<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Oh No! 'Top Gun 2'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/21/oh-no-top-gun-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/21/oh-no-top-gun-2/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/21/oh-no-top-gun-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/07/topgun2-(2).jpg"  alt="" />Honestly, by now, I think we've all lost that lovin' feeling.<br /><br />It wouldn't surprise me in the least to hear that folks were mulling a sequel to the 1986 romantic fighter jet flick. Not only are sequels to older films hot these days (see:<em> Indiana Jones 4, Rocky 6, Die Hard</em> 4), but <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/1848500/main">Tom Cruise</a> could provide a real boost to his rep if he were to revisit the character that kinda made him. Whether or not it would actually turn out to be a good movie is a whole different conversation. First off, according to those extremely reliable cats at <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/film/article1448779.ece"><em>The Sun</em></a>, a script outline for <em>Top Gun 2</em> is done and "movie bosses" want Cruise to star. <br /><br />Apparently a source said this about the plot: "The idea is Maverick is at the Top Gun school as an instructor - and this time it is he who has to deal with a cocky new female pilot." Ooohh, original ... and spicy! It's like <em>Karate Kid 4</em> meets <em>A Really Big Paycheck for Tom Cruise!</em> And yet ... we'd all still see it. Why are we such suckers? We currently have no idea how <em>real </em>this rumor is, so for the time being I wouldn't exactly break out into song and dance. Maybe it'll happen, maybe it won't. <br /><br />What say you? Could this be the sequel we've subconsciously been waiting for our entire lives?<br /><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/21/oh-no-top-gun-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1262307/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/21/oh-no-top-gun-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>maverick</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>tom gun 2</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>TomGun2</category><category>top gun</category><category>TopGun</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cruise Might Skip Playing President and Play a Spy Instead</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/01/cruise-might-skip-playing-president-and-play-a-spy-instead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/01/cruise-might-skip-playing-president-and-play-a-spy-instead/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/01/cruise-might-skip-playing-president-and-play-a-spy-instead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/07/tom-cruise13.jpg" alt="" />We <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/16/tom-cruise-in-talks-to-play-president-in-28th-amendment/">reported</a> several weeks ago that Tom Cruise was all but confirmed to play the U.S. president in <em>The 28th Amendment</em>, a thriller that was to be directed by Phillip Noyce and co-star Denzel Washington. But now <em>Variety</em> has delivered a hold-your-horses on that story, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117988334.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">saying</a> <em>Amendment</em> is being set aside in favor of something else: an espionage thriller called <em>Edwin A. Salt</em>.<br /><br />This one will star <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/">Cruise</a> as a CIA agent accused of being a traitor. He has to go on the lam long enough to clear his name, find the real bad guy, etc.; you know the drill. The film has been in the works as a star vehicle for Cruise for some time, with Terry George and Peter Berg at various times attached to direct it. (The screenplay was written by Kurt Wimmer, author of the recent flop <em>Street Kings</em>.) Now it looks like the reins will go to Noyce, who previously made the action flicks <em>Patriot Games</em> and <em>Clear and Present Danger</em>. <br /><br /><em>The 28th Amendment</em> sounds fine, and no doubt it will still get made with a different director and co-star for Denzel. But I really like the sound of <em>Edwin A. Salt</em>. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0637518/">Noyce</a> is a very solid director, with 2002's double-whammy of <em>Rabbit-Proof Fence</em> and <em>The Quiet American</em> still looming large in my memory, and he's generally made serious, respectable films (<em>Sliver</em> notwithstanding). We don't know yet how Cruise's troubled <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0985699/"><em>Valkyrie</em></a> will turn out, but <em>Edwin A. Salt</em> -- a heroic role guided by a smart director -- could be a wise move for his next project.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/01/cruise-might-skip-playing-president-and-play-a-spy-instead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1241807/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/01/cruise-might-skip-playing-president-and-play-a-spy-instead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>28th amendment</category><category>28thAmendment</category><category>denzel washington</category><category>DenzelWashington</category><category>edwin a. salt</category><category>EdwinA.Salt</category><category>phillip noyce</category><category>PhillipNoyce</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Top Gun' Bar Destroyed</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/27/top-gun-bar-destroyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/27/top-gun-bar-destroyed/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/27/top-gun-bar-destroyed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/S1NqVsmMq_U&amp;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S1NqVsmMq_U&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br />On the heels of <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/01/huge-fire-erupts-at-universal-citys-backlot/">the terrible Universal Studios fire</a> comes word of another landmark movie location gone up in flames. San Diego's Kansas City Barbeque, which can be seen in <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/top-gun/6941/main">Top Gun</a> </em>(watch one of its memorable scenes, dubbed in Italian, above), was been gutted by a fire that started yesterday in an open cooking pit. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080627/ap_en_mo/restaurant_fire">According to the AP article</a> reporting on the fire, the restaurant was used for the scene in which Maverick (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/1848500/main">Tom Cruise</a>) first picks up Charlie (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/kelly-mcgillis/1226732/main">Kelly McGillis</a>) by singing "You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling," but this is incorrect (that scene was shot in Coronado, at the Officer's Club at Naval Air Station North Island). Kansas City Barbeque was used for the above scene in which Goose (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/anthony-edwards/1791080/main">Anthony Edwards</a>) and Maverick are singing "Great Balls of Fire," as well as the final scene when "You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling" is playing on the jukebox.<br /><br />The restaurant had capitalized on the fact that <em>Top Gun </em>was filmed there, and <a href="http://www.kcbbq.net/topgunbar/">as you can see on its website</a>, people referred to it as the "Top Gun Bar." You could even purchase <em>Top Gun </em>merchandise there and see props from the film, including the piano that Goose plays on and the jukebox from the end. Although the fire was reportedly extinguished in only 20 minutes, the restaurant has been destroyed and apparently those props are now lost forever.