<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Girls on Film: Bella, Buffy, and Bloodsuckers</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/girls-on-film-bella-buffy-and-bloodsuckers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/girls-on-film-bella-buffy-and-bloodsuckers/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/girls-on-film-bella-buffy-and-bloodsuckers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/girls-on-film/" rel="tag">Girls on Film</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/bellbuff070609.jpg" /><br /><br />I'm about to make a very unpopular comparison, one that surely will have some fans trying to revoke my own Whedon fandom: Bella, Buffy, and the bloodsuckers from <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/twilight/31347/main"><em>Twilight</em></a> and <a href="http://www.buffyguide.com/episodes.shtml"><em>Buffy</em></a> aren't all that different. <br /><br />I say this as someone who only left her house once during the seven seasons of <em>Buffy</em> night, who watched each episode countless times, and amassed a huge pile of memorabilia. I say this as someone who has read Stephenie Meyers' series and enjoyed it for the ways it reflected and improved on my own fluffy YA reading (<em>The Vampire Diaries</em>), and knocked it for the Mormon-esque message underneath.<br /><br />I haven't ignored my fandom; I just can't help but see the myriad of similarities between the two characters, ones that make <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/22/watch-this-buffy-owns-edward-cullen/">Buffy owning Edward</a> seem quite hypocritical. The power behind the slayer comes from Joss Whedon and the themes explored throughout her story -- not from the character herself. Strip away the story arcs and implied messages, and you've got a troubled woman who is no better off than Bella.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/girls-on-film-bella-buffy-and-bloodsuckers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Girls on Film: Bella, Buffy, and Bloodsuckers</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/girls-on-film-bella-buffy-and-bloodsuckers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087255/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/girls-on-film-bella-buffy-and-bloodsuckers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Bella</category><category>Buffy</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Girls on Film</category><category>GirlsOnFilm</category><category>Joss Whedon</category><category>JossWhedon</category><category>Stephenie Meyer</category><category>StephenieMeyer</category><category>Twilight</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Credits Report: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/credits-report-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/credits-report-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/credits-report-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/film-clips/" rel="tag">Film Clips</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/western/" rel="tag">Western</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/good_the_bad_and_the_ugly.jpg" /><br /> <br />
<div align="left">Welcome to the latest <em>Cinematical</em> feature -- <em>Credits Report</em>! Hatched by our own <a href="http://twitter.com/scottEweinberg">Scott Weinberg</a>, this is going to be an ongoing celebration of our favorite opening and closing credit sequences. Like our other features, <em>Scenes We Love</em> and <em>Terrific Trailers</em>, it'll be one that's passed around our stable of writers and will pop up completely at random, and will probably depend entirely on what the internet provides. Nevertheless, if you know us, you know you can expect some treasures.<br /> <br /> It's my bit of luck that I've gotten to do the first installment (I <em>tried</em> to get Weinberg to do it) and what better way to kick it off than with one of the greatest credit sequences ever? The opening to <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/3733/main"><em>The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</em></a> is a piece of edgy, badass beauty even <em>without </em>that classic Ennio Morricone theme ... and <em>with</em> it? Well, that just makes it perfection. If I was very clever and artistic, I would put together an art print that puts all the primary color character and film panels together, Andy Warhol style, with the title in the middle. (If someone out there actually does this, <em>please</em> send me one?)<br /> <br /> There's nothing else to say about this one. The clip is below the jump. Enjoy!<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </div>
</div><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/credits-report-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Credits Report: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/credits-report-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/credits-report-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>and the Ugly</category><category>Credit Report</category><category>CreditReport</category><category>Credits Report</category><category>CreditsReport</category><category>featured</category><category>the Bad</category><category>The Good</category><category>TheGood</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Direct-to-DVD Release 'The Code' Tops the Charts</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/direct-to-dvd-release-the-code-tops-the-charts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/direct-to-dvd-release-the-code-tops-the-charts/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/direct-to-dvd-release-the-code-tops-the-charts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/thick-as-thieves-freeman-and-banderas.jpg" />Hey, remember the <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/morgan-freeman/1030592/main">Morgan Freeman</a> / <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/antonio-banderas/1308458/main">Antonio Banderas</a> thriller,<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-code/36821/main"> <em>The Code</em></a> (also known as <em>Thick as Thieves</em>)? No? That's ok, no one does! This poor film was doomed to go straight to DVD shelves, but there it was <em>not</em> forgotten. <em>Home Media Magazine </em>reports that the flick topped the rental charts last week, deftly knocking <em>Gran Torino</em> out of #1. (Mr. Freeman, did you call and crow over your pal Clint for that one? If not, you should. I'm sure he'll get a good laugh.)<br /> <br /> Scott Weinberg believes this is the first DTV movie to ever top the rental charts. If anyone out there knows of another one that has, you should correct him. But for now, history has been made by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/mimi-leder/1860024/main">Mimi Leder</a>! <br /> <br /> The plot follows an aging jewel thief (Freeman) and the uppity young Turk he recruits to help him pull off one final job. They're not going after just <em>any</em> family jewels, but those most treasured by the Romanovs -- Faberge eggs! The ultimate goal of the heist is to pay off the Russian mob, and I'd like to think Banderas and Freeman are stealing the Faberge eggs just to <em>really </em>piss them off. Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/radha-mitchell/1973815/main">Radha Mitchell</a> gets in between them, and makes things sexy. Check out the trailer below the jump, and contemplate renting it for yourself. It topped the rental charts, and millions of people can't be wrong!