Skip to Content

Massively looks at the best free to play games

ew Tagged Articles at Cinematical

What Kind of Movie Nudity Do You Like?

Filed under: Home Entertainment », Polls »



As far as movie nakedness goes, do you prefer the comedic kind (think of Mike Meyers, John Cleese or Graham Chapman) or do your tastes run more towards the sexy stuff like Daryl Hannah, Brigitte Bardot and (sigh) Beverly D'Angelo in National Lampoon's Vacation! I only ask because a goofy little bracket game just went up at the Entertainment Weekly website, and since any blog post with the word "nude" in it gets massive traffic, I just figured the game was worth mentioning on a boring Monday afternoon.

Basically you click right here and then vote your way through a series of tourney-style brackets, picking the most memorable nude scene each time out. Of course Borat is in there, and so is Will Ferrell, so I'm thinking that EW (and voxpop.tv) should have split the titillating tournament into two divisions: The silly stuff and the sexy stuff. Ah, but which division would Charlton Heston go in? He's both!

Anyway, pop on in and have a PG-rated click-fest with some of your favorite cinematic skin. Better yet, go do that and then come back here to wonder, like omg how did ACTRESS X in MOVIE Y not make the tournament!?!?! (Classy move by EW to not include Jcon from Requiem, because I'm sorry but that IS one seriously memorable nude scene.) But if EW wants to put together another tourney, I'll cast my votes for Salma Hayek in Desperado, Joey Lauren Adams in Mallrats, Pamela Susan Shoop in Halloween 2, or Bo Derek in anything pre-1989. And if I'm being honest and the topic is "most memorable nudity," I'd have to admit that Harvey Keitel buck-naked is, for some reason, forever seared across my brain. Can't even remember what movie it was.

And how the hell did they leave Ewan "Eterno-Nude" McGregor out of the contest? (For more on blatant cinematic nudity, click here and here.)

Edward Norton Responds to 'Hulk' Bashing

Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », RumorMonger », Celebrities and Controversy », Fandom », DIY/Filmmaking », Comic/Superhero/Geek », Remakes and Sequels »



For the past several months, folks have been questioning The Incredible Hulk and whether Edward Norton's extremely "hands on" involvement hurt or helped the finished product. It took a very long time for any images from the film to hit, and even longer for an initial trailer. Some have claimed that part of the hold-up had to do with a dispute between Norton, director John Louis Leterrier and Marvel -- with the latter wanting a more commercial cut of the film and the former, according to Entertainment Weekly, wanting a "more meditative cut of the film that ran about two hours and 15 minutes." From what I've heard, Norton is notoriously hard to work with -- so much so that everyone around him must refer to the guy as Edward, not Ed or Nort or Dude from Fight Club. I imagine folks just go along with it so they don't have to see him angry. In case you didn't know, you don't want to see Edward Norton when he's angry.

After trying for more than a month to interview the guy, EW has just published a 257-word statement (approved in advance by Universal and Marvel) from Norton. In it, he briefly addresses some of these accusations in saying, "Every good movie gets forged through collaboration, and different ideas among people who are all committed and respect the validity of each other's opinions is the heart of filmmaking. Regrettably, our healthy process, which is and should be a private matter, was misrepresented publicly as a 'dispute,' seized on by people looking for a good story, and has been distorted to such a degree that it risks distracting from the film itself, which Marvel, Universal and I refuse to let happen.''

I'm sure we won't hear the real story until well after the film is out in theaters (if there even is a real story), but we'd like you to chime in here: Should this sort of off-screen dispute worry fans of the film? And would you rather see a more commercial or meditative cut of The Incredible Hulk (which, mind you, hits theaters on June 13)?

Check out Norton's full statement to EW after the jump ...

George and Oscar: Entertainment Weekly in 60 seconds

Filed under: Awards », New Releases », Entertainment Weekly in 60 Seconds », Newsstand », Oscar Watch »

Hitch, Hostel, and Hugh: Entertainment Weekly in 60 seconds

Filed under: Entertainment Weekly in 60 Seconds », Newsstand »

  • The MatadorKing Kong didn't do as well as everyone thought it would? Why not?
  • New movie reviews: The Matador gets a B, Hostel a B, and Wolf Creek a B-. 
  • New DVDs: both The Exorcism Of Emily Rose and Serenity get a B.   
  • What makes a film Hitchcockian?
  • In the print edition only: how Michelle Williams went from Dawson's Creek to Brokeback Mountain (I'd say she probably got on a plane and headed west - ha!)
  • Online only: an interview with Hugh Jackman about X-Men 3 and more.

The Must List: Entertainment Weekly in 60 seconds

Filed under: Entertainment Weekly in 60 Seconds »

  • John GulagerOne of my favorite issues of the year: "The Must List." (Though I think this was once called "The It List?") It's what's hot right now for the summer (though much of this stuff, like movies and CDs, isn't coming out 'til fall).
  • Some film-related people and things on the list this year: Jessica Alba, Peter Jackson's King Kong, Lynda Carter, Thomas Haden Church, Mos Def, Lee Taylor Pucci, Brandon Routh (the new Superman - he's on the cover), Jodie Foster, Uma Thurman, John Gulager, Tim Burton's Corpse Bride, and Hoop Dreams.
  • Some film-related people and things not on the list this year: Pauly Shore.
  • And here's the history of Batman, from comic books to Christian Bale.
 
.