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080627/ap_en_mo/restaurant_fire>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/27/top-gun-bar-destroyed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1238669/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/27/top-gun-bar-destroyed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>movie locations</category><category>MovieLocations</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>top gun</category><category>TopGun</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Valkyrie' Update: No Cruise Photoshopping</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/25/valkyrie-update-no-cruise-photoshopping/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/25/valkyrie-update-no-cruise-photoshopping/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/25/valkyrie-update-no-cruise-photoshopping/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/stauffenbergclausgraf_print.jpg" />Tom Cruise may be guilty of some odd public antics -- but he isn't guilty of photo fudging. Last week, we reported on <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/18/was-tom-cruise-photoshopped-into-claus-von-stauffenberg/">Slate's little expose</a>, where they examined a publicity photo released by United Artists. According to their graphic experts, the photo of Claus von Stauffenberg had been altered to better resemble <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/">Tom Cruise.</a> <br /><br />However,  <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20080624/121436418000.html">Yahoo! Movies</a> now says <em>Slate</em> has been forced to retract the story. It turns out they were comparing the wrong photos -- they used one from the AP, as opposed to the Getty photograph United Artists used. Unfortunately, Slate didn't search all available archives for the photo before making their assertion.<br /><br />United Artists is understandably upset over the slanderous claim. "The picture United Artists used of Colonel Stauffenberg can be found all over the Internet," said <em>Valkyrie</em> co-writer and producer Chris McQuarrie. He added that it would be much easier to "alter Tom Cruise" than to doctor "every available picture of Claus von Stauffenberg." <br /><br />Now, with all due respect, I politely disagree with McQuarrie that the photo used by United Artists is easy to find. When this story first broke, I did my own Google search out of curiosity. The most readily available photo of von Stauffenberg is the one accompanying this post. It is also the first image Getty produces when you search their archives. The only site that produced the same photo was <a href="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERstauffenberg.htm">Spartacus Educational</a>, and even then I wasn't sure, as the UA version seemed so much cleaner. <br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/25/valkyrie-update-no-cruise-photoshopping/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Valkyrie' Update: No Cruise Photoshopping</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/25/valkyrie-update-no-cruise-photoshopping/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1235808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/25/valkyrie-update-no-cruise-photoshopping/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>claus von stauffenberg</category><category>ClausVonStauffenberg</category><category>Tom Cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>Valkyrie</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Was Tom Cruise Photoshopped into Claus von Stauffenberg?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/18/was-tom-cruise-photoshopped-into-claus-von-stauffenberg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/18/was-tom-cruise-photoshopped-into-claus-von-stauffenberg/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/18/was-tom-cruise-photoshopped-into-claus-von-stauffenberg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a></p><div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/salon-cruise.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />
<div align="left">Tom Cruise and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0985699/"><em>Valkyrie</em></a> just cannot stay out of the press -- and alas, the press has rarely been good. Well, here comes a bit more controversy: There have now been claims from German press that United Artists doctored a photo of hopeful Hitler assassin, Claus von Stauffenberg. In the interests of historic representation, journalistic credibility, and a chance to see how weird Cruise's career can get, <em>Slate </em>took the above photo (released by United Artists) to their design experts. <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2193467/#tomfoolery">Visit the magazine</a> to see the details of their analysis -- but they have come to the conclusion that it has been doctored. A comparison with a AP file photo of von Stauffenberg is remarkably different than the one UA has been publicizing. It <u>seems</u> to be the same photo, but that too could be up for debate. Possibly, UA is guilty of nothing more than carefully choosing a flattering photo. Other photos of von Stauffenberg, which are from the front and better lit, don't have much of a resemblance to Cruise. <br /><br />Visit <em>Slate </em>to judge for yourself, then come back and tell us your take. If it has been doctored, how silly is that? Plenty of historical figures have been ably played by actors bearing little resemblance to them -- and perhaps even the better for it, as they didn't rely only on physical looks to carry the role. The whole story smells of insecurity on the part of someone (or everyone) at United Artists. Though, for now (or until more experts weigh in), we'll just chalk this up as another piece of fascinating Hollywood mystery. <br /><br />[via <a href="http://www.imdb.com">IMDB's Hitlist</a>]</div>
<br />
<div align="left"> </div>
<br />
<div align="left"> </div>
</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/18/was-tom-cruise-photoshopped-into-claus-von-stauffenberg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1228939/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/18/was-tom-cruise-photoshopped-into-claus-von-stauffenberg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Claus von Stauffenberg</category><category>ClausVonStauffenberg</category><category>featured</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>valkyrie</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Another 'Valkyrie' Film to Challenge Cruise Film Prospects</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/another-valkyrie-film-to-challenge-cruise-film-prospects/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/another-valkyrie-film-to-challenge-cruise-film-prospects/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/another-valkyrie-film-to-challenge-cruise-film-prospects/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cannes/" rel="tag">Cannes</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-weinstein-co/" rel="tag">The Weinstein Co.</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><img width="165" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="220" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/operation-valkyrie.jpg" alt="" />When two movies with similar plots hit theaters around the same time, it usually just reveals the vapidity of Hollywood formula (as was the case when <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/deep-impact/2384/main"><em>Deep Impact</em> </a>and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/armageddon/2890/main"><em>Armageddon</em></a> came out a few months apart). The situation changes, however, when the subject matter has far more thematic weight. <a href="http://defamer.com/393719/jealous-harvey-weinstein-stakes-his-own-claim-to-valkyrie-debacle"><em>Defamer</em>'s S.T. VanAirsdale</a> points out the potential conflict brewing now that <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117986449.html?categoryid=1975&amp;cs=1">The Weinstein Company has picked up</a> U.S. theatrical, DVD and television rights to the 2004 German film <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0388437/"><em>Operation Valykrie</em></a>, a dramatization of the failed attempt to assassinate Adolf Hilter during World War II. Sound familiar? That's because <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/bryan-singer/193696/main">Bryan Singer</a>'s upcoming 2009 release, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/valkyrie/30574/main"><em>Valkyrie</em>,</a> tells precisely the same story, with <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise </a>in the role of would-be assassin Col. Claus Von Stauffenberg. In the German movie, the character is played by <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/sebastian-koch/220062/main">Sebastian Koch</a>, the debonair star of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-lives-of-others/26624/main"><em>The Lives of Others</em></a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/paul-verhoeven/206576/main">Paul Verhoeven</a>'s <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/black-book-zwartboek/27332/main"><em>Black Book</em></a>. <br /><br />In addition to the overlapping content, VanAirsdale points out another potential conflict: Koch's female co-star in <em>Black Book</em>, the alluring <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/carice-van-houten/430618/main">Carice van Houten</a>, stars opposite Cruise in <em>Valkyrie</em>, creating the sort of meaty overlap that money <em>can</em> buy. