NewYorkCity Tagged Articles at Cinematical
Image of the Day: Plane Crashes in Hudson River, NYC
Filed under: Newsstand »
.jpg)
I know this isn't film-related, but by now I'm sure you're all well aware of the plane that crashed earlier today in the Hudson River in New York City. Apparently, word has it that everyone on board was able to escape with minor injuries. That said, a friend of a friend who was on one of the rescue ferries sent along this image to me and it absolutely blew my mind. This is a photo of the folks exiting the place in the icy waters around NYC. Unreal. Check out a larger version below. Thankfully everyone is safe.
Gallery: NYC Plane Crash
(image taken by JKrums)
Borrowed 'Sex' Scenes
Filed under: Comedy », Drama », New Releases », RumorMonger », Celebrities and Controversy »
Since Sex and the City has screened around the world and critics have weighed in, it's time for a little nitpicking -- and nobody seems more up to the task than that unflagging beacon of urban gossip, Page Six. Today, the New York Post column reports that New Line Cinema and Radio City Music Hall are facing off in a blame-fest following the mistake that lead to 1,000 ticket holders getting turned away at the New York City premiere. At the close of the piece, however, the article gets into some of the details of the plot: "Those who've seen Sex and the City are buzzing that its story owes much to widely reported episodes involving Jonathan Tisch and Ellen Barkin," it reads, and that's just one of the alleged rip-offs. There's also a supposed reference to Tisch's canceled engagement to Jill Swid, and a "scene where Carrie freaks out about having a 347 area code seems just like one in an old Seinfeld episode." Not having seen the movie, I can only judge from afar, but this sounds like two very separate complaints. That Sex and the City would use real life incidents to inspire its metropolitan plot shouldn't bother anyone (except the real life inspirations, of course). But borrowing from Seinfeld? Now that's a low blow.
'Watchmen' NYC Sets Revealed!
Filed under: Warner Brothers », Movie Marketing », Comic/Superhero/Geek », Images »
.jpg)
Who wants to see the Watchmen newsstand come to life? Here it is. And guess, what? That's not really New York City. No, fortunately (and unfortunately, kinda), 42nd Street no longer looks like that. Instead, that's a custom backlot built up in Vancouver. And there's more photos to whet your appetite, too, over at Warner Bros.' official site for the film. Looking at the pics, I feel like I'm seeing an establishing montage of the NYC of Watchmen. There's a grimy bus stop with the Treasure Island store behind it. There's the pun-named Gunga Diner. And best of all, there's a re-election campaign poster of Richard Nixon, with Rorschach walking by and some graffiti asking, "WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN?" nearby (see image above). This new update also includes interesting facts about the backlot, such as information on its design, construction ("20,000 donuts were consumed by the construction crew") and requirements ("Street had to work for 1938, 1945, 1953, 1957, 1964, 1974, 1975, 1977, and 1985"). Of course, someone might complain that all this work and money could have gone to a Mars set (which director Zach Snyder said they couldn't afford to build), and real New York locations should have been used instead.
I may be a die-hard supporter of New York films actually being shot in the Big Apple, but there are numerous occasions where I'm forgiving. For instance, I completely get that Watchmen can't film here. Aside from the fact that the story takes place in the 1980s -- an alternate 1980s to be exact -- and aside from the fact that until the end of the graphic novel there is no significant use of any necessary NYC locales or landmarks, the movie is based on a comic book. And it's important for it to look like a comic book movie, because it is a story that's very much centered on a comic book world. I don't mean it should look like a cartoon. It actually should look gritty and realistic at times. But I think having the characters dropped into the actual streets of Manhattan -- even if those streets were dressed up (or down, as it would be) -- it would look even more fake than a constructed set, which might be able to compliment the characters and their costumes better. If Watchmen were shot in the real NYC, my beloved city might look as artificial and lame as it does in Enchanted.
NYC Loosens Those Crazy Film/Photography Restrictions
Filed under: Independent », Celebrities and Controversy », Tech Stuff », DIY/Filmmaking », Politics », Cinematical Indie »
Remember the crazy restrictions that the New York City Mayor's Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting (MOFTB) created to control photography and filmmaking in the Big Apple this past summer? The regulations stated that two or more people who use a camera in a public place for more than half an hour, or five or more people who use a tripod for more than 10 minutes, would need to get a permit and a $1 million liability insurance policy. Obviously, that was a pretty strange set of restrictions, and while the city claimed that they weren't meant for amateur photographers and filmmakers, there was nothing in the regulations to protect that claim, until now.According to MOFTB, the restrictions will go back to permits being necessary for shoots that have production equipment and vehicles that create an obstruction, rather than "productions that only use hand-held cameras or tripods that don't cause an obstruction." The permit-needing equipment includes things like film cameras, lights, and sets, but doesn't include the hand-helds and tripods. Commissioner Katherine Oliver says: "our intention has always been to balance the needs of filmmakers working in New York City with concerns about congestion in public places, traffic flow, and public safety."
