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/crank-2-crop.jpg" />Internet history was made on March 18, 2009. Lionsgate became the first studio to debut original content on <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>, which means anyone who signs onto the social media network after this point is officially five minutes late. (Hooray! I made it under the wire.)<br /><br />What was this content? Why, a <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/crank-high-voltage/33734/main"><em>Crank 2: High Voltage </em></a>poster! It's very yellow and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jason-statham/1681196/main">Jason Statham-y</a>, for those missing his squint from the popping vein poster. I've put both in the gallery below. Maybe we'll get some shirtless pictures to pad it out in the next few weeks. (Hey, a girl can dream.)<br /><br />But more important than the poster is where it appeared, and what this might mean for all of us. Many are applauding this new frontier of communication, while others say this is the beginning of the end -- the Re-Tweeting of posters, stills, and trailers could put us all out of work. For other media geeks, the <em>Crank 2</em> poster means that Twitter is no longer cool, and is now just another tool of the corporate machine. <br /><br />All I know is that Lionsgate is <em>really</em> lucky TwitPic was working, and didn't replace Statham with a Jason who uploaded his photo at the exact same time they did. That happened to me the other day, and boy was it embarrassing.<br /><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/crank-2/">Crank 2</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/crank-2/1440225/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/crank-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/crank-2/1440224/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/crank-poster-original_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/19/crank-2-poster-debuts-on-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1492482/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/19/crank-2-poster-debuts-on-twitter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Crank 2</category><category>crank 2 high voltage</category><category>Crank2</category><category>Crank2HighVoltage</category><category>jason statham</category><category>JasonStatham</category><category>Lionsgate</category><category>Twitter</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Movie Seat Shaker to Debut with 'Fast and Furious'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/18/movie-seat-shaker-to-debut-with-fast-and-furious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/18/movie-seat-shaker-to-debut-with-fast-and-furious/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/18/movie-seat-shaker-to-debut-with-fast-and-furious/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/eats031909.jpg" />If you thought smell-o-vision was weird, get prepared to keep a tight grip on your movie concessions -- the seats, they'll soon be shakin'.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/home-cinema/d-box-seat-shaker-gets-fast-furious-debut-575886">TechRadar</a> reports that there's a new motion-generating system called D-Box Motion Code, which will accompany films by shaking theater seats. It's "perfectly synchronized with all onscreen action, creating an unmatched realistic, immersive experience." The first film to get matched up with these seat-shakers is the upcoming <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/fast-and-furious/31559/main"><strong><em>Fast and Furious</em></strong></a><strong><em> </em></strong>(in theaters April 3), and in only two locations: Mann Chinese 6 in Hollywood, and the UltraStar Surprise Pointe 14 in Arizona. From there, either all the seats will start shaking in a cacophony of vibration and shrieks, or there will be a revolt of sticky movie patrons.<br /><br />There are so many scenarios where I can see this being a real annoyance. Just as you get that drink to your lips, bzzzz! It's all over you. As a poor lad sits there trying to make his bladder ignore the insistence of that extra-large drink, vibrations send him into agony. And heck, would pregnant women be allowed on this cinematic "ride"?<br /><br />The idea is neat, but seems quite impractical. I like to curl up in the seat and experience the film, not go for a ride. But what do you think? Would you like your seat to rumble with the action on the screen?<br /><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/18/movie-seat-shaker-to-debut-with-fast-and-furious/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1490786/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/18/movie-seat-shaker-to-debut-with-fast-and-furious/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cinematical</category><category>D-Box Motion Code</category><category>D-boxMotionCode</category><category>featured</category><category>shaking movie seats</category><category>ShakingMovieSeats</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Buy This: World's First Wrist-Watch Video Phone</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/18/buy-this-worlds-first-wrist-watch-video-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/18/buy-this-worlds-first-wrist-watch-video-phone/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/18/buy-this-worlds-first-wrist-watch-video-phone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><img hspace="4" height="241" border="1" align="middle" width="450" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/02/dicktracywatchphone-(2).jpg" /><br /><br />Growing up, I'd always see guys like Dick Tracy use that ridiculously cool video wrist-watch phone and I'd wish something like that were real. Well, guess what -- it's finally real. Orange has announced the LG G910 Touch Watch phone in Europe, making it the first video watch phone to be sold by a major mobile carrier. With a planned release date of "later this year," the LG G910 is 13.9 mm thick, comes with a blue-tooth headset and features a full touch-screen interface, 3G HSDPA, video-calling capabilities and an MP3 player, according to the <a href="http://orange.com/en_EN/press/press_releases/cp090216en4.html">press release</a>. <br /><br />As the PR points out: "Whether it is searching for restaurants and making video conference calls, or watching sports clips and listening to music on the built-in MP3 player, Orange customers will be able to enjoy the same multimedia experience on a watch, as they do on other mobile phones." Personally, I'd use it to solve crimes like Dick Tracy, or pick up women like James Bond ... but I suppose you can use it to search for a restaurant or whatever. Check out a couple additional images down below.<br /><br />So have at it: Who's buying one of these?<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/lg-touch-watch-phone/">LG Touch Watch Phone</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/lg-touch-watch-phone/1368524/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/02/touch-watch-phone_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/lg-touch-watch-phone/1368523/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/02/lg-watch-phone_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/lg-touch-watch-phone/1368522/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/02/lg-touch-watch_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/18/buy-this-worlds-first-wrist-watch-video-phone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1464074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/18/buy-this-worlds-first-wrist-watch-video-phone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>dick tracy</category><category>DickTracy</category><category>featured</category><category>james bond</category><category>JamesBond</category><category>lg g910 touch watch</category><category>LgG910TouchWatch</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Tron 2.0' Will Bring Back Young Jeff Bridges</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/04/tron-2-0-will-bring-back-young-jeff-bridges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/04/tron-2-0-will-bring-back-young-jeff-bridges/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/04/tron-2-0-will-bring-back-young-jeff-bridges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/disney/" rel="tag">Disney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/02/jeff_bridges.jpg" />There's a plot to clone the young <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jeff-bridges/1044686/main">Jeff Bridges</a>. Unfortunately, it won't be for general purchase (sorry <em>Starman</em> fans -- I know, having a Bridges of your own seems like a lot of fun, plus we would eventually have our own Dude), but for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/tron/1372418/main"><em>Tron 2.0</em></a>. <br /><br /><a href="http://io9.com/5145800/how-tron-20-will-clone-the-young-jeff-bridges">io9</a> recently learned that a plaster cast of Bridges has been created and sent to Canada to be digitized. According to their secret source: "They will then take that 3D model and make him younger and then slap it on a body double in post. As this is only one cog in the machine, I can't give a whole lot of detail. Canada scans actors and props to be used for various projects. These are very high resolution scans that pick up every wrinkle, face lift and scar on the actors body."<br /><br />The sharp-eyed noted that this is exactly how Bridges can be young and old Flynn, as he was in the ComicCon teaser footage. I've embedded a bootleg of the footage below so you can finally see it -- I'm now resolved to get Lasik on my eyes because holy crap, I was there and I'll be damned if I remember recognizing young Flynn.<br /><a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/02/03/jeff-bridges-gets-digitally-scannedcloned-for-tron-sequel/"><br />/film </a>cautions that this plaster Bridges cast may have nothing to do with the film, but may be for the Tron 2.0 video game which is rumored to be in production at Disney Interactive.  We'll find out what it all means eventually -- but <em>Tron 2.0</em> is officially the new <em>Star Trek </em>or <em>Avatar</em> where every snippet of info is eagerly analyzed, discussed, and probably proved wrong. But hey, that's what makes this fun.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/04/tron-2-0-will-bring-back-young-jeff-bridges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Tron 2.0' Will Bring Back Young Jeff Bridges</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/04/tron-2-0-will-bring-back-young-jeff-bridges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1449855/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/02/04/tron-2-0-will-bring-back-young-jeff-bridges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Disney</category><category>jeff bridges</category><category>JeffBridges</category><category>tron 2</category><category>tron 2.0</category><category>Tron2</category><category>Tron2.0</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Sundance Interview: Director Ondi Timoner and Josh Harris of 'We Live in