<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/direct-to-dvd-release-the-code-tops-the-charts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Direct-to-DVD Release 'The Code' Tops the Charts</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/direct-to-dvd-release-the-code-tops-the-charts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087505/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/direct-to-dvd-release-the-code-tops-the-charts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>antonio banderas</category><category>AntonioBanderas</category><category>First Look</category><category>FirstLook</category><category>Gran Torino</category><category>GranTorino</category><category>Mimi Leder</category><category>MimiLeder</category><category>morgan freeman</category><category>MorganFreeman</category><category>rahda mitchell</category><category>RahdaMitchell</category><category>The Code</category><category>TheCode</category><category>Thick as Thieves</category><category>ThickAsThieves</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Scenes We Love: Series 7: The Contenders</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/scenes-we-love-series-7-the-contenders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/scenes-we-love-series-7-the-contenders/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/scenes-we-love-series-7-the-contenders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scenes-we-love/" rel="tag">Scenes We Love</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/cine-series-7.jpg" alt="" />Well, leave it to the comedy duo of Will Ferrell and Adam McKay to remind me of one of the better B-movie curios sitting on my shelf, a film that even combines their own site's merits of <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/embed_videos/f878c58420/14-movies-will-ferrell-and-adam-mckay-think-you-should-see-before-you-die?page=9">'funny' and 'die'</a> into one sharp satire that's already gone overlooked and underappreciated since its 2001 release (into a whopping <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=series7.htm">ten theaters</a>, it seems).<br /><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/series-7-the-contenders/8988/main"><em>Series 7: The Contenders</em></a> plays like a 90-minute marathon of a supposed TV show in which contestants are chosen at random and tasked with killing the competition. Everyday citizens have to take out other everyday citizens while the cameras are rolling, and the last man or woman standing wins, plain and simple.<br /><br />It's funny in the ways it dead-on skewers the manipulations and absurdity of reality programming, and it's funny in more bleakly matter-of-fact ways as we grow slowly but surely engaged by the characters, just as the show itself would intend to. Besides, in what other movie would you see Paul Giamatti's mom from <em>Sideways</em> and the girl from the well in <em>The Silence of the Lambs</em> duke it out, with Will Arnett narrating throughout? Now that's something I <em>would</em> watch...<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KVdc5qTJqjY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KVdc5qTJqjY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/scenes-we-love-series-7-the-contenders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087306/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/scenes-we-love-series-7-the-contenders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>adam mckay</category><category>AdamMckay</category><category>brooke smith</category><category>BrookeSmith</category><category>daniel minahan</category><category>DanielMinahan</category><category>funny or die</category><category>FunnyOrDie</category><category>marylouise burke</category><category>MarylouiseBurke</category><category>reality television</category><category>reality tv</category><category>RealityTelevision</category><category>RealityTv</category><category>satire</category><category>series 7</category><category>series 7 the contenders</category><category>Series7</category><category>Series7TheContenders</category><category>will arnett</category><category>will ferrell</category><category>WillArnett</category><category>WillFerrell</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Discuss: From Big Screens to Boob Tubes</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/discuss-from-big-screens-to-boob-tubes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/discuss-from-big-screens-to-boob-tubes/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/discuss-from-big-screens-to-boob-tubes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/10things070509.jpg" /><br /> <br /> This week marks the premiere of the first of three film-to-television adaptations that will hit our TV's this year. ABC Family will kick things off on Tuesday with their spin of <em>10 Things I Hate About You</em>, and in the fall, two will follow -- NBC's <em>Parenthood</em> and ABC's <em>Eastwick</em> (based, of course, on <em>The Witches of Eastwick</em>). In honor of this trio of shows, the<em> LA Times</em> has outlined not only <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-ca-reboots5-2009jul05,0,2093924.story">the details</a> of the new programs, but also the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-ca-tv-reboots-pictures,0,7972890.photogallery">hits and misses</a> that already litter television history. <br /> <br /> The piece notes a few from recent memory, like <em>The Sarah Connor Chronicles</em>, <em>Buffy</em>, and <em>The Dead Zone</em>, but also notes some doozies that you might not remember. Did you ever catch <em>Ferris Bueller</em> co-starring Jennifer Aniston? <em>Dangerous Minds? Baby Talk</em> (an abysmal remake of <em>Look Who's Talking</em>)? One glaring omission -- especially in the wake of Nia Vardalos' return to film -- the shockingly bad <em>My Big Fat Greek Life</em>. <br /> <br /> It's usually easy to forget that some films head for weekly programming because they're either too terrible to remember, or so good (<em>Buffy</em>) that they blow the movie out of the water. But with three new ones in one season, methinks we have a new trend on our hands. (One, I hope, won't inspire more <em>Producers</em>-esque remake vortexes.) As we come out of a holiday weekend sluggish and hopefully sated on barbecues and fireworks:<br /> <br /> Will you partake in television's latest odes to Hollywood? And what about the ones that have come and gone? Which did you love, and which did you loathe? Or, do you just ignore Hollywood when it heads for the small screen?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/discuss-from-big-screens-to-boob-tubes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/discuss-from-big-screens-to-boob-tubes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>10 Things I Hate About You</category><category>10ThingsIHateAboutYou</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>Parenthood</category><category>Witches of Eastwick</category><category>WitchesOfEastwick</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Terrific Trailers: Casino Royale</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/terrific-trailers-casino-royale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/terrific-trailers-casino-royale/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/terrific-trailers-casino-royale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/james-bond/" rel="tag">James Bond</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/daniel-craig/" rel="tag">Daniel Craig</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/casinoroyalecraig.gif" alt="Daniel Craig in 'Casino Royale'" /></p>
<p>If the true measure of a good trailer is that it makes you want to see the movie that's being advertised, my definition of a <em>terrific</em> trailer is one that makes you want to see a movie again -- <em>after</em> you've already seen it several times. The trailer for Martin Campbell's <em><strong><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/casino-royale/18129/main">Casino Royale</a></strong></em> fits that definition to a "T."</p>
<p>Granted, any trailer for a James Bond movie has the advantage of familiarity. Yet that same familiarity can breed contempt, and the last two Bond flicks with Pierce Brosnan (<em>The World is Not Enough</em>, <em>Die Another Day</em>) had soured me on the spy that I once loved. The casting of blonde, undersized <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/daniel-craig/1786190/main">Daniel Craig</a> did <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/02/22/everyone-hates-daniel-craig/">not inspire</a> much confidence. But the <em>Casino Royale</em> trailer really raised my expectations, and the movie itself fully delivered on its promise. I've ended up watching the movie multiple times since its release.</p>