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/harvey-weinstein/116278/main">Harvey Weinstein</a>'s no slouch when it comes to instigating controversy, but his company hasn't exactly had the best of luck with its recent daring titles (few turned out for <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/where-in-the-world-is-osama-bin-laden/32574/main"><em>Where in the World is Osama bin Laden?</em></a>). Personal drama <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/22/news/newsmakers/cruise_paramount/index.htm">has impacted Cruise's films before</a>, but this might be the rare case where he would have nothing to do with it.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/another-valkyrie-film-to-challenge-cruise-film-prospects/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1208398/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/another-valkyrie-film-to-challenge-cruise-film-prospects/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>armageddon</category><category>black book</category><category>BlackBook</category><category>bryan singer</category><category>BryanSinger</category><category>deep impact</category><category>DeepImpact</category><category>defamer</category><category>defamer.com</category><category>harvey weinstein</category><category>harvey weinsterin</category><category>HarveyWeinstein</category><category>HarveyWeinsterin</category><category>paul verhoeven</category><category>PaulVerhoeven</category><category>relationships</category><category>s.t. vanairsdale</category><category>S.t.Vanairsdale</category><category>sebastian koch</category><category>SebastianKoch</category><category>stvanairsdale</category><category>the lives of others</category><category>the weinstein company</category><category>TheLivesOfOthers</category><category>TheWeinsteinCompany</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>valkyrie</category><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Tom Cruise in Talks to Play President in '28th Amendment'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/16/tom-cruise-in-talks-to-play-president-in-28th-amendment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/16/tom-cruise-in-talks-to-play-president-in-28th-amendment/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/16/tom-cruise-in-talks-to-play-president-in-28th-amendment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/tom-cruise---lions-for-lambs---imdb.jpg" />Luckily for <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise,</a> the latest rumors surrounding him have <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/more-bad-news-for-tom-cruise-and-valkyrie/ ">nothing to do with <span style="font-style: italic;">Valkyrie</span></a> -- for once, there's some good news for the much-maligned movie star (a round of applause, please, if you will). Yesterday, Moviehole <a href="http://www.moviehole.net/news/20080515_confirmed_cruise_for_28th_amen.html">confirmed </a>reports that Cruise is in talks to star as the US president in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0637518/">Philip Noyce</a>'s DC thriller, <span style="font-style: italic;">28th Amendment</span> -- and according to their sources, an official announcement will be made as soon as the paperwork has been completed.<br /><br />Cruise would star opposite <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/denzel-washington/74843/main">Denzel Washington</a> as President Ben Cahill. Tom Cruise as President? Really? Plot follows the adventures of a commander-in-chief who learns that he has no real sway at the White House after uncovering a secret organization (run by Washington) that has been the 'power behind the throne' since WWII. Unfortunately for Cahill, this group has no qualms about bumping off presidents (grassy knoll, anyone?) and as he starts to put the pieces together, he becomes the next target -- which will probably give Cruise plenty of opportunities to show off <a href="http://video.aol.com/video-detail/just-cruise-tom-cruise-nike-commercial-spoof/126639220">that run of his</a>.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/16/tom-cruise-in-talks-to-play-president-in-28th-amendment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tom Cruise in Talks to Play President in '28th Amendment'?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.moviehole.net/news/20080515_confirmed_cruise_for_28th_amen.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/16/tom-cruise-in-talks-to-play-president-in-28th-amendment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1197621/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/16/tom-cruise-in-talks-to-play-president-in-28th-amendment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>28th amendment</category><category>28thAmendment</category><category>American Pastoral</category><category>AmericanPastoral</category><category>denzel washington</category><category>DenzelWashington</category><category>dirt music</category><category>DirtMusic</category><category>mary queen of scots</category><category>MaryQueenOfScots</category><category>phillip noyce</category><category>PhillipNoyce</category><category>the art of making mo...</category><category>TheArtOfMakingMo...</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Did Tom Cruise Have a Love Child With ... Will Smith?!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/did-tom-cruise-have-a-love-child-with-will-smith/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/did-tom-cruise-have-a-love-child-with-will-smith/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/did-tom-cruise-have-a-love-child-with-will-smith/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="169" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/cruise-connor-(2).jpg" />Just when you thought you've seen it all ... okay, I'm not even gonna go there. Scientology! But anyway, Connor Cruise, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/">Tom Cruise's</a> 13-year-old adopted son, has <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20080422/120891372000.html">landed a role</a> in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000226/">Will Smith's</a> new flick <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814314/">Seven Pounds</a></em>, where he'll be playing a younger version of Smith in a minor, non-speaking part. For those who aren't up to speed on Cruise and all his kids, you might be kinda looking sideways at your computer right now. "Did he say Cruise's kid is going to play a younger version of Will Smith?" Fear not, my illinformed friends, they're not taking a page from the <em>Tropic Thunde</em>r playbook; oh no, see, Cruise's son Connor is adopted and he is of the same color as Mr. Smith. Phew. (Sit down Al, I didn't say anything wrong or offensive.)<br /><br />The film, which also stars Rosario Dawson, Woody Harrelson and Barry Pepper, and is directed by Gabriele Muccino (<em>The Pursuit of Happyness</em>), follows the story of a man (Smith) who affects the lives of seven strangers. It's a drama. There are no crazy special effects. And, yes, it comes out this December -- which, cross your shiny, manicured little fingers, means Smith will be listening for a knock on his door from Mr. Oscar come February. Seriously, though, I love Will Smith. I cannot think of a performance from him that I did not enjoy (performance, not movie -- stop smiling <em>I, Robot,</em> you're not off the hook yet), which is something I rarely say about an actor or an actress. Will Smith is like a warm cup of hot chocolate on a cold winter day, no matter which film he's starring in. Guy always finds a way to leave you feeling all warm and toasty inside. Mmmm ...