thor-related stories
Geek Daily: Quotes From 'Green Lantern', 'Priest', 'We3' and 'Thor'
Filed under: Fandom », Scripts », DIY/Filmmaking », Newsstand », Comic/Superhero/Geek »

First, let's talk The Green Lantern -- or rather, read what Marc Guggenheim told Sci Fi Wire about it. He assures fans that the film is moving forward, and that he's written yet another draft of its screenplay. "You know I really can't [say anything]. I've sworn a blood oath of secrecy in relation to the project. But, you know, the thing I can tell you is that it is a very loving and respectful approach. The goal here is to do the best cinematic representation of the Green Lantern character. You know, there's no desire on anyone's part to completely change the character and just call this other character Green Lantern and try to ... draft off the name recognition. This is all about 'How do we bring the best version of this character to the silver screen?'"
SciFi Wire also caught up with Don Murphy for a We3 update. John Stevenson is still attached, the script is done, and now they're just looking for a studio that'll give it a home. "We're working with a director named John Stevenson. Don't be confused, though. Even though he directed Kung Fu Panda, the movie's going to be live action. It's going to be a combination CG, puppetry [and] real animals. We have a great script, a great director, and we're trying to figure out who's going to pay for it in this marketplace, but we're looking."
Monday Night Poll: Your Most Anticipated Marvel Movie?
Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Paramount », Fandom », Comic/Superhero/Geek », Polls »
.jpg)
Movies based on characters from comics published by DC and Marvel took a summer sabbatical this year -- I'm trying really hard to pretend X-Men Origins: Wolverine was only a bad dream -- but the next couple of summers promise a healthy dash of costumed superheroes to liven up movie theaters. As noted in a post earlier today, next summer will see the return of Robert Downey, Jr. as Tony Stark in Jon Favreau's Iron Man 2. Two summers hence will feature the big-screen debut of Kenneth Branagh's vision of Thor, with Chris Hemsworth playing the hammer-wielding Norse god and Tom Hiddleston as his adopted brother / arch-nemesis Loki, followed by Joe Johnston's adventure The First Avenger: Captain America, set primarily during World War II. And 2012 will finally bring superhero team-up The Avengers, plus another unspecified movie. Could it be Edgar Wright's Ant-Man? Or something else?
Without being an expert on any of these characters -- for that I bow gratefully to our own Elisabeth Rappe -- from strictly a movie fan's perspective, I'm most anticipating The First Avenger: Captain America. That's because director Joe Johnston hasn't let me down yet, and the film's World War II setting and sense of wholesome, patriotic adventure play to his strengths. But the more I think about these projects, the more I like the variety of settings and styles. Sure, they're all superheroes, but there's plenty of room for the films to establish their own identities.
What do you think? What's your most anticipated Marvel movie? Feel free to suggest other characters that should have their own movie in the comments.
Marvel Updates 'Iron Man 2,' 'Thor,' 'Captain America'
Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Paramount », Fandom », Comic/Superhero/Geek »
.jpg)
Above: Check out new logos for the upcoming Marvel films from E3, via AICN
The Marvel movie slate for the next couple of years has been firmly established: Iron Man 2 in May 2010, Thor in May 2011, and The First Avenger: Captain America in July 2011, with The Avengers to follow in Summer 2012. Kevin Feige, the company's president of production, revealed at an industry conference this weekend that another new Marvel movie will be released in 2012, according to First Showing, and also provided tidbits of information about their other projects.
-
Iron Man 2: The goal is to carry over the humor and tone of the first film, while adding more characters and upping the action. Scarlett Johannson's character has "two sides," and the actress is signed for multiple movies.
-
Thor: No Shakespearean dialogue (per Kenneth Branagh's wishes)! No Don Blake! Primarily set on Earth (though also on Asgard and "other worlds")! How exactly is that going to work? No idea!
-
The First Avenger: Captain America: Will be "primarily" set during World War II. With Joe Johnston at the helm, Feige described the picture in terms of the director / visual effects designer's past work (The Rocketeer, October Sky, Star Wars). Sidekick Bucky will appear "in some capacity."
-
The Avengers: Captain America will be involved in the plot "from the get go."
-
Ant-Man: Edgar Wright will be submitting another draft after he completes Scott Pilgrim.
Feige "Feige kept saying often that he'd love for audiences to have the same experience that comic book readers have - where characters make surprise appearances almost out of nowhere in issues they pick up." To be continued...