<p>In retrospect, the trailer gives away bits and pieces from the entire movie, but it starts smart by spending its first thirty seconds in black and white, then shifting to color and introducing everyone we need to know, squeezing in a bit of cheesecake (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/eva-green/2111022/main">Eva Green</a> in an evening gown), a touch of beefcake (Daniel Craig emerging from the ocean), and then revving up to full-tilt action, accompanied by a jazzed-up version of the James Bond theme music. Watching the trailer reminds me of all the high points and makes we want to see it again ... right now!</p>
<p>After the jump: Watch the <em>Casino Royale</em> trailer.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/terrific-trailers-casino-royale/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Terrific Trailers: Casino Royale</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl5WHj0bZ2Q>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/terrific-trailers-casino-royale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19086125/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/terrific-trailers-casino-royale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>casino royale</category><category>CasinoRoyale</category><category>daniel craig</category><category>DanielCraig</category><category>james bond</category><category>JamesBond</category><dc:creator>Peter Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Fox Releasing 'The Paul Newman Tribute DVD Collection' </title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/fox-releasing-the-paul-newman-tribute-dvd-collection/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/fox-releasing-the-paul-newman-tribute-dvd-collection/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/fox-releasing-the-paul-newman-tribute-dvd-collection/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/20th-century-fox/" rel="tag">20th Century Fox</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/paul_newman.jpg" />It's tough to lose a legend like <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/paul-newman/1162265/main">Paul Newman</a>, and the rush of DVDs, biographies, and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/14/new-bio-has-marlon-brando-outing-paul-newman/">rumor mongering</a> don't make it any easier. The rush of merchandising seems to walk a fine line between actually honoring the person, and pure graveyard profit. You can decide what category Fox's upcoming <em>Paul Newman Tribute Collection</em> falls into. I'm going to err on the side of classy, even at its steep price of $89.98, because it contains a total of 17 DVDs. The list includes:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-long-hot-summer/33041/main"><em>The Long, Hot Summer</em> </a> (the film that Newman Joanne Woodward met on)<br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/rally-round-the-flag-boys/1071890/main"><em>Rally 'Round the Flag, Boys</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/from-the-terrace/1012938/main"><em>From the Terrace</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/exodus/1011111/main"><em>Exodus</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-hustler/1016795/main"><em>The Hustler Collector's Edition</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/adventures-of-a-young-man/1061554/main"><em>Hemingway's Adventures of a Young Man</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/what-a-way-to-go/37531/main"><em>What a Way to Go!</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/hombre/37241/main"><em>Hombre</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/butch-cassidy-and-the-sundance-kid/4974/main"><em>Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid Collector's Edition</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-towering-inferno/32499/main"><em>The Towering Inferno Special Edition</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/buffalo-bill-and-the-indians/14168/main"><em> Buffalo Bill and the Indians Or Sitting Bull's History Lesson</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/quintet/14187/main"><em>Quintet</em></a><br /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-verdict/12369/main"><em>The Verdict Collector's Edition</em></a><br /><br />The collection goes on sale on September 22. It's definitely a fine collection of films (and it's especially nice to include the posh Collector's Editions of films like <em>Butch Cassidy</em>, unfortunately the notes say nothing about the lesser known films like <em>Exodus</em> or <em>Quintet</em> getting the remastered treatment. Still, it's a chance for a lot of people to meet some gems of Newman's impressive career for the first time, and for longtime fans to rediscover a film they forgot all about. To sweeten the deal, the set comes with a 136 page softbound book with new photos of Newman, photos of cast, crew and sets of the film along with , movie excerpts, and personal quotes from the man himself. The book alone might help tip the balance -- he was possibly the most beautiful man to have ever lived! Who wouldn't want a nice book like that? <br /><br />[via <a href="http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/the-paul-newman-tribute-collection.html">DVD Active</a>]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/fox-releasing-the-paul-newman-tribute-dvd-collection/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/fox-releasing-the-paul-newman-tribute-dvd-collection/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Buffalo Bill and the Indians</category><category>BuffaloBillAndTheIndians</category><category>butch cassidy and the sundance kid</category><category>ButchCassidyAndTheSundanceKid</category><category>Exodus</category><category>Fox</category><category>From the Terrace</category><category>FromTheTerrace</category><category>Hemingways Adventures of a Young Man</category><category>HemingwaysAdventuresOfAYoungMan</category><category>Hombre</category><category>Hot Summer</category><category>Paul Newman</category><category>Paul Newman Tribute Collection</category><category>PaulNewman</category><category>PaulNewmanTributeCollection</category><category>Quintet</category><category>Rally Round the Flag Boys</category><category>RallyRoundTheFlagBoys</category><category>The Hustler</category><category>The Long</category><category>The Towering Inferno</category><category>The Verdict</category><category>TheHustler</category><category>TheLong</category><category>TheToweringInferno</category><category>TheVerdict</category><category>What a Way to Go</category><category>WhatAWayToGo</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekend Box Office: 'Ice Age' and 'Transformers' Tie While 'Public Enemies' Puts Up Strong Numbers</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/weekend-box-office-ice-age-and-transformers-tie-while-publ/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/weekend-box-office-ice-age-and-transformers-tie-while-publ/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/weekend-box-office-ice-age-and-transformers-tie-while-publ/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/ice-age-3.jpg" />As expected, <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/22/review-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/"><em>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</em></a></em> won't have the word of mouth to hang around <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/07/review-star-trek/"><em>Star Trek</em></a> style, though its megaton opening has already made it the year's top grosser. It fell just over 60% in its second weekend to virtually tie with <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/01/review-ice-age-dawn-of-the-dinosaurs/"><em>Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs</em></a>' bow with $42.5 million in the estimates, though the final numbers will surely break the deadlock.* A 60% drop is by no means unusual for a movie that opened to well over $100 million, so don't think the drop is a badge of shame or anything. Mr. Bay is still very, very happy.