Skip to Content

Make smart financial decisions with DailyFinance

China Tagged Articles at Cinematical

'Avatar' Could Earn Back Its Budget From China Alone

Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Distribution », 20th Century Fox »


I don't know how many moons orbit Cameron's fantasy planet Pandora, but I'm just going to assume they're currently all heading for alignment. Screen Daily tells us that Avatar's two-months away release in China has caused no less than four of its own would-be blockbusters to hide from the giant shadow the blue cat-people will inevitably cast when they debut there January 1st. Zhang Yimou's remake of the Coen Brother's 1984 directorial debut Blood Simple has now decided to bow closer towards the beginning of December. Same goes for the road movie Wu Ren Qu, The Pang brother's fantasy/action sequel The Storm Warriors, and the sci-fi western Treasure Hunter (starring Jay Chou, who America will soon know as Kato in The Green Hornet).

Now I understand that few people who read Cinematical are going to be affected by the release date shift of those four films, but what makes this news worth paying attention to is the fact that these changes slot Avatar into a position in which it could conceivably earn its budget back from Chinese cinemas alone. The biggest time of the year for the Chinese box office is the three month window that covers Christmas, New Year, and the Chinese Lunar New Year and now that these four domestic films have made way for an international usurper, it means Avatar will be taking over a whopping 80% of China's screens during its most crucial box office season.

Chinese Exhibitor Bans Sharon Stone

Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy », Politics »

These stories just keep getting better. On the heels of Israeli municipalities apparently banning the display of the word "sex" on Sex and the City billboards (a claim that's been disputed) and Russian communists calling for a boycott of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull because the Soviet Union did not, in fact, seek to use alien technology to practice mind control on US citizens during the Cold War, comes the news that Sharon Stone has annoyed the owner of the leading Chinese cinema chain to the point where he's pledged not to show her films.

What did she say? She said that the recent earthquake in China may have been "karma" -- cosmic justice for the way China has treated the Tibetans. That's stupid, but the theater owner -- Ng See-Yuen -- wasn't angry at the manifest silliness of Stone's statement so much as the fact that she's politicized a devastating natural disaster. Which is kind of a good point too -- at least, she's politicized it in a way that's really weird. And it's important to note that, at least on its face, this doesn't seem to be a case of the Chinese government censoring Stone's films, but rather an exhibitor making a choice not to show them. Of course, with the way the Chinese government operates, who really knows.

Sharon Stone seems to have no "big" films in the pipeline, so it's not clear what effect, if any, the boycott will have on revenues.

Poll: Should Celebs Take on Politcal Causes?

Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy », Politics », Polls »

Here's something interesting ... Jeff Wells at Hollywood Elsewhere posted a "salute" yesterday afternoon to Steven Spielberg, who announced yesterday that he's withdrawing as an artistic advisor to the Beijing Summer Olympics. Here's the kicker though ... Spielberg didn't pull out because of the Chinese government's continued human rights abuses within its own borders, or for its oppression in Tibet, but over Darfur.

According to this piece over on Variety, which broke the story, "I have made repeated efforts to encourage the Chinese government to use its unique influence to bring safety and stability to the Darfur region of Sudan," Spielberg wrote. "Although some progress has been made ...the situation continues to worsen and the violence continues to accelerate."

As Wells noted, Spielberg's "enlightment" about China may be due, at least in part, to Mia Farrow's ripping him a new one over China's human rights issues (and bankrolling of the genocide in Darfur) back in March. So kudos to Spielberg for finally getting on the human rights bandwagon here, but geez, how about getting on China for all its human rights issues, while you're at it? And while we're on the subject, how do you feel about celebs and political issues?

Should Celebs and Politics Mix?



Review: Summer Palace

Filed under: Foreign Language », New Releases », Theatrical Reviews », New in Theaters », Cinematical Indie »



With his previous two features, Suzhou River (2000) and Purple Butterfly (2003), Sixth-Generation Chinese director Lou Ye has earned mostly unfavorable comparisons to Wong Kar-wai. However, he finally gets away from that with his new film, Summer Palace, which, instead, moves closer to seminal works by his own countrymen. Summer Palace is a tormented romance set between 1987 and 2001 in which a country girl, Yu Hong (Hao Lei), goes to school in Beijing, meets Zhou Wei (Guo Xiaodong), and gets caught up in a whirlwind of romantic and social changes. Two other Chinese filmmakers have attempted historical dramas of this type, set against a backdrop of real, fairly recent events. The best of the Fifth Generation team of filmmakers, Tian Zhuangzhuang, made The Blue Kite (1993), and the best of the Sixth Generation team, Jia Zhang-ke, made Platform (2000).