<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/did-tom-cruise-have-a-love-child-with-will-smith/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1174990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/22/did-tom-cruise-have-a-love-child-with-will-smith/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>connor cruise</category><category>ConnorCruise</category><category>i</category><category>robot</category><category>seven pounds</category><category>SevenPounds</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>tropic thunder</category><category>TropicThunder</category><category>will smith</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bryan Singer's 'Valkyrie' Pushed to 2009</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/bryan-singers-valkyrie-pushed-to-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/bryan-singers-valkyrie-pushed-to-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/bryan-singers-valkyrie-pushed-to-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mgm/" rel="tag">MGM</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><img width="440" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="294" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/valkyrie.jpg" /><br /><br />What in the world is going on now? <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/valkyrie/30574/main"><em>Valkyrie </em></a>(recently criticized by <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/more-bad-news-for-tom-cruise-and-valkyrie/">Fox's Roger Friedman</a>, who said the film "is set up for not only failure, but ridicule") has just shifted release dates yet again (according to <em><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i775aad50a32da1ae5a6ad70e3ba961e4">The Hollywood Reporter</a></em>); this time moving from October 2008 to President's Day Weekend 2009. You might remember that the flick was originally supposed to hit theaters this June, before the first release date shift was made. Some claimed MGM and United Artists were moving the film to the fall in order to line up for possible Oscar consideration. Could all of this early negative talk have convinced them to, instead, target one of the first big holiday weekends of 2009? <br /><br />Seems like a pretty good decision to me. With everyone trashing <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise</a> for his non-existent German accent and silly eye patch, there was pretty much no way this film was going to be taken seriously come Oscar time. The cast definitely rocks -- no doubt there -- but if <em>Lions for Lambs</em> proved anything, it's that you should not release a Tom Cruise film in the middle of Oscar season unless it's Thanksgiving Weekend and we're talking <em>Mission Impossible 4</em>.  <em>Valkyrie </em>will now go up against a new <em>Friday the 13th</em> film and <em>Confessions of a Shopaholic</em>. Clark Woods, president of domestic distribution, had this to say: "When an opening became available for President's Day Weekend, we seized the opportunity. Moving into a big holiday weekend is the right move."<br /><br />Let's hope there's still a right move to be made...<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/bryan-singers-valkyrie-pushed-to-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1160889/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/bryan-singers-valkyrie-pushed-to-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bryan singer</category><category>BryanSinger</category><category>cinematical</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>valkyrie</category><category>valkyrie release date</category><category>ValkyrieReleaseDate</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>More Bad News for Tom Cruise and 'Valkyrie'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/more-bad-news-for-tom-cruise-and-valkyrie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/more-bad-news-for-tom-cruise-and-valkyrie/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/more-bad-news-for-tom-cruise-and-valkyrie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/04/tom-cruise---valkyrie.jpg" />So we all know that <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise</a> jokes are getting a little old, but you can't deny it's been fascinating to watch one of the most powerful guys in movies have a "freak out" and be forced to watch all his star-worship fade away. According to <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,343449,00.html">Fox News' Roger Friedman</a>, it's not looking good for <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/bryan-singer/193696/main">Bryan Singer</a>'s historical drama, <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/valkyrie/30574/main">Valkyrie</a></em>. According to Friedman, "<em>Valkyrie</em> is a set up for not only failure, but ridicule." Friedman goes on to take shots at Cruise's attempts at a German accent and even Singer and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0003160/ ">Christopher McQuarrie</a>'s dialog gets a few (dis) honorable mentions. Although, to be fair, I wouldn't count on a gossip reporter from Fox to be the final word on film criticism. <br /><br />Friedman joins the chorus of critics who think that <em>Valkyrie</em> will not only fail to improve Cruise's current Hollywood standing, but that it will further add another nail to his box office coffin. Cruise still has a few more chances to pull himself out of this mess: First up will be a <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/19/check-out-the-fat-and-bald-version-of-tom-cruise/">cameo</a> in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/tropic-thunder/29232/main">Tropic Thunder</a></em>, then it's on to a full-on attempt at comedy with director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0680846/">Todd Phillips</a> (<em>Old School</em>) <em>in Men</em>, and finally Cruise is expected to star alongside Ben Stiller in the buddy comedy, <em>The Hardy Men</em> (which I personally think has some potential). Who knows? Maybe he will finally be making people laugh at him on purpose. <em>Valkyrie</em> arrives in theaters on October 3rd.<br /><br />[via <a href="http://www.filmdrunk.com/post.phtml?pk=1457">Film Drunk</a>]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,343449,00.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/more-bad-news-for-tom-cruise-and-valkyrie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1160349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/07/more-bad-news-for-tom-cruise-and-valkyrie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>ben stiller</category><category>BenStiller</category><category>bryan singer</category><category>BryanSinger</category><category>todd phillips</category><category>ToddPhillips</category><category>tropic thunder</category><category>TropicThunder</category><category>valkyrie</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>New 'Valkyrie' Photos Online</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/new-valkyrie-photos-online/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/new-valkyrie-photos-online/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/new-valkyrie-photos-online/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/03/valkyrie-(2).jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br />So for starters, the <a href="http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=22278">newest photos</a> from <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/valkyrie/30574/main">Valkyrie</a></em> manage to make <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise</a> look a lot more dashing. Good thing, too, because the only <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/19/get-a-load-of-the-first-tom-cruise-photo-from-valkyrie/">other photo release</a> prompted a flurry of cheap shots aimed at everybody's favorite tabloid whipping boy. <em>Empire </em>now has three new studio stills from <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/bryan-singer/193696/main">Bryan Singer</a>'s historical drama about the infamous July 20th plot to assassinate Hitler. Joining Cruise are Bill Nighy, Kenneth Branagh, Eddie Izzard and Terrence Stamp. There are also some extra shots in the newsstand edition of Empire this month, along with an interview with Singer.<br /><br />Cruise stars as German Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg. In 1944, Stauffenberg along with other high-ranking officers in the Nazi party attempted to assassinate Adolph Hitler. Stauffenberg and his crew attempted to kill Hitler with a bomb planted in a briefcase. Obviously they failed, and the key players were rounded up almost immediately. By 1945, most of the men involved had committed suicide or had been executed in a variety of nasty ways. <br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/new-valkyrie-photos-online/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New 'Valkyrie' Photos Online</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=22278>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/new-valkyrie-photos-online/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1153343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/03/31/new-valkyrie-photos-online/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bill nighy</category><category>BillNighy</category><category>bryan singer</category><category>BryanSinger</category><category>eddie izzard</category><category>EddieIzzard</category><category>kenneth branagh</category><category>KennethBranagh</category><category>Tom Cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>valkyrie</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>UA Signs Deal With Christopher McQuarrie: John Wilkes Booth Biopic?