I don't know. If they gave any thought to the wording of the previous proposal, it would've been obvious that those parameters were most definitely not about safety and transportation flow. Don't these people sit down, examine, and question their wording and policy? It seems like back-tracking, arse-covering to me, but whatever the case may be -- we no longer have to worry about trouble with the men in blue if we walk around recording the sights in the Big Apple.
[via IndieWIRE]
'I Am Legend' Scene Costs Studio $5 Million ... or More?
Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Warner Brothers », Remakes and Sequels »
For five million smackers you could probably put together a darn fine "low-budget" film or two -- or, you could film one sequence for the latest Will Smith action flick. It's being called "the most expensive scene ever shot in New York," and it might have cost even more than the $5 million the studio is quoting. Producers required tons of permits, approvals, consultations and extra-thick winter apparel ... All this to make one sequence in Francis Lawrence's I Am Legend -- and it's a flashback scene! (It's a massive evacuation scene, probably similar to the one Spielberg put together in War of the Worlds.)In order to pull off the scene properly, the second-time director needed the assistance of one bridge (Brooklyn!), 6 nights, 14 government agencies, 160 National Guardsmen, 250 crew people, one thousand extras and probably 10,000 cups of coffee. Oh, and about five million bucks, although apparently some internet folks* believe the sequence cost a whole lot more than that. No word yet on how lengthy this sequence might be, but for that kind of money (and effort) it better be pretty impressive. At the very least, I'm sure the six nights spent on the Brooklyn Bridge will make for one really nifty featurette on the I Am Legend DVD.
(* Both Yahoo and The Hollywood Reporter cite anonymous "internet" reports while claiming that the sequence may have cost a lot more than $5 million, but I was unable to track down any such reports. Cite your sources, journalists!)
NYC Cuts Film Industry Perk
Filed under: Newsstand »
Just when the city of New York is enjoying a surge in film production, hopefully cutting down on movies set in NYC but shot in Canada, a new decision is pissing off a lot of people in the movie business. The Mayor's Office of Film, Theatre and Broadcasting has announced they are getting rid of a parking privilege that film shoots have in the city. Many in the industry, from location scouts to costume people, need to make quick stops around the city, an in the past have been able to acquire tags that exempt them from paying meters or getting tickets. The cut doesn't dig into the permits which enable shoots to take up block after block with trailers and trucks, which is the more visibly annoying element of having a production in your neighborhood, but it seems that the tags were upsetting enough for locals to complain. Mostly, the problems had to do with the industry abusing their tags.
It is a shame that some dishonest people have to go and ruin a good thing for the rest of the film workers, but things like this are always going to happen. I just hope that productions aren't deterred from filming in NYC because of this change. Seeing film shoots around every corner is part of what makes the city special, and putting up with them is part of living and working here. I can't say they've ever been enough of a bother that I would rather they weren't around. And though I used to get frustrated with the parking situation in New York, I now accept that no intelligent human being should be driving around Manhattan unless they are a delivery truck or a taxi (and I'll lump in film industry vehicles with delivery trucks).
Lindsay Lohan, and more Hollywood flight: Variety in 60 Seconds
Filed under: Deals », Variety in 60 Seconds », Distribution », 20th Century Fox », DIY/Filmmaking »
The New York City tax
incentive program Made in NY has so far
been a rousing success, drawing $600 million in new filmmaking business to the city, and
creating more than 6,000 jobs. The progame has helped pay for a total of 350 film and TV productions this year, and
it's not just about tax credits – the city also offers free advertising on any city-owned media property to
productions that conduct at least 75% of their shoot here, which somewhat explains why I can't leave the house without
seeing an ad for The Producers.- In other non-Hollywood Hollywood news, Washington state is putting together its own incentive package to lure film production back to the states from Canada. The project, organized by a group of Seatlle-based industry leaders and soon to work itself through the Washington legislature, would offer rebates of up to $1 million per picture (which seems pathetically low for all but the most indie of productions). The state is said to be smarting over the loss of several recent, Seattle-set films to the more affordable British Columbia.
- And now, you've been patient, so here's your Lohan: Fox is moving the young bombshell's upcoming Just My Luck from March to May. They're apparently so confident in the film, they're setting it up to compete against Warner Brothers' huge-money remake, Poseidon.
Transit strike and NY indies
Filed under: Sundance », DIY/Filmmaking »
On the Filmmaker blog,
Scott Macaulay ponders how the now-ending transit strike might have thus far impacted New York producers trying to
hustle their features through post in time for Sundance. "Fortunately," he writes, "the project I'm
working on is picture-locked and all elements are to the appropriate vendors. My worry is with the vendors and their
employees, hoping that the strike doesn't slow them down." He goes on to ask others involved with NY productions,
Sundance or otherwise, to shar their horror stories. The major catastrophe for us is that I missed two press screenings
on the first day of the strike - Casanova and Rumor Has It – and will be able to write a
straight review of neither. How should I handle this conundrum? What would you like to see instead? And if you have
other movie-related strike stories, do tell. Now that it's all over it's time to take stock – and take the L
train into city for the first time this week.