<br /><br /><em>Dawn of the Dinosaurs</em>, meanwhile, collected $67.5 million over the five-day holiday weekend. That's not a bad showing either; its franchise <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/ice-age-the-meltdown/19797/main">predecessor</a> collected about that much in its first three-day weekend, but it had virtually no competition at the end of March in 2006. The third film's numbers are likely enough to keep the franchise alive.<br /><br />I was impressed with the showing for <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/01/review-public-enemies/"><em>Public Enemies</em></a>, which really leveraged its cast and gangster movie hook to the tune of $26.2 million over three days, and $41 million over five. Michael Mann's current top box office performer is <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/collateral/17730/main"><em>Collateral</em></a> with just over $100 million; it's unclear that <em>Public Enemies</em>, which is lengthy, difficult and dark, will be able to hang on long enough to toy with that number. But I think it's already earned a minor victory.<br /><br />*Edited to note: The deadlock was broken in favor of <em>Transformers</em>, $42.3 million vs. $41.7 million.<br /><br />The full top 10 after the jump.<br /><br /><em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/weekend-box-office-ice-age-and-transformers-tie-while-publ/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Weekend Box Office: 'Ice Age' and 'Transformers' Tie While 'Public Enemies' Puts Up Strong Numbers</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/weekend-box-office-ice-age-and-transformers-tie-while-publ/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/weekend-box-office-ice-age-and-transformers-tie-while-publ/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>ice age</category><category>ice age: dawn of the dinosaurs</category><category>IceAge</category><category>IceAge:DawnOfTheDinosaurs</category><category>public enemies</category><category>PublicEnemies</category><category>transformers: revenge of the fallen</category><category>Transformers:RevengeOfTheFallen</category><dc:creator>Eugene Novikov</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Harrison Ford Returning for 'Indiana Jones 5'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/harrison-ford-returning-for-indiana-jones-5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/harrison-ford-returning-for-indiana-jones-5/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/harrison-ford-returning-for-indiana-jones-5/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/indiana_jones.jpg" />I guess this is the news that nobody was waiting for, but the threat of another Indiana Jones film has been inching closer to reality by the day, and now The Insider has <a href="http://www.theinsider.com/news/2358604_Harrison_Ford_set_to_play_Indiana_Jones_again">received reports</a> that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/harrison-ford/1290206/main">Harrison Ford</a> will be polishing off the fedora and the whip one last time. There have been rumblings about a fifth film ever since <em>Crystal Skull</em> first hit theaters, but now we've gone past rumblings and finally started to hear some details. Both <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/shia-labeouf/1704907/main">Shia LaBeouf</a> and producer Frank Marshall have recently <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/18/frank-marshall-confirms-indy-5-is-on-the-horizon/">confirmed</a> that a film is in the works, and now, Insider's sources are saying that, "...filming will not start until next year, and it will not be released before 2011." Now, if you happen to be mathematically inclined, you might notice that Ford will be almost 70 by the time the film starts production, which would probably make for a slightly less 'active' Indy this time around. <br /><br />I won't waste your time recounting all the ways that <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the/25440/main">Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</a></em> was a let-down for fans -- you know things are bad when an unflattering '<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/nuke+the+fridge/">buzz-word</a>' is created as a tribute. But maybe it's possible that a fifth film could correct some of those mistakes. Call me naive, but there is a very (and I mean, <em>very</em>) small part of me that thinks <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/george-lucas/1144148/main">George Lucas</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/steven-spielberg/1198594/main">Steven Spielberg</a> may have learned their lesson, and will go back to what made the original films so great. Maybe this time they could capitalize on the relationship between Indy and his son Mutt to try recapturing some of that <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-last-crusade/2401/main">Last Crusade</a></em> vibe? But, I guess we can take comfort in the fact that no matter what those two come up with this time, it certainly couldn't get any worse than what was ... or can it?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.theinsider.com/news/2358604_Harrison_Ford_set_to_play_Indiana_Jones_again>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/harrison-ford-returning-for-indiana-jones-5/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/harrison-ford-returning-for-indiana-jones-5/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>harrison ford</category><category>HarrisonFord</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>sequel</category><category>shia labeouf</category><category>ShiaLabeouf</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator>Jessica Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>New 'G.I. Joe' Trailer Gives First Look at Cobra Commander</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/new-g-i-joe-trailer-gives-first-look-at-cobra-commander/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/new-g-i-joe-trailer-gives-first-look-at-cobra-commander/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/new-g-i-joe-trailer-gives-first-look-at-cobra-commander/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/doctor1-(2).jpg" /><br /><br />There's a new Japanese trailer for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/gi-joe-the-rise-of-cobra/30887/main"><strong><em>G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra</em></strong></a> making the rounds, and while it contains most of the same footage included in the previous trailer, this one does give us our first look at Cobra Commander (aka The Doctor), as played by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/joseph-gordon-levitt/1796930/main">Joseph Gordon-Levitt</a>, in all his weird masked glory. In the screencap above, The Doctor is standing next to Destro (Christopher Eccleston) and the two are plotting to destroy the world and whatnot. <br /><br />Perhaps it's because this Japanese trailer cuts around a lot and doesn't remain too long on any one scene that I'm digging it more than I did the domestic version. I think Paramount should just cut together a trailer featuring only Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow since those are easily the two coolest-looking characters, and their sword fight will most likely become a highlight of the film. I dunno ... maybe this one will surprise us in some ways and let us down in others ... but isn't that what we've come to accept from all of these based-on-an-80s-toy-line-or-comic-book movies? <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/gi-joe-the-rise-of-cobra/30887/main"><strong><em>G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra</em></strong></a> hits theaters on August 7.