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/07/ua-signs-deal-with-christopher-mcquarrie-john-wilkes-booth-biop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/07/ua-signs-deal-with-christopher-mcquarrie-john-wilkes-booth-biop/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/07/ua-signs-deal-with-christopher-mcquarrie-john-wilkes-booth-biop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a></p><p align="left"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/02/225px-jwbooth-(2).jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />I'm delighted by today's news that UA is apparently pleased enough with what they've seen of <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/valkyrie/30574/main">Valkyrie</a></em> that they've signed screenwriter <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0003160/">Christopher McQuarrie</a> to a first look deal. <em>The Usual Suspects</em> is one of my favorite films -- the kind of film that will make me overlook a guy not doing anything of note for the next ten to twelve years of his career -- and what little I've heard about <em>Valkyrie</em> so far has put it at the top of my must-see list for 2008. It's got Carice van Houten, for starters, which should be enough to get anyone into the multiplex. The actual terms of McQuarrie's deal are known only to him and United Artists COO Xenu, but <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i0a04b1d7f7560b577dd0eca32ef0edd0"><em>The Hollywood Reporter's</em> writeup says</a> that there are currently "several projects under discussion." One of them, we know, will not be the Alexander the Great biopic that McQuarrie spent much time on, only to be beaten to the punch by Oliver Stone's worst movie ever, and yes, I've seen <em>U-Turn</em> and it's great by comparison.</p>
<p align="left">McQuarrie is currently prepping <em>The Stanford Prison Experiment</em>, a film based on a famous behavioral study conducted at Stanford in the 70s in which students had to play the roles of guards and prisoners and things got out of hands. For some reason, this doesn't really ring my bell -- I can't see how it will work as a sensible movie -- but one thing I love about McQuarrie is his fascination with history and I'm crossing my fingers that he'll use this deal to get his John Wilkes Booth screenplay into the development cycle immediately. What little I know of the script is that people who read it a couple of years ago were floored by it and that its development seemed to follow the same trajectory as the Alexander script -- it was written, it was tossed around and toyed with by some A-list actors and then dropped because of competition concerns. But unless it's flown under my radar, I don't know of any competing Booth film that has made it to the filming stage, so why not do it now? And seriously, raise your hand if you'd rather see McQuarrie's John Wilkes Booth biopic than Steven Spielberg's Lincoln biopic. Just like I thought -- every hand in the room.</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/07/ua-signs-deal-with-christopher-mcquarrie-john-wilkes-booth-biop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1108890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/02/07/ua-signs-deal-with-christopher-mcquarrie-john-wilkes-booth-biop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>carice van houten</category><category>CariceVanHouten</category><category>christopher mcquarrie</category><category>ChristopherMcquarrie</category><category>john wilkes booth</category><category>JohnWilkesBooth</category><category>the stanford prison experiment</category><category>TheStanfordPrisonExperiment</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>valkyrie</category><dc:creator>Ryan Stewart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Tom Cruise Recruitment Video Scientology Tried to Hide</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/15/the-tom-cruise-recruitment-video-scientology-tried-to-hide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/15/the-tom-cruise-recruitment-video-scientology-tried-to-hide/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/15/the-tom-cruise-recruitment-video-scientology-tried-to-hide/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ol1I3E3-pHY&amp;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ol1I3E3-pHY&amp;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />Hoo boy. <em>Hoooooo</em> boy. Check out this video of <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0000129/">Tom Cruise</a> aggressively preaching the merits of Scientology while the <em>Mission: Impossible</em> theme plays. It is very real, and you need to see it. Like, now. Let's just say the dude's even more into this than we thought. As Gawker (who's <a href="http://gawker.com/5002269/the-cruise-indoctrination-video-scientology-tried-to-suppress">also hosting a clip</a>) writes, "If Tom Cruise jumping on Oprah's couch was an 8 on the scale of scary, this is a 10." Apparently, the video has been privately shared between reporters investigating Cruise's ties to the religion, although no writers have gone public with it for fear of lawsuits by the Scientologists. Until now. It's out there, baby.<br /><br />I would check the video out quickly. Gawker claims they are not removing the clip, regardless of what pressure they get, but a lot of similar Youtube and Google videos have been put up and quickly taken down in the past week. The one we have up now hasn't been taken down, so get to it fast! The video is nearly ten minutes of pure Cruise intensity and oddness, undiluted by publicists and cover-ups. I did a little research while watching it, as I didn't know what some of the terms meant. When he says "org," he means "organizations," "KSW" is a policy letter used to "Keep Scientology Working," and "SP" is Scientology code for a "Suppressive Person." The video's most chilling moment follows Cruise's question, "Have you ever met an SP?" when that blood-curdling, hollow laugh kicks in. Remember Cruise's "Respect the c**k, tame the c**t" monologues in <em>Magnolia</em>? This is like that, only disturbingly real. But maybe I'm just being "glib."<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/15/the-tom-cruise-recruitment-video-scientology-tried-to-hide/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1087452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/15/the-tom-cruise-recruitment-video-scientology-tried-to-hide/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>l ron hubbard</category><category>LRonHubbard</category><category>scientologists</category><category>scientology</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><dc:creator>Patrick Walsh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>United Artists Strikes Deal with WGA, Tries on Some Fantasy</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/05/united-artists-strikes-deal-with-wga-tries-on-some-fantasy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/05/united-artists-strikes-deal-with-wga-tries-on-some-fantasy/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/05/united-artists-strikes-deal-with-wga-tries-on-some-fantasy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><p><img height="170" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/01/ua.jpg" width="250" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Some major <em>major</em> news on the strike front seems to be leaking out today, with an official announcement expected to come at some point tomorrow (according to <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/">Deadline Hollywood</a>). Looks like United Artists (aka the movie studio run by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/">Tom Cruise</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0906048/">Paula Wagner</a>) is in the process of inking a deal with the WGA that's very similar to the one they made with David Letterman's Worldwide Pants. Said deal, if it goes through, would allow United Artists to work with writers on whatever upcoming projects they have planned, making them the first such studio allowed to do this since the strike began. Damn. Score one for Tommy Boy! It's not yet known which films will take advantage of this interim deal right off the bat, but we do know that Oliver Stone's <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1051718/">Pinkville</a></em> was <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/19/oliver-stones-pinkville-gets-delayed/">recently postponed due to problems</a> with the script. Chances are, with the cast for that flick already in place, it will be one of the first delayed productions to be back in business. Of course, this is all subject to the deal actually going through.</p>