Public'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/23/sundance-interview-director-ondi-timoner-and-josh-harris-of-we/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/23/sundance-interview-director-ondi-timoner-and-josh-harris-of-we/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/23/sundance-interview-director-ondi-timoner-and-josh-harris-of-we/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sundance/" rel="tag">Sundance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/01/harrisandtimoner.jpg" /><br /><br />Getting ready to interview director Ondi Timoner and subject Josh Harris about the documentary <em>We Live in Public</em> (<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/22/sundance-review-we-live-in-public/">reviewed here</a>) at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival, I sat with my recorder and got ready with my questions as Timoner offered me a T-shirt for the film. A nice gesture, and a casual one -- but the fact that Timoner, Harris and I were being filmed at the time by a camera capturing their Sundance experience for future use turned a gracious, friendly gesture into a curiously weighted proposition: What if I didn't take it? What if I didn't want it? And how long would my reaction endure?<br /><br />Revolving around Harris' spectacularly failed internet art projects Quiet and We Live in Public, Timoner's film uses Harris as a case study in the perils of our over-broadcast age and offers an examination of the numbing, overwhelming possibilities the internet offers. Timoner and Harris spoke about the film, why the subject of the film refuses to watch it, information theory and the power behind pointing a camera, plus much more.<br /><br />You can listen to the interview here at <em>Cinematical </em>by clicking below: <br /><br /><object height="24" width="290" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf" /> <param name="FlashVars" value="soundFile=http://podcasts.cinematical.com/podcasts/WLIP.mp3&amp;leftbg=0xb7b7db&amp;rightbg=0xcdeb8b" /> <param name="quality" value="high" /> <param name="menu" value="false" /> <param n="" value="transparent" /></object><br /><br />You can also download the interview in full <a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/cinematical/podcasts/Krasinski.mp3">right here</a> -- and those of you with RSS Podcast readers can find all of <em>Cinematical</em>'<em>s </em>podcast content <a href="http://podcasts.cinematical.com/rss.xml">at this link</a>.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/23/sundance-interview-director-ondi-timoner-and-josh-harris-of-we/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1438284/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/23/sundance-interview-director-ondi-timoner-and-josh-harris-of-we/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Josh Harris</category><category>JoshHarris</category><category>Ondi Timoner</category><category>OndiTimoner</category><category>Pseudo</category><category>Quiet</category><category>sundance2009</category><category>We Live in Public</category><category>WeLiveInPublic</category><enclosure url="http://www.cinematical.com/podcasts/WLIP.mp3" length="5" type="audio/mpeg"/><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Buy This: Wrap 920AV Video Eyewear</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/09/buy-this-wrap-920av-video-eyewear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/09/buy-this-wrap-920av-video-eyewear/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/09/buy-this-wrap-920av-video-eyewear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tech-stuff/" rel="tag">Tech Stuff</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/01/image_wrap920av-%282%29.jpg" /><br /><br />I swear, sometimes it feels like folks are getting all their inspiration from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096874/"><em>Back to the Future II</em></a>. Earlier this week, Vuzix introduced <a href="http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/products_wrap920av.html">a new pair of video eyewear</a> that kinda looks like the glasses worn by the future McFly kids in BTTFII. These, however, aren't for talking on the phone -- instead, you'll be able to watch video that provides an effect as if you're looking at a 60-inch monitor from nine feet away. Not only that, but apparently you'll still be able to see out of the glasses while watching the video (hello car accidents) ... and look uber stylish the entire time!<br /><br />No word on pricing or what the video resolution is (two very important factors, in my opinion), but The Wrap 920AV will be compatible with iPod, iPhone, Portable DVD Players, Media Players, Digital Cameras, Camcorders, Cellular phones with video out, Video Game Systems, PCs and Laptops with S-Video. Is has a 30 degree field of view, noise-canceling earphones, weighs less than three ounces and works on 2 AA batteries for six hours. Optional accessories include a stereo camera pair and a clip-on, six degrees of freedom head tracking system. <br /><br />So whaddya think? You buying one?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/09/buy-this-wrap-920av-video-eyewear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1424837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/09/buy-this-wrap-920av-video-eyewear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>back to the future ii</category><category>BackToTheFutureIi</category><category>cinematical</category><category>video eyewear</category><category>VideoEyewear</category><category>vuzix wrap 920av</category><category>VuzixWrap920av</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>