Call it performance art, savage prank behavior or audacious social satire. Call it whatever you want, but there's no question Sacha Baron Cohen is at it again. As Erik reported back in March, the Borat star began surfacing as his Bruno alter-ego in a variety of absurd situations likely intended for the movie starring the effeminate European character. Wearing chains at a Kansas church? Check. Weirding out Ben Affleck? Check. Airport dancing? Yep. Now, bizarre reports of a cage match in Arkansas, where attendees paid for admission expecting to watch a fight and instead witnessed two men get naked and lock lips, suggests Cohen is still at it, more than three months down the line. Not only that, but he appears to have pulled the stunt twice: First on June 5 at the Four States Fair Grounds in Texarkana, then again at Fort Smith's convention center, where a character named "Straight Dave" apparently selected a planted audience member to challenge him.

Whether or not you agree with Cohen's brash style -- he claims to take inspiration from Michael Moore's stunts --
the actor definitely constructs his gags with very specific ideas in mind. Borat took a stab at American stereotypes of foreign cultures, but Bruno looks like it's geared more towards attacking homophobia -- specifically as it manifests in middle America. However, it's hard to say whether or not such excessive spectacles will manage to correct misinformed perspectives or reinforce them.

For everyone who's ever watched a bad movie and thought, "If this is what they produced, I wonder what they threw away?," the Village Voice has found an answer. In an amusing and fascinating article posted today, reporter Tony Ortega says he and a buddy accidentally stumbled across a recycling bin full of paper from Harvey Weinstein's office -- and not just from the office, but from Weinstein's own desk. Ortega proceeds to tell us all the juicy details he learned about the daily work of a movie mogul.

So what is Harvey Weinstein throwing away? Lots of copies of screenplays, naturally, as well as daily sheets (prepared by an assistant, no doubt) listing phone calls he needs to make or return. As you might imagine, the roster of people seeking Weinstein's attention is staggering, with actors, agents, lawyers, producers, and reporters all vying for his time. Michael Moore called him on April 25 and Weinstein didn't return the call for over a month. I'd say being able to ignore Michael Moore for a full month is the very definition of power.

Strangely, Weinstein's e-mails are printed out for him to peruse. (Maybe he gets eye strain from looking at a computer monitor? Maybe he just likes wasting paper?) There were some pretty interesting tidbits in the copies he tossed, including lots of stuff about the Weinstein-produced Project Runway, if you're into that.

If you read any part of that draft of W., Oliver Stone's Bush biopic, which hit the net a few months back, you might think it ludicrous for the film to be likened to Shakespeare. But Stone himself has done so, as part of an L.A. Times set visit interview. Lumped in with a quote in which Stone also contrasts the project to the work of Michael Moore, the Oscar-winning director's statement is in response to the film's level of seriousness: "W. isn't an overly serious movie, but it is a serious subject. It's a Shakespearean story. . . . I see it as the strange unfolding of American democracy as I have lived it."

The Times piece, which reports from Shreveport, Louisiana, where Independence Bowl stadium fills in for the Texas Rangers' Arlington Stadium, is very filling for anyone with an appetite for more W. updates. Included are a description of and dialogue from a scene between George W. Bush (Josh Brolin) and George H.W. Bush (James Cromwell), details on a "baseball-oriented fantasy" sequence, Brolin stating that he's not out to do a SNL-style caricature and admitting his initial hesitance to take on the role, a general overview of the project's coming together, and, best of all, a picture (seen, cropped, above) of Brolin as the future Commander in Chief looking like he's just had the crap beaten out of him. Also a fact I'd somehow never known prior to reading the article: Stone was "briefly a Yale classmate of Bush."

Documentaries and foreign films, for the most part, are thrown into a cinematic void in North America. If not on PBS, or featuring Al Gore or Michael Moore, the docs usually don't get seen. The same goes for films that have, gasp!, subtitles. Both are pretty unfortunate, considering the amazing selections that each offers. Yet even with breakthroughs like An Inconvenient Truth, Amelie, or The Passion of the Christ, documentaries and foreign films hit a very low ceiling when it comes to mainstream viewing.