<br /><br /><strong>Watch the trailer after the jump</strong><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/new-g-i-joe-trailer-gives-first-look-at-cobra-commander/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New 'G.I. Joe' Trailer Gives First Look at Cobra Commander</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/new-g-i-joe-trailer-gives-first-look-at-cobra-commander/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087897/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/new-g-i-joe-trailer-gives-first-look-at-cobra-commander/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cobra commander</category><category>CobraCommander</category><category>g.i. joe movie photos</category><category>g.i. joe: the rise of cobra</category><category>G.i.Joe:TheRiseOfCobra</category><category>G.i.JoeMoviePhotos</category><category>joseph gordon-levitt</category><category>JosephGordon-levitt</category><category>the doctor</category><category>TheDoctor</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>What Happens When the Twilight Runs Out?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/what-happens-when-the-twilight-runs-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/what-happens-when-the-twilight-runs-out/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/what-happens-when-the-twilight-runs-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/twilight.jpg" />As much as we might like to poke fun at <em>Twilight</em> now and again, there's no denying it's a multimedia juggernaut. Besides the books, you can read about the stars in their off-hours in celeb gossip mags, listen to <em>Twilight</em>-inspired bands like <a href="http://www.myspace.com/thebellacullenproject">The Bella Cullen Project,</a> read <em>Twilght </em>fan fiction, peep fan art, buy all the <em>Twilight</em> tchotchkes your heart could desire over at <a href="http://www.hottopic.com/hottopic/LicensedGear/Twilight.jsp">Hot Topic</a> or Amazon (like this <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Twilight-Music-Jewelry-Box/dp/B001UL4U6S/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;s=apparel&amp;qid=1246893573&amp;sr=8-3">jewelry box!</a>) and, yes, get inked with <em>Twilight</em>-inspired <a href="http://www.bellasugar.com/3023140">tattoos.</a><br /><br />But unless Stephenie Meyer starts cranking out some more books about Bella and Edward, the four <em>Twilight</em> tomes are going to be the end of Bella and Edward on the big screen... right?<br /><br />Not necessarily, according to <em>Twilight</em>'s producers, who were caught on video by the folks over at <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/06/exclusive-twilight-interviews-producers-talk-rob-fave-books-and-spin-offs">RadarOnline.com</a> at the 36th Annual Vision Awards this past weekend. RadarOnline's intrepid reporter tracked down Wyck Godfrey and Greg Mooradian at one of the awards parties and asked them about the possibility of a spin-off about the Volturi family. <br /><br />For those not in the know -- myself included -- the Volturi family is the big daddy coven of vamps, the "de facto royal family" according to the extensive <em>Twilight</em> <a href="http://twilightsaga.wikia.com/wiki/Volturi">wiki.</a> The cast list for <em>New Moon</em>'s Volturi clan stands out because it includes Michael Sheen, star of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0870111/"><em>Frost/Nixon,</em></a> <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436697/">The Queen</a></em> and Tim Burton's highly anticipated remake of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1014759/"><em>Alice in Wonderland,</em></a> and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/07/dakota-fanning-joins-the-runaways-and-new-moon/">future <em>Runaway</em></a> Dakota Fanning.<br /><br />While Greg Mooradian played coy, he left the door open for spin-offs depending on how well the saga does in theaters and "[where] the audience demands us to go from there."<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/what-happens-when-the-twilight-runs-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What Happens When the Twilight Runs Out?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/what-happens-when-the-twilight-runs-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/what-happens-when-the-twilight-runs-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Dakota Fanning</category><category>DakotaFanning</category><category>Michael Sheen</category><category>MichaelSheen</category><category>New Moon</category><category>NewMoon</category><category>sequels</category><category>spin-offs</category><category>stephenie meyer</category><category>StephenieMeyer</category><category>Twilight</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Lucas Gearing Up Live-Action 'Star Wars' TV Show?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/lucas-gearing-up-live-action-star-wars-tv-show/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/lucas-gearing-up-live-action-star-wars-tv-show/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/lucas-gearing-up-live-action-star-wars-tv-show/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img hspace="4" height="278" border="0" width="400" vspace="4" alt="george lucas star wars tv show boba fett" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.scifisquad.com/media/2009/07/lucas_star_wars_tv_show.jpg" /><br /><br /><em>Over on <a href="http://www.scifisquad.com/2009/07/06/tv-geek-week-lucas-can-keep-his-star-wars-tv-show/">SciFi Squad</a>, Mike Moody debuts his new weekly column called <strong>TV Geek Week</strong>, which will not only talk about the latest and greatest news in geeky TV land, but will also take a look at what fanboy-ish goodies are arriving on the boob tube this week. Check it:</em><br /><br />Is George Lucas finally moving ahead with that promised live-action <em>Star Wars</em> TV show? <a href="http://scifiwire.com/2009/07/rumor-mill-live-action-st.php">Sources say yes</a>. Sources also say the show will be produced in Australia by a hand-picked crew of Aussie TV vets. And we might even get to see it before the end of 2010. But I got a question: Do we really want a live-action <em>Star Wars</em> TV show?<br /><br />Well, yeah, of course we do. For most of us, the original <em>Star Wars</em> trilogy was a thrilling entry point into the bizarre and inspiring world of science fiction. For an '80s kid like me, <em>Star Wars</em> was nothing less than a dazzling blast of awesome that I couldn't get out of my head. There was nothing cooler. (I wore the sh*t outta my Yoda jammies.) I'd love to see a <em>Star Wars</em> TV show deliver the same unpolished pluck, heart and spirit of the original trilogy, but we all know that's not gonna happen.<br /><strong><a href="http://www.scifisquad.com/2009/07/06/tv-geek-week-lucas-can-keep-his-star-wars-tv-show/"><br />Read the rest at SciFi Squad</a></strong><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/lucas-gearing-up-live-action-star-wars-tv-show/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087617/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/lucas-gearing-up-live-action-star-wars-tv-show/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>star wars</category><category>StarWars</category><dc:creator>Cinematical staff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>A Trailer for Gyllenhaal and Maguire's 'Brothers'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/a-trailer-for-gyllenhaal-and-maguires-brothers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/a-trailer-for-gyllenhaal-and-maguires-brothers/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/a-trailer-for-gyllenhaal-and-maguires-brothers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/brothers070509.jpg" />You'll have to dip a bit back into the memory banks for this project. <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/18/jake-gyllenhaal-and-tobey-maguire-interested-in-becoming-brothe/">Back in 2007</a>, well before <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jake-gyllenhaal/1798333/main">Jake Gyllenhaal</a> got buff for the <em>Prince of Persia</em>, he and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tobey-maguire/1937226/main">Tobey Maguire</a> were circling an English-language remake of Susanne Bier's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/brothers/31198/main"><em>Brothers</em></a>. No longer rivals for the web of Spider-Man, the two would play brothers that get torn apart by war, assumed death, and familial drama. The film will finally get released this year, and there's a solid first trailer over at <a href="http://www.etonline.com/news/2009/07/76000/index.html">ET Online.