Quite frankly, Lou's work pales next to these twin masterworks, but Summer Palace also comes with its own collection of beautifully dislocated moments. At times the film feels forced, or squeezed, to include certain events. Somehow, during the course of this timeline, our heroes manage to make it to Berlin in time for the Wall to come down in 1989, and to Hong Kong in time for the handover in 1997. Far more appropriate is the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. Yu Hong, Zhou Wei and their friends join the fray in high spirits, thrilled to be a part of something so big, perhaps without realizing just how far it stretched and what it all meant. It could be argued that they saw it as a giant party, and a chance to sing, dance, and perhaps meet someone and get laid.

Ruby Yang Tackles Controversial Subjects: With China's Support

Filed under: Foreign Language », Shorts », Politics »

We're always letting you know about the latest battle between Chinese filmmakers and Chinese censors. The most recent kerfuffle was earlier this month, when Peter Martin blogged about how the Lost in Beijing filmmakers were banned in China. After a seemingly endless deluge of stories like that, I'm very happy to report that there's a positive story coming out of China dealing with filmmaker Ruby Yang and the Chinese government. Making this even better -- it isn't a case of a filmmaker bending over backward for the censors, but her tackling what Reuters calls "China's thorniest issues."

An Oscar winner for the documentary short The Blood of Yungzhou District, Yang has been busy making films about HIV/AIDS, tobacco/smoking, homosexuality, and the environment will full support from China's state organizations. Just this November, she made public service ads about condom use featuring celebs like Jackie Chan, and she's now gearing up for a half-hour documentary on gay life a the pressures stemming from the country's one-child policy. Yang says: "There's a lot of pressure to produce an heir. Many gay men are married and live a double life. They lie to their parents, lie to their wives." Although she's gotten a lot of support, Yang doesn't expect this particular project to get a public release in the country, and is instead planning on international festivals.

On the bigger-scale end of things, she's also working on promotions for a smoke-free Olympics in 2008, citing that the number of smokers in China is larger than the population of the US. (Maybe the anti-smoking advocates should take an international trip...) More stateside, she also has a 60-minute PBS doc in the works on San Fran's Chinatown.

'Mummy 3' is a Wrap

Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Universal », DIY/Filmmaking », Remakes and Sequels »

Well to be honest, my expectations for the latest installment of The Mummy aren't too high, so if I look on the bright side then maybe I will get a pleasant surprise after all. Director Rob Cohen has announced on his production blog that The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor has wrapped shooting in China. Starring Brendan Fraser as Rick O'Connell, this time, the O'Connells (Maria Bello, Fraser, and Luke Ford as their son, Alex) are bound for China to battle an immortal emperor (Jet Li). Rounding out the cast are John Hannah, who returns to play Evy's brother Jonathan, and Michelle Yeoh as a "double-crossing sorceress".

Cohen has made this particular announcement on his blog a veritable love fest for his cast. Cohen gushes over his new stars, Maria Bello as the 'new and improved' Evy, saying, "Her beauty and intelligence, wit and courage were something I appreciated each and every day". Jet Li wasn't left out either, and Cohen says that he was everything that "epitomizes graciousness, spiritual depth, and physical grace". Just because shooting has finished, there is still a lot of work ahead on the film, including somewhere around "800 visual effects shots" to be completed.

Considering no one was all that anxious for a third film in the series, the blog has maybe managed to improve things just a little. I know my opinion on the film has fluctuated wildly based on the few pictures that have been released so far. Just for the record: those opinions varied from everything from "Well, maybe this won't be so bad after all" to something with a lot more expletives in it that I probably shouldn't get into here. The Mummy 3 is set for release on August 1st, 2008.

Review: Blind Mountain

Filed under: Drama », Foreign Language », Independent », Cannes », Telluride », Theatrical Reviews », Festival Reports », Cinematical Indie »



One of the most compelling films that played Telluride this year (and hopefully will be coming soon to a film fest near you) was Blind Mountain, directed by Li Yang, whose 2003 film Blind Shaft won awards at fests from Berlin to Tribeca and points in between. Blind Shaft told the tale of two Chinese illegal coal mine workers who plan an extortion scam to kill a co-worker they claim is a relative and make it look like an accident, getting themselves, as the "family" of the victim, paid off to avoid publicity for the illegal mining operation. In Blind Mountain, which played at Cannes earlier this year before heading to Telluride, Li examines a different marginalized community and illegal activity in China: the selling of young women as wives in remote regions of the country. As in Blind Shaft, Li presents the community to which he turns his lens as a unique social microcosm with its own set of rules and mores.