What 'Thor' is Aiming For
Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Fandom », Scripts », Newsstand », Comic/Superhero/Geek »
The flurry that surrounded the casting of Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston in Thor has abated, leaving us in a "So, what now?" kind of zone. No one really knows what to expect out of the actors or the story. But CineFOOLS has a scoop on the latter, as they sat down with Thor co-writer Ashley Miller. He's such a fan of the series that he nearly pulled out his collection of bags and boards, so at least you know its in continuity-obessed hands. Miller hints that he's been heavily influenced by Walt Simonson's run (and possibly Ultimates 2), and is looking to make us really identify with the God of Thunder:
"You want to feel Thor's rage when he rages. You want to see him fight like hell, and take as much he dishes out -- maybe more. You want to have a visceral reaction to the guy, and what happens to him. You don't want his adventures to be clean and antiseptic. You want to see the dirt, and grime and blood. You want to feel every bone crunching moment of every fight. And when he unleashes the storm, you want to feel like you're seeing the power of a GOD at work ... But at the end of the day, he's a man. In the comics, Odin sends him to Earth because he's not perfect. He's brash, arrogant. Even over-confident. We all know that guy -- some of us have even been that guy. Stan Lee's genius was to give Thor-as-hero an emotional throughline we could all relate to, and knock him down a couple of pegs. So on that level, your question answers itself. The challenge is to dramatize that and make the audience see what the fans have known and believed about the character all along."
Discuss: Will 'Thor's' Unknown Leads Help or Hurt The Giant Marvel Film?
Filed under: Action », Casting », Paramount », Fandom », Movie Marketing », Comic/Superhero/Geek », War »

Casting comic book characters is a tricky business. The better known the character, the bigger the minefield. That's why I think casting the (basically) unknown Chris Hemsworth as Thor / Don Blake, which Erik Davis posted about on Saturday, is a good bet. And once you've cast one unknown in the lead, you might as well get another unknown for the second lead, which is exactly what Marvel has done. Tom Hiddleston will play the trickster Loki, Thor's adopted brother and principal foe since childhood, in the upcoming film version of Thor. Sorry, everybody who was pulling for Josh Hartnett.
The news was broken by Nikki Finke at Deadline Hollywood Daily shortly before Marvel posted their press release. Hiddleston previously worked with director Kenneth Branagh on the London stage production of Chekhov's Ivanov, and acted with him in the BBC mini-series Wallander. Now we have an unknown Australian and an unknown Brit playing Norse gods! Thor is not due out until May 2011, though, so that should give the actors time to become better established. Hemsworth is currently filming The Cabin in the Woods, due for release next February, and also snared the lead in the Red Dawn remake, which should be out in September 2010. And it's likely that Hiddleston will show up in something else before Thor as well.
Casting unknowns / lesser knowns as comic book characters sometimes works (Christopher Reeve in Superman) and sometimes doesn't (Brandon Routh in Superman Returns). What do you think? Will Thor's unknown leads help or hurt the film?
Chris Hemsworth is Marvel's 'Thor'!
Filed under: Casting », Fandom », Newsstand », Comic/Superhero/Geek »

Even though it's Saturday, that doesn't mean the big news waits till Monday -- Nikki Finke over at Deadline Hollywood has once again come through on yet another Marvel casting scoop; this time it would appear as if actor Chris Hemsworth -- who played Kirk's father in the opening scenes of Star Trek -- has been cast as Thor in Marvel's big-budgeted, live-action film due out in theaters on May 20, 2011. Kenneth Branagh is set to direct, with production currently scheduled to begin early next year.
Hemsworth is a bit of a departure from the big, familiar names Marvel has been using to populate its superhero films -- but he's a solid choice; a bright, young pretty face who, like Chris Pine, seems destined to break out in the next year. Not only did he land a pretty sweet role in Trek, but he's currently shooting the horror flick The Cabin in the Woods (written by Joss Whedon, directed by Cloverfield's Drew Goddard), was just cast in the Red Dawn remake and starred on the popular Aussie show Home and Away. Hemsworth joins a production that doesn't have anyone cast as of yet, and since they're going with a relative unknown in the lead role, look for Marvel and Branagh to stick some known faces around him (Josh Hartnett has been rumored to be up for the part of villain).
What do you think of Hemsworth? Is Marvel taking a risk by casting an unknown in the lead role, or is this the best way to go when it comes to Thor, the Viking God of thunder?
Natalie Portman to be Thor's Girl?
Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Casting », RumorMonger », Newsstand », Comic/Superhero/Geek »
While the rumors still run rampant as to who will wield the hammer as Thor, Nikki Finke is reporting that Kenneth Branagh and Marvel are courting Natalie Portman to romance him. No one knows if Portman is being eyed to play Amora the Enchantress, lover and antagonist of Thor up in Asgard, or if she'll be playing a "real world" love interest of Donald Blake. The latter would suit the delicate Portman much better ... but hey, maybe playing a Nordic goddess could finally allow her to cut loose. It feels like it's been awhile since Portman wowed audiences, and maybe the Marvel Universe is just the place for her to do it.