And this is really ticking off Michael Moore. The Hollywood Reporter has posted that the documentary filmmaker is "mad as hell" about the fact that both types of films are shut out of theaters, and he is itching to change it. Moore says: "My new year's resolution is to sit down with the heads of exhibition chains and have them devote one screen in their multiplexes to nonfiction and foreign films." (Another option they're looking into: one night a week, like the usually-weak Monday nights.) He continues: "People want to see documentaries, but there's a disconnect between that desire and the exhibitors out there. We're not asking for charity. This could be on the 15th screen of a multiplex that would otherwise have the sixth showing of the new Harry Potter movie. Some of these films make $200 or $300 per screen."

I would love to see this happen. However, I worry about what happens after the initial rush. It's so very easy to say, if the starting box office take is week, that it wouldn't work. Hopefully, they'll realize that it takes some time to foster. Many people might shun the possibility, but then there are those who will take a chance, fall in love with what they see, and not only bring their friends, but have their eyes opened to two huge, and wonderful areas of cinema. Then again, I'm wishing big, in hopes that original films can start thriving instead of the continual barrage of remakes.

Wonderful as the classic family Christmas movies can be, the overwhelming sugary sweetness in most of them can be a little off-putting to adult audiences. I know my friends tend to gravitate more towards the R-rated holiday fare -- Die Hard, Bad Santa, The Ref, etc. Lord knows Hollywood doesn't want to be bothered coming up with original ideas, so I'm proposing seven remakes of Christmas family classics -- souped up for 2008 and aimed at the 17+ crowd. I've set up the plots and even suggested a possible director for each. Enjoy...

Michael Moore's A Christmas Carol

In Michael Moore's return to narrative filmmaking, George W. Bush plays with his shiny new train set, sets out cookies for Santa Claus, and falls asleep in his footie pajamas while watching Power Rangers. He is awoken in the middle of the night by The Ghost of Christmas Past, who takes Georgie through his days of frat parties, draft dodging, drunk driving, and cocaine abuse. Even faced with hard evidence, Bush denies any involvement. The Ghost of Christmas Present takes Bush deep into a post-Katrina New Orleans, where Bush cracks jokes and enjoys some caramel corn. Stunned by Bush's lack of feeling, the ghost takes him to Iraq, where he sees what Christmas is like for U.S. soldiers. Bush yawns. He is sleepy. The Ghost of Christmas Future shows Bush a world ravaged by the effects of global warming and America hated by countries all across the globe. "Not real concerned about my legacy, Future Dude" chuckles Bush, and he falls asleep safe in his bed. Bush wakes up twelve hours later, having learned absolutely nothing. As the movie ends, he runs over a homosexual couple with his truck and kicks a sick orphan in the face.

The biggest indie release this week is Michael Moore's Sicko, which we've already covered extensively. I admit to a blind spot regarding Moore -- I think he's sincere in wanting to change things for the better, but his methods and approach drive me nuts -- so I'll just note that The Weinstein Co. DVD is filled with supplemental features and move on to less publicized films.

Just as controversial in its own way, Bruno Dumont's Flanders (pictured) debuted at Cannes last year, sparking passionate response, mainly in a negative vein. Our own James Rocchi called it "slow, turgid, bleak and brutal ... watching Dumont try and craft allegories and deeper meanings out of the petty interactions of his thinly-crafted characters and their meaningless actions and cruelties is a bitter experience." Other critics liked it much more, though, so I remain stubbornly intrigued. The DVD from Koch Releasing appears to be bare bones.

I'm also curious about Pretty Things (Les Jolies Choses) because it features Marion Cotillard in a dual role as "a goody-goody and her evil twin." Variety further described the film as "a blistering music-biz romp." Cotillard made a huge splash as Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose this year. I'd love to give this action thriller a spin. The DVD, also from Koch Releasing, is likewise without supplemental features.

Blame It on Fidel follows a nine-year-old girl trying to make sense of a world gone mad: Europe in the early 1970s as her parents suddenly become politically active, throwing her life into turmoil. The movie slipped completely under my radar, but it received very positive reviews when it was released earlier this year. Koch Releasing's DVD includes a "making of" feature, behind the scenes segments, and deleted scenes presented by director Julie Gavras.

With five feature documentaries under his substantial belt and plenty more on TV, Michael Moore will be honored Dec. 7 with the International Documentary Association's Career Achievement Award. That's right: For many conservatives, Dec. 7 is a date which will live in infamy all over again.

