Skip to Content

Summer Budget Travel Tips from Gadling

little fockers Tagged Articles at Cinematical

Universal Unloads 2010 Images: 'Scott Pilgrim', 'Your Highness' and More

Filed under: Fandom », Movie Marketing », Images »



Over the past few weeks, the different studios have been revealing their 2010 slates, complete with introductory images and details about the plot, cast and crew. We haven't been covering too many of them because a lot of 2010 films have already released images, as well as trailers. But Universal has a nice crop of flicks that haven't yet managed to sneak into our grimy little geeked-out hands, and so it was pretty cool to finally see some decent imagery for films like Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, MacGruber, Your Highness and Little Fockers.

The image above is some crazy shot from Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, a film I feel needs the most support because it's a crazy badass risky flick on Universal's part, and because the property that it's based on might not be as well known in the United States as it is in Canada. I have no idea how moviegoers will react to this film, but I do know that director Edgar Wright worked his ass off shooting this rockin' action-packed teen angsty adventure flick, and I urge you all to read up on Pilgrim and prepare yourselves for what's sure to be one of the year's most talked-about films.

The other films featured in this little 2010 intro include MacGruber (based on the SNL skit), which from what I hear is actually turning out to be one crazy R-rated mofo of a movie. Your Highness is also in there, which is that medieval pot comedy from David Gordon Green, and starring Natalie Portman, James Franco, Danny McBride and Zooey Deschanel. Meanwhile, Little Fockers is the third installment in that already very successful franchise.

Check out all the new images below.

Eesh, Paul Weitz Circles 'Little Fockers'

Filed under: Comedy », Deals », Remakes and Sequels »

It's almost official. In February, Paul Weitz was one of the names circling the second Meet the Parents sequel, Little Fockers. And now the rest of the possibilities seem to have fallen by the wayside, because Variety reports that Weitz is now in talks to direct the comedy. No Pete Segal. No Wain. No Reed. The American Pie and About a Boy man wants the Fockers, and I think he's under ill advisement.

All I can think to ask is why? It's like there's this large "why?!" bubble following this project. First it was why anyone would want to see the Focker offspring. I previously asked whether any of you wanted to see the little Fockers, and I think ICON! said it best: "Putting out a lit cigar on my balls would be more enjoyable and entertaining than ANOTHER installment of lame rehashed nipple and Focker jokes."

And now, why on Earth would Weitz want to do this? He's not some king of the critical world, but he's made some rather good films and has a roster that should earn him work better than a dreaded second sequel. Variety says that he'll jump from Fockers to Another Bullshit Night in Suck City, and I think maybe the "Suck City" part should be taken off project #2 and moved over to #1.

Discuss: Does the World Really Need 'Little Fockers'?

Filed under: Comedy », Casting », RumorMonger », Remakes and Sequels »

When bad movie ideas hit the wire and then seemingly dissolve into thin air, there's a chance to breathe that sigh of relief over what could have happened, but didn't. Unfortunately, sometimes months or even years later, we're slapped with the news that silence doesn't necessarily mean death, and that our worst nightmares are coming true.

Fox News has "released" word that a sequel to Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers is happening. We already knew that was the case, since it was confirmed last year, but the news piece does add to it -- Blythe Danner and Robert De Niro are returning. This means that last year's news wasn't a dream, and that Ben Stiller hasn't forgotten about it, no matter what other projects he is busying himself with. We are getting more Fockers. We just don't know if Babs and Dustin are in for the ride as well.

Not that it matters. There are those that love the original, and those who actually like the sequel more, but can't we all agree that a third installment is pushing it. I mean, what're they going to do? Have Gaylord actually try milking a cat for his kid? Do any of you actually want to see that? Are you eager for more Focker hijinx?

Little Fockers Confirmed

Filed under: Comedy », Universal », Remakes and Sequels »

It seems Teri Polo wasn't lying last month when she said there would be another sequel to Meet the Parents. Here, I thought she was just making up stuff in the hopes Universal would agree that a third installment is a good idea. She definitely needs the job more than the rest of the franchise's cast. In fact, I bet she's hoping for a television spin-off (on which she'd be the only actor to follow her part to the tube, I'm sure). Anyway, it is true. Universal is moving ahead with Little Fockers.

The sequel, which follows the comical next step by featuring children, was confirmed with the studio's renewing of its contract with Robert DeNiro's and Jane Rosenthal's Tribeca Productions, which will produce the movie. Jay Roach will be returning to the franchise as director and Larry Stuckey is set to write the script. Obviously Polo, DeNiro, Ben Stiller, and Blythe Danner will all have to return, possibly joined by Dustin Hoffman and Barbara Streisand. And no Fockers movie is complete without a visit from Owen Wilson.

Unlike a lot of people, I hated Meet the Parents but really enjoyed Meet the Fockers, mostly due to Hoffman though for other reasons as well. I'm pretty positive that I would not like this third movie, though, because I feel like I already know every joke it will include. I could do without any more first-time diaper change gags, thank you. Anyway, didn't the second movie already feature enough kiddie comedy? Still, I'm very glad they're making this. My mother absolutely loves the first two and I'm sure she'll love another. And anything that makes Mom happy makes me happy.
 
.