Frankly, I would have preferred to see her as the Black Widow in Iron Man 2 over Scarlett "isn't my cleavage fantastic?" Johansson. If you're going to pick a Bolyen girl, you might as well pick the one who emoted the most, and the one who looks the most Eastern European. (To be kind, Johansson would be a better pick for the Nordic Asgard. Any way we can reverse the casting at this late hour?)
Meanwhile, we still don't know who will actually play Thor. Apparently, Marvel is leaning towards casting an unknown blonde -- Charlie Hunnam, Tom Hiddleston, Liam Hemsworth, and Joel Kinnaman are now in competition with the already reported Alexandar Skarsgard. At least they're no longer hosting open calls, and leaning towards men who have a bit of experience in British and Danish drama.
Jon Favreau Closer to Directing 'The Avengers'?
Filed under: Action », RumorMonger », Fandom », Comic/Superhero/Geek »
.jpg)
Yesterday it was announced that Marvel was changing the release dates for a few of its upcoming heavy hitters, including Thor (pushed to June 17, 2011), Captain America (July 22, 2011) and The Avengers (May 4, 2012). Additionally, we were told that Spider-Man 4 would hit theaters on May 6, 2011 -- allowing the summer of 2011 to become a make or break time for the future of several Marvel properties. But what was the thought behind making these release date adjustments? Is it simply to give folks a little more time to get the films right, or did part of it have to do with freeing up the schedule of one Jon Favreau?
According to a Marvel spy who wrote into AICN, that's exactly what's happening. Says the spy: "Avengers is delayed a year because of financing issues but also because the plan is for Favreau to helm it. Everybody here loves the guy and he wants to do it, but it would have been impossible for him to do before the date change given his Iron Man 2 commitments. Also partly the reason why he agreed to do the Stark sequel on such an accelerated schedule was so he could get given first dibs on this. It would still be a punishing schedule for him, so hes not firmly confirmed yet, but he is certainly the presumptive director at this point."
What do you think? Is Favreau the man to direct The Avengers, or would you rather some fresh eyes at the helm?
New Dates for Thor, Captain America, and The Avengers
Filed under: Action », New Releases », Newsstand », Comic/Superhero/Geek »
It has been a busy couple of weeks for Marvel. After signing Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury for the rest of the man's natural born life and stalling on Iron Man casting (although that all worked out in the end), their behavior might have looked a little crazy -- but, it appears it was all a part of the plan. Deadline Hollywood Daily has posted a press release from Marvel today announcing "an adjusted release pipeline for its self-produced feature film properties that reflects the first time individual Super Hero characters and story arcs will be inter-woven and culminate in a multi-character motion picture."So what exactly do they mean by adjusted? According to the new schedule, Thor will now be released June 17, 2011 (previously the big guy was slated for July 2010), The First Avenger: Captain America will now hit July 22, 2011 (one year later than expected), and the big bad daddy of them all, The Avengers has been moved to May 4th, 2012. Marvel even got a little feisty and stole some of Sony's thunder by announcing Spider Man 4's release date of May 6th, 2011. The good news for Marvel is this new schedule means that they will have a summer blockbuster entry every year between 2010-2012.
'Thor' Rumors Invade The Net
Filed under: Action », Sci-Fi & Fantasy », Casting », RumorMonger », Comic/Superhero/Geek »
So if you were still hoping to get the chance to audition to play the mighty Thor in Kenneth Branagh's adaptation, you might have to act fast. Latino Review has just received a tip that the Shakespearean director was recently spotted having a 'working lunch' with True Blood's Alexander Skarsgård (son of *But the Thor chatter doesn't end there. Over at IESB, talk has surfaced that Branagh has shortlisted Josh Hartnett to play Thor's brother, and bad guy, Loki. According to IESB, "Josh and his camp are really interested because he has never played a villain before and after Heath Ledger's Oscar win for the latest comic book villain, Hartnett is intrigued by the character." But before you get too excited about Hartnett and Skarsgård, keep in mind these are some pretty tenuous rumors -- even for a comic book movie. IESB also says Channing Tatum was or is being considered to play Thor, as well.
So outside of True Blood fans, Skarsgård may not be a household name, but the addition of a relatively unknown actor for the lead would be right in line with some of the other unlikely participants in this comic book adaptation. I mean would anyone have suspected that Branagh would be handed the keys to a Marvel franchise? I know Marvel has faith in him, but do you?
*Correction: Alexander's dad is acclaimed Swedish actor Stellan Skarsgård
Follow Me on Twitter!