<br /></a> <br /> Maguire plays Sam, a marine off on his fourth tour of duty while Gyllenhaal plays Tommy, his charming bad-boy brother, fresh out of jail. When Sam's copter is shot down, he's assumed dead and his wife Grace (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/natalie-portman/1937784/main">Natalie Portman</a>) tries to pull her life back together. Tommy helps, the line blurs, and in true Hollywood fashion, just as she starts to fall for Tommy ... it turns out Sam is alive. He was tortured by the Taliban, but now returns home visibly on edge both from his experiences and Tommy's inclusion in his family's life.<br /> <br /> Talk about a welcome change. The film looks good. It's been long enough since the seemingly daily influx of war films that the premise doesn't seem tired, and it's almost jarring to see Maguire getting serious again -- in a gaunt and crazy <em>Machinist</em> sort of way. Since the first <em>Spider-Man</em> came out, the only non-webbed wonder movies to get released were <em>Seabiscuit</em> and <em>The Good German</em>. It's about time Maguire showed off more non-Peter Parker fare. As for Jake, well, he doesn't really look like a bad boy and brings to mind Marc Blucas in <em>Prey for Rock &amp; Roll</em>, but that's not entirely surprising.<br /> <br /> The film is slated to hit screens on December 4.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/a-trailer-for-gyllenhaal-and-maguires-brothers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/a-trailer-for-gyllenhaal-and-maguires-brothers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Brothers</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>Jake Gyllenhaal</category><category>JakeGyllenhaal</category><category>Natalie Portman</category><category>NataliePortman</category><category>Tobey Maguire</category><category>TobeyMaguire</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'T.J. Hooker' to Get the Movie Treatment</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/t-j-hooker-to-get-the-movie-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/t-j-hooker-to-get-the-movie-treatment/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/t-j-hooker-to-get-the-movie-treatment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/hooker070509.jpg" alt="" />When we rant about remakes and reboots, it's easy to hide in hyperbole. It <em>seems</em> like there are a lot of them, but maybe we're just really sensitive to Hollywood's bouts with unoriginality. But then Peter wrote the piece "<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/04/discuss-which-remake-reboot-are-you-looking-forward-to-the-leas/">Which Remake/Reboot Are You Looking Forward to the Least</a>," and when my eyes hit his list of those announced in only one month, it hit me: No, we're not exaggerating. There's a lot of frakking reboots and remakes out there. And now we've got one more on the way.<br /> <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118005660.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562"><br /> <em>Variety</em></a> reports that <em>T.J. Hooker</em> is going to head to the big screen as an action comedy with <em>Short Circuit</em> scribes <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0534681/">Brent Maddock</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0934093/">S.S. Wilson</a> writing it, and Chuck Russell (<em>The Scorpion King</em> and <em>The Mask</em>) negotiating for the directorial spot. Producer Ryan Heppe says: "The series was the poster child for cop TV shows in the 1980s with great stunts, so we think there's a fun movie to be made from it." Hmmm, think they were inspired by Kevin Smith's <em>A Couple of Dicks</em>? It seems a little more than coincidental.<br /> <br /> Whatever the case, I'm currently in the "not another Shat-free remake!" phase, but I fully admit that's from watching both his meddling cameo in <em>Fanboys</em> and part of a <em>Star Trek</em> episode with some classic Shatner acting over the weekend. In reality, I imagine that it'll be a non-offensive law-filled diversion. Think Adrian Zmed will pop up?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/t-j-hooker-to-get-the-movie-treatment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087243/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/t-j-hooker-to-get-the-movie-treatment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Brent Maddock</category><category>BrentMaddock</category><category>Chuck Russell</category><category>ChuckRussell</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>SS Wilson</category><category>SsWilson</category><category>T.J. Hooker</category><category>T.j.Hooker</category><category>TJ Hooker</category><category>TjHooker</category><category>William Shatner</category><category>WilliamShatner</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Red-Band 'Jennifer's Body' Trailer Answers All Of Your Prayers</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/red-band-jennifers-body-trailer-answers-all-of-your-prayers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/red-band-jennifers-body-trailer-answers-all-of-your-prayers/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/red-band-jennifers-body-trailer-answers-all-of-your-prayers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-atomic/" rel="tag">Fox Atomic</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/megan-fox-jennifers-body.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <br />
<div align="left">You no longer have to wait until <em>Bruno</em> to catch a glimpse of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/jennifers-body/35943/main"><em>Jennifer's Body</em></a> a.k.a <em>that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/megan-fox/2106006/main">Megan Fox</a> horror movie where she might show her boobs! </em><a href="http://shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=10988">ShockTillYouDrop</a> has a red-band trailer directly from the <em>Body</em> team of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/karyn-kusama/2014969/main">Karyn Kusama</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/diablo-cody/467335/main">Diablo Cody</a>, and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jason-reitman/1824905/main">Jason Reitman</a>. According to the filmmakers, this is the trailer that truly captures what the film is all about: "Fox is putting a trailer of <em>Jennifer's Body</em> in front of <em>Bruno</em> this Friday. Great, right? Only problem is it's not our trailer. It's kind of a straight horror preview and while we're sure it'll appeal to many of you, we wanted to make sure you guys got to see our cut ... Lets call it the "filmmaker's cut". We think it captures the comedy and scares of the horror films we grew up on - a kind of nostalgia for when horror films were fun. Can't wait to show you the whole film ... In the meantime, here's the red band trailer we wanted our fans to see."</div>
<br />
<div align="left">And you know what? It's a pretty awesome trailer. I was neither here nor there about the film, but this looks like a hell of a lot of fun ... <br /> <strong><br /> <a href="http://www.horrorsquad.com/2009/07/06/the-red-banded-trailer-for-jennifers-body-shows-some-skin-and/">Head to <em>The Horror Squad </em>for the red-banded fun</a></strong><br /> <br /> <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/megan-fox/">Megan Fox</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/megan-fox/2010710/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/05/tf2megan-(3)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/megan-fox/1449731/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/fox_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/megan-fox/1074919/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/10/meganfoxmain6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/megan-fox/1074918/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/10/meganfoxmain5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/megan-fox/1074917/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/10/meganfoxmain4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div>