<p>On the other hand, United Artists could get right to work on a literary property they just optioned for seven figures. While all this interim agreement talk continues, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i017145c042c6bedaf3b1e2ecba3c1390"><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></a> tells us UA has optioned the film rights to <em>Ranger's Apprentice</em>, a fantasy series written by Australian author John Flanagan. According to <em>HR</em>, it "follows the adventures of an orphan boy named Will who becomes an apprentice ranger and fights to keep the mythical kingdom of Araluen safe from invaders, traitors and other dangers with the help of his master Halt." Yup, that sounds like just about every fantasy series being optioned these days, but what's even more interesting is that writer-director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0353673/">Paul Haggis</a> was in talks to adapt and direct at one point before the strike happened and halted those discussions. Haggis doing big-budget fantasy? Bit of a stretch if you ask me -- what do you think?</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/05/united-artists-strikes-deal-with-wga-tries-on-some-fantasy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1078076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/05/united-artists-strikes-deal-with-wga-tries-on-some-fantasy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>paul haggis</category><category>paula wagner</category><category>pinkville</category><category>ranger's apprentice</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>united artists</category><category>UnitedArtists</category><category>wga</category><category>worldwide pants</category><category>writer's strike</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Peter Berg to Direct Tom Cruise in 'Edwin A. Salt?'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/20/peter-berg-to-direct-tom-cruise-in-edwin-a-salt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/20/peter-berg-to-direct-tom-cruise-in-edwin-a-salt/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/20/peter-berg-to-direct-tom-cruise-in-edwin-a-salt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a></p><img height="150" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/10/berg101607.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Considering how hard it is to get people to go see a <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise</a> movie these days, it wouldn't be surprising if it was also hard to get a director who'll work with the guy. Of course, Cruise's waning bankability isn't the reason that <a href="http://w.cinematical.com/tag/edwin%20a.%20salt/">his spy movie</a>, the weakly titled <em>Edwin A. Salt</em>, has already lost <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0313623/">Terry George</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000520/">Michael Mann</a> as potential directors. I'm not sure why they aren't doing the film (Mann apparently <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/06/johnny-depp-and-michael-mann-are-public-enemies/">picked </a><em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1198165285687*/">Public Enemies</a> </em>instead), but it can't be fears of a potentially low gross. No matter; they are out and Peter Berg (<em>The Kingdom</em>) is in, <a href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2007/12/pete-berg-to-di.html">according to <em>Entertainment Weekly</em>'s Hollywood Insider Blog</a>. Well, he's not quite in yet; Columbia Pictures is only reportedly wooing the guy, though in the end it's supposedly up to Cruise's approval whether or not he gets the gig. Interestingly enough, Berg can almost be viewed as a Mann prot&eacute;g&eacute;, since he produced <em>The Kingdom </em>and Berg's follow-up, next summer's Will Smith vehicle, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/hancock/24641/main"><em>Hancock</em></a> (the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/17/first-trailer-for-will-smiths-hancock/">trailer</a> of which hit the net this week). However, it doesn't appear that Mann will have any involvement with <em>Edwin A. Salt</em>.<br /><br />I won't admit to being the biggest fan of Berg's work (who could, really?), but I will admit that <em>The Kingdom </em>was one of my top ten movies of 2007. Though it's mainly on my list because all critics have to have that one obligatory mainstream Hollywood pick, I do think it was directed quite well, with a tone that perfectly suited what it was really about (American dreams of an '80s action-movie-type response to 9/11). Also, his <em>Friday Night Lights </em>(the film; I haven't seen the TV pilot he did) was better than most high school football movies. So, I'm excited to see what he can do with Cruise, a script from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0934483/">Kurt Wimmer</a> (<em>Equilibrium</em>) and the beginning-to-get-tired world of spies.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2007/12/pete-berg-to-di.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/20/peter-berg-to-direct-tom-cruise-in-edwin-a-salt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1067642/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/20/peter-berg-to-direct-tom-cruise-in-edwin-a-salt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>edwin a. salt</category><category>EdwinA.Salt</category><category>film</category><category>friday night lights</category><category>FridayNightLights</category><category>hancock</category><category>kurt wimmer</category><category>KurtWimmer</category><category>michael mann</category><category>MichaelMann</category><category>movie</category><category>peter berg</category><category>PeterBerg</category><category>public enemies</category><category>PublicEnemies</category><category>terry george</category><category>TerryGeorge</category><category>the kingdom</category><category>TheKingdom</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Valkyrie' Release Date Pushed Back to October, 2008</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/15/valkyrie-release-date-pushed-back-to-october-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/15/valkyrie-release-date-pushed-back-to-october-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/15/valkyrie-release-date-pushed-back-to-october-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/valkyrie---cinematical.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The release dates, they are a-changing! Universal just moved the release of the action flick <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493464/"><em>Wanted</em>,</a> which stars Angelina Jolie and James McAvoy, from March to June 27th, 2008. That June release date was also held by Pixar's new one, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0910970/"><em>WALL-E</em></a>, and the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/">Tom Cruise</a> "Hitler assassination plot" flick -- <em>Valkyrie</em>. According to <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=40246">Coming Soon</a>,<em> Valkyrie</em> has officially budged (though I think it would have absolutely crushed <em>Wanted</em> and it's courting a different audience than <em>Wall-E)</em>. United Artists will now release the film on October 3rd of 2008 -- a date also held by less intense competition -- <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0981227/"><em>Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist</em></a> and Guy Ritchie's Gerald Butler drama <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1032755/"><em>RocknRolla</em>.