<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>The Rocchi Report: Before Toronto</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/07/the-rocchi-report-before-toronto/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/07/the-rocchi-report-before-toronto/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/07/the-rocchi-report-before-toronto/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/festival-reports/" rel="tag">Festival Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-rocchi-report/" rel="tag">The Rocchi Report</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/toronto-international-film-festival/" rel="tag">Toronto International Film Festival</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" id="vimage_2" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/09/logobw.jpg" /><br /><br />I grew up near here, but at the time it wasn't near at all; <city w:st="on">
<place w:st="on">Toronto</place>
</city> was just stations on the TV, voices on the radio, where the Sunday paper came from. It was an hour-and-a-half drive, or a well-planned afternoon on a terrific transit system, and it was a world away. Coming to Toronto for the Film Festival is, for me, always a bit disconcerting -- I remember how awestruck I felt at age 14 seeing the inside of Toronto's retail landmark Eaton Centre for the first time. Bear in mind, the <a href="http://www.torontoeatoncentre.com/">
<place w:st="on">
<placename w:st="on">Eaton</placename>
<placetype w:st="on">Centre</placetype>
</place>
</a> is a mall with one thing going for it: <span style="font-style: italic;">It is enclosed during winter</span>. But I was easily impressed. In many ways, I still am, and grateful for it.
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p> </p>
And <city w:st="on">
<place w:st="on">Toronto</place>
</city> never leaves my mind. How could it? I watch the trailers for movies I wouldn't watch in a thousand years and, yes, there's Milla Jovovitch running down <city w:st="on">
<place w:st="on">Toronto</place>
</city>'s City Hall building, as it explodes about her. Or I perk up during a dull action film for two things: Brian Cox and the moment Chow-Yun Fat strides by a Toronto Sun box. Or the music of Broken Social Scene playing counterpoint to Ryan Gosling's imploding life in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468489/"><span style="font-style: italic;">Half Nelson</span></a>. These things crop up everywhere.
<p> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p> </p>
Or they do if you look for them, and all Canadians are cultural critics at heart -- early on you're told <span style="font-style: italic;">That culture is not you</span>. It's not you because it's American, French-Canadian, English-Canadian; spinning the TV dial was an act of cultural roulette. And you went to the movies at a big movie palace, The Tivoli, and for a few dizzy <span style="font-style: italic;">Star Wars-Indiana-Jones-Aliens</span> years, you would be part of a line that stretched down the block past the funeral parlor. <br />
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/07/the-rocchi-report-before-toronto/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Rocchi Report: Before Toronto</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/07/the-rocchi-report-before-toronto/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/664883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/07/the-rocchi-report-before-toronto/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Canada</category><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>TIFF</category><category>Toronto International Film Festival</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Rocchi Report: You Are at Cannes.</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/25/the-rocchi-report-you-are-at-cannes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/25/the-rocchi-report-you-are-at-cannes/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/25/the-rocchi-report-you-are-at-cannes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cannes/" rel="tag">Cannes</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/festival-reports/" rel="tag">Festival Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-rocchi-report/" rel="tag">The Rocchi Report</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img width="425" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="300" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2006/05/LogoBW.JPG" /><br /><br />You arrived on the 15th. It's the 25th. Ten days and ten nights, a nice round number. Round because it's rolling over you, and you feel that weight. How is the cat doing? What about the mail? How are the plants? You left all these things in the hands of friends, but you still worry. You'd like to go take care of them yourself. Because then you'd be home. You still need to get thank-you gifts for the custodians of your keys, the cat, the plants. You've seen 24 films. You needed to go back through the press screening schedule to arrive at that number. Consult your notes, scrawled in a clumsy hand in the dark of the various theaters. Last night, you ran into a film critic for a weekly magazine you've gotten to know. He was leaving a film you were about to see. How was it, you ask. He offers a sentence and shrug. I've run out of opinions, he says. You know the feeling. <br /><br />But opinions is what you're here for. You're a machine in this job -- you turn a movie into a thousand words, five hundred words, two hundred words, a paragraph. A sentence. A well-polished phrase for broadcast or another journalist. You want to be clever and insightful, because those things got you here. That and a plane. Now and then, a film doesn't work for you and you get up, get out. You step on feet. Pardonnez moi, Pardonnez moi. Apology is a universal language. You don't write about a film if you walk out of it. You have something like ethics, or maybe it's just standards. You're in it to win it, opening title to final credit. And if you walk out of something, maybe you can get to something else. The endless pursuit of the next experience. I heard this one was good. That one has no buzz. I don't know a thing about that film, but it's in competition. All your research has been used up. Now you follow the timing of the press guide, as if all of cinema was a bus line; you'll take whatever comes along next.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/25/the-rocchi-report-you-are-at-cannes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Rocchi Report: You Are at Cannes.