Nearly thirty years of the one-child policy in China has resulted in countless female fetuses being aborted and female babies abandoned for adoption or even murdered, as couples sought to have the more "desirable" male infants. Now the repercussions of this policy are becoming more clear, as women of marrying age are in short supply, making women a commodity. Blind Mountain tells the tale of Bai Xuemei (Huang Lu), who has traveled to a remote community for a job with a medicine supply company. The recent college graduate has had trouble finding a job and wants desperately to pay off the debt her parents incurred for her education, and to help ensure her younger brother is able to stay in school. She travels to the distant countryside in the company of her boss and his assistant, believing she is there to procure medicinal herbs from remote farms.

MPA Says Hollywood May Boycott China Over Piracy -- Uh, Huh

Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy », Distribution », Politics »

The words "China" and "piracy" seem to always go hand-in-hand these days, no matter what efforts are made to stop those sneaky buggers from releasing super-cheap pirated copies of high-profile movies. Just the other day, a student from South China won a short film contest entitled "Respect Copyrights, Stay Away From Piracy" with his one-minute short depicting students describing what the word "steal" means. Even though the 20-year-old will head to Hollywood to visit the MPA, Christopher Campbell's comment last month about $1 Spider-Man 3 DVDs seems to have come true...or so we thought?

After reports that copies of Spider-Man 3 had been sold on the streets of China for $1, Sony says that their investigation has found that it was actually the second installment sold in the third installment's boxes. Hmm. Are they fooling with the people anxious to see the third film, or did they totally pull the wool over Sony's eyes? Whatever the case, the MPA and companies are ticked and considering taking action. CEO Dan Glickman says that studios are backing the complaint made to the World Trade Organization and could choose to boycott the country. The complaints accuse Beijing of violating trade commitments and failing to stop piracy of U.S. media. (The possibility of blocking China from films is also inspired by the country's recent lock-down on U.S. influence.) Sure, blocking China would make it harder for pirates to nab illegal copies, but to me, it seems akin to the flawed thinking that releasing a film earlier in China will curb the problem. If this mess was handed over to you to solve, what would you do?

'Spider-Man 3' To Land In China Before U.S., To Stem Piracy

Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », New Releases », Sony », Distribution », Comic/Superhero/Geek », Remakes and Sequels »

Is everybody ready to storm the multiplex on May 4? If you're like me, you can't wait for that date, and with it the chance to finally see Venom on the big screen in Spider-Man 3. Surely some of us will even be making the trek to a midnight showing the night before (keep in mind, this one is about 3 hours with ads and previews included). But we won't be nearly the first ones to see the movie, because it will bow in China a whole day earlier than it opens in the States. The decision for the head start was made in order to put a dent in piracy of the movie. Apparently it had nothing at all to do with Hollywood's current favoring of international markets -- as was the reported excuse for Spider-Man 3 having its world premiere in Japan on May 1.

I'm not an expert on film piracy, but a one day advance doesn't seem to me like it would matter to bootleggers, or to many of the people who buy pirated discs over seeing a film in the theater. Isn't it already good enough for Eastern countries to get a day-and-date release? With such a simultaneous release they still technically get to see the movies before us anyway. I actually don't mind not seeing the film first, and could even wait to see Spider-Man 3 on Monday, when the theater won't be so packed. And if I was a poorer or cheaper person who could easily pick up a copy on the street for as little as $1, I could probably wait even longer for whenever the pirates get the chance to distribute it illegally.

Several High-Profile Films Anticipating Chinese Censorship

Filed under: Action », Animation », Comedy », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Disney », Warner Brothers », Distribution », Johnny Depp », Harry Potter », Remakes and Sequels »

Disney will be trying hard this summer to get Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End into Chinese cinemas despite the fact that the last installment of the franchise was banned by the country's censors. Obviously the studio is aware that many of China's movie fans at least got to see Dead Man's Chest via bootleg, and it understandably wants to profit from those fans' desire to see part three. But this isn't just about exploiting the expectant audiences, and it isn't exactly about fighting piracy. All of Hollywood wants to succeed in the Chinese market because it is a growing source of income for the studios.

What this means for the rest of the world may be nothing. Hollywood studios and distribs will likely start censoring for easy approval by China the same way they censor for the rest of the international markets. As I mentioned recently when The Departed failed with Chinese censors, the best way for a film to meet approval is for it to have no mention of China. However, the Chinese aren't only concerned with references to themselves; Dead Man's Chest was banned because it featured cannibals.

The Chinese version of our holiday season is coming up soon, and the titles looking for big box office are Night at the Museum, which has been performing brilliantly all over the world, 16 Blocks and South Korea's Joong Cheon (The Restless). These will be taking up three of the 20 quota slots that China allows to be filled by imported titles, and the last of these fills one slot that Hollywood missed out on. Following this month's big movie-going time, Hollywood will continue trying to fill in the rest of these slots, and so Chinese audiences may or may not get proper releases of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, The Pursuit of Happyness, Transformers and At World's End.
 
.