</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/red-band-jennifers-body-trailer-answers-all-of-your-prayers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/06/red-band-jennifers-body-trailer-answers-all-of-your-prayers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>adam brody</category><category>AdamBrody</category><category>Amanda Seyfried</category><category>AmandaSeyfried</category><category>amy sedaris</category><category>AmySedaris</category><category>Diablo Cody</category><category>DiabloCody</category><category>Fox Atomic</category><category>FoxAtomic</category><category>jason reitman</category><category>JasonReitman</category><category>Jennifers Body</category><category>JennifersBody</category><category>karyn kusama</category><category>KarynKusama</category><category>Megan Fox</category><category>MeganFox</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Yesterday, Did You Celebrate Our 'Independence Day'?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/yesterday-did-you-celebrate-our-independence-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/yesterday-did-you-celebrate-our-independence-day/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/yesterday-did-you-celebrate-our-independence-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/20th-century-fox/" rel="tag">20th Century Fox</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/cine-id4-quaid.jpg" />Maybe I just follow far too many movie nerds on Twitter to get an accurate reading on this, but did <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/independence-day/2318/main"><em>Independence Day</em></a> turn around and become an honest-to-goodness movie staple over the Fourth of July holiday while I wasn't looking?<br /><br />I mean, I get that it was huge when it landed on said weekend back in 1996, and I know that President Pullman's speech (embedded below) is quotable as all get out -- though extra points to the pal who instead posted "Eagle-20! Fox-2!" -- but I usually see war movies and TV show marathons as go-to fodder for the 4th, however less fitting their titles may be.<br /><br />So how many of you actually did watch <em>ID4</em> yesterday? How long had it been since you watched it? How fond of it were you thirteen years back? Did you watch it because it harkens back to a big, loud, relatively healthy level of cheese that we used to get from our blockbusters, back when we could see what exactly was going on in any given action scene? Or was it simply a more welcome/convenient option than going to see a third <em>Ice Age</em> or a two-and-a-half-hour gangster drama, or perhaps a memorial to <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/01/jeff-goldblum-confirms-his-own-death/">the late Jeff Goldblum</a>?<br /><br />Comment away!<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oRGUqd_M6Mg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oRGUqd_M6Mg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/yesterday-did-you-celebrate-our-independence-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19087063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/yesterday-did-you-celebrate-our-independence-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bill pullman</category><category>BillPullman</category><category>id4</category><category>independence day</category><category>IndependenceDay</category><category>jeff goldblum</category><category>JeffGoldblum</category><category>randy quaid</category><category>RandyQuaid</category><category>roland emmerich</category><category>RolandEmmerich</category><category>will smith</category><category>WillSmith</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Kiddie Matinee, Or: My Summer with Hot Tamales in My Hair</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-kiddie-matinee-or-my-summer-with-hot-tamales-in-my-hair/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-kiddie-matinee-or-my-summer-with-hot-tamales-in-my-hair/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-kiddie-matinee-or-my-summer-with-hot-tamales-in-my-hair/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/summer-movies/" rel="tag">Summer Movies</a></p><img height="NaN" align="middle" width="433" alt="" src="http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss166/dawntaylor666/Calamity-Jane-London-Ad.jpg" /><br /><br /><br />One summer, my home town's local movie theater got the bright idea to run a series of kids-only matinees. As far as I remember, it was the only summer that they did this. Looking back, it's one of those ideas that was probably a lot better on the drawing board than in execution.<br /><br />The LaMar Theater was a real, old-school, small-town movie palace. Just a block from the ocean in Manhattan Beach, California -- hence the compounded Spanish for "the sea" -- with thick, red velvet curtains and a big screen above a raised stage. There was a ceiling mural that featured dolphins arcing above curling waves, and big plaster sea shells served as covers for the sconces that lit the walls. <br /><br />In the 1940's my grandmother was manager of the LaMar for a time, and I have photos of her posing with movie stars and USO workers, doing publicity when the theater hosted special shows to benefit the war effort. My mother worked at the theater as a barely legal usher, and told me that during one of these drives she shot craps backstage with Donald O'Connor and some of the musicians. Sadly, the theater is now gone, torn down in the 1980s to make room for a McDonalds and a multiplex.<br /> <br /> The summer of the children's matinee fiasco, I was maybe ten or eleven years old. I loved movies -- Mom, the former movie usher, reared me with daily viewings of Ben Hunter's Movie Matinee on KTTV, watching old black-and-white films from the 40's and 50's while she did laundry. Every day he'd run a contest called "Hunter's College of Obscure Knowledge," showing a photo or clip and asking a trivia question, and awarding a prize to the first caller with the correct answer. My mother never called the show, but she got every question right.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-kiddie-matinee-or-my-summer-with-hot-tamales-in-my-hair/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Kiddie Matinee, Or: My Summer with Hot Tamales in My Hair</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-kiddie-matinee-or-my-summer-with-hot-tamales-in-my-hair/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19086454/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-kiddie-matinee-or-my-summer-with-hot-tamales-in-my-hair/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Dawn Taylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Discuss: Little 'Orphan' Aneurysm</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/discuss-little-orphan-aneurysm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/discuss-little-orphan-aneurysm/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/discuss-little-orphan-aneurysm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/03/cine-orphan-post.jpg" />Another day, another snafu on the ol' political correctness front. It seems that adoptive parents and adoption agencies are up in arms because of a line in the trailer for Warner Brothers' forthcoming thriller, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/orphan/32213/main"><em>Orphan</em></a>: "It must be hard to love an adopted child as much as your own."<br /><br />A full <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=7702341&amp;page=1">ABC News</a> report has parents calling for the studio to remove the line from the trailers, which it did, despite the fact that the trailer can only play before other R-rated films. But that's not enough, because apparently, the film itself can be and has been taken as one big campaign playing up the stereotypes and exploiting the fears of adoption.