</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/25/the-rocchi-report-you-are-at-cannes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/621780/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/25/the-rocchi-report-you-are-at-cannes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cannes</category><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>journal</category><category>movie</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 18:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Rocchi Report: Cannes-do, Cannes-do</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/21/the-rocchi-report-cannes-do-cannes-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/21/the-rocchi-report-cannes-do-cannes-do/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/21/the-rocchi-report-cannes-do-cannes-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cannes/" rel="tag">Cannes</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/hollywood-truths/" rel="tag">Hollywood Truths</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-rocchi-report/" rel="tag">The Rocchi Report</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2006/05/LogoBW.JPG" vspace="4" border="1" /><br />First of all, everything you imagine about a film festival like Cannes is wrong, wrong, wrong. You don't rub elbows with stars; you don't go to fabulous parties. You wake up, you see three or four movies, you write -- a lot -- and try to come to grips with the fact that for every movie you're seeing there are four, five, six more that you're missing. You try to not think about it, because you'd go mad -- but you do think about it, and you do go a little mad. <br /><br />The thing you also need to know about Cannes is that it's essentially a big, shiny fa&ccedil;ade -- the reality of it is nothing like you see in the media. Cannes is a festival, but it's also a market -- a place where films are bought, sold and crafted. I remember my first year here, two years ago, seeing posters for <em>16 Blocks</em> and thinking "Bruce Willis? Mos Def? Why haven't I heard about this film?" Then, sitting down with a coffee and reading the trades, I realized that the reason I hadn't heard of <em>16 Blocks</em> before that morning was because before that morning it didn't exist -- the deal had been signed that night, foreign financing and markets brought on board and ensuring the film would happen.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/21/the-rocchi-report-cannes-do-cannes-do/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Rocchi Report: Cannes-do, Cannes-do</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/21/the-rocchi-report-cannes-do-cannes-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/620322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/21/the-rocchi-report-cannes-do-cannes-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 22:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Rocchi Report: What I've Learned.</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/09/the-rocchi-report-what-ive-learned/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/09/the-rocchi-report-what-ive-learned/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/09/the-rocchi-report-what-ive-learned/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-rocchi-report/" rel="tag">The Rocchi Report</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2006/05/Logo.JPG" alt="" /><br /><br />I went to a caf&eacute; without wireless to write this column, because I'm finding that the communications options offered by the internet have turned my attention span into a twitching, wretched thing. And I wanted to think. This column is going to be all about what I've learned in two months as Cinematical's Editor-in-Chief, and one of the things I've learned is that my column turned out to be bi-weekly. It's verging on tri-weekly. And I try, weakly, to get it in on a regular basis, but who knows and/or cares if that's going to happen? So I retreat to a lead-lined caf&eacute; in a part of the city I don't get to that often before the press screening of <em>Poseidon</em>, trying to run through what I laughingly call my thought process about this job so far. And here are some things I've learned. <br /><br />1) "Feed Me, Krelborn! Feed Me Now!" <br /><br />Anyone who runs a blog of any kind will tell you that frequency of updates translates into traffic, visits and comments. And yet, this has taken a while to sink in with me. But the ravenous hunger of the blog essentially devours all sense -- watching update after update come from our news gatherers and commentators, posted to the site by Kim or Martha or rarely myself. I frankly don't know how a reader keeps up with it. But when you slow it down, you see the effect ... and that's, to quote Michael Franti, "as real as rent." So you step back; you look hard, and you start by kicking you own ass to make more news posts, more reviews, more columns, while recognizing that you are but one part of a much larger, spread-out network of busy, busy people, each of whom you owe about eight e-mails. And meanwhile the hunger of the blog -- what ink-and-print people call 'the news hole" -- demands feeding.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/09/the-rocchi-report-what-ive-learned/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Rocchi Report: What I've Learned.</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/09/the-rocchi-report-what-ive-learned/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/616334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/09/the-rocchi-report-what-ive-learned/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>blogging</category><category>Brick</category><category>cinematical</category><category>nave-gazing</category><category>navel-gazing</category><category>poseidon</category><category>United 93</category><category>United93</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Rocchi Report: Pixar and Pix-aren't</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/24/the-rocchi-report-pixar-and-pix-arent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/24/the-rocchi-report-pixar-and-pix-arent/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/24/the-rocchi-report-pixar-and-pix-arent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/disney/" rel="tag">Disney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-rocchi-report/" rel="tag">The Rocchi Report</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2006/04/Logo.JPG" /><br /><br />Idon't often sit around thinking about the artistic and financial fate of major media conglomerates (no more than