A statement from IDA president Diane Estelle Vicari says, "Michael Moore still has many more extraordinary films ahead of him. Our members are thankful for his fearless commitment to tell compelling stories. He is a role model for young documentary filmmakers everywhere in the world."

Personally, I disagree with that last part. I don't think would-be filmmakers should emulate him. Even though I agree with almost all the points he makes in his films, I'm often embarrassed by his antics and shenanigans. His most recent, Sicko, was his sloppiest yet, and Moore shot himself in the foot by behaving like a buffoon.

Dec. 7 is also the night of the IDA's general awards, the nominees for which were previously announced. Moore's already a contender there, as Sicko is up for best feature-length documentary. He's no stranger to the IDA awards, having previously won for Roger & Me and Fahrenheit 9/11.

The IDA was founded in 1982. Previous Career Achievement honorees include William Greaves, D.A. Pennebaker and Chris Hegedus, Jean Rouch, and David Attenborough.

Michael Moore's new documentary opens with a title card explaining that we're in Tallahassee, Florida the night before the 2004 election and immediately I thought: Uh, yeah -- I think I recall how this one turned out. Chronicling Moore's 2004 Slacker Uprising Tour -- a get-out-the-vote series of speaking engagements in 20 'Battleground' States -- Captain Mike Across America is easily Moore's weakest film, a self-congratulatory mess that has nothing to say about the American political process and tells you everything you need to know about the numbing cult of personality that's sprung up around Moore. It's not so bad that there's a cult of personality around Moore -- as I've said of Moore before, some Americans are so desperate for someone to speak truth to power that they'll settle for someone saying anything to it. What's bad is that Moore seems to be buying into his own myth, now, and here that seems both narcissistic and futile.

Moore wants to keep old grudges alive -- anger about the 'Swift Boat' ads that ran against Kerry, anger about the decision to go to war in Iraq, anger about the 2000 election Supreme Court decision that ended Al Gore's presidential ambitions. It's like watching a demented cheerleader scream their lungs out over a game that was lost years ago -- and was rigged in the first place. And yes, I just compared the American electoral process to a rigged game.

Because it is: You could make a hell of a documentary about what's wrong with American electoral politics from both sides of the aisle -- 30 minutes on how campaign finance and TV advertising makes candidates slaves to specialized interests, 30 minutes on how voter registration in its current form deliberately disenfranchises select groups based on color and class, 30 minutes on how aggressive, computer-aided redistricting is allowing parties in power to re-draw wide swaths of the political landscape as permanent fiefdoms. And the Michael Moore who was more interested in doing well than looking good might have made that film. What we get in Captain Mike Across America is 97 minutes of Michael Moore receiving standing ovations and looking like a fabulous human being -- pensive at the site of the Penn State shootings, reluctantly taking the family-heirloom Bronze Star a young man wants him to have for fighting the good fight, getting kicked off a San Diego campus but then filling a venue ten times the size.

You might have heard of this documentary called Manufacturing Dissent, where Rick Caine and Debbie Melnyk went about filming a doc focusing on Michael Moore, and ended up using Moore's own in-your-face techniques to question the controversial filmmaker. Cinematical's Jette Kernion reviewed it at SXSW, and asked: "how do we know what the truth is behind this film or any documentary?" But she isn't the only one who started asking questions after the film. Kim also alerted us to complaints from John Pierson about Moore's techniques and wavering credibility. Now you can see it for yourself -- or rather, most of it.

Before the doc gets released on DVD on November 6, Variety has reported that 40 of the film's 97 minutes are getting screened on AOL's True Stories website -- for free. Of course, since you're not having to fork over your hard-earned money, you will have to deal with ads being spliced into the video. It's an ... interesting way to drum up support. They're hoping for lots of blogs and comments on the material to help increase buzz, and possibly get the film on more screens, but is showing almost half of the film interspersed with ads the way to go?

We're all familiar with a preview clip here or there, but that's different than watching half the film and then waiting a few months to see the other half. I'm wondering if this will drum up enough buzz for the DVD, or if it will be forgotten by the time November rolls around. Or, will viewers feel satiated by what they see in 40 minutes, and not feel the need to see the rest? It's an intriguing idea, yet I can't help but think it would've been much better if it was done a week or two before the DVD release -- where people could see if they'd like the doc enough to buy it, and still have the film fresh in their mind when it hits the stands.