</a> <br /><br /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0985699/"><em>Valkyrie</em></a> is directed by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001741/">Bryan Singer</a> and written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0003160/">Christopher McQuarrie</a> (<em>The Usual Suspects</em>) and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1267492/">Nathan Alexander</a>. Tom Cruise has become everyone's favorite punching bag lately, and reaction to <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/08/bryan-singers-valkyrie-gets-an-official-trailer/">the trailer</a>, particularly Cruise's lack of a German accent, was pretty hostile. (Although probably not as hostile as it would have been had he...attempted a German accent!) But the plot sounds awesome, Singer is a great director (<em>Superman Returns</em> aside), and it's got a hell of a cast -- including <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0631490/">Bill Nighy</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000110/">Kenneth Branagh</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000410/">Stephen Fry</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0412850/">Eddie lzzard</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000654/">Terence Stamp</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0929489/">Tom Wilkinson</a>, and <em>Black Book's </em>stunning <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0396924/">Carice Van Houton</a>. How bad could it be? It's got to be better than <em>Wanted</em> -- have you seen <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/31/wanted-trailer-arrives-online/">the trailer</a> for <em>that</em> thing? Haven't I seen that movie, oh, a thousand times already?<br /><br /><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/15/valkyrie-release-date-pushed-back-to-october-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1063657/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/15/valkyrie-release-date-pushed-back-to-october-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>angelina jolie</category><category>AngelinaJolie</category><category>bill nighy</category><category>BillNighy</category><category>bryan singer</category><category>BryanSinger</category><category>carice van houton</category><category>CariceVanHouton</category><category>eddie izzard</category><category>EddieIzzard</category><category>gerald butler</category><category>GeraldButler</category><category>guy ritchie</category><category>GuyRitchie</category><category>james mcavoy</category><category>JamesMcavoy</category><category>kenneth branagh</category><category>KennethBranagh</category><category>stephen fry</category><category>StephenFry</category><category>terence stamp</category><category>TerenceStamp</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>tom wilkinson</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>TomWilkinson</category><category>valkyrie</category><category>wall-e</category><category>wanted</category><dc:creator>Patrick Walsh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Seven: Movies Celebrating Alcohol</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/05/cinematical-seven-movies-celebrating-alcohol/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/05/cinematical-seven-movies-celebrating-alcohol/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/05/cinematical-seven-movies-celebrating-alcohol/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cinematical-seven/" rel="tag">Cinematical Seven</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/james-bond/" rel="tag">James Bond</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a></p><img width="433" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="300" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/sidewayscheer.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />Happy Prohibition Repeal Day! One year from now will be the 75th anniversary of the ratification of the 21st Amendment, which lifted the ban on manufacturing, distributing and selling alcohol in the United States. Always a fan of pre-gaming, I've decided to start celebrating early with a look at some favorite movies that celebrate wine, beer and liquor. <br /><br />Certainly I am no fan of alcoholism, and I encourage all Americans to drink responsibly. That is why most of these movies (not all, though) are about the appreciation of the taste of alcoholic beverages rather than about getting drunk. Also, I'm sorry to disappoint fans of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086373/locations"><em>Strange Brew</em></a>, but that hilarious brewery-set comedy was shot in Canada and so it doesn't seem to fit the focus of this list.<br /><br /><br /><em><strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375063/">Sideways</a> </strong></em><strong>(Alexander Payne, 2004)<br /><br /></strong>Imagine what California's wine country would be like if Prohibition were still around. Whatever would be there in place of vineyards would sure be a waste. Just ask Miles (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0316079/">Paul Giamatti</a>), everyone's favorite wine <strike>expert</strike> snob character. The movie didn't exactly allow me to have a great appreciation of fine wines -- I can't afford to -- and it didn't make me tolerate people like Miles any better, but it was interesting to see a story set in that world, which could only exist thanks to the 21st Amendment. <em><strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0372140/"><br /></a></strong></em><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/05/cinematical-seven-movies-celebrating-alcohol/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cinematical Seven: Movies Celebrating Alcohol</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/05/cinematical-seven-movies-celebrating-alcohol/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1054642/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/05/cinematical-seven-movies-celebrating-alcohol/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>007</category><category>american beer</category><category>AmericanBeer</category><category>cinematical</category><category>cocktail</category><category>dazed and confused</category><category>DazedAndConfused</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>sideways</category><category>strange brew</category><category>StrangeBrew</category><category>superbad</category><category>the big lebowski</category><category>the public enemy</category><category>the thin man</category><category>TheBigLebowski</category><category>ThePublicEnemy</category><category>TheThinMan</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Poll: Katie Holmes -- Is the New Hairdo Hot or Not?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/02/poll-katie-holmes-is-the-new-hairdo-hot-or-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/02/poll-katie-holmes-is-the-new-hairdo-hot-or-not/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/02/poll-katie-holmes-is-the-new-hairdo-hot-or-not/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/polls/" rel="tag">Polls</a></p><p><img height="329" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/12/katie-holmes-tom-cruise-250a12012007.jpg" width="250" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Okay, she hasn't been in a movie for awhile because she's been busy being Mrs. Tom Cruise and having a freakishly cute baby, but I have to admit, I still like <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/katie-holmes/225994/main">Katie Holmes</a> and keep hoping she'll come back and do another film. She was quite good in <em>Pieces of April</em>, and then just as it seemed she might be the next breakout indie actress, in came <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise</a> to sweep her off into happily-ever-after, Scientology style, and we've hardly seen the girl since. And then all of a sudden, she shows up with this spiffy new hairdo. </p>
<p>But what's up with Tom rocking the Third Reich look? I know he's been filming <em>Valkryie</em>, but isn't it in post-prod now? Time to lose that hairdo, Tom, seriously. It looks like he's wearing a toupee that's slipping. As for Katie, my husband took one look at this pic and said her hair reminds him of Julia Roberts when she was wearing the hooker wig in <em>Pretty Woman</em>, but I kinda like the Louise Brooks vibe she has going here. </p>
<p>Could this be Katie's "I'm less than a year away from leaving this marriage and going for an Oscar" look, like "ex-Mrs. Cruise" Nicole Kidman? Is she just angling for a tony modeling gig, or perhaps a good starring role so she can ease out of stay-at-home-momhood and slip back into her serious actress shoes? Or did she just want to look hot to support her man? </p>
<p>What do you think of Katie's new look?</p>
<p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/02/poll-katie-holmes-is-the-new-hairdo-hot-or-not/#poll6526">View Poll</a></p></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/02/poll-katie-holmes-is-the-new-hairdo-hot-or-not/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1052354/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/02/poll-katie-holmes-is-the-new-hairdo-hot-or-not/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>katie-holmes</category><category>tom-cruise</category><dc:creator>Kim Voynar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Does Tom Cruise Want to Suck Blood Again?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/does-tom-cruise-want-to-suck-blood-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/does-tom-cruise-want-to-suck-blood-again/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/does-tom-cruise-want-to-suck-blood-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/united-artists/" rel="tag">United Artists</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/11/tom-cruise-as-the-vampire-lestat.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />On behalf of fans of vampire movies everywhere, I certainly hope we can chalk this one up to just a silly rumor. <em>Bloody Disgusting</em> is <a href="http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10569">reporting</a> that United Artists is pushing to snap up the rights to the fourth novel in Anne Rice's <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Vampire Chronicles</span>, <a style="FONT-STYLE: italic" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tale_of_the_Body_Thief">The Tale of The Body Thief.</a> According to BD's sources, "here's speculation on my behalf, but UA = Tom Cruise, right? Might we be seeing Tom Cruise back as the Vampire Lestat?" The casting of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main ">Tom Cruise</a> as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vampire_Lestat">Vampire Lestat</a> in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001403/">Neil Jordan</a>'s 1994 adaptation of Rice's bestselling novel, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Interview with The Vampire,</span> caused an uproar among fans (and the author for that matter). Rice had been quoted as saying that Cruise was, "no more my Vampire Lestat than Edward G. Robinson is Rhett Butler".**<br /><br />The story of <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Body Thief </span>picks up with Lestat who has made a deal with a "body thief" to get the chance to switch bodies and to live like a mortal again. This would be the third attempt to make an Anne Rice book into a film, the last being the disastrous <a style="FONT-STYLE: italic" href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/queen-of-the-damned/10521/main">Queen of the Damned</a> with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004691/ ">Aaliyah</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0870204/ ">Stuart Townsend</a> as Lestat. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Townsend's Lestat wasn't too bad all things considered. He definitely had the Lestat pout down pat, something that Cruise could just never quite pull off in <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Interview</span>. Not to mention Cruise's avoidance of the obvious homoerotic content to the original story -- although kudos to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/antonio-banderas/3682/main">Antonio Banderas</a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/brad-pitt/56988/main">Brad Pitt</a> for being the only two actors in that film to even hint at a little vampire on vampire action.<br /><br />As we all know, Cruise's relationship with Paramount ended badly back in '06. Now that Cruise is calling shots at UA, could Tom be planning to "ruin" yet another Anne Rice property? Until we get some kind of official word on the project, lets just keep our fingers crossed that Cruise is going to leave the fangs to someone else this time.</p>
<p>**Rice did eventually back-track and reverse her statements once she actually saw the film and Cruise's performance.<a href="http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10569"><br /></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10569>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/does-tom-cruise-want-to-suck-blood-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1051697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/30/does-tom-cruise-want-to-suck-blood-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Antonio Banderas</category><category>AntonioBanderas</category><category>Brad Pitt</category><category>BradPitt</category><category>Neil Jordan</category><category>NeilJordan</category><category>Queen of the Damned</category><category>QueenOfTheDamned</category><category>Stuart Townsend</category><category>StuartTownsend</category><category>The Tale of the Body Thief</category><category>TheTaleOfTheBodyThief</category><category>Tom Cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Check Out the Fat and Bald Version of Tom Cruise</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/19/check-out-the-fat-and-bald-version-of-tom-cruise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/19/check-out-the-fat-and-bald-version-of-tom-cruise/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/19/check-out-the-fat-and-bald-version-of-tom-cruise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/tom-cruise/" rel="tag">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a></p><p><img height="194" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/11/tomcruisefatsuit.jpg" width="166" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />So folks have been taking tons of jabs at <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/tom-cruise/86295/main">Tom Cruise</a> for <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/13/should-tom-cruise-stick-to-action-films/">wearing an eye patch</a> in the new Bryan Singer flick <em>Valkyrie</em>. If you think that's bad, get a load of the guy in these new photos (courtesy of <a href="http://justjared.buzznet.com/2007/11/17/tom-cruise-fat-suit/">JustJared</a>) in which he's dressed as a studio exec for a cameo role in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/ben-stiller/112816/main">Ben Stiller's</a> <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/tropic-thunder/29232/main"><em><strong>Tropic Thunder</strong></em></a>. And what's their idea of a studio exec? Why a fat, hairy-chested bald guy -- is there any other kind? Cruise's cameo had been <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/24/tom-cruise-may-play-film-studio-tyrant-in-tropic-thunder/">rumored for quite some time now</a>, while Stiller and Co. have been doing what they can to keep quiet when asked about the role. Unfortunately, the surprise casting is now out in the open, but in my opinion it's worth it to see these pics. And kudos to Cruise for putting himself out there ... though as a guy who has the potential to one day be fat and bald, I sort of take offense. Boo Tom Cruise. Shame on you. </p>
<p>In <em>Tropic Thunder</em>, Ben Stiller, Robert Downey Jr., Jack Black, Justin Theroux and Jay Baruchel play a group of American actors attempting to shoot a war film who, through a series of freak accidents, become forced to become the soldiers they're portraying. Nick Nolte, Bill Hader and Steve Coogan also star. Honestly, with this cast, how can this film not be an absolute riot. I've been off the Stiller wagon for awhile now, as I'm sure a lot of you have, so hopefully he still has it in him to produce a gem. <em>Tropic Thunder</em> is due out on July 11. A petition to ban Tom Cruise from giving fat, bald men everywhere a bad name will be started (by myself) tomorrow. </p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.joblo.com/index.php?id=18657">Joblo</a>]</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/19/check-out-the-fat-and-bald-version-of-tom-cruise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1043076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/19/check-out-the-fat-and-bald-version-of-tom-cruise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>jack black</category><category>jay baruchel</category><category>justin theroux</category><category>matthew mcconaughey</category><category>nick nolte</category><category>tom cruise</category><category>tom cruise pics</category><category>tropic thunder</category><category>TropicThunder</category><category>valyrie</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>