two,three times a day, anyhow), but between <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/14/review-the-wild/"><spanstyle="font-style: italic;">The Wild</span></a>'s release last Friday and last weekend's scathing <spanstyle="font-style: italic;">TV Funhouse</span> mockery of all things mouse on <em><ahref="http://www.saturdaynightlive.com">SNL</a></em>, I've been thinking about Disney Animation, their merger withPixar, and where they're going. <br /><br />First off, I don't know if <span style="font-style: italic;">TheWild</span> is the last film to come out of Disney Animation before Pixar takes over, but regardless, it's a greatdemonstration of why that deal seems so necessary. <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wild</span> was, perhaps, themost tired animated film I've seen in a long time; boring, bland, re-hashed and recycled, with a tag-team script thathad been bounced between writing pairs for so long that you could see the bruises. Wow, break-dancing lions! Ooh,inter-species romance! <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000544/">Carmen Miranda</a> jokes that no one under the ageof 60 is going to get! What's worse than the script is the look of the film -- clumsy, inelegant, bumbling; we'regetting to the point where computer-animated films essentially look as cheaply-made and dull as cut-scenes fromvideogames, and not like works of art. <br /><br />So, something had to happen to change Disney Animation-- I guess thequestion is if the Pixar deal is going to be enough to do it. I keep thinking of Hong Kong's transfer to China -- when asolid, inertia-bound object takes on a small, new motor, which gets affected more? Making a change at a movie studionormally is like trying to turn an aircraft carrier by dangling your hand in the water behind it as a rudder; I can'teven imagine what it's like at Disney, where the normal long-term development pipeline of a studio is lengthened by thework required to craft animation ... and stretched even longer by the years of tradition in the company's past.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/24/the-rocchi-report-pixar-and-pix-arent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Rocchi Report: Pixar and Pix-aren't</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/24/the-rocchi-report-pixar-and-pix-arent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/611089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/24/the-rocchi-report-pixar-and-pix-arent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Brad Bird</category><category>BradBird</category><category>Cars</category><category>Disney</category><category>John Lasseter</category><category>JohnLasseter</category><category>Mickey Mouse</category><category>MickeyMouse</category><category>Pixar</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Rocchi Report: Endless? Bummer.</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/10/the-rocchi-report-endless-bummer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/10/the-rocchi-report-endless-bummer/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/10/the-rocchi-report-endless-bummer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cannes/" rel="tag">Cannes</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/brett-ratner/" rel="tag">Brett Ratner</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-rocchi-report/" rel="tag">The Rocchi Report</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2006/03/Logo.JPG" alt="" /><br /><br />Ilook to the coming summer movie season much as ancient cavemen must have looked toward the huge thunderstorms thatswept across the blasted plain; with terror, and fear, and a little bit of awe. It was not just the first day of springthat made me think of summer, nor was it the call of the sparrow as she returns from the sunnier climes in the Southwhere she has rested for the past months; it was the frickin' fact that <ahref="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/05/more-for-cannes-x3-fountain-wtc/"><span style="font-style: italic;">X-Men:The Last Stand</span> is playing at Cannes</a>. There's a New Yorker cartoon by BEK, that master of block-drawn,rushing, stout-legged figures. In it, two people stride out from a movie theater and one asks (and I'm paraphrasing)"When did the movies get stupid <span style="font-style: italic;">year-round</span>?" Well, you can updateit: "When did the movies get stupid <span style="font-style: italic;">world-wide</span>?"<br /><br />Thereare summer movies I'm looking forward to unabashedly. Part of me wants to see Phillip Seymour Hoffman as nerdGoldfinger, despite all my misgivings about building an <ahref="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0317919/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9TUk6IDN8ZnQ9MXxteD0yMHxsbT01MDB8Y289MXxodG1sPTF8bm09MQ__;fc=1;ft=22">actionfranchise</a> on the gleaming foundation of Tom Cruise's grin.&nbsp; Part of me wants to see a <span style="font-style:italic;">Pirates of the Caribbean</span> sequel, even if subsequent viewings of the first have made it abundantly clearthat the movie's third act is as slack and unspooled as a mains'l in the doldrums. (That's a shout-out to all y'allPatrick O'Brien fans! Yeah!)<br /><br />But I'm not looking forward to <span style="font-style: italic;">X:3</span>,despite liking the first two. Or the other big summer movie debuting at Cannes, <span style="font-style: italic;">TheDa Vinci Code</span>. When told that Ron Howard was going to be directing the film of <span style="font-style:italic;">The Da Vinci Code</span>, I was actually glad -- it combined two things I had no interest in(Catholic-cryptography boring best-sellers <span style="font-style: italic;">and </span>Ron Howard's next project) intoone package.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/10/the-rocchi-report-endless-bummer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Rocchi Report: Endless? Bummer.</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/10/the-rocchi-report-endless-bummer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/604454/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/04/10/the-rocchi-report-endless-bummer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Brett Ratner</category><category>BrettRatner</category><category>Cannes Film Festival</category><category>CannesFilmFestival</category><category>Da Vinci Code</category><category>DaVinciCode</category><category>Ron Howard</category><category>RonHoward</category><category>X-Men 3</category><category>X-men3</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>