conservative Tagged Articles at Cinematical
Discuss: Do Politics Belong in Kids Movies?
Filed under: Animation », New Releases », RumorMonger », Celebrities and Controversy », Scripts », Newsstand », Politics »

A couple of people have been griping about Wall-E director Andrew Stanton's refusal to admit that his cute little movie about a robot in love actually contains some pretty upfront green politics, but there's a far more polarizing reference in the film than its harmless pro-environment agenda. It's no major plot spoiler to reveal that, about an hour or so into the story, Fred Willard appears in a recorded message as the mysterious president of Earth's corporate government and orders the ship's captain (Jeff Garlin) to "stay the course." Wait, we've heard this one before: It was the go-to statement used by the Bush administration for about three years or so when describing its modus operandi in Iraq (the term was abandoned when staying the course started to sound like a bad idea). In Wall-E, the context is quite different -- it's an order to not do something, rather than take action -- but hard to ignore nonetheless.
Certain critics with (surprise!) conservative slants have taken issue with this. At Dirty Harry's Place, John Nolte expresses his disappointment in the first paragraph of his review: "Have we lost the wonderful studio who brought us The Incredibles and Ratatouille to Bush Derangement Syndrome?" he asks. New York Post critic Kyle Smith picked up the rant and decided to write his own, even though he hadn't seen the film yet: "This kind of crack, lame as it is, also breaks the spell of the movie by hurling you out of the theater and back into reality."
Sean Hannity may sue filmmakers
Filed under: Documentary », Politics », Michael Moore »
Director Peter Greenstreet's documentary This Divided State, which covered the controversial plan to
bring Michael
Moore to the ultra-conservative Utah Valley State College in Orem, Utah, has raised the ire of Sean Hannity, who was brought to the college in response to Moore's
scheduled appearance. Hannity says he plans to sue the filmmakers due to this footage, which, quite frankly, makes him
look like a complete jerk (actually, "jerk" isn't the right word, but I'm trying to keep this family
friendly). You can also watch the first 26 minutes of the documentary on the official web site. While the clip shows Hannity being cheered by huge numbers of
conservative students and being asked questions by the handful of liberals in attendance (who are often shouted down by
the crowd), there's nothing especially "political" about it. Its intent seems to be an indictment of Hannity
himself, but what it really reveals, to me anyway, is the sorry state of political discourse and what happens when
emotions take over and people begin to block out differing opinions entirely. And, needless to say, that happens at
both ends of the political spectrum.
Using politics to rate films?
It might sound absurd at first to compile a top ten list of movies based solely
on your political views. But let's face it, we all do this on one level or another. For example, a movie loses big
points for me if the women are all submissive, supportive wives or nagging-bitch girlfriends. And I never could bring
myself to see The Passion of the Christ (although part of that
isn't politics, it's the same reason I haven't seen Hostel—I
can't abide excessive gore).
So perhaps former Boston Herald columnist Don Feder's list of the 10 best conservative films of 2005 isn't as
unusual as it might seem. Feder selected the films that he felt represented "conservatism’s cardinal values
– faith, family and freedom." Does that explain why King Kong is #2 on the list? Feder feels
the movie's characters "exemplify feminine virtue, masculine heroism and romantic love." Oh, and lots of cool
computer-generated effects. His #1 pick isn't The Lion, The Witch, and the
Wardrobe, either; that movie is down at #4, past "pro-life" film The Island. Feder tops the list with
Cinderella Man, and he
particularly cites Renee Zellweger's performance as the "worried but steadfast wife". Good thing Feder and I
have never been on a movie date together.
[Thanks to Nigel R. for the link.]
V for Vendetta: Will its politics hurt its box office?
Filed under: Action », Berlin », Box Office », Politics », Comic/Superhero/Geek »
V for Vendetta - produced by Joel Silver and the
Wachowskis; based on a graphic novel by Alan Moore (who has since disowned the film), and starring a bald Natalie
Portman – won't officially premiere until the Berlin Film Festival in February, but ever since its first public
screenings in Austin a couple of weeks ago, the film's been trapped in a bit of a tug of war between the left and right
corners of the web. The fan boy circles are, predictably, all about it, and even the Hollywood Reporter has
come out with a positive review. In contrast, Jason Apuzzo's leading one of the strongest marches against the picture
on Libertas. From what I can tell, neither Apuzzo, nor his commenters, have actually seen the film, but that's not
stopping them from proclaiming it a national tragedy. Partially in response to the Reporter review, Apuzzo
writes: "Those of you who’ve been claiming that this film is just an innocent little adaptation of an
80’s graphic novel series are, um, in for a surprise." His commenters take this opening and run with it. Calling V "a big slap in the face to “Jesusland”", Jim Rockford claims that "What makes this film junk as a film and as storytelling is that it’s explicit pro-Terrorist and anti-American, anti-Bush politics fly in the face of the reality: terrorists really DO want to kill us all; they’ve tried very hard." It will fail commercially, he continues, because "being explicitly opposed to what most of your paying customers hold dear is a good way to lose their business." Michael Hutchinson continues the ideological doomcasting: "Now, the Wachowski Brothers were REALLY lucky that they were able to sell The Matrix with its anti-social message because of its flash and style, but its messages were rather hidden and a huge part of the audience just went for the SFX. Here you have a movie that’s all about its message, even in the trailers. Do you really think this can find an audience?"
Of course, the film's success (or lack thereof) may very well rest on one entirely non-political factor: as Alexander "Bejamins" Hamilton puts it on Left Behinds: "...the problem isn't the directors, it's that Evey Hammond is played by fucking Natalie Portman. Because Natalie Portman can't fucking act."
Thoughts?