<br /><br />I can't speak for everyone, but I'd like to think that any potential parent who finds themselves scared off from real-world adoption because of something they saw in a heavily exaggerated movie probably do not have the proper judgment to serve as a parent in the first place. As for the effect that line and the whole premise might have on adopted kids specifically, I really can't speak to that, as I don't know how exposed to the film's marketing they'd be if watching appropriate channels and seeing appropriate movies.<br /><br />What are your thoughts? Over-reaction? Just right reaction? Or are we simply overdue for this summer's <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/10/tropic-thunder-boycott-planned/">next big controversy</a>?<br /><br />[Thanks to <a href="http://shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=10685">Shock</a> for the heads-up.]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/discuss-little-orphan-aneurysm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19086719/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/discuss-little-orphan-aneurysm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>adoption</category><category>adoptive parents</category><category>AdoptiveParents</category><category>controversy</category><category>jaume collet-serra</category><category>JaumeCollet-serra</category><category>orphan</category><category>peter sarsgaard</category><category>PeterSarsgaard</category><category>vera farmiga</category><category>VeraFarmiga</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Lure of the Cheap DVD Rack</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-lure-of-the-cheap-dvd-rack/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-lure-of-the-cheap-dvd-rack/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-lure-of-the-cheap-dvd-rack/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/australia-crop.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <br />
<div align="left">Consider this post your confessional as well as my own. You see, I can't resist a cheap DVD. Even if the film isn't something I'd even put on a top 10 or 20 list, if I see it for $10.00 or less, <em>I must own it.</em> <br /> <br /> This week's guilty grab was <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/australia/32859/main"><em>Australia</em></a>, a film I was very disappointed in, and planned never to see again unless I stumbled on it while flipping through cable channels. But there it was on half.com, "watched once, brand new" for $5.00. I thought about how very nice "the bucket scene" is, and how it's chock full of beautiful sunsets and rugged Australian landscapes (several that aren't named <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/hugh-jackman/1373085/main">Hugh Jackman</a>) and I caved. It's really the perfect movie for knitting to, because I can just concentrate on turning my sock heel, and look at the pretty cinematography. My DVD shelf is chock full of such films. <em>Kate and Leopold</em>, <em>The Long Kiss Goodnight</em> (worth far more than whatever I paid), my entire Mel Gibson collection, <em>Marie Antoinette</em>, <em>The Wedding Singer</em>, and so on. The list is long and not very illustrious (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/vanishing-point/1115997/main"><em>Vanishing Point </em>remake</a>, anyone?), but at least I can say I didn't go out of my way for most of them. I just threw them into the Target cart while shopping for flip flops. I'm always on the hunt for more. I saw <em>The Transporter</em> in a hologram box awfully cheap, and it's begging to come home with me for those awkward Sunday nights when I need something short before heading back to the grind. <br /> <br /> So while <a href="http://twitter.com/scottEweinberg">Scott Weinberg</a> was positively crowing about the fact that I'd willingly purchased <em>Australia</em> with my own money, I see nothing wrong in it. I can spend $5.00 on a lot sillier things, like a magazine that ultimately ends up in my recycle bin, or an enormous Starbucks espresso that is gone in a matter of minutes. But Hugh Jackman's tight shirt? That lasts forever. <br /> <br />  </div>
</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-lure-of-the-cheap-dvd-rack/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19086391/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/05/the-lure-of-the-cheap-dvd-rack/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Australia</category><category>cheap DVDs</category><category>CheapDvds</category><category>Hugh Jackman</category><category>HughJackman</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Trailer Park: Carrying, Retreating and Informing</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/04/trailer-park-carrying-retreating-and-informing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/04/trailer-park-carrying-retreating-and-informing/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/04/trailer-park-carrying-retreating-and-informing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailer-trash/" rel="tag">Trailer Trash</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a></p><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/07/carriers_trailer-park.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2009/0-9ABC/Carriers/trailer.php"><em>Carriers</em></a><br />
</strong>A decent looking tale of an apocalyptic plague and four friends attempt to survive it. If you've read <em>The Stand</em> or seen the mini-series based on it the idea seems kind of similar. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/chris-pine/2115778/main">Chris Prine</a>, the new James T. Kirk stars and I thought the faces drawn on the surgical masks were a nice touch. Things start getting germy on September 4.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/couplesretreat/"><em><strong>Couples Retreat</strong></em></a><br />
Four couples head to a tropical resort where they learn that couples' therapy is a mandatory part of the program. The impressive cast includes <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/vince-vaughn/1964026/main">Vince Vaughn</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jason-bateman/1776366/main">Jason Bateman</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/jon-favreau/1211890/main">Jon Favreau</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/malin-akerman/2276284/main">Malin Akerman</a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/kristin-davis/1977140/main">Kristin Davis</a>, and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/kristen-bell/2104593/main">Kristen Bell</a>. The retreat commences on October 9. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809912816/video/14259558/standardformat/"><strong><em>Planet 51</em></strong></a><strong><br />
</strong>There's a new full length trailer for this animated comedy about a human astronaut landing on an alien world that looks strikingly like an American suburb. The residents of the planet see the visitor as a threat and it looks like there's probably a decent message for kids about prejudice, but this one doesn't thrill me. The idea is cute and they get points for the use of The Killers' song "Spaceman" but it didn't have me laughing. <span style="font-style: italic;">Planet 51</span> touches down on November 20.<br />
<strong><br />
</strong><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/04/trailer-park-carrying-retreating-and-informing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Trailer Park: Carrying, Retreating and Informing</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/04/trailer-park-carrying-retreating-and-informing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19086172/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/04/trailer-park-carrying-retreating-and-informing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Carriers</category><category>Cloudy WIth a Chance of Meatballs</category><category>CloudyWithAChanceOfMeatballs</category><category>Couples Retreat</category><category>CouplesRetreat</category><category>Planet 51</category><category>Planet51</category><category>The Informant</category><category>TheInformant</category><dc:creator>